Small home · Licensed for 6 · Victorville
Chantilly Lace Manor IV
13365 Hidden Valley Rd, Victorville, CA 92395Licensed since 2016
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 5 NON AMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Chantilly Lace Manor IV: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,200a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,200
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,200likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,450–$5,200
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
- $4,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,600
- $6,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,800 to $5,500
11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$4,000.
- Golden Years Elderly CareVictorville · 1.6 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Yorkshire Garden Care #1Apple Valley · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Della Guest HomeVictorville · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aries Residential CareHesperia · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,400Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seegal Residential CareVictorville · 2.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmel Care HomeHesperia · 2.4 mi · Mid-size home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission of Love IIHesperia · 2.7 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crystal Garden RCFEApple Valley · 3.6 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Arya Senior Care HomeApple Valley · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aging Grace Senior Living FacilityHesperia · 4.1 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Maemar ManorVictorville · 4.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
13365 Hidden Valley Rd, Victorville, CA 92395Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Desert Valley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #361800121 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury Staff do not ensure that medications are stored inaccessible to residents Staff do not assist residents with obtaining medical care Staff do not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met Licensee does not ensure that staff have required training Staff did not maintain facility in good repair Staff are not distributing resident's medication as prescribed
On 7/23/2026 at 2:50PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Eldin Serrano and Matthew Aguilar made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPAs met with caregiver Carmen Enriquez to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and residents as well as facility observation. Allegation #1: Staff did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury –Based on interviews and review of records, it was determined that the residents identified in the allegation were receiving services from an outside vendor. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff do not ensure that medications are stored inaccessible to residents - Based on LPA observation, medications were stored in a locked closet that required a key to access. LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiated Allegation #3: Staff do not assist residents with obtaining medical care - Based on interviews and review of records, it was determined that the facility utilizes an outside vendor to provide care for residents whose needs exceed the skill level of facility staff. Therefore, the allegation cannot be corroborated. Allegation #4: Staff do not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met – Based on LPA observation and review of records, it was determined that the facility has sufficient food supplies and provides a balanced diet that meets the residents’ dietary needs. LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #5: Licensee does not ensure that staff have required training – Based on a review of records, it was confirmed that facility staff have the required training to perform their duties. The facility provided proof of the training conducted. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation #6: Staff did not maintain facility in good repair – Based on interviews and observation, it was determined that the bed alleged to be in disrepair was found to be in good condition and in good repair and did not pose any safety concerns to residents. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation #7: Staff are not distributing resident's medication as prescribed – Based on observation, record review, and medication audit, it was confirmed that medications were administered on time and as prescribed. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Information received during investigation LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. Based on the evidence, record review and interview, the allegations mentioned above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099 and LIC9099C were discussed and provided to caregiver Carmen Enriquez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251007081521
Apr 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that facility staff who provided medical care to residents were appropriately skilled professionals Facility staff inappropriately restrained resident
On 4/27/2026 at 9:40 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to house manager Stephanie Smith. The investigation consisted of record review, interviews with staff and resident as well as observation. Allegation #1: Licensee did not ensure that facility staff who provided medical care to residents were appropriately skilled professionals – Based on interviews and a review of documentation, it was determined that R2’s insulin was being administered by the resident’s family member. The LPA also confirmed that some residents receive care from external providers. Allegation #2 Facility staff inappropriately restrained resident – LPA observed that R3 was not restrained during the visit. Interviews confirmed that facility staff do not utilize restraints on the residents in care. During the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiated Based on the evidence, the allegations mentioned above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099 and LIC9099C were discussed and provided to house manager Stephanie Smith.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 27, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250929120855
20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/5//2025 at 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Eldin Serrano, Magda Malcore and Andrew Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with house manager Stephanie Smith and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was one (1) staff, and five (5) residents present. The facility is a four (4) bedroom, three (3) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room/activity room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of 6 and which five (5) non-ambulatory and six (6) hospice care waiver and 1 maybe bedridden and the current census is five (5) residents. LPAs were accompanied by a staff to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with the required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPAs observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPAs measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 110 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguisher was also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a Medicine closet with the resident’s medications locked. LPAs observed first aid kit and manual. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, two (2) side gates with self-latching handles on both side of the house that leads into the backyard, attached two (2) car garage observed. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Food Service: Seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. LPA observed that the facility has the 72 hour emergency food and water. Care & Supervision: The facility has an Administrator present in the facility with enough hours to appropriately manage the facility. The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Also, LPAs observed that the facility has dementia residents. Record Review: LPAs reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPAs observed resident files reviewed were complete. LPAs reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, trainings, and health screenings. LPAs observed that staff #1,#2 (S1,S2) do not have health screening reports available for review. Deficiency issued. LPAs observed that staff #3 (S3) do not have the required CPR/First aid training. Deficiency issued. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, two (2) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC809, LIC909C, LIC809D forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to House Manager Stephanie Smith.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver, Stephanie Smith and was granted entry to the facility. LPA was accompanied by Stephanie to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: The facility has 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, entry room, laundry room, garage and backyard. LPA completed a walk through of facility, review of records and medication audit. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 119 degrees fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, charged fire extinguisher, and first aid kit. Posters such as; the personal rights, CCL complaint poster, ombudsman, and license were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, medications and other dangerous items were kept in secure cabinets inaccessible to residents. Residents/Staff files were observed locked and made inaccessible. There are no bodies of water, firearms or ammunition in the facility. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: LPA observed 2 days of perishables and 7 days non-perishables food, pantry stocked and up to date. Facility has a variety of food available. Dishes, cups, and utensils were stored properly. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, a side gate with entrance/exit to the facility on the left and right side. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. Medication was audited and matched with record. LPA reviewedemergency disaster plan and disaster drills. LPA observed that the facility did not have a copy of the report sent to the local fire jurisdiction about oxygen used in the facility. Technical violation issued. LPA observed that the bedrooms with oxygen did not have oxygen in use signs. Technical violation issued. No deficiencies and two technical violations were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C, and LIC9102TV were discussed and copies were provided to caregiver, Stephanie Smith.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024
Feb 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria arrived at the facility unannounced on 2/7/24 and was granted entry by caregiver, Stephanie Smith. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit to Smith. The purpose of today's visit was to follow-up on Plan of Correction (POC) previously due on 02/02/2024 for deficiencies cited on form LIC9099-D issued on 01/24/2024. Smith then phoned the administrator, Teresa Baddeley to notify her about the visit. The following deficiency was not corrected by the POC due date nor at the time of this visit. Civil penalties are being assessed and will continue to accrue until correction has been submitted: Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87465(b) and POC was for Licensee to hold a training with staff and submit proof to LPA via email by 02/02/24. Proof of training was not received. LPA spoke to the administrator over the phone and stated that she did not submit a POC since she was appealing the deficiency cited. Civil penalties assessed today at the rate of $100 per day per citation per violation per day until the violation is corrected. Exit interview conducted with and a copy of this report, LIC421FC, and appeal rights were provided to Stephanie Smith.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024
Feb 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria conducted an unannounced case management visit to the facility during a plan of correction (POC) visit. During the visit, LPA observed cameras in the residents bedrooms, dining room and living room. LPA also observed the main entrance being restricted to all residents in care by not allowing them to enter and exit the facility without an access code entered on the door knob. During today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809D, and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Stephanie Smith.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 8, 2024
87468.2(a) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities......personal rights: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by violating the personal rights for residents with the cameras installed in their bedrooms which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator stated that she will review regulation CCR 87468.2(a) and submit a statement of understanding to LPA via email by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87705(l) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 8, 2024
87705(l) Care of Persons with Dementia (l) The following initial and continuing requirements shall be met for the licensee to lock exterior doors or perimeter fence gates: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by restricting access to entering and exiting the main entrance door by requiring a code to be entered which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator stated that she will replace the door knob that has a code with one that doesn't have a code. Administrator stated that she will submit a statement of understanding to LPA via email by 2/8/24.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/22/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPA met with caregiver, Christina Bratton, and introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA was informed that there are 6 residents in care. The facility has 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, entry room, laundry room, garage and backyard. LPA completed a walk through of facility and review of records. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA observed video cameras inside the residents bedrooms. Deficiency issued. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. LPA observed a missing non-skid mat in one of the bathrooms. Deficiency issued. Water temperatures tested at 119.4 degrees fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors and charged fire extinguisher. LPA observed non-functioning carbon monoxide alarms. Deficiency issued. Posters such as; the personal rights, ombudsman, CCL complaint poster and disaster plans were posted in a common area. LPA observed the emergency disaster plan on an outdated form. Technical violation issued. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were not all kept in secure cabinets. Deficiency issued. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications and first aid kit were observed and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed a broken cabinet beneath the kitchen sink and broken counter top. Deficiency issued. LPA also observed the main entrance door with restricted exit access due to code needed in order enter/exit the facility. Deficiency issued. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient. Facility has a wide variety of food available. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, a side gate with entrance/exit to the facility on the left and right side. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Record Review: LPA reviewed administrator's and staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed incomplete personnel records. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that one staff was not associated to the facility and did not have transfer of criminal record clearance. Deficiency with civil penalty issued. LPA was prohibited to review resident records and was not given access. Deficiency issued. LPA observed through interview with administrator, Teresa Baddeley that the facility did not have an Infection Control Plan. Deficiency issued. Deficiencies, technical violation and civil penalty were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D, LIC9102TV, LIC421BG and appeal rights were discussed and copies were provided to caregiver, Heilala Poloa who took over the next shift since caregiver's Christina Bratton's shift had ended.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2023
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 2 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jan 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Chitgian made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA was greeted by Administrator Teresa Baddeley. At the time of the visit there was two (2) staff, and four (4) residents present. LPA discussed best practices for infection control and prevention and toured the facility inside and outside. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating residents and caring for residents with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases, suspected cases, ensuring Personal Protective Equipment(PPE) supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE. The entrance of the facility has a check in process for staff and visitors that includes a temperature and symptom check. The bathrooms were stocked with hand soap and paper towels. Postings are seen in the bathrooms for proper hand washing procedure, and proper postings posted throughout. LPA requested to inspect the facility's PPE supplies, which were in the garage. The facility has a full thirty (30) day supply of PPE items including gloves, gowns, disinfectant, surgical masks, N95 masks, and hand sanitizer available. All staff and residents are practicing all other COVID-19 precautions, which minimize the risk of them contracting COVID-19. LPA toured the facilities interior and exterior and there were no health and safety concerns. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Teresa Baddeley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Mar 1, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide resident with an appropriate sleeping arrangement.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rohit Lama made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Caregiver Yasmin Aguirre and spoke with Administrator Teresa Baddeley over the phone. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed facility files. The allegation states that the facility did not provide adequate sleeping arrangements for Resident #1 (R1). LPA was unable to interview R1 because he had passed away prior to LPA conducting this investigation. Interviews with the Staff #1 (S1) showed that an agreement was made to have R1 move in on 2/11/2022. S1 also stated that R1 was to reside in the bedroom that was currently being occupied by another resident, Resident #2 (R2). As of 2/11/2022, R2 had not moved out. Because of this, a bedroom was unavailable for R1 and thus had to sleep in the living room. ***CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C*** Substantiated ***CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099*** Based on LPA interviews conducted and a review of records, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division & Chapter number 87307 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed, and appeal rights were provided to Caregiver Yasmin Aguirre, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of the above-mentioned documents. ***CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099-A*** The second allegation alleges states that facility staff did not adequately supervise residents. LPA made observations, conducted interviews, and toured the facility. LPA interviewed Residents #3, #4, and #5. All three residents stated that they believe that the facility staff is well trainined and able to provide adequate supervision to the residents at the facility. LPA also interviewed Staff #2. S2 stated that he/she has never had issues providing supervision for the residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Caregiver Yasmin Aguirre, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of the above-mentioned documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220222130445
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(2)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 1, 2022
No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident. This includes any hall, stairway, unfinished attic, garage storage area, shed or similar detached building. Based on interviews and record review the licensee did not provide adequate sleeping arangements for residents, which poses a potential health and safety risk to resident(s) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee shall agree that prior to accepting new residents they will ensure that the residence's room is ready. Licensee shall also read regulation 87307 in its entirety. Licensee shall provide proof of correction by submitting email confirming review of the section mentioned above to LPA by 3/7/22.
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 23, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Chantilly Lace Manor II, LLC, licensed since 2016.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 18
- Total complaints
- 9
- Substantiated allegations
- 6
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 5
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 5 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 6 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 9 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Chantilly Lace Manor IV
Is Chantilly Lace Manor IV licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Chantilly Lace Manor IV licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Chantilly Lace Manor IV been cited?
1 Type A and 5 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.
Is Chantilly Lace Manor IV still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Chantilly Lace Manor IV cost?
$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Victorville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,700 to $4,225 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Chantilly Lace Manor IV take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Chantilly Lace Manor II, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Desert Valley Hospital is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Chantilly Lace Manor IV keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Chantilly Lace Manor IV license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CHANTILLY LACE MANOR IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #361800121. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Chantilly Lace Manor II, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 18 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 5 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
- 9 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$2,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$2,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County