Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Blueberry Hill Senior LivingLicense #342700821 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareBlueberry Hill Senior LivingLicense #342700821 · 3827 Olive Lane, Carmichael, CA · (916) 801-8589Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sacramento County/Carmichael/Blueberry Hill Senior Living
Map · 3827 Olive Lane

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,250/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,250 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 801-8589

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • blueberryhillseniorliving.com↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

BH

Call Blueberry Hill Senior Living

Carmichael · Licensed for 6

(916) 801-8589

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, blueberryhillseniorliving.com:

keith.hamric@blueberryhillsl.com · administrator’s or owner’s email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Carmichael

Blueberry Hill Senior Living

3827 Olive Lane, Carmichael, CA 95608 · Licensed since 2020

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Blueberry Hill Senior Living

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,250 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,250 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 5 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 4 residents

Not on file: bedridden approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 1 AMBULATORY AND 5 NON-AMBULATORY. RESIDENTS LOCATED ONLY IN MAIN BEDROOM AREAS WITH 1 3/8"SOLID CORE, FRONT BEDROOM BY MAIN ENTRY FOR AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • Podiatrist visits

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • Activities of daily living the home lists help withBathing · Grooming · Dressing · Daily Activities

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

As needs change

  • Someone awake overnight

    Awake staff overnight — reported yes

    blueberryhillseniorliving.com · October 20, 2020

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Blueberry Hill Senior Living: two-person transfers or a lift and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,250a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,250

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,250likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,450–$5,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,450
$4,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
$6,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,300 to $6,000

$3,300$6,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$5,000.

  • Madison Square Senior Living IICarmichael · 0.9 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Splendor Oaks Senior Living 1Carmichael · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Cozy Home CareCarmichael · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hollister Care HomeCarmichael · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Abundant Love and Care for the ElderlyCarmichael · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marylou's Home CareSacramento · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Norris Senior HomeSacramento · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Meraki of SacramentoSacramento · 2.4 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Magnolia Elderly Care HomeFair Oaks · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Eastern ManorSacramento · 2.6 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Kentfield Estates Ranch RCFESacramento · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (4)Private rooms · Staff help residents use devices · Shared / companion rooms
  • Private rooms

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Staff help residents use devices

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-private

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (2)Snacks available · Special diets supported
  • Snacks available

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • Special diets supportedDiet Restricted Meals

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (7)Activity types offered · Activity calendar published · One-to-one engagement offered
  • Activity types offeredZoom · Card program · Recipes from home · Holiday parties · Movie night · Cooking classes · and 15 more

    Zoom · Card program · Recipes from home · Holiday parties · Movie night · Cooking classes · Crafts · Events within our community · Exercise — reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 22, 2020.

    Celebrations — reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

    Puzzles · Board Games · Card Program To Connect Residents With Family & Friends · Outings · Day Trips · News & Current Events · Music · Entertainment · Cooking Class · Special Events · Special Events & Celebrations — reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Activity calendar published

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 22, 2020.

  • One-to-one engagement offered

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 22, 2020.

  • Activities tailored to the individual

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Exercise or fitness programExercise · Physical Activity

    Exercise — reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 22, 2020.

    Physical Activity — reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 20, 2020.

  • Activities coordinator on staff

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

Visiting & staying involved (4)Staff help with video calls · Contact form · URL of the photo gallery page
  • Staff help with video calls

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 10, 2020.

  • Contact form

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · seen October 5, 2026.

    Open on the website ↗
  • URL of the photo gallery page

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated September 21, 2020.

    Open on the website ↗
  • Events the home invites families to

    Reported on blueberryhillseniorliving.com · source dated October 22, 2020.

Where it is

3827 Olive Lane, Carmichael, CA 95608Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Mercy San Juan Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.5 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #342700821 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 5 of 10 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unfounded”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived unannounced and met with Licensee Keith Hamric to conduct an annual inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed resident rooms, common area bathrooms, kitchen, common areas and perimeter of care home. LPA observed rooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition, properly maintained, and the hot water temperature was observed to be 108.8 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two day perishable and (7) seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are operational in the care home. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files, staff files and resident medications. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA obtained a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time. Staff did not properly clean a resident in care. Staff does not ensure that a resident in care is fed. Staff did not prevent a resident from developing a pressure injury while in care. Facility is allowing unqualified staff to fill a syringe with medication. Staff are smoking inside of the facility.

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Carestaff Latonia Swain to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation.LPA spoke with Administrator Keith Hamric via phone to discuss findings During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfounded Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time. Interviews with residents indicated they feel their incontinence needs are being met by care staff. Interviews with staff indicated that two residents are continent and able to use the restroom with minimal assistance. One resident is incontinent but vocal regarding need to be changed. Interview with Resident R1 indicated that they have no issues with getting assistance with changing after using the restroom. Therefore the allegation staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time is unfounded. Staff did not properly clean a resident in care. Records reviewed indicated that residents in care were receiving proper care and cleaning which was logged on a daily basis. Records indicated that residents were receiving three or four showers per week unless it was declined by resident. Observations indicated that residents were clean and did not present any odors. Interviews with residents indicated that they feel their hygiene needs are being met by staff. Therefore the allegation staff did not properly clean a resident in care is unfounded. Staff does not ensure that a resident in care is fed. Interviews conducted with Resident R1, R2 and R3 indicated that they are content with the meals being provided at the facility. Interviews with staff indicated that they will assist residents as needed with meals and offer additional options if the food made at that time was not desired or liked. Observations indicated that there is a variety of food at the facility for resident consumption. Therefore the allegation staff does not ensure that a resident in care is fed is unfounded. Staff did not prevent a resident from developing a pressure injury while in care. Interviews with Resident R1 indicated that they stay in bed most of the day but are able to turn themselves and reposition as needed. Interviews with staff and administrator indicated that R1 uses a hoyer lift for transfers out of bed and is able to reposition themselves as needed. Staff assist with changing R1 and have not seen any signs of skin breakdown. Therefore the allegation staff did not prevent a resident from developing a pressure injury while in care is unfounded. ***Report continued on 9099-C2 page Facility is allowing unqualified staff to fill a syringe with medication. Records reviewed indicated that syringes were being filled by outside agency for resident who was on hospice care. Facility documentation indicates when syringes were being filled and given to resident. Interviews conducted with staff and administrator indicated that hospice agency filled all medications for resident. No staff at the facility were in charge of drawing up medications for residents. Therefore the allegation facility is allowing unqualified staff to fill a syringe with medications is unfounded. Staff are smoking inside of the facility. Interviews with staff, administrator and residents all indicated that no individuals smoke within the facility. Observations indicated that there was an ash tray on the back patio of the facility which contained cigarettes. Observations also indicated that there was no odor of smoke within the facility and no physical indications of smoking were seen within the facility. Therefore the allegation staff are smoking inside of the facility is unfounded. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report was given to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250717100855
Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived unannounced and met with Administrator Keith Hamric to conduct an annual inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed four (4) resident rooms and two (2) common area bathrooms. LPA observed rooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition, properly maintained, and the hot water temperature was observed to be 109.7 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two day perishable and (7) seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are operational in the care home. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files, three (3) staff files and resident medications. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025

20241 state visit · 2 documents

May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 5/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a required annual inspection utilizing the full CARE tool. LPA met with Caregiver who then contacted Administrator who then arrived to the facility shortly. LPA observed the presence of five residents in care, two residents were in their private rooms and three residents in the common area, watching television. During today's inspection, LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to: four residents room, bathroom, garage, kitchen, and the common areas. LPA observed the sharps to be locked and secured in the kitchen. LPA observed the facility to have 2+ days of perishables and 7+ days of nonperishable foods. LPA observed facility to have ample supply of linens for residents in care. LPA observed facility to be clean, sanitary and in good repair. LPA and Administrator discussed the definition of non-ambulatory as Title 22 defines non-ambulatory as a "persons who are unable, or likely to be unable, to respond physically or mentally to an oral instruction relating to fire danger". LPA discussed with Administrator that Bedroom 1 may be non-ambulatory if a direct exit door is installed. File review conducted five residents and four personnel files. LPA completed the care tool and found facility to be in compliance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024
May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver who then contacted Administrator who then arrived to the facility shortly. LPA is conducting an annual inspection today but this report is being generated to clear the Post-Licensing inspection in the system. There are no citations issued on this report. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

May 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit to complete the annual inspection conducted on 5/17/2023. LPA met with Licensee, Megan Hamric, and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA observed caregiver serving lunch to residents in care. LPA and Licensee continued and completed the full CARE tool kit during today's visit. Facility was found to be in compliance. No deficiency was cited as a result of today's inspection. Additionally, LPA requested a copy of Administrator Certificate, liability insurance, LIC 500 and LIC 308 to be emailed to LPA Yang by Wednesday June 7, 2023. Licensee provided a copy of Administrator Certificate and certificate of liability insurance. Licensee will email LIC 500 and LIC 308. Exit interview conducted with licensee and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2023
May 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 5/17/2023 at 1:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang and Associate Governmental Program Analyst (AGPA) Matt Sparling arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required-1 year inspection. LPA and AGPA met with caregiver, Stephanie Martinson, who contacted Licensee/Administrator, Keith Hamric, who arrived to the facility at approximately 2:05 PM. LPA and AGPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and AGPA wore the following Personal Protective Equipment; surgical mask. Facility is licensed for capacity of six (6) with hospice waiver of 4. Facility's census is six (6) with two (2) on hospice services. LPA will provided Licensee an updated license. During today's visit, LPA and AGPA toured the interior of the facility with Licensee. In areas toured included but not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, garage and laundry/medication room. At 2:15 PM, LPA, AGPA and Licensee entered the locked garage and found cleaning solutions on the floor. Additionally at 2:25 PM, LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be last serviced 9/9/2021. LPA was informed it may have been a mistake as the extinguisher has been serviced recently. LPA and AGPA conducted a personnel and resident file review and deficiencies were observed. Please see attached LIC 809-D. LPA, AGPA and Licensee was unable to complete the CARE tool during today's inspection, annual continuation is to follow. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided to Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2023

20222 state visits · 2 documents

May 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Christina Pena, caregiver, who contacted Administrator by phone. LPA spoke to Administrator, Keith Hamric and Activities Director, Megan Hamric, who were not able to be at the facility right away. LPA explained that annual inspection today is focused on Covid-precautionary measures in place. Administrator authorized caregiver to provide information, as needed, to LPA and sign today's report. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and confirmed the facility does not currently have any positive Covid-19 diagnoses. LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the facility. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: KN95 mask. LPA observed (4) residents in the common area watching television, and (2) residents to be resting in their rooms. There is currently (1) resident on hospice services. LPA and caregiver toured the interior and exterior of the facility, including (4) private resident bedrooms, (1) shared resident bedroom, (2) bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, laundry/medication room, and garage/storage area. LPA observed all areas toured to be clean, safe and in good repair and to not pose a health and safety risk or personal rights violation. Inside temperature was observed to be 74* F. Fire extinguisher last serviced 9/10//2021. LPA observed locked toxins, medications and sharps and sufficient 2+day perishable/7+day non-perishable food. First aid kit on site.. Exit doors have alarms on them. LPA observed paper towels, soap, sanitizer, and hand-washing posters in the bathrooms. LPA observed sufficient PPE supply and incontinent products. There is (1) outside gate that is unlocked from the inside. LPA observed various Covid posters throughout as well as other required postings. LPA observed Provider Information Notices (PIN) issued by the Department and the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E) to be available for staff review in the medication room. report continued on 809C... Discussed vaccination status of residents and staff with Administrator and observed facility to be maintaining records of visitor and staff vaccination status. Discussed scheduling a first or second booster shot with families of residents that have not received it yet. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC308, LIC 500, current liability insurance and Administrator RCFE certificate be provided to the Department by 5/20/22. There were no deficiencies observed during today's inspection. Exit interview with caregiver. Copy of report left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2022
Mar 4, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not following doctors orders Staff force residents to wake up at unreasonable time in the morning Licensee does not did not treat residents with dignity and respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to deliver findings to a complaint the department received on 12/17/2021. LPA's met with Christina Pena, caregiver, who contacted the Administrator, Keith Hamric, and staff, Megan Hamric, by phone. Caregiver confirmed there are (6) residents present and there are currently no residents receiving hospice services. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: KN95 mask. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator, (4) staff, (6) residents and (2) family members and reviewed documentation including, but not limited to, various documents from resident's (R1) file, and multiple pages of staff shift notes provided for random days from 7/19/2021 to 10/24/2021. The results of the investigation are as follows: cont on 9099C(1).. Unfounded 9099C(1).. Allegation: Licensee is not following doctors orders. Allegation states that on/around September/October 2021, the Administrator refused to allow resident (R1) to have her prescribed Ativan medication for pain because the Administrator would have to dispense the medication to her. Allegation further states that resident was believed to be in pain due due to picking the open wounds on her chest and arms, and the wounds are not healing because resident picks at them. Physician's orders dated 7/31/2021 note that R1 was to be discharged from hospice services and to discontinue multiple medications, including Ativan. A subsequent order was issued on 8/27/2021 to discontinue all hospice medications given at bed-time and to start Trazadone 100 mg at bedtime for insomnia. E-mail dated 8/2/2021 from R1's health care provider to the Administrator states that R1 is "being discharged from hospice services as her prognosis has extended" and discusses how home health will be able to assess and manage the "non-healing lesions" while R1 resides at the facility. Home Health Nurse charting notes, dated 9/23/2021 to 12/6/2021, document that wound care was being provided, R1 tolerated it well and there were no signs of infection. Notes dated 11/17/2021, indicate that the wound was "improving-doing well" and skin assessment was performed with no breakdown shown. Notes entered on 11/22/2021 document that R1 stated ""ouch" during wound care but shows no signs of being in pain". Staff (S1) stated in an interview that Ativan is a medication for agitation and not for pain. Staff (S2) stated that her understanding is that Ativan is a comfort medication that hospice care provides even if it is not needed and that if R1 shows discomfort from the wound, staff would give PRN medications. R1 was not able to be interviewed due to a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and being non-verbal, as noted on the Resident Appraisal, dated 12/6/2020. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. cont on 9099C(2)... 90909C(2)..Allegation: Staff force residents to wake up at unreasonable time in the morning. Allegation states that since around June 2021, staff have been required to wake the residents up between 5:00 am- 6:00 am so that residents are prepared for the next shift. Staff (S5) informed LPA's Calzada and Yang that some residents are up already by the time she starts on the morning shift at 7:30 and explained that upon starting her shift, she takes vitals and temperature and then prepares breakfast for residents. S5 indicated that if residents choose to stay in bed, she will let them and reheat breakfast when residents wake up. Staff (S2) stated to to LPA's that staff does not force residents to get up in the morning at a certain time but rather staff knows each resident's routine. S2 explained that there is not a set schedule for residents to wake up at a certain time, and residents can get up when they prefer and know breakfast is served at 8:30 am and coffee is available before breakfast too. Staff (S1) explained that staff start with resident (R1) first, around 5:00 am, as it takes about 30 minutes to get R1 ready, including repositioning, and then she continues with the next resident, R2, who is also an early riser. Shift notes consistently show that R1 is the first resident staff help get ready in the morning and by 7:30 am, (5) of (6) residents are generally ready for the day at 7:30 am. S2 stated that resident (R3) is not a morning person and likes to wake up right before breakfast. Shift notes reflect that R3 is generally the last resident to wake up in the morning. R3 stated to LPA's that she wakes up around 8-8:30 am. Interview with (1) resident revealed that staff will enter her room around 6:00-7:00 am to wake her up, and if she wants to sleep in longer, she will notify staff and they will listen and leave her alone. Another resident stated she does not want to miss breakfast time because she loves coffee. Another resident stated she wakes up at 6:30 am and would like to sleep a little longer. A third resident stated she wakes up around 6:30 am and would prefer to sleep a little longer; however, stated that staff would let her continue sleeping until 7:00-7:30 am if she would like, and staff will get clothes ready for her. Staff (S3) informed LPA's that they do have a schedule, "but it is not a military schedule." and explained residents are allowed to decline and stay in bed if desired. Administrator explained that residents wake up around 7:00 am to get ready for breakfast, explaining the residents love coffee and want to wake up to socialize and drink coffee. cont on 9099C(3).. 9099C(3).Family member interviewed stated..residents do wake up early around 6:30- 7:00 am, but explained that staff needs to do vitals and give medications to residents in the morning. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit Interview conducted. Allegation: Licensee does not did not treat residents with dignity and respect. LPA's interviewed (5) residents. One resident stated that facility staff listens to her concerns. A second resident stated that staff are responsive to residents' needs and she can communicate well with them. A third resident indicating staff treats her independently and are kind and respectful, stating "there's good staff here". LPA's interviewed (2) resident family members. One family member indicated that staff are very accommodating and provide lots of privacy for her sister, who does not have any issues with the facility. A second family member stated the facility treats the residents well, includes daily activities and denied having any issues with staff and/or the facility. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit Interview conducted. There are no deficiencies cited on this report. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Keith Hamric and staff, Megan Hamric, by phone. Administrator authorized caregiver on site, to sign today's reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2022 · control 25-AS-20211217151503

20211 state visit · 1 document

Oct 6, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility not allowing resident to have visitors Facility staff verbally abusive towards resident Facility is not following resident's care plan

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings to a complaint the department received on 6/23/2021. LPA discussed complaint findings with Administrator, Keith Hamric, by phone, who was not able to be at the facility at the time of the inspection. Caregiver confirmed there are (6) residents present and there are currently no residents receiving hospice services. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator, (1) staff, (3) residents, Ombudsman, resident's (R1) representative and family member. LPA reviewed documentation pertaining to resident, including, but not limited to, physician's report, appraisal, care plan and a letter from another resident's representative. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Facility not allowing resident to have visitors: Interview with (2) residents revealed they have had family visitors on a regular basis and there have been no situations where visitation has been denied, with one resident stating her family will inform the facility in advance prior to visiting. Resident (R1) stated the facility does allow her to have visitation with her family cont on 9099-C.(1) ... Unfounded 9099-C (1) since she and her family have been vaccinated and that another family member was also allowed to visit with her inside the facility. Resident’s (R1) representative stated that resident is not able to leave the facility unattended due to having a diagnosis of early stages of Dementia and been hospitalized in the past due to certain behaviors. Resident’s representative confirmed there are not any restraining orders in place currently. Resident’s (R1) physician’s report, dated 10/15/2020, states that she has a diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment and is confused at times. Skilled Nursing facility notes, dated 10/29/2020, states resident (R1) has Dementia and will be going to assisted living. Care plans, dated 3/24/2021, indicate that resident has a diagnosis of Dementia and is at risk for wandering. Staff (S1) interviewed stated she is not aware of any issues with visitation. Administrator stated that he “appreciates advance notice” and schedules visiting in advance, staying within the facility’s visiting hours, due to Covid -19 precautionary measures. Administrator stated that he had spoken by phone with resident’s (R1) family member regarding visitation on/around 6/14/2021, and requested she provide him with advance notice in scheduling visitation to minimize the cross traffic at any given time at the facility, per Covid-19 precautionary measures. Administrator stated he did not tell resident's (R1) family member by phone she couldn't visit and did not refer her to resident's POA for approval prior to visiting. Additionally, Administrator stated there was never a discussion with resident's family member about taking resident (R1) off site for visitation. Administrator stated that when resident’s family member arrived at the facility on 6/19/2021, resident (R1) ran to the front door, without her walker and darted outside and almost fell. Administrator stated that resident’s family member was allowed to visit inside the facility with resident (R1) on 6/19/2021, as resident has dementia, is a fall-risk and often needs reminders to use her walker to ensure her safety. Resident’s (R1) family member stated resident heard her voice when she came to the door and the Administrator allowed them to have a visit inside. Resident’s family member stated that the Administrator told her he was “okay” with her visiting when they spoke on the phone, and she has been fully vaccinated so could not have been denied inside visitation. Letter provided from a resident’s representative states that the Administrator is “diligent about following all of the required licensing rules and Covid-related rules” and keeps families aware of visiting protocols to ensure the safety of the residents first. cont on 9099-C(2)... 9099-C(2)....PIN 21-17.2 issued 5/14/2021 states, in part, that “Licensees should allow indoor visitation, including in-room visitation, at all times and for all residents…” when Covid-19 precautionary measures are followed, and that “At all times when visitation is restricted under this waiver, licensees must allow for scheduled outdoor visits…” when Covid-19 precautionary measures are followed. Administrator stated he had reiterated to resident’s family member twice to call ahead of time for visitation on/around 6/14/2021 when they spoke by phone. LPA observed visiting hours to be posted by the visitor sign-in log at the facility entrance. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Allegation: Facility staff verbally abusive towards resident. Interview with (2) residents indicated that all staff is very caring, listens well to resident’s concerns, is always kind and professional and does not yell, but sometimes may have to raise their voice slightly, or speak sternly, to get a resident’s attention. Resident (R1) stated that she enjoys living at the facility and staff does not yell at anyone. Resident’s (R1) representative stated that he has not observed any staff to be verbally abusive to resident (R1) when he visited. Staff (S1) interviewed stated she has never yelled at a resident or observed other staff to do so. Administrator stated he has never been verbally abusive or asked any inappropriate questions to any residents or staff. Letter from another resident’s family member states that the Administrator does not raise his voice at residents, even if a resident can be challenging and doesn’t want to initially follow safety protocols. The letter continues to state that Administrator will calmly, but firmly, speak to residents about following safety guidelines. Ombudsman stated he spoke with resident’s (R1) representative who indicated that resident(R1) has never told him that facility staff have been rude or disrespectful or said anything inappropriate to resident (R1) at any time. Additionally, Ombudsman indicated that resident (R1) told him that she enjoys living at the facility and all staff have been respectful to her. cont on 9099-C (3)... 9099-C(3)...Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Allegation: Facility is not following resident's care plan One resident interviewed stated that she receives help with medications and shower reminders. Another resident interviewed stated that staff is “very helpful and meet my needs” and staff does not yell but possibly talks loudly and she is receiving the assistance she needs with showering, toileting and medications. Resident (R1) stated she receives assistance with her hair, making her bed, showers and medications. Care plan notes that resident (R1) does not need help with food or nourishment but receives assistance with bathing and needs a walker to get around safely due to her fall history and wandering tendencies. Resident’s (R1) updated care plan, dated 3/24/2021, from resident’s home health care, indicates that resident has Dementia or cognitive impairment and is at risk for wandering and uses a walker. Staff (S1) interviewed stated she reviews each resident’s care plan to know if a resident has mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment and for medication information. Staff confirmed that the facility has an awake night staff. When asked if the facility is following resident’s (R1) care plan, Administrator stated that resident is a fall risk, requires a chaperone to the bathroom, assistance with showering, is independent with dressing and is "stand by" with brushing her teeth. Letter provided from another resident’s representative states that the facility has provided “excellent care” to all residents and has closely monitored and cared for her family member whose health quickly improved after moving to the facility. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit Interview conducted. There are no deficiencies cited from this report and allegations are being dismissed. Exit interviewed conducted with caregiver, Victoria, who is authorized by Administrator to sign today's reports. Copy of report left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210623104810

3 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 28, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Blueberry Hill Senior Living, Inc., licensed since 2020.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
9
Total complaints
2
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints20

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Blueberry Hill Senior Living

Is Blueberry Hill Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Blueberry Hill Senior Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Blueberry Hill Senior Living been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Blueberry Hill Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Blueberry Hill Senior Living cost?

$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Carmichael that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,450 to $4,625 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Blueberry Hill Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Blueberry Hill Senior Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Blueberry Hill Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Blueberry Hill Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BLUEBERRY HILL SENIOR LIVING, INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342700821. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Blueberry Hill Senior Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.7 mi

    The Oaks at Garfield

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.3 mi

    Villa Capri Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.3 mi

    Blue Oasis Senior Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.5 mi

    New Life

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.5 mi

    Blessed Homecare 3

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.7 mi

    Esther Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sacramento County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
BH

Call Blueberry Hill Senior Living

Carmichael · Licensed for 6

(916) 801-8589

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, blueberryhillseniorliving.com:

keith.hamric@blueberryhillsl.com · administrator’s or owner’s email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Blueberry Hill Senior Living

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages