Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Jose
Lorrie Residential Care Home IV
675 High Glen Drive, San Jose, CA 95133Licensed since 1997
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 60 YEARS AND OVER. 5 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN CLEARANCE. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OFTHE HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 2.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Lorrie Residential Care Home IV: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,500likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,500–$6,100
- $5,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,500–$9,650
- $8,000
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes13 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,600 to $5,000
13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,350–$5,000.
- CJCP RCFESan Jose · 0.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Evonne's Residential Care Home #1San Jose · 0.7 mi · Mid-size home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Olga's Care Home for the ElderlySan Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- A Heavenly Care HomeSan Jose · 1.7 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa LaurelSan Jose · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Amor Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home$4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bristolwood HomeSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Bonnevie Residence and CareSan Jose · 3.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- River Park Homes IISan Jose · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Santo Nino Residential Care Home #1San Jose · 4.0 mi · Small home$1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Garden RCFESan Jose · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marilag's Care HomeSan Jose · 4.2 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Laurel HavenSan Jose · 4.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
675 High Glen Drive, San Jose, CA 95133Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Regional Medical Center of San JoseHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #435200327 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unfounded”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Angelina Escobar. LPA toured the facility inside and out with ADM. License, Administrator Certificate, and personal rights posters were observed in the facility. 4 residents and 3 staff were observed in the facility. LPA reviewed 3 resident file and 3 staff files. Living room, kitchen, family room, dining room, 2 restrooms, 1 staff room were inspected. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Medication closet, knives closet were observed locked. Dish washing solution bottle was observed on the kitchen sink counter, ADM locked it immediately. Room temperature was at 70 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 114 degree F in facility. The temperature of the refrigerator was at 40 degree F, and the temperature of the freezer was at 0 degree F. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 07/21/2025. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Carbon monoxide detectors were tested by ADM, and were working. First aid box, night lights, and flash lights were observed in the facility. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. The last time the facility conducted the emergency drill or fire alarm drill was 11/8/2025. No citation noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of the report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff member physically abused resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced investigation visit to deliver the investigation finding and met with Administrator (ADM) Angelina Escobar. On 11/03/2025, the Department received a complaint with the allegation that a staff member physically abused resident in care. On 11/05/2025, the Department conducted an investigation visit. LPA interviewed ADM, 2 staff and 6 residents. LPA obtained a copy of a staff's statement, a copy of resident R1's cognitive assessment, physician report, and appraisal need and service plan. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 1 of 3. Unfounded On 11/05/2025, LPA interviewed 2 staff (S2, S3). Both staff stated they never heard any staff hit any resident. LPA interviewed resident R1. R1 stated staff S1 hit him/her on 11/26/2025. R1 stated S1 did not hit him/her on any other day. R1 stated no other staff hit him/her. LPA interviewed the other 5 residents (R2 - R6). 3 Out of 5 residents stated the facility staff never hit them and they never heard any staff hit residents. 2 Out of 5 residents were not responsive to LPA's questions due to neurocognitive issue or was on hospice care. LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM) Angelina Escobar. ADM stated on 10/27/2025, resident R1's case manager (CM) visited R1 and R1 told CM that on 10/25/2025 staff S1 physically abused him/her. ADM stated CM discussed the allegation with him/her but he/she was not aware of the allegation before and did not receive any report regarding the allegation. ADM stated S1 was off on 10/27/2025 and CM scheduled a meeting with him/her and S1. ADM stated he/she interviewed S1 on the phone on 10/27/2025. S1 denied he/she physically abused R1. S1 stated he/she just changed R1's diaper and cleaned up R1 because R1 had bowel movement. ADM stated he/she talked to R1 and assessed R1. ADM stated R1 did not have injury or skin discoloration. ADM stated R1 has history of generalized chronic pain and has behavior of yelling for pain without reason. ADM stated on 10/30/2025, at 2:15PM, CM came to the facility and talked to R1 in private for 30 minutes. ADM stated CM then had a meeting with he/she and S1. ADM stated in the meeting, S1 stated he/she did not hit R1 and he/she just cleaned up R1 due to R1's bowel movement. ADM stated CM concluded that there was no physical abuse in the facility due to R1 has cognitive impairment. Based on the review of S1's writing statement dated on 10/31/2025, S1 stated on 10/26/2025, R1 had large bowel movement, with R1's permission, S1 and staff S4 provided perineal care at R1's private area with soap and water, and applying protective skin barrier to help preventing irritation, rash, soreness, and redness. S1 stated during the care, R1 complained of pain in the perineal area despite the perineal care was conducted carefully and respectfully. S1 stated R1 often complained of pain when being turned or repositioned. S1 stated R1 currently has pain medication. S1 stated at the end of their shift on 10/26/2025, there were no complaint from R1 regarding the perineal care. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 2 of 3. Based on the review of R1's Cognitive Assessment Note from Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP1) dated 11/03/2025, R1 has moderate/severe neurocognitive issue. Based on the review of the Letter of Capacity Determination for R1 from Nurse Practitioner (NP1) dated 11/19/2025, R1 has cognitive and memory impairment, and R1 has been making flirty comments frequently towards healthcare workers. Based on the review of R1's Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan dated 07/01/2025, R1 has Chronical pain on left shoulder/left hip and bladder discomfort. Based on the investigation report dated 11/14/2025, R1 did not sustain any visible injuries and had a complaint of pain. Staff S4 stated resident R1 always yelled in pain and R1 was very sensitive. S4 sated on 10/26/2025, he/she and S1 changed R1's diaper and cleaned R1. S4 stated he/she did not observe S1 behaved aggressively to R1. S1 denied he/she hit R1. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on the investigation, record reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No citation noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. The report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of the report was provided to ADM. Page 3 of 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251103085122
Jan 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Angelina Escobar, Administrator/Licensee. LPA announced the purpose of the visit. LPA observed 6 residents in care and 2 staff. LPA observed room temperature to be at 72 degrees F. During visit, LPA toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the garage area and observed food storage areas and locked cabinets for cleaning supplies. LPA observed the kitchen area and observed locked cabinets for medications, sharp objects, and cleaning supplies. LPA observed perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA observed 3 cans of expired food ADM removed them and discarded them. ADM was reminded to check the dates frequently and discard any food that is expired. Refrigerator temperature measured at 40 degrees F and freezer was 0 degrees F. LPA toured 5 resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had available bedding and clothing storage areas as well as functioning lights. LPA toured two out of two resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had available soap and paper towels and functioning lights. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measured with thermometer at 110-111 degrees F. LPA observed 2 linen closets and Laundry area used to do laundry. ADM tested the smoke detector in the hallway and found the smoke detector to function properly when tested. Facility has a Fire Pull alarm which was last serviced on 06/24/24. LPA observed posters located by the front entrance for Long Term Care Ombudsman and Employee Rights and Residents Rights. Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 LPA toured the outside area and found the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA observed fire extinguisher was last serviced on 06/24/24. LPA reviewed Fire and Earthquake log and last disaster drill was conducted on 11/17/24. LPA reviewed resident records for 3 residents and Centrally Stored Medication Record (CSMDR) and found to be complete. LPA reviewed 2 Residents Hospice file which included Hospice Plan and visit log and progress notes. LPA reviewed 3 staff records and found them to be complete. No deficiency were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. Technical Violation was issued today for 87555 (b)(8) (see LIC9102) This report was reviewed with Administrator Angelina Escobar and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jan 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mita Partoza conducted an unannounced continuance of the required annual visit. LPA met with administrator and licensee (ADM/LIC) Angelina Escobar. During today's visit, LPA and ADM. conducted medication review of 3 residents (R1-R3) and found R1 missed medications. ADM/LIC stated they do not keep a daily log for administered medication or Medication Administration Report (MAR) to monitor daily medication intake. Deficiency were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today's visit. This report was reviewed with administrator Angelina Escobar and a copy of the report was provided to the administrator/licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024
Jan 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mita Partoza and LIcensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano conducted an unannounced annual inspection to the facility. LPA and LPM met with administrator (ADM) Angelina Escobar and two staff. Current census 6 and 1 out 6 is in hospice care. During visit, LPA and LPM toured the facility to include the living room, dining room, kitchen, bedrooms, bathroom, garage, and backyard. Staff room was inspected, 2 bathroom were inspected. The bathroom hot water temperature was measured at 111F to 120F. room temperature in the facility was at 68-75F. LPA randomly reviewed resident and staff records including _________________ Perishable and non-perishable food supply are within required regulation. Toiletries such toilet paper, paper towels, toothpaste are inspected and found to be in ample supply. Toxic materials such as laundry detergent, disinfectant are inaccessible to residents (locked in a cabinet). Annual required inspection to be continued at a later date. The following documents to be submitted on or before on or before 1/30/2023. LIC 500, LIC 308, LIC 309, Administrative Organization LIC400, Affidavit Regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources, LIC610D, Emergency Disaster. A copy of a current Administrator's Certificate LIC200 with updated information. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today's visit. This report was reviewed with administrator Angelina Escobar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024
Earlier years2022 · 3 documents
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Simi Rai and Steve Chang conducted a Case Management Incident visit, a continuation of a case management initially conducted by LPA Donovan on 5/10/22 regarding an incident which occurred on 4/21/2022 involved resident (R1). On 5/10/2022, LPA Donovan conducted interviews with staff at the facilty in response to an incident report that occurred on 4/21/22. According to ADM and staff, R1 was gardening in the backyard at 1:45pm. At 2:00pm staff did not see R1 in the backyard and went searching for R1. Administrator called the police to report a missing person. Police arrived at the home to take a report, when S1 called and reported S1 found. R1 was one block away. The police called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. R1 sustained injuries to face and hand. R1 was discharged back to the facility at 10:00pm with instructions to follow up with medical doctors. On 5/10/2022 stiches above right eye removed. R1 has neurocognitive impairment and no history of elopement. R1 was monitored by staff before the incident. After reviewing the available documentation, interview with administrator and S1 and S2's stating the timeline of the the incident, it is determined by the department that R1's elopement could not prove nor disprove that R1's elopement was due to staff neglect/lack of supervision. R1 was not neglected by the staff. This report was reviewed with Administrator Angelina Escobar and a copy provided. No deficiencies cited at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2022
May 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marybeth Donovan conducted a case management visit regarding an incident involving resident (R1) elopement from the facility. LPA met with Angelina Escobar Administrator and toured the facility inside and out. Incident report states on 4/21/22 R1 was gardening in the backyard at 1:45pm. At 2:00pm staff did not see R1 in the backyard and went searching for R1. Administrator called the police to report a missing person. Police arrived at the home to take a report, when S1 called and reported S1 found. R1 was one block away. The police called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. R1 sustained injuries to face and hand. R1 was discharged back to the facility at 10:00pm with instructions to follow up with medical doctors. On 5/10/2022 stiches above right eye removed. The Administrator understood no Police Report was written. R1 had resided at the facility for approximately 2 months. R1's family home is located a couple of blocks away. On one occasion after R1 moved in, he wanted to visit his family home and was shadowed by staff . Staff remind R1 that he cannot not leave the facility without staff but to let them know and staff will make arrangements for R1 to go out. R1 stated that R1 wanted to get something to eat, so R1 left the facility and had a fall. LPA advised the Department will review the information provided to conclude the incident case management. This report was reviewed with Angelina Escobar Administrator and a copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022
Jan 25, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 12:20PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection, and met with Administrator (ADM) Angelina Escobar . Upon Arrival, staff Jeniline Elizaga (S1) took LPA's body temperature, asked infection control questionnaires, and checked LPA in the visitor log book. LPA observed the COVID posters in the facility. Two staff and four residents were observed in facility. LPA toured the facility with ADM inside out. LPA inspected living room, family room, dinning room, and kitchen. There are 2 restrooms, 5 resident rooms, and 1 staff live-in room in facility. Some trash cans without covers were observed in facility. Some paper towel without holder were observed. ADM stated the facility will fix the issues in one day. Two days perishable foods and seven nonperishable foods were observed sufficient. Room temperature was observed at 69 degree F, hot water temperature was observed at 105 degree F. Medication cabinet, Knife closet, and cleaning products closet were observed locked. PPE supplies were observed sufficient. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 9/1/2021. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detector alarm system was tested, and was working fine. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. ADM stated all the residents and staff are fully vaccinated and done with booster shots, No deficiency or allegation was issued today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of this report was emailed to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the December 4, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Angelina Escobar, licensed since 1997.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1997, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1997, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Lorrie Residential Care Home IV
Is Lorrie Residential Care Home IV licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Lorrie Residential Care Home IV licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Lorrie Residential Care Home IV been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Lorrie Residential Care Home IV still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Lorrie Residential Care Home IV cost?
$5,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,575 to $4,625 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Lorrie Residential Care Home IV take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Angelina Escobar, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Regional Medical Center of San Jose is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Lorrie Residential Care Home IV keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Lorrie Residential Care Home IV license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LORRIE RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435200327. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Angelina Escobar, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Santa Clara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Santa Clara County