Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sonoma, Sonoma County, California — state license #496804032, licensed for 105 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 28, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 105 residents · Sonoma, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496804032, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
91 Napa Road · Sonoma, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 939-1500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 105 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 105 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN ON THE FIRST FLOOR IN BEDROOMS #13-21 AND 101-132. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12. MANAGEMENT COMPANY: COGIR MANAGEMENT USA INC.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 28, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the May 28, 2026 visit
95 of 105 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 6, 2023 to May 28, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 5 documents
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly assessing residents for a higher level of care Resident's care needs are not being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges residents R1, R2, R3, and R4 are not being properly assessed for a higher level of care. Complainant states these residents should be housed in Memory Care (MC) rather than Assisted Living (AL). During investigation LPA reviewed documents and conducted interviews. Per facility Administrator (Admin) at the initial resident assessment, the facility administers a Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam; a certain score lends to the resident being placed in either MC or AL. A resident’s preplacement appraisal, physician’s report, and their SLUMS exam score are all factored into the placement decision. After their initial exam, they have an assessment every 6 months or if they have a change in condition. During investigation, LPA reviewed the physician’s reports for R1, R2, R3, and R4. Continuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260311115010
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an injury due to possible neglect or physical abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges resident (R1) sustained an injury due to possible neglect or physical abuse. Complainant states that facility staff observed R1 to have a black eye, it was observed while they were getting R1 ready for morning breakfast. Staff questioned R1 about their eye, but R1 made conflicting statements accounting for they received it; initially stating that a person came in the night and struck them but then reporting to the police that they had a bug in their eye. During investigation, LPA conducted interviews. LPA interviewed seven staff. One (1) staff said they did not directly observe R1 to have any bruising of the eye or a black eye, but that staff reported to them that they saw a bruise, three (3) staff reported seeing a bruise or red mark on R1's eyelid, and three (3) staff reported they did notthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260518155849
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not meet residents care needs Inadequate Staffing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges facility staff did not meet residents care needs. Complainant states that incontinence needs of residents are not being met, that they are found in the morning soaking wet or covered in feces, indicating they had not been changed overnight. During investigation, LPA interviewed witnesses. Three (3) of four (4) witnesses interviewed indicate that they have witnessed the incontinence needs of residents not being met and finding them as the complainant alleges. Complainant alleges facility does not have adequate staffing. Complainant states that often facility’s Memory Care (MC) is short staffed on the NOC shift. California Code of regulations, Title 22 does not have Continued on 9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250919160909
Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff financially abused residents in care Staff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges staff financially abused residents in care and staff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured. Complainant states between at least 2024-2025 Cogir staff member was found to have stolen several thousands of dollars in cash, coins and jewelry from the six noted residents of Cogir of Sonoma Plaza and also appears to have made some unauthorized transactions with a stolen credit card." On 7/22/25, Admin notified LPA of theft in facility. Minor instances of theft were previously reported to LPA earlier in the year, suspect unknown. On 7/21/25 at approximately 7:30pm, staff (S4) was caught on camera digging through a recently deceased resident's (R3) belongings. S4 was observed opening a drawer and pulling out an envelope of money. Money was stolen and put in S4's pocket. On 7/22/25 atthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250805091856
Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility administered the incorrect medication to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Coppo met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo to investigate a complaint regarding the allegation of “facility administered the incorrect medication to resident in care." Complaint alleges a medication technician at facility administered another resident’s medication to resident listed as R1. R1 was taken to the emergency room to be evaluated and returned to the community the same day. Based on interviews and a record review, R1’s responsible party received a call from the facility on October 13, 2024 alerting them of a medication error and that R1 was taken to the ER out of precaution. R1 was discharged back to the community the same day. Additionally, on October 17, 2024 the Department received an Special Incident Report (SIR) from the facility, related to the medication error and steps taken to ensure R1’s safety. Continued on 9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241106151738
Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202635020255612024221202344020222202021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 939-1500

Is Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza licensed?

Yes — Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sonoma (Sonoma County): California license #496804032, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 105 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 28, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 105 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN ON THE FIRST FLOOR IN BEDROOMS #13-21 AND 101-132. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12. MANAGEMENT COMPANY: COGIR MANAGEMENT USA INC.

How much does Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

95 of 105 beds occupied (90%) when the state visited on May 28, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2021 for Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly assessing residents for a higher level of care Resident's care needs are not being met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges residents R1, R2, R3, and R4 are not being properly assessed for a higher level of care. Complainant states these residents should be housed in Memory Care (MC) rather than Assisted Living (AL). During investigation LPA reviewed documents and conducted interviews. Per facility Administrator (Admin) at the initial resident assessment, the facility administers a Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam; a certain score lends to the resident being placed in either MC or AL. A resident’s preplacement appraisal, physician’s report, and their SLUMS exam score are all factored into the placement decision. After their initial exam, they have an assessment every 6 months or if they have a change in condition. During investigation, LPA reviewed the physician’s reports for R1, R2, R3, and R4. ContinuedCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260311115010
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury due to possible neglect or physical abuse
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges resident (R1) sustained an injury due to possible neglect or physical abuse. Complainant states that facility staff observed R1 to have a black eye, it was observed while they were getting R1 ready for morning breakfast. Staff questioned R1 about their eye, but R1 made conflicting statements accounting for they received it; initially stating that a person came in the night and struck them but then reporting to the police that they had a bug in their eye. During investigation, LPA conducted interviews. LPA interviewed seven staff. One (1) staff said they did not directly observe R1 to have any bruising of the eye or a black eye, but that staff reported to them that they saw a bruise, three (3) staff reported seeing a bruise or red mark on R1's eyelid, and three (3) staff reported they did notCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260518155849

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not meet residents care needs Inadequate Staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges facility staff did not meet residents care needs. Complainant states that incontinence needs of residents are not being met, that they are found in the morning soaking wet or covered in feces, indicating they had not been changed overnight. During investigation, LPA interviewed witnesses. Three (3) of four (4) witnesses interviewed indicate that they have witnessed the incontinence needs of residents not being met and finding them as the complainant alleges. Complainant alleges facility does not have adequate staffing. Complainant states that often facility’s Memory Care (MC) is short staffed on the NOC shift. California Code of regulations, Title 22 does not have Continued on 9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250919160909
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff financially abused residents in care Staff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo. Complaint alleges staff financially abused residents in care and staff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured. Complainant states between at least 2024-2025 Cogir staff member was found to have stolen several thousands of dollars in cash, coins and jewelry from the six noted residents of Cogir of Sonoma Plaza and also appears to have made some unauthorized transactions with a stolen credit card." On 7/22/25, Admin notified LPA of theft in facility. Minor instances of theft were previously reported to LPA earlier in the year, suspect unknown. On 7/21/25 at approximately 7:30pm, staff (S4) was caught on camera digging through a recently deceased resident's (R3) belongings. S4 was observed opening a drawer and pulling out an envelope of money. Money was stolen and put in S4's pocket. On 7/22/25 atCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250805091856

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility administered the incorrect medication to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Coppo met with Administrator Wendy Cornejo to investigate a complaint regarding the allegation of “facility administered the incorrect medication to resident in care." Complaint alleges a medication technician at facility administered another resident’s medication to resident listed as R1. R1 was taken to the emergency room to be evaluated and returned to the community the same day. Based on interviews and a record review, R1’s responsible party received a call from the facility on October 13, 2024 alerting them of a medication error and that R1 was taken to the ER out of precaution. R1 was discharged back to the community the same day. Additionally, on October 17, 2024 the Department received an Special Incident Report (SIR) from the facility, related to the medication error and steps taken to ensure R1’s safety. Continued on 9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241106151738

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 939-1500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cogir Of Sonoma Plaza? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.