Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Large community·Licensed for 112·Belmont, California

Licensed since 2013Licence #415600869
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$13,350 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 112Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit88 of 112 beds occupiedJuly 31, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMarch 24, 2026CDSS inspection record

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills is a large care community in Belmont — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 112 residents since 2013. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills licensed for?

112 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills been cited?

1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 46 state visits over the same years.

Is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills cost?

$13,350 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Mateo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,613 to $7,610 a month, and the middle figure is $6,274 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Subtenant 1301 Ralston Ave; Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Mateo Medical Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 25 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - BELMONT HILLS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #415600869. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 112 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Subtenant 1301 Ralston Ave; Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 46 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 46 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 25 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 112 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE WITH DELAYED EGRESS. LOCKED PERIMETER IS PERMITTED. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25 RESIDENTS. * MEDICAL OFFICE NOT PART OF THE LICENSED FACILITY. *

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 25 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

2 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$13,350a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$13,350a month

Likely $13,350–$13,950

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$13,350this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $13,350–$13,950
$13,350
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $13,350–$17,450
$15,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,950–$9,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1301 Ralston Ave, Belmont, CA 94002Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 42 documents for this home, and its records count 46 visits since 2013. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 24, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
46
Most recent visit
March 24, 2026
Occupied · July 31, 2025 visit
88 of 112 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 12, 2021 to July 31, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 2
  • Total complaints6typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2013.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025810120244402023101002022121222021240

The last 36 months — 19 of 42 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On March 24, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case-management visit in relation to two incidents that occurred at the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 3/8/26 at around 8:00pm, Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) were found together in a room. Both residents were observed half undressed. R1 was observed behind R2 but was not observed touching R2. R1 and R2 were immediately separated and redirected back to their rooms. There were no signs of intimacy or injuries. Licensee implemented 30 minute status checks, reminded staff to redirect and encourage both residents to join activities. All required parties were notified On 3/12/26 at around 6:40pm, the Licensee reported, R1 and R2 were found undressed and involved in an intimate act in a room. Both residents were separated and required parties were notified. Status checks were implemented for every During the visit, LPA reviewed R1 and R2's files, discussed incident with staff, and reviewed the facility's policy regarding resident relationships. According to R1 and R2's file, both residents have Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis and this was the first incident with R1 and R2 being half undressed and being intimate with each other. R1 and R2's service plan was observed to be updated to address these incidents. According to the Assistant Director of Health Services observed R1 and R2 walking around in the courtyard at around 6pm. Administrator and Assistant Director of Health Services indicated that R1 was moved to a different neighborhood and since these incidents, there has not been any new incidents and they have not been observed together. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Assistant Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026
Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On January 5, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver a copy of amended report that was originally delivered on 2/25/25. LPA met with amended administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA delivered an amended copy of LIC9099 and LIC9099D that was issued on February 25, 2025. Report was reviewed with Administrator, Robert Snee and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026
20258 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 29, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on 12/3/25. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 12/3/25, Staff 1 (S1) was assisting Resident 1 (R1) with care when R1 suddenly became agitated and aggressive towards S1. Resident 2 (R2) entered the room and observed R1 being aggressive towards S1. R2 kicked R1's leg and R1 slapped R2's leg. Both residents were immediately separated, assessed for injuries and were placed on behavior mapping. During the visit, LPA observed R1 and R2, discussed the incident with Director of Health Services and Assistant Director of Health Services, and reviewed both residents' files. Based on R1 and R2's file reviewed, both residents have a dementia diagnosis. Based on R1's file reviewed, R1 has a behavior of aggression/agitation and it's towards staff during care. Based on R2's file, he/she had a history of aggressive behavior, however it has improved. During the visit, LPA observed R1 walking around the community and R2 in the dining hall. According to the Director of Health Services and Assistant Director of Health Services, R2 hit R1 because he/she was trying to protect S1 from R1's aggressive behaviors. No residents had injuries noted. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025
Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On December 29, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside but not limited to, five resident neighborhoods; maple, cedar, bay, twin pines and oak, one main administrative office, library, and kitchen. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. This is a locked perimeter facility. LPA toured resident neighborhoods and observed a dining room in each neighborhood. Hallways and resident rooms were observed to be clean, odor-free and free from tripping hazards. Nurses/wellness office was observed in Oak and Maple neighborhood. Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Chemicals and sharps were locked and inaccessible from residents. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 105-117 degrees F. Communal bathrooms were observed to be clean and odor-free. Kitchen was observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. A comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Fire extinguishers were serviced in 10/2025. Emergency drills are logged and done every three months. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On October 8, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 9/26/25. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. On 9/26/25, the Licensee reported Resident 1 (R1) was standing in the dining room when Resident 2 (R2) came up to R1 and leaned his/her head over R1's shoulder. It was observed that R1 punched R2 on the left side of his/her face. Both residents were immediately separated. According to R1, R2 punched him/her first. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1 and R2's file, observed both residents, and reviewed care plans. Based on both resident's files, R1 and R2 have a diagnosis of dementia. Based on records reviewed, this is the second altercation incident between R1 and R2. According to staff interviewed, verbal training was conducted to ensure both residents are seated separately/ are separated at all times. R2 was seen by his/her physician and there was a medication adjustment. LPA observed both R2 walking around in the courtyard and R1 was observed participating in activities. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On September 16, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on 8/26/25. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. On 8/26/25, the Licensee reported at approximately 2:30pm, it was found that Resident 1 (R1) left the community was was observed by a caregiver driving to the facility, that R1 was walking on the sidewalk heading towards Notre Dame School. The caregiver immediately parked, approached R1 and brought R1 back to the community. No injuries were noted. Upon investigation, it was noted that the gate failed to lock. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file and toured the facility to observe that locks at the facility. Based on R1's file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. R1 has no history of elopements, however does have wandering behaviors. According to administrator and staff interviewed, the locks failed and the gate did not lock properly. Third party vendor, Lockworks Unlimited arrived the same day to fix the locks and checked all other exit gates to ensure the locks did not fail. During the visit, LPA toured the facility and observed all the exit. All gates were locked. According to the administrator, the gates were also re-keyed. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On August 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude Staff #1 (S1) from the facility. The letter was given to the Administrator, Robert Snee. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025
Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries in care. Due to staff neglect, resident was dehydrated.

On July 31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident sustained pressure injuries in care, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital on February 19th with open wounds on both heels. R1 had deep tissue pressure injury on the left heel and a wound on the right heel. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, reviewed R1’s file and reviewed medical records. Based on charting notes reviewed, on 2/15/25, the facility reported a right heel wound to R1’s physician and R1’s responsible party. According to R1’s responsible party, it was noted that R1 has a history of pressure ulcer. According to interviewed staff, R1’s physician sent a referral to home health wound nurse, however on 2/19/25, R1 was sent to the ER and was told by R1’s responsible party that home health called to notify R1’s responsible party that they are coming to the facility, however cancelled because R1 was still admitted at the hospital. (continue to 9099C) Unsubstantiated Based on photos, facility wound care notes, home health wound care notes, and interviews conducted, R1 returned to the community on 3/7/25 with wounds on both heels. Home health wound nurse came into the facility for wound care 3x a week. On 4/11/25, R1 was admitted to hospice. Regarding the allegation, due to staff neglect, resident was dehydrated, according to the reporting party, R1 was admitted to the hospital on 2/19/25 for dehydration. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff. According to staff interviewed, the facility was notified that R1 had a history of dehydration. Because the facility is not a skilled nursing facility, they don't log water intake, however since facility staff were aware of the history of dehydration, the facility staff ensured to monitor R1's water intake. Facility staff indicated that a water bottle was also purchased for R1 so that staff are aware how much water R1 is drinking a day. Based on interviews conducted, documents reviewed and information collected, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with the Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250320161225
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On July 31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on July 8, 2025. LPA met with Director of Health Services (DHS), Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported, on 7/8/25, a med-tech reported to the DHS that Staff 1 (S1) reported on 7/6/25, Resident 1 (R1) refused to go out of his/her room because he/she was afraid of Staff 2 (S2). The med-tech spoke to R1 and R1 indicated that S2 is rough to R1 and pushed R1 against the wall. DHS conducted an investigation and asked R1 is he/she knew the staff and R1 stated S2's name and stated S2 threw him/her against the wall and left him/her in a bad position. No injuries were notes. S2 was suspended pending investigation. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1's file, reviewed facility's investigation and attempted to interview S2 and R1. R1 was not interviewable during the visit as he/she was eating lunch. S2 was not working during the time of the visit. Based on R1's file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia, however does not have any aggressive or violent behaviors. According to the DHS, this is the first time R1 accused a staff of being aggressive towards him/her. Based on the facility's investigation, the findings went unsubstantiated as no staff member from the PM shift on 7/6/25 witnessed the incident. DHS provided training documents for S2 and will complete an in-service training with all staff on 7/31/25. According to the DHS, S2 is back to work, however is in a different neighborhood from R1. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025
Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On June 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude an Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) from the facility. The letter was given to the Director of Health Services. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025
May 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On May 27, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management in relation to an incident that occurred on 4/27/25. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. On 4/27/25, the Licensee reported, the facility's engagement assistant (S1) observed Resident 1's (R1's) 1:1 caregiver sitting outside the door holding the door knob preventing R1 from leaving the room. All required parties were notified. New medications were ordered and 1:1 caregiver was terminated. During the visit today, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1's file. Based on file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of advanced dementia and a previous history of aggressive behavior, however was on medication to stabilize his/her aggressive behaviors. R1's behavior stabilized so the physician stopped the medication, however R1 started having aggressive behaviors. According to staff interviewed, the 1:1 caregiver was through a third party vendor/agency the facility uses, however the family contracted with the vendor/agency directly. The Director of Health Services indicated, when S1 witnessed 1:1 caregiver sitting outside holding R1's door knob preventing R1 from leaving his/her room, S1 immediately let R1 out of the room and walked him/her around outside. 1:1 caregiver is no longer allowed to come back to the facility and another 1:1 caregiver was hired to assist R1. R1 has a weekly psychiatrist appointments and medication management has been implemented. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2025
Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

**This is an amended copy of the report that was issued on February 25, 2025. An amended copy of LIC9099 and LIC9099D will be provided during visit on January 5, 2026.** On February 25, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conuducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, according to the reporting party, on 12/23/24, Resident 1 (R1) had a witnessed fall at 11am and the facility did not seek timely medical attention until 4:54pm when R1's responsible party told S1 to call 911 after calling for an update and being notified by Staff 1 (S1) that R1 is in severe pain and can't move his/her leg. During the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator, staff, and reviewed documentation. Based interviews conducted, 3/3 staff members indicated R1 had a witnessed fall at 11am and complained of pain. Staff immediately responded, assisted R1 from the floor and assessed R1. S1 and Staff 2 (S2) indicated that they reached out the the doctor for advice, however the doctor was not responding. S1 and S2 checked on R1 throughout the day and R1 still complained of pain. (Continue to 9099C) Substantiated S2 who was on the AM shift admitted that he/she should have called 911 immediately after resident had a fall and complained of pain, however indicated because resident was not in severe pain, S2 did not call 911. S1 who was on shift during the PM shift, indicated he/she was not sure why the facility did not send R1 to the hospital after the fall in the morning. The facility did not send R1 out to the hospital till about 5:30pm when R1 started moaning, complaining of pain, and couldn't move his/her legs. Based on medical records reviewed, due to the fall, R1 sustained a left hip fracture. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Failure to correct said deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. AN IMMEDIATE CIVIL PENALTY OF $500.00 WAS ASSESSED TODAY: $500 FOR THE VIOLATION AS STAFF DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR A RESIDENT. THE ADMINISTRATOR WAS INFORMED THAT AN ADDITIONAL CIVIL PENALTY IS STILL BEING DETERMINED AND MIGHT BE ASSESSED BASED ON HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE §1569.49. According to the administrator and the Director of Health Services, the facility's protocol is to have the shift nurse call responsible parties regarding incidents that occur before they leave their shift. The facility did notify R1's responsible party based on interview conducted with S2, administrator and Director of Health Services. Based on care notes reviewed, it was observed that S2 did contact R1's responsible party. Based on the above information, the Department has found that this allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that this allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241227093734

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care - (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to seek timely medical attention after R1 had a fall and complained of pain. Based on interviews and records reviewed, R1 had a fall at 11am and R1 was not sent out to the hospital till about 5:30pm. Based on interview conducted with S2, S2 admitted that 911 should have been called immediately after R1 had a fall and complained of pain, however indicated because resident was not in severe pain, S2 did not call 911. Nevertheless, R1 complained to 3 staff members of pain and observed by staff of having pain and the facility did not seek medical attention for R1 which poses an immediate health risks to residents in care and resulted into a left hip fracture.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/administrator shall submit a plan in writing addressing how to seek timely medical attention. Civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 is being assessed today as the facility failed to seek timely medical treatment for Resident 1 (R1) after an incident that occurred on 12/23/24 which resulted in a fractured left hip.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 6, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2)... This regulation is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to seek timely medical attention after R1 fell and immediately complained of pain. Staff interviewed admitted that R1 needed to go to the hospital but chose to wait stating R1 was not in enough pain. R1 had a severe injury and could not move their leg. Staff left R1 to endure pain for hours from approximately 11am to 5:30pm without seeking emergency medical services which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee completed an in-service training on 12/30/24 with nurses in relation to responding to change of condition and when to call 911. Deficiency cleared.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On December 3, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds including but not limited to, five resident neighborhoods; maple, cedar, bay, twin pines and oak, one main administrative office, library, and kitchen. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured resident neighborhoods and observed a dining room in each neighborhood. Dining room and hallways were clean and free from any tripping hazards. Resident rooms were observed clean, odor-free, with all required furniture. Nurses station was observed in the Oak and Maple neighborhood. Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. First aid kits were observed to be present and complete. Toxins and chemicals were locked and stored away in a storage room. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 105-115 degrees F. Communal bathrooms were observed to be clean and odor-free. Kitchen was observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. Lighting and temperature throughout the facility was sufficient for comfort. Fire extinguishers were mounted and serviced in 10/2024. Emergency drills are logged and done every three months. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On March 15, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCL. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on March 11, 2024 at approximately 12:05pm, Resident 1 (R1) was found by Resident Care Coordinator outside near the community parking lot in a wooded area. R1 was escorted back into the community and was assessed by the nurse. Based on facility's internal investigation, perimeter gates were all closed, locked and in working order; no evidence of equipment or rocks were visible to indicate gate was propped open. There were no signs of equipment or furniture to indicate that R1 could've climbed the gates. Facility initiated behavior mapping for R1 and conducted rounds to ensure all gates were locked and secure. In addition, on the same day, March 11, 2024 at approximately 6:25pm, while conducted rounds, staff reported that R1 was not in the dining room. Staff immediately started searching for R1. Med-tech found R1 walking around on the other side of the gates near the Bay neighborhood, close to a picnic area. R1 was redirected back into the community, assessment was done by nurse, and a one on one caregiver was assigned to R1. Community perimeters were checked again, all gates were observed locked. Locksworth Unlimited inspected the gates. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, observed R1 eating lunch. R1 is currently residing in Twin Pines neighborhood where there is more staff present. Based on R1's file, R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. Behavior mapping log was observed. Facility conducted 30-minute status checks after the first incident occurred at 12:05pm. According to Administrator and Director of Health Services, R1 does not have a history of AWOL, however R1's responsible party takes R1 out of the community for several days at a time which; recent outing was hiking from 3/5/2024 - 3/10/2024. Updated service plan was observed. No citations issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024
Feb 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On February 16, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero for a Case Management visit to follow up on a substantiated complaint allegation of neglect and lack of supervision resulting in serious bodily injuries. On October 10, 2019, the Department concluded a complaint investigation which alleged that the facility did not provide proper care and supervision which resulted in a resident (R1) sustaining multiple falls including a serious bodily injury. The allegation was substantiated, and the licensee was cited for violating California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, § 87464(f) Basic Services. The investigation revealed the facility failed to do an accurate fall risk assessment after R1 experienced multiple fall incidents at the facility on June 17, 2018, July 15, 2018, October 11, 2018, October 17, 2018, and December 19, 2018. As a result, the facility failed to identify and implement measures and or plan of care changes to minimize further fall incidents for R1. Based on documentation reviewed, according to the facility’s assessment, it was not identified that R1 was a high risk for falls. On March 1, 2019, R1 had another unwitnessed fall and was hospitalized. Based on the investigation, it was revealed that there are three small buildings on this property. There were no caregivers present in R1’s building before or at the time R1 fell. Two caregivers were in another building and a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) was in a med room, but the LVN was not answering their phone. As a result of the improper risk assessment and facility’s failure to identify and implement a proper plan of care to address R1’s fall risk; R1 sustained a right intertrochanteric femur fracture and needed to undergo an operation called femur intramedullary rodding. (Continue to 809C) In addition, based on the documents and information collected, the investigation revealed that the facility was aware of R1’s multiple falls, but continued to provide care based on inaccurate fall risk assessments, outdated plan of care, and did not notify the Primary Care Physician (PCP) of the changes until R1’s fall on March 1, 2019. There was no facility report or documentation available for review to indicate facility staff or the administrator had notified the PCP about R1’s fall history or a plan of care necessary to minimize R1’s risk for falls. At the time of the complaint visit on October 10, 2019, an immediate civil penalty of $500 was issued and the licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty was being determined and might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that an additional civil penalty is warranted for a violation that resulted in R1 sustaining serious bodily injuries while under the care of this facility. Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.67, defines serious bodily injury as “an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation.” This is evidenced by the facility failing to provide the proper care and supervision to R1, knowing that R1 was a fall risk, resulting in R1 falling and sustaining a right intertrochanteric femur fracture, which is serious bodily injury. Today, February 16, 2024, the Department will be issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1569.49 for a violation that the Department constitutes as a serious bodily injury in the amount of $10,000. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on October 10, 2019, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9500. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to Administrator, Robert Snee and originals were signed. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal rights provided. Administrator, Robert Snee signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC 421D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024
Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On January 31, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds including but not limited to, five resident neighborhoods; maple, cedar, bay, twin pines and oak, one main administrative office, library, and kitchen. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured resident neighborhoods and observed a dining room in each neighborhood. Dining room and hallways were clean and clear for hazards. Resident rooms observed had all required furniture and were observed to be clean. Nurses station was observed in the Oak and Maple neighborhood. Medications were observed to be locked. First aid kits were observed to be present and complete. Three laundry rooms and one main laundry room was observed to be locked. Toxins and chemicals were locked and stored away in a storage room. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 112-118.9 degrees F. Six communal bathrooms were observed to be clean and odor-free. Kitchen was observed to be clean. Kitchen was observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. Lighting throughout the facility was sufficient for comfort. A comfortable temperature of 71 degrees F is maintained. Fire extinguishers were mounted and serviced in 10/2023. Emergency drills are logged and done every three months. LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are observed during the visit. Report is reviewed with the Administrator and Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on December 10, 2023. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. On December 10, 2023, the Licensee reported that a staff member observed Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) in the room together. It was reported that R1 was touching R2's chest area. R1 has a 24/7 one-on-one private caregiver assigned to him/her, however during the time of the incident, the private caregiver went to use the restroom and left R1 unattended without telling a staff member. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, interviewed administrator and director of health services. According to Administrator and Director of Health Services, agency caregivers are required to contact the nurse's station and notify a staff member prior to going on break/lunch so a staff member can be assigned to be R1's companion while the agency caregiver is on break. Based on R1's file, this is the the third incident involving R1 touching another resident inappropriately; previous incidents occurred 11/7/2023 and 11/8/2023. A 24/7 private agency caregiver was assigned on 11/8/2023. Facility was unable to provide LPA an orientation checklist or training provided to the private one-on-one agency caregiver regarding breaks/lunches. Based on documents reviewed and interviews conducted, facility failed to provide orientation/training to the private on-on-one agency staff member assigned to R1 which resulted to R1 being left unattended. Nevertheless, due to R1 being left unattended, R1 was observed in the room with R2 touching his/her breasts. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the facility failed to provide orientation/training to the private on-on-one agency staff member assigned to R1 which resulted to R1 being left unattended. Nevertheless, due to R1 being left unattended, R1 was observed in the room with R2 touching his/her breasts.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to create a checklist and/or documented training for all one-on-one agency caregivers. Checklist/training to include; protocols when taking breaks and lunches.

Dec 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 6, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on two incidents that was reported to CCLD. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 11/7/2023, Resident 1 (R1) was observed holding Resident's 2 (R2's) hand. It was observed by a caregiver that R1 reached over and touched R2's breasts. Caregiver immediately separated R1 and R2. R1 was placed on 30-minute checks, facility called responsible party to request a one-on-one caregiver, and facility called R1's physician to review R1's medications. The Licensee reported on 11/8/2023 around 4:30pm, R1 observed walking by R2 and gilded his/her hang over Resident 3's (R3's) breast area. Caregiver separated both residents at the time. One one one caregiver for R1 was provided at 6:30pm on 11/8/23, physician adjusted R1's medication, behavior mapping is on-going. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, observed R1 and discussed the incidents with Administrator and Director of Health Services. Based on R1's record review, R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and does not have any inappropriate or aggressive behaviors. Based on observations, R1 was in the dining room with R1's one-on-one caregiver. According to the administrator and director of health services, R1 has not had any inappropriate incidents since the one-on-one caregiver was assigned and facility will continue to monitor R1. Director of Health Services will set up a meeting with R1's physician and responsible party and conduct a re-assessment for R1. No deficiencies are cited today. Report is reviewed with Administrator and Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2023
Sep 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On September 29, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee, Director of Health of Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude an employee of the facility. The letter was given to the Administrator. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Licensee and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Patio · Garden · Walking paths

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Room typesStudio (all inclusive) · Semi-Private

    Studio — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Semi-Private — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasGrill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · Arts room · and 5 more

    Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Cognitive learning center — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • AmenitiesPiano · Fireplace · Concierge · Move-in coordination

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Places to eat on sitePrivate Dining Room

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredMusic programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Bible study group · Happy hour · and 19 more

    Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Bible study group · Happy hour · Cooking classes · Live dance or theater performances · Holiday parties · Dances · Art classes · Has karaoke · Trivia games · Has birthday parties · Has garden club — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Gardening Club · Pet-focused Programs · Karaoke · BBQs or Picnics · Educational Speakers / Life Long Learning · Live Musical Performances · Brain fitness / Dakim · Birthday Parties · Light Therapy Programs · Activities On-site — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Intergenerational programs

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Religious observance supportedChristian services

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish · French · Chinese · German · Mandarin · and 8 more

    English · Spanish · French · Chinese · German · Mandarin · American sign language · Russian · Vietnamese · Japanese · Arabic · Ukrainian · Dutch · Filipino — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Support services for families

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Transport for shopping and errands

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Mateo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Mateo County