Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604405, licensed for 100 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 13, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 100 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604405, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2567 2nd Avenue · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 209-5216
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 100 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
February 13, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
84 of 100 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 26, 2023 to February 13, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide reasonable privacy to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to General Manager Jill Johnson. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care, interviewed staff and obtained copies of facility records. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. On June 15, 2025 , the Department received a complaint alleging that staff did not provide reasonable privacy to the resident in care, specifically Resident #1 (R1) Email correspondence dated April 25, 2025 from R1's Responsible person to Senior General Manager(ED) Hansen instructed ED Hansen not to contact the hospital and stated that R1 reposnsible person was the designated representative for updates. (Continued on LIC9099) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250715131154
Feb 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address resident's change in condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself, was greeted by facility staff, and explained the purpose of the visit to General Manager Jill Johnson During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care and obtained copies of facility records and interviewed staff..The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, records review, and observations. On January 22, 2025, the Department received a complaint alleging that staff did not address a resident’s change in condition. More specifically, it was alleged that Executive Director (ED) Lori Hansen interfered with staff documentation related to Resident #1(R1) change of condition. It was reported that the R1dementia is progressing and requires a higher level of care. (Continued on LIC9099-C). Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250122094452
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not charge agreed upon admissions fee.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Lori Hansen, Senior General Manager. On 8/28/23 it was alleged that the Licensee did not charge a resident (R1) the agreed upon admissions fee. The Department’s investigation consisted of two unannounced facility visits, review of facility records, interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interview revealed that R1 and their responsible party were given the costs of residency upfront and signed in agreement to the costs via the Residency and Services Agreement. Review of the signed Residency and Services Agreement, itemized billing invoice, and documented communication between the family and Licensee confirmed that the amount charged was the amount that was agreed upon by the Licensee and family. (Continued on LIC9099-C) This is an amended report from the facility vthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230828151755
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622120252202024340202311020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 209-5216

Is Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill licensed?

Yes — Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604405, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 100 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 13, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS.

How much does Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

84 of 100 beds occupied (84%) when the state visited on February 13, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 13, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide reasonable privacy to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to General Manager Jill Johnson. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care, interviewed staff and obtained copies of facility records. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. On June 15, 2025 , the Department received a complaint alleging that staff did not provide reasonable privacy to the resident in care, specifically Resident #1 (R1) Email correspondence dated April 25, 2025 from R1's Responsible person to Senior General Manager(ED) Hansen instructed ED Hansen not to contact the hospital and stated that R1 reposnsible person was the designated representative for updates. (Continued on LIC9099) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250715131154
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not address resident's change in condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself, was greeted by facility staff, and explained the purpose of the visit to General Manager Jill Johnson During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care and obtained copies of facility records and interviewed staff..The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, records review, and observations. On January 22, 2025, the Department received a complaint alleging that staff did not address a resident’s change in condition. More specifically, it was alleged that Executive Director (ED) Lori Hansen interfered with staff documentation related to Resident #1(R1) change of condition. It was reported that the R1dementia is progressing and requires a higher level of care. (Continued on LIC9099-C). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 5, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250122094452

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not charge agreed upon admissions fee.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Lori Hansen, Senior General Manager. On 8/28/23 it was alleged that the Licensee did not charge a resident (R1) the agreed upon admissions fee. The Department’s investigation consisted of two unannounced facility visits, review of facility records, interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interview revealed that R1 and their responsible party were given the costs of residency upfront and signed in agreement to the costs via the Residency and Services Agreement. Review of the signed Residency and Services Agreement, itemized billing invoice, and documented communication between the family and Licensee confirmed that the amount charged was the amount that was agreed upon by the Licensee and family. (Continued on LIC9099-C) This is an amended report from the facility vCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230828151755

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 209-5216
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Merrill Gardens At Bankers Hill? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.