Pacifica Senior Living Poway is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Poway, San Diego County, California — state license #374604604, licensed for 72 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 27, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 27, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 16, 2023 to December 31, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Mar 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 31, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent the spread of gastrointestinal illness.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA Correia was met by Executive Director (ED) Azemikah, identified herself, and explained the purpose of the visit. On December 15, 2025, the Department received a complaint that alleged the Licensee did not prevent the spread of an illness. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff, resident, and outside source interviews, a facility tour, and a records review. It was alleged that shortly after reopening the facility’s communal dining room, after undergoing renovations, residents in care experienced an outbreak of a gastrointestinal illness. An outside source alleged the illness was related to the food served at the facility. On the same day the complaint was filed, December 15, 2025, the ED reported the outbreak to the Department. [Continued on LIC 9099 C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251215130522
Aug 25, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting the residents bathing needs. Staff are not properly maintaining the residents rooms. Staff are not meeting the residents catheter needs. Staff are not meeting the residents laundry needs. Staff are not meeting the residents transferring needs. Staff are allowing the residents to be soiled. Staff do not keep the facility free from mold. Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents. Facility is insufficiently staffed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and met with Executive Director (ED) Azemikhah to discuss the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation included facility and staff records reviews and interviews, and a facility tour. It was alleged staff were not meeting residents’ needs of assistance with Activities of Daily Living skills (ADLs). Specifically, it was alleged facility staff did not provide adequate assistance with bathing, transfers, and housekeeping. Interviews conducted with residents revealed no concerns or issues with assistance with ADLs as mentioned above. It was also alleged that staff did not provide adequate incontinence and/or catheter care, and residents had been left soiled. Similarly, interviews with residents that required incontinence and/or catheter care revealed no issues with services provided by staff. Unsubstantiatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250815104547
Aug 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 13, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not serve residents food of good quality.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Executive Director Cameron Azemikhah, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 05/05/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not serve residents food of good quality. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed observations of various wait times, which were not observed to all be consistently long. Staff informed that two serving staff were out at the same time recently which resulted in staffing adjustments; while this affected wait times slightly, the times were not reported to be in excess of 15 minutes from when the resident ordered their food. Staff offered that possibly during high service times, pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250505153230
Apr 17, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not give medications as prescribed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA was met by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Director Cameron Azemikhah. The Department's investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and outside sources. Resident (R1) was a total assist with medication and it was alleged that staff did not give medications as prescribed to (R1). Photographs from outside sources showed that there were two handwritten notes with the instructions to take “pills”. Review of facility email communications concluded that the event happened and a staff member was identified for placing medication with the notes in the resident room. Staff interviews revealed one job requirement for medication management is that staff are present with a resident during a medication pass. (Cont'd on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230728165332
Apr 4, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 20, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Questionable Death. Staff did not notify residents authorized representative of incident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), David Roman, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA D. Roman identified himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director, Cameron Azemikhah. On March 17, 2025, it was reported to the Department that there was a questionable death, and staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of the incident. During today's visit, LPA D. Roman reviewed records and interviewed staff which revealed the resident in question did not reside in the Assisted Living portion of the facility. This resident did reside in the 55+ Independent Living facility in a different address, adjacent and associated to the Pacifica Senior Living Poway. The Independent Living component is not licensed through California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. Based on the information revealed during the visit, these allegations are deemed to be unfounded. An unfounded determination means that the allegation was fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250317160123
Mar 13, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that residents had running water. Facility did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Facility did not follow reporting requirements
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above complaint allegations. LPA Correia met with Executive Director (ED) Azemikhah to whom was explained the purpose for the visit. The Department’s investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, as well as facility records reviews. It was alleged the facility did not ensure that residents had running water and did not ensure residents hygiene needs were met. An interview with the Executive Director (ED) revealed the facility had a planned water outage scheduled for September 4, 2024, due to an upgrade in their water system. The interview also revealed several measures were put in place to ensure the residents care needs were met, including dedicated empty rooms with full water use, and offering showers a day before or after for residents whose care plan included showers during the day of the outage. Staff and resident interviews also cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240904154400
Mar 13, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 23, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility was not communicating their visitation policy.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Cameron Azemikhah, Executive Director. On 4/24/23 it was alleged that the facility was not communicating their visitation policy, due to residents not being given access inside the building at night. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation, staff informing that timeliness in assisting residents with access to the building at night had been an ongoing issue. Staff interview further revealed that the facility's phone system was inconsistent, causing some calls to not go through, resulting in staff not being aware that someone was at the door. Staff interview, confirmed by records review, shthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230424144236
Oct 20, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Cheyenne Tillman, and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of observations, multiple interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources and a detailed review of relevant records. On September 29, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff did not meet a resident’s (R1) incontinence care needs, [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. (continue at LIC 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230929161749
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Pacifica Senior Living Poway licensed?
Yes — Pacifica Senior Living Poway is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Poway (San Diego County): California license #374604604, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 72 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 27, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Pacifica Senior Living Poway care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pacifica Senior Living Poway with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 72 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 8.
How much does Pacifica Senior Living Poway cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Pacifica Senior Living Poway's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Pacifica Senior Living Poway accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Pacifica Senior Living Poway is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
52 of 72 beds occupied (72%) when the state visited on December 31, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Pacifica Senior Living Poway?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Pacifica Senior Living Poway; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 31, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(858) 451-9933Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Pacifica Senior Living Poway? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.