Aegis Living San Francisco is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California — state license #415601101, licensed for 100 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 28, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

46 homes in view

Aegis Living San Francisco

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 100 residents · South San Francisco, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415601101, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2280 Gellert Blvd · South San Francisco, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 952-6100
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 100 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 100 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 28, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 28, 2026
Occupancy at the June 12, 2024 visit
65 of 100 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 2, 2022 to June 12, 2024. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Jun 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 6 documents
Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not report an incident involving resident in care as necessary.

On 6/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator (ADM), Cecilia Dauth and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Donato interviewed three staff members during the course of the investigation. Regarding the allegation of staff did not report an incident involving resident in care as necessary, RP stated that no one told F1 that R1 sustained any injuries. F1 visited R1 on 03-13-24 and asked R1 how he/she was. R1 said his/her leg hurt. F1 pulled up the pants and saw a 4'5" gash with dried blood, as well as the two bruises. During the interview S2 mentioned that the bruising was not reported to management. page 1 of 2 Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240408125636
Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper infection control requirements

On 3/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Cecilia Dauth and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of staff are not following proper infection control requirements, the Reporting Party (RP) stated that there is no PPE for the staff. RP stated that they don’t have any face shields or hair covers. RP stated that all the residents are being isolated except one. LPA interviewed staff members and 6 out of 6 mentioned that there were emergency PPEs provided by the facility. LPA also interviewed Administrator Cecilia Dauth & Wellness Director Hayley Ragasa, both stated that part of their protocol is to have garbage bin and supply outside the rooms of infected residents. This is for when staff enters, they wear the PPE supply and when exiting, throw the PPEs right away on the bin. Face shields are also available when requested by staff. Residents who were infected are isolthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240313115017
Jan 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Residents' room is malodorous - Facility placed a resident in another residents room without notifying responsible party.

Based on observations and review of records, these allegations are substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. During initial complaint visit on 4/11/23, LPAs Jeung and Donato visited all 17 memory care apartments, and detected the smell of urine in 3 rooms, despite the overwhelming floral scent of a cleaner/disinfectant product and that LPAs were wearing surgical masks. As confirmed by staff and indicated in facility's billing records, client #2 was relocated to room 101 with client #1 on 3/14/23. There was no notice given to conservator of client #1 about this new living arrangement. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are cited on a following page. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024 · control 14-AS-20230403164840
Jan 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not help facilitate communication between reporting party and resident Facility staff chemically restrained the resident

On 11/07/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Cecilia Dauth & Resident Wellness Director Hayley Ragasa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of facility staff does not help facilitate communication between reporting party (RP) and resident (R1). It was reported that the facility is not helping RP communicate with R1. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff members and five out of eight staff mentioned that there are no issues with regards to any family members calling to speak to residents. The only times that a phone call might not go through is when a resident is agitated, sleeping, is on an activity or having meals. In cases or residents with dementia, residents might not be lucid at that time or don’t even remember who they are talking to. The facility is also able to transfer calls so that residents will be able to talk to famthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230628150627
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202446220235502022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 952-6100

Is Aegis Living San Francisco licensed?

Yes — Aegis Living San Francisco is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in South San Francisco (San Mateo County): California license #415601101, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 100 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 28, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Aegis Living San Francisco care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Aegis Living San Francisco with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.

How much does Aegis Living San Francisco cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Aegis Living San Francisco's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Aegis Living San Francisco accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Aegis Living San Francisco is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

65 of 100 beds occupied (65%) when the state visited on June 12, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Aegis Living San Francisco?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2022 for Aegis Living San Francisco; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 12, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not report an incident involving resident in care as necessary.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator (ADM), Cecilia Dauth and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Donato interviewed three staff members during the course of the investigation. Regarding the allegation of staff did not report an incident involving resident in care as necessary, RP stated that no one told F1 that R1 sustained any injuries. F1 visited R1 on 03-13-24 and asked R1 how he/she was. R1 said his/her leg hurt. F1 pulled up the pants and saw a 4'5" gash with dried blood, as well as the two bruises. During the interview S2 mentioned that the bruising was not reported to management. page 1 of 2 SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240408125636
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following proper infection control requirements
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 3/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Cecilia Dauth and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of staff are not following proper infection control requirements, the Reporting Party (RP) stated that there is no PPE for the staff. RP stated that they don’t have any face shields or hair covers. RP stated that all the residents are being isolated except one. LPA interviewed staff members and 6 out of 6 mentioned that there were emergency PPEs provided by the facility. LPA also interviewed Administrator Cecilia Dauth & Wellness Director Hayley Ragasa, both stated that part of their protocol is to have garbage bin and supply outside the rooms of infected residents. This is for when staff enters, they wear the PPE supply and when exiting, throw the PPEs right away on the bin. Face shields are also available when requested by staff. Residents who were infected are isolCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240313115017
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Residents' room is malodorous - Facility placed a resident in another residents room without notifying responsible party.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Based on observations and review of records, these allegations are substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. During initial complaint visit on 4/11/23, LPAs Jeung and Donato visited all 17 memory care apartments, and detected the smell of urine in 3 rooms, despite the overwhelming floral scent of a cleaner/disinfectant product and that LPAs were wearing surgical masks. As confirmed by staff and indicated in facility's billing records, client #2 was relocated to room 101 with client #1 on 3/14/23. There was no notice given to conservator of client #1 about this new living arrangement. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are cited on a following page. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2024 · control 14-AS-20230403164840

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not help facilitate communication between reporting party and resident Facility staff chemically restrained the resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/07/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Cecilia Dauth & Resident Wellness Director Hayley Ragasa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of facility staff does not help facilitate communication between reporting party (RP) and resident (R1). It was reported that the facility is not helping RP communicate with R1. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff members and five out of eight staff mentioned that there are no issues with regards to any family members calling to speak to residents. The only times that a phone call might not go through is when a resident is agitated, sleeping, is on an activity or having meals. In cases or residents with dementia, residents might not be lucid at that time or don’t even remember who they are talking to. The facility is also able to transfer calls so that residents will be able to talk to famCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230628150627
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility staff allowed resident's gifted cell phone of choice to be taken away from them
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
*** Amended document to reflect as a public document*** On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings regarding the above allegation recieved. LPA met with the business office manager David and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews with facility staff, resident POA, other agencies, and the complainant. Pertinent documentation is also reviewed. Pertinent documents were received and reviewed as part of the investigation. Regarding the phone being allowed to be taken away, the assigned POAs of the resident were responsible for the phone being removed. LPA received photgraphic evidence of the phone and a note that was confirmed to be from the POA. Interviews also confirmed this. Continued on next page UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 19, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230214151033

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident being chemically restrained Facility not following doctors medication orders Facility has a locked Memory Care Unit Facility has unqualified staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 2, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator/ General Manager, Cecilia Dauth and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that resident is being chemically restrained and facility is not following doctor's medication orders, according to the reporting party, Resident #1 (R1) was given 75mg of Trazodone instead of between 25-50mg as indicated on the doctor's order and was chemically restrained by the facility. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1's file and medical records. Based on the file reviewed, LPA observed that R1's medication list dated 5/29/21 notes R1 is required to take between 25-50mg of Trazodone daily at bedtime, however on 6/3/21, R1 had a medication adjustment which notes R1's Trazodone dosage increased to 75mg daily at bedtime. Furthermore, based on a faxed document reviewed dated 6/5/21, from the facilitCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2022 · control 14-AS-20210618102222

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 952-6100
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Aegis Living San Francisco? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.