Ivy Park At Santa Rosa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California — state license #496804017, licensed for 114 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 27, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

25 homes in view

Ivy Park At Santa Rosa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 114 residents · Santa Rosa, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496804017, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4225 Wayvern Drive · Santa Rosa, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 538-2590
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 114 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 14 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 114 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 14 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 27, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 22, 2026
Occupancy at the December 18, 2025 visit
101 of 114 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 22, 2022 to December 18, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not giving resident medications as prescribed Personal Rights

At approximately 11:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank conducted an unannounced visit and met with Administrator Stephanie Limeberg. LPA came to the facility to investigate complaint allegations listed above. During today's visit, LPA learned that involved parties including resident does not reside and never have been present at the facility. LPA was unable to identify any deficiencies at this facility. The allegation about personal rights and staff are not giving resident medications as prescribed are UNFOUNDED. An allegation that is UNFOUNDED, means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251212112334
Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident funds

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director (ED) Stephanie Limberg. During the investigation LPA interviewed facility Administrator, one (1) resident, and reviewed files. The complaint alleges that the staff did not safeguard resident funds. The alleged theft occurred on 6/9/2025. The facility self reported the incident to Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 6/10/2025 by submitting an LIC 624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report and an SOC 341 Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse form. On 6/10/2025 the facility reported the alleged theft to the Santa Rosa Police Department. The report was filed online as the Santa Rosa Police Department requires that all thefts, under five-thousand dollars ($5,000) and without a known suspect be reported in this manner. The Santa Rosa Police Department case number is SR250L00544.0. The Santa Rosa Police Department did not come to the facility to ithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250730131807
Mar 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025330202444020236702022780
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 538-2590

Is Ivy Park At Santa Rosa licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Santa Rosa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Rosa (Sonoma County): California license #496804017, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 114 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 27, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Park At Santa Rosa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Santa Rosa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 114 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 14 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.

How much does Ivy Park At Santa Rosa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Santa Rosa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Santa Rosa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Santa Rosa is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

101 of 114 beds occupied (89%) when the state visited on December 18, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Santa Rosa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Ivy Park At Santa Rosa; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 18, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not giving resident medications as prescribed Personal Rights
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
At approximately 11:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank conducted an unannounced visit and met with Administrator Stephanie Limeberg. LPA came to the facility to investigate complaint allegations listed above. During today's visit, LPA learned that involved parties including resident does not reside and never have been present at the facility. LPA was unable to identify any deficiencies at this facility. The allegation about personal rights and staff are not giving resident medications as prescribed are UNFOUNDED. An allegation that is UNFOUNDED, means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. NoCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251212112334
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident funds
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director (ED) Stephanie Limberg. During the investigation LPA interviewed facility Administrator, one (1) resident, and reviewed files. The complaint alleges that the staff did not safeguard resident funds. The alleged theft occurred on 6/9/2025. The facility self reported the incident to Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 6/10/2025 by submitting an LIC 624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report and an SOC 341 Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse form. On 6/10/2025 the facility reported the alleged theft to the Santa Rosa Police Department. The report was filed online as the Santa Rosa Police Department requires that all thefts, under five-thousand dollars ($5,000) and without a known suspect be reported in this manner. The Santa Rosa Police Department case number is SR250L00544.0. The Santa Rosa Police Department did not come to the facility to iCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250730131807

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff interferes with resident visiting at the facility
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
***Amended Report*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced on to deliver amended the amended report originally dated for February 23, 2023 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Erik Gonzalez Campos . LPA was greeted at the door by Business Office Manager, Debbie Spencer and was granted access into the facility. LPA reviewed records and conducted interviews. LPA attempted to contact Resident 1’s (R1) Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) on record. DPOA was not reachable. LPA contacted family listed in resident file who expressed no concerns regarding visitation of R1. Reporting Party (RP) also indicated that they have been allowed to visit R1 on multiple occasions. Per staff interviews, no one has been denied entry to visit R1. LPA toured memory care unit and observed R1 in the bedroom. R1 appeared to be in no distress. Based on the investigation, the allegation is unfounded meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonaCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221219120741

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Care and Supervision causing resident to sustain an unstageable pressure injury Staff did not address a change in the resident's health condition Facility failed to report death, fall, and pressure injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Gonzalez Campos arrived unannounced on 12/16/2022 to deliver complaint findings regarding the allegations above. LPA met with Health Services Director Teresa Weerts. There was an allegation that facility failed to report death, fall, and pressure injury. During the initial complaint inspection on 08/18/2022 LPA obtained copy of Resident 1’s (R1) file. LPA contacted R1’s responsible party (RP) for statement concerning the allegations. RP indicated that a fall had occurred but that it had been reported to them by the facility. Record review revealed a move in date of 06/23/2022 and a move out date of 07/05/2022. R1 passed away after moving out of the facility. LPA obtained copies of hospice records. Hospice records noted skin abrasions on 07/03/2022 but no other wounds. Hospice care plan did not have measures in place to address the presence of a significant wound. Although the allegation may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to proveCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220816152630
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in injuries while in care. Resident sustained skin tears while in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with Lydia Gravelynand discussed findings. This Department has investigated allegations by conducting interviews; reviewing documents and photographs; making site visits to facility. The following determinations are made: R1 sustained unwitnessed fall on 1/19/2022; initial assessment of 1/11/2022 notes R1 can transfer independently and does not require assistance; Staff report that R1 had been checked prior to fall within the hour; Staff summoned medical attention and made the required notifications. On 5/17/2022, staff noted a fresh skin tear on R1; Facility LVN assessed and dressed the tear and made required notifications; Seen by a MD on 5/23/2022, R1 was noted to have no signs of infection or abuse; MD reports that the injury consistent with a fall. This Department has investigated the complaint allegations and, based upon the statements taken and documents reviewCDSS inspection report, November 22, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220531090701

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Ivy Park At Santa Rosa?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Well Ivy 6 Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 538-2590
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Santa Rosa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.