Sacramento Guest Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #340308207, licensed for 13 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated September 19, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Sacramento Guest Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 13 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #340308207, held since 1985 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2715 G St. · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 447-1502
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 2 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
ELEVEN AMBULATORY, TWO NONAMBULATORY, AGES 60 & OVER.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on September 19, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
September 19, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
11 of 13 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 8, 2024 to September 19, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Staff did not prevent a resident from wandering from the facility. 2) Staff did not meet the residents hygiene needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Sacramento Guest Home RCFE on 9/19/25 at 1:40pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegations mentioned above and deliver findings. LPA met with Licensee Gladys Mangabat and together discussed allegations. LPA Gould reviewed resident file and records and conducted an interview with S1 and RP. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA reviewed resident file and observed an updated physician's report that indicates R1 is able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA conducted an interview With R1's Social worker who confirmed R1 has an adequate amount of clothing and is always well groomed and clean when conducting visits with R1. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250917125404
Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not taking sufficient measures to address bed bug infestation

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with licensee Gladys Mangabat and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPAs Moleski and Williams interviewed Mangabat, a resident (R1), a resident's responsible party (R1's RP), and a pest control contractor. Mangabat had been aware of a bed bug infestation since around mid-June. Mangabat said she had contracted with a pest control company to have monthly chemical sprayings done. Mangabat also said she had implemented several additional pest control measures, including encasing residents' mattresses, performing hot-water laundry services, localized heat treatments with a heat gun, and enhanced environmental cleaning with alcohol-based solution. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240709164336
Jul 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was served unlawful eviction notice Facility is in disrepair Facility is unclean Waste was stored in an unsafe manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Gladys Mangabat and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed this facility's house rules and an eviction notice for R1. The eviction notice stated that R1 was being evicted effective as of 4/4/24 due to marijuana use and inappropriate behaviors, including arguing with roommates. The notice did not contain a sufficient amount of detail, such as time and dates, nor did it contain the required information about unlawful detainers, nor did it contain information about residents' rights to file a complaint, nor did it contain contact information for CCLD, and therefore was not lawful. LPA Moleski toured this facility. LPA Moleski and Mangabat observed in the ktichen a dish on the floor containing chicken scraps. Mangabat said it was for her dog. LPA Moleski and Mangabat observed an uncovered container on the counter containingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240405101732
Apr 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints3typical 1
State visits on file11typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1985.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252302024351202311020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 447-1502

Is Sacramento Guest Home licensed?

Yes — Sacramento Guest Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #340308207, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 13 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated September 19, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Sacramento Guest Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sacramento Guest Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordELEVEN AMBULATORY, TWO NONAMBULATORY, AGES 60 & OVER.

How much does Sacramento Guest Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sacramento Guest Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sacramento Guest Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sacramento Guest Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

11 of 13 beds occupied (85%) when the state visited on September 19, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sacramento Guest Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Sacramento Guest Home; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 19, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Staff did not prevent a resident from wandering from the facility. 2) Staff did not meet the residents hygiene needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Sacramento Guest Home RCFE on 9/19/25 at 1:40pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegations mentioned above and deliver findings. LPA met with Licensee Gladys Mangabat and together discussed allegations. LPA Gould reviewed resident file and records and conducted an interview with S1 and RP. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA reviewed resident file and observed an updated physician's report that indicates R1 is able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA conducted an interview With R1's Social worker who confirmed R1 has an adequate amount of clothing and is always well groomed and clean when conducting visits with R1. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250917125404

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not taking sufficient measures to address bed bug infestation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with licensee Gladys Mangabat and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPAs Moleski and Williams interviewed Mangabat, a resident (R1), a resident's responsible party (R1's RP), and a pest control contractor. Mangabat had been aware of a bed bug infestation since around mid-June. Mangabat said she had contracted with a pest control company to have monthly chemical sprayings done. Mangabat also said she had implemented several additional pest control measures, including encasing residents' mattresses, performing hot-water laundry services, localized heat treatments with a heat gun, and enhanced environmental cleaning with alcohol-based solution. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240709164336
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was served unlawful eviction notice Facility is in disrepair Facility is unclean Waste was stored in an unsafe manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Gladys Mangabat and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed this facility's house rules and an eviction notice for R1. The eviction notice stated that R1 was being evicted effective as of 4/4/24 due to marijuana use and inappropriate behaviors, including arguing with roommates. The notice did not contain a sufficient amount of detail, such as time and dates, nor did it contain the required information about unlawful detainers, nor did it contain information about residents' rights to file a complaint, nor did it contain contact information for CCLD, and therefore was not lawful. LPA Moleski toured this facility. LPA Moleski and Mangabat observed in the ktichen a dish on the floor containing chicken scraps. Mangabat said it was for her dog. LPA Moleski and Mangabat observed an uncovered container on the counter containingCDSS inspection report, April 8, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240405101732

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 447-1502
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sacramento Guest Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.