Little Brook Care Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Carmichael, Sacramento County, California — state license #345003004, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated March 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

15 homes in view

Little Brook Care Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Carmichael, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #345003004, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8832 Fair Oaks Blvd · Carmichael, Sacramento County
Phone
(279) 289-6907
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 5 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 5 BEDRIDDEN ROOMS 6,5,4,3,2 ONLY. 1 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENT FOR BEDROOM 1. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 4 RESIDENTS.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 16, 2026
Occupancy at the October 2, 2024 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 22, 2024 to October 2, 2024. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 12 documents
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not provide resident’s medication as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 10/2/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, a medications count, and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. During a visit conducted on 6/19/24, LPA conducted a medication count for resident (R1) comparing the resident's medication lists on file with the medication centrally stored for the resident. LPA observed three (3) medications for R1 that were over the amount documented. Due to facility receiving a citation regarding the same violation in a separate inspection conducted on 9/25/24, no additional citations will be issued regarding allegation. Based on a medication count and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. No citations are being issued tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240614145902
Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility is not providing medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 9/25/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed documentation and conducted a medication count. Allegation: Facility is not providing medications as prescribed. During a visit conducted on 6/19/24, LPA conducted a medication count for resident (R1) comparing the resident's medication lists on file with the medication centrally stored for the resident. LPA observed three (3) medications for R1 that were over the amount documented. Based on a medication count and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240524095425
Sep 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure reporting requirements were followed Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed in a timely manner

On 8/1/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Persida Pop, Administrator to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. While R1 was a resident at the facility, R1 experienced seizures/ hospitalization on 12/14/23, a skin tear on 1/5/24 and a hospitalization for UTI on 1/15/24. These incidents were not reported to CCL as required. During the course of this investigation, several other violations are noted and will be reported on in a subsequent Facility Evaluation Report. Report continued Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240116101651
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not provide a proper eviction notice to resident or resident's authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 5/23/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C**************************************************** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240112110717
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility is not providing medications as prescribed -Facility staff interfered with resident's right to receive medical care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 5/23/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation, conducted a medication count for 3 residents, and conducted interviews. Allegation: Facility is not providing medications as prescribed. LPA conducted a medication count for residents (R1, R2 & R3), comparing the residents' medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA observed four (4) medications for R1 that were over the amount documented and there were two (2) medications for R1 that were under the amount documented. LPA observed four (4) medications for R2 that were over the amount documented. LPA observed five (5) medications for R3 that were over the amount documented and there was one (1) medication that was under the amount docuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240214141242
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff placed locks on the resident's door that violates the facility fire clearance -Staff did not ensure the facility had a working telephone

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home unannounced today, 2/22/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to open a complaint and deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegations. During today's visit, LPA tested the facility phone and observed all the doors in the facility. The facility has an operable phone line for residents' use. None of the facility doors prevent residents from exiting their bedrooms or the care home. Based on observation, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240220102745
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints7typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file22typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025110202491252023220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (279) 289-6907

Is Little Brook Care Home licensed?

Yes — Little Brook Care Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Carmichael (Sacramento County): California license #345003004, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Little Brook Care Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Little Brook Care Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 5 BEDRIDDEN ROOMS 6,5,4,3,2 ONLY. 1 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENT FOR BEDROOM 1. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 4 RESIDENTS.

How much does Little Brook Care Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Little Brook Care Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Little Brook Care Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Little Brook Care Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on October 2, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Little Brook Care Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2023 for Little Brook Care Home; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 2, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not provide resident’s medication as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 10/2/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, a medications count, and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. During a visit conducted on 6/19/24, LPA conducted a medication count for resident (R1) comparing the resident's medication lists on file with the medication centrally stored for the resident. LPA observed three (3) medications for R1 that were over the amount documented. Due to facility receiving a citation regarding the same violation in a separate inspection conducted on 9/25/24, no additional citations will be issued regarding allegation. Based on a medication count and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. No citations are being issued toCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240614145902
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility is not providing medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 9/25/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed documentation and conducted a medication count. Allegation: Facility is not providing medications as prescribed. During a visit conducted on 6/19/24, LPA conducted a medication count for resident (R1) comparing the resident's medication lists on file with the medication centrally stored for the resident. LPA observed three (3) medications for R1 that were over the amount documented. Based on a medication count and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240524095425
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure reporting requirements were followed Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8/1/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Persida Pop, Administrator to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. While R1 was a resident at the facility, R1 experienced seizures/ hospitalization on 12/14/23, a skin tear on 1/5/24 and a hospitalization for UTI on 1/15/24. These incidents were not reported to CCL as required. During the course of this investigation, several other violations are noted and will be reported on in a subsequent Facility Evaluation Report. Report continued SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240116101651
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not provide a proper eviction notice to resident or resident's authorized representative
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 5/23/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C**************************************************** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240112110717
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility is not providing medications as prescribed -Facility staff interfered with resident's right to receive medical care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 5/23/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation, conducted a medication count for 3 residents, and conducted interviews. Allegation: Facility is not providing medications as prescribed. LPA conducted a medication count for residents (R1, R2 & R3), comparing the residents' medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA observed four (4) medications for R1 that were over the amount documented and there were two (2) medications for R1 that were under the amount documented. LPA observed four (4) medications for R2 that were over the amount documented. LPA observed five (5) medications for R3 that were over the amount documented and there was one (1) medication that was under the amount docuCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240214141242
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff placed locks on the resident's door that violates the facility fire clearance -Staff did not ensure the facility had a working telephone
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home unannounced today, 2/22/24, and met with the Administrator, Persida Pop, to open a complaint and deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegations. During today's visit, LPA tested the facility phone and observed all the doors in the facility. The facility has an operable phone line for residents' use. None of the facility doors prevent residents from exiting their bedrooms or the care home. Based on observation, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240220102745

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(279) 289-6907
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Little Brook Care Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.