Oakmont Of Burlingame is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burlingame, San Mateo County, California — state license #415601178, licensed for 97 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 8 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

20 homes in view

Oakmont Of Burlingame

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 97 residents · Burlingame, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415601178, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1818 Trousdale Drive · Burlingame, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 692-2805
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 97 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 26 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 97 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (26).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 8 times and filed 8 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the March 12, 2025 visit
64 of 97 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 1 document with transcribed findings, dated March 12, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 1 document below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was locked in a room due to staff neglect

On March 12, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the investigation outcome. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose to today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of – resident was locked in a room due to staff neglect, the reporting party stated that resident – in – question (R1) resides on the memory care unit and the responsible party was notified by the facility that R1 was missing. The reporting party reported that after hours of searching, R1 was found in an empty room that was locked, and facility staff was not able to check that room because the door lock was broken. The reporting party also stated that the empty room was next to R1's room and he/she wandered into that room, shut the door and was not able to get out due to the broken lock. The reporting party stated that the facility did not search room to room resulting R1 being stuck in an empty room for hours. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250121124939
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints1typical 7
State visits on file8typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202623020254412024110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 692-2805

Is Oakmont Of Burlingame licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Burlingame is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burlingame (San Mateo County): California license #415601178, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 97 residents. State records list 8 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Of Burlingame care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Burlingame with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 97 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (26).

How much does Oakmont Of Burlingame cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Burlingame's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Burlingame accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Burlingame is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

64 of 97 beds occupied (66%) when the state visited on March 12, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Burlingame?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 8 state visits and 8 dated documents since 2024 for Oakmont Of Burlingame; 1 complaint-investigation narrative is transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 12, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

1 transcribed report on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was locked in a room due to staff neglect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 12, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the investigation outcome. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose to today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of – resident was locked in a room due to staff neglect, the reporting party stated that resident – in – question (R1) resides on the memory care unit and the responsible party was notified by the facility that R1 was missing. The reporting party reported that after hours of searching, R1 was found in an empty room that was locked, and facility staff was not able to check that room because the door lock was broken. The reporting party also stated that the empty room was next to R1's room and he/she wandered into that room, shut the door and was not able to get out due to the broken lock. The reporting party stated that the facility did not search room to room resulting R1 being stuck in an empty room for hours. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250121124939

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 8 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
1
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
8
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Oakmont Of Burlingame?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Transformer Opco Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 18 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 692-2805
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Burlingame? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.