Silverado Senior Living-encinitas is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas, San Diego County, California — state license #374604254, licensed for 122 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Silverado Senior Living-encinitas

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 122 residents · Encinitas, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604254, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
335 Saxony Road · Encinitas, San Diego County
Phone
(949) 240-7200
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 122 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
THE FACILITY SERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; OF WHICH 122 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 25. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS, AND SECURED LOCKED PERIMETER.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 15, 2026
Occupancy at the October 8, 2025 visit
71 of 122 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 30, 2023 to October 8, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in multiple injuries. Staff made false statements regarding resident incident. Staff falsified records

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint to Executive Director Calais Anguiano. On 08/07/2025 it was alleged that staff’s lack of supervision for Resident 1 (R1) resulted in multiple injuries, staff made false statements regarding R1's incident, and that staff falsified records regarding R1's incident. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Regarding the allegation, “Lack of supervision resulting in multiple injuries”, eight (8) staff members involved in the incident on 08/02/2025 were interviewed. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff stated R1 had been supervised per care plan as routine, and was observed walking during and after dinner in their neighborhthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250807121519
Jul 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Calais Anguiano. On 07/01/2025 it was alleged that staff mismanaged Resident 1's (R1) medication. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Staff interview did not corroborate the allegation, as staff involved with medication administration informed no medication errors had occurred. Staff informed that a documentation discrepancy had ocurred but was corrected and the correct medication was given. Management informed that all medication errors are elevated and investigated, and confirmed that no medication errors had occurred for residents during the timeframe of complaint. Two outside sources were interviewed regarthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250701131855
Mar 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility did not allow resident to refuse medical care - Facility did not meet resident’s nutritional needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Caroline Fitzgerald, Concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Administrator Dyan Summerell and Kaitly Collins, Director of Resident and Family Services. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and attempted interview with resident, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations. On February 28, 2025, it was alleged facility did not allow resident to refuse medical care, and facility did not meet resident’s nutritional needs. (Continuation on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250228165315
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility employed staff without background clearance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Marisa Hatcher, Business Office Coordinator. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Marivel Johnson. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On October 6, 2023, it was alleged that the facility employed staff without a background clearance. It was specifically alleged that between June 2023 through October 2023, the facility did not obtain appropriate criminal background clearance for staff. Interview with staff said the facility received an exemption letter from the Department after a staff was cleared to work around June 2023. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231006152308
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file18typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025660202455020233322022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 240-7200

Is Silverado Senior Living-encinitas licensed?

Yes — Silverado Senior Living-encinitas is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas (San Diego County): California license #374604254, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 122 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Silverado Senior Living-encinitas care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Silverado Senior Living-encinitas with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTHE FACILITY SERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; OF WHICH 122 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 25. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS, AND SECURED LOCKED PERIMETER.

How much does Silverado Senior Living-encinitas cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Silverado Senior Living-encinitas's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Silverado Senior Living-encinitas accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Silverado Senior Living-encinitas is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

71 of 122 beds occupied (58%) when the state visited on October 8, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Silverado Senior Living-encinitas?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2022 for Silverado Senior Living-encinitas; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 8, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in multiple injuries. Staff made false statements regarding resident incident. Staff falsified records
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint to Executive Director Calais Anguiano. On 08/07/2025 it was alleged that staff’s lack of supervision for Resident 1 (R1) resulted in multiple injuries, staff made false statements regarding R1's incident, and that staff falsified records regarding R1's incident. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Regarding the allegation, “Lack of supervision resulting in multiple injuries”, eight (8) staff members involved in the incident on 08/02/2025 were interviewed. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff stated R1 had been supervised per care plan as routine, and was observed walking during and after dinner in their neighborhCDSS inspection report, October 8, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250807121519
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medications.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Calais Anguiano. On 07/01/2025 it was alleged that staff mismanaged Resident 1's (R1) medication. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Staff interview did not corroborate the allegation, as staff involved with medication administration informed no medication errors had occurred. Staff informed that a documentation discrepancy had ocurred but was corrected and the correct medication was given. Management informed that all medication errors are elevated and investigated, and confirmed that no medication errors had occurred for residents during the timeframe of complaint. Two outside sources were interviewed regarCDSS inspection report, July 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250701131855
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility did not allow resident to refuse medical care - Facility did not meet resident’s nutritional needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Caroline Fitzgerald, Concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Administrator Dyan Summerell and Kaitly Collins, Director of Resident and Family Services. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and attempted interview with resident, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations. On February 28, 2025, it was alleged facility did not allow resident to refuse medical care, and facility did not meet resident’s nutritional needs. (Continuation on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250228165315

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility employed staff without background clearance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Marisa Hatcher, Business Office Coordinator. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Marivel Johnson. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On October 6, 2023, it was alleged that the facility employed staff without a background clearance. It was specifically alleged that between June 2023 through October 2023, the facility did not obtain appropriate criminal background clearance for staff. Interview with staff said the facility received an exemption letter from the Department after a staff was cleared to work around June 2023. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 13, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231006152308
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff violated residents personal rights
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Rhea Espinoza, Receptionist. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Marivel Johnson, Administrator. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On July 17, 2023, it was alleged that facility staff violated residents’ personal rights. It was specifically alleged that facility staff groomed hair from two residents peri/groin area without consent. Interview with the Administrator confirmed that the Facility conducted an internal investigation where they found staff #1 and staff #2 admitted to grooming three residents without the consent of their responsible parties. Upon the FacilitCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230718114734
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not have residents participate in self-administering medication
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Administrator, Marivel Johnson to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff and outside sources, and records review. On July 26, 2021, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not have residents participate in self-administering medication. It was specifically alleged that staff without proper credentials were crushing, mixing, and administering medication directly into the residents’ mouth without allowing the residents to participate in the process. (continue on LIC9099C) UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210726113635

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 240-7200
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Silverado Senior Living-encinitas? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.