Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Eskaton Lodge Granite BayLicense #317005628 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareEskaton Lodge Granite BayLicense #317005628 · 8550 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA · (916) 789-0326Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Placer County/Granite Bay/Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay
Map · 8550 Barton Rd

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Starting rate$3,190/mo

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 789-0326

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

EL

Call Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay

Granite Bay · Licensed for 118

(916) 789-0326

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 118 · Granite Bay

Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay

8550 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA 95746 · Licensed since 2015

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay

Overview

Starting rate

$3,190 a month

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Languages spoken: English and SpanishReported on Seniorly · August 24, 2026
  • Licensed for 118: a large care communityThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 118 residents
  • Hospiceup to 10 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 10 residents

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. LICENSED FOR 118 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Independent living

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Caring.com · September 9, 2026

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,190a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,190likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,190this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,190–$3,790
$3,190
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,190–$7,350
$5,690
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $5,300

$2,500$5,300

This homeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,300.

  • Sunrise of RocklinRocklin · 2.8 mi · Large community
    $3,900Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 27, 2026
  • Vista Roseville Senior LivingRoseville · 3.1 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Summerfield of RosevilleRoseville · 3.2 mi · Large community
    $5,300Listed on its own website · studio memory care apartments, starting at · seen October 5, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Oakmont of RosevilleRoseville · 3.4 mi · Large community
    $5,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Carlton Senior Living OrangevaleOrangevale · 3.7 mi · Large community
    $4,395Listed on its own website · apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Meadow Oaks of RosevilleRoseville · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $3,215Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Terraces of RosevilleRoseville · 4.4 mi · Large community
    $3,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blossom Vale Senior LivingOrangevale · 5.0 mi · Large community
    $4,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (16)Shared / companion rooms · Outdoor space · Private bathroom
  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths · Outdoor Common Areas

    Outdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Outdoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Common areasDining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · and 4 more

    Dining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Fitness room — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Indoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Room typesTwo Bedroom · One Bedroom · Studio

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • AmenitiesConcierge · Move-in coordination · Beautician

    Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Beautician — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Kitchenette in the unit

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (8)Dining style · Vegetarian or vegan options · All-day or flexible dining
  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Kosher foodKosher style

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (5)Activity types offered · Trips outside the home · Resident-run activities
  • Activity types offeredMusic programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Activities On-site

    Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Activities On-site — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence (3)Residents may bring a pet · Pet types allowed · Pet weight limit
  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Pet weight limit

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (4)Support services for families · Transport for group outings · Public transit access claimed
  • Support services for families

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Where it is

8550 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA 95746Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - RosevilleHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.3 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #317005628 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 10 of 19 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”, 1 “Unsubstantiated” and 4 “Unfounded”.

20264 state visits · 5 documents

May 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff do not ensure the kitchen is safe and in good repair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director, Meggin Cortez, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C***************************************************** Substantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure the kitchen is safe and in good repair On March 12, 2026, LPA toured the kitchen area with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO). LPA observed several maintenance concerns during the tour. The steam table had water dripping and was not working properly. Kitchen staff were not able to use the steam table. The refrigerator that stores dairy had a small puddle near the bottom. The garbage disposal was not working and there was a garbage bag underneath the sink to put food scraps. Lastly, the left side/hot water on the back sink did not work. Staff (S2, S4, and S5) indicated that the steam table has not been in good repair and working properly for an extended period. S4 and S5 indicated that the garbage disposal has not been working properly. Staff (S3) and S5 indicated that there was a puddle that formed near the refrigerator each day. S5 indicated that the hot water did not work on the left side of the back faucet in the kitchen. After LPA’s visit to the care home on March 12, 2026, the facility made repairs to the garbage disposal, steam table, hot water in the back double sink, and dishwasher gauge. The facility found that the puddle that would form near the refrigerator was from the condensation pan not being dumped out when needed, so no repair was required. The facility provided LPA with all repair documentation/invoices. During the May 29, 2026 visit, LPA toured the kitchen area and observed that all maintenance concerns had been addressed. Based on observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights provided. Allegation: Staff do not ensure fire drills are being conducted as required LPA obtained the fire drill logs from the facility indicating that the facility is conducting monthly fire drills with staff and rotating shifts each month. Facility also provided LPA with documentation that the facility held an in-service training on April 14, 2026 for emergency disaster preparedness. According to fire alarm company invoice, a service was provided on April 8, 2026 to ensure all alarms are functioning properly. Staff interviews indicated that they have participated in fire drills. Allegation: Staff do not ensure food is kept at the required temperature On March 12, 2026, LPA toured the kitchen area with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO). LPA observed that the freezer was within regulatory range at -17 degrees F and the refrigerator was within range at 39 degrees F. Interviews with staff indicated that they have never observed food being kept out of the required temperature range. Allegation: Staff do not ensure kitchen equipment is clean and sanitary During the tour of the kitchen on March 12, 2026, LPA observed the kitchen equipment was clean and sanitary. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) indicated that they have never observed the kitchen not being cleaned and sanitized, including equipment. Staff indicated that ensuring cleanliness in the kitchen is a part of their job while working in the kitchen and that cleaning/sanitizing is done regularly. Staff also indicated that dishes are sanitized and that the dishwasher water runs hot at the correct temperature to clean the dishes. LPA observed that the water to sanitize the dishes was within the regulatory range at 172 degrees F. Allegation: Facility is not ensuring volunteers are criminal record cleared Interview with the former Executive Director (ED), Kay Devault, indicated that they never had anyone working at the care home, including family, that were not criminal record cleared. Interviews with multiple staff indicated that they have never witnessed the former ED’s spouse working at the care home as a volunteer. Based on observations, interviews conducted, and documentation obtained although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260304094625

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 12, 2026

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews conducted, the facility did not ensure the kitchen was in good repair, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility has completed all repairs needed in the kitchen area. LPA verified documentation and observed the kitchen after repairs. POC has been completed.

May 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director (ED), Meggin Cortez, to conduct a case management visit in relation to a separate inspection conducted on today’s date, May 29, 2026. Interview with former ED, Kay Devault, indicated that their minor child would provide volunteer assistance during events at the care home. Former ED indicated that their minor child went through the volunteer program that the facility offers and attended a virtual training. Former ED indicated that their minor child would set up decorations for holiday events, serve water or drinks, fold napkins, and help set up tables. Former ED indicated that their minor child did not work in the kitchen with food. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, S4, S5, and S6) indicated that they witnessed the former ED’s minor children serving food from the kitchen area to residents in the dining room. Staff (S3) indicated that they heard from a resident that the former ED’s minor children were helping in the kitchen area. Staff interviews also indicated that the former ED’s minor children were serving food when the facility was short staffed and not just at special events. According to the facility’s plan of operation, the facility’s Waitperson job summary indicates “the Waitperson is responsible for the set-up, delivery and clean-up of the meal period for which he/she is responsible.” Some of the essential job functions include: taking resident meal orders in accordance with prescribed diets, preferences, dislikes and food allergies in an accurate and courteous manner and provide service, and familiar with food service disaster plan. Additional information on the plan of operation indicated that the Waitperson is to work in accordance with established safety guidelines with emphasis on the use of proper body mechanics and safe work practices; wears appropriate safety gear. The Waitperson should attend and participate in appropriate ***********************************************Continued on LIC809-C************************************************** in-service and department meetings. The educational qualifications for a Waitperson is to be a high school graduate or equivalent G.E.D., preferred. They should also have completed the California Food Handler training. The facility did not have any documentation regarding any volunteer training completed by the former ED’s minor children. As a result of today's inspection, a deficiency is being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Deficiency is listed on the 809-D page. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87208(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 12, 2026

87208 Plan of Operation (a) The licensee shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation for the facility. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the terms specified in the plan of operation and may be cited for not doing so pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 1569.49. The plan and related materials shall be on file in the facility and shall be submitted to the licensing agency with the license application. Any significant changes in the plan of operation which would affect the services to residents shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation obtained and interviews conducted, the facility did not ensure to operate in accordance with the terms specified in the plan of operations, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility will complete a statement of understanding regarding operation in accordance with the plan of operation and submit to LPA by the POC due date of 6/12/26. Facility provided LPA with new plan of operation, which is pending review.

May 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure that a resident in care is being fed.

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Meggin Cortez to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfounded Staff does not ensure that a resident in care is being fed Interviews with Executive Director and Staff member S1 indicated that Resident R1 receives meals three times a day and requests the same thing each morning for breakfast. R1 wakes up later in the morning so staff have food prepared for when R1 is ready to eat. There are days where R1 does not eat as much while other days R1 eats more. Observations indicated that meals are prepared and available to R1. Staff were checking on R1 and R1’s call button was within reach to call for assistance. Records reviewed indicated that R1 is under the care of hospice. Hospice is monitoring R1’s decline and taking the appropriate steps to ensure R1 is safe and comfortable. Hospice staff and facility staff have noticed a decrease in food intake but R1 is still eating on a daily basis. Therefore, the allegation staff does not ensure that a resident in care is being fed is unfounded. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. Copy of report was given to facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260413223438
Apr 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived unannounced and met with Executive Director Alicia Rist to conduct an annual inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed resident rooms, common area bathrooms, kitchen, dining areas, common areas, activities areas and perimeter of care facility. LPA observed rooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care facility has required (2) two day perishable and (7) seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are operational in the care facility. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed eight (8) resident files, five (5) staff files and resident medications. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA obtained a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted with Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026
Mar 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility staff are not answering communications from resident’s family

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Regional Director of Operations, Alicia Rist, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C************************************************ Unsubstantiated Interviews with the Resident Care Director (RCD) and former Executive Director (ED), Kay Devault, indicated that they have not had any voice messages from any other family members of resident (R1). The former ED indicated that they provided their cell phone number to family members of residents at the care home, so they can contact the ED anytime. Interview with staff (S1) indicated that they have only heard of and seen R1's responsible party and were not aware of any other family members. Interviews with RCD, S1, and former ED indicated that the facility communicated frequently with R1's responsible party. Interview with R1's responsible party indicated that they were at the facility almost everyday and communicating with facility staff. Based on interviews conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260219102741

20253 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not ensure reporting requirements were followed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with Dina Jones, Activities Director, to open a complaint and deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA also spoke with the Executive Director (ED), Kay Devault, by phone. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. LPA obtained a copy of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report LIC624 that was sent to the former LPA on September 3, 2025 indicating that the facility found bed bugs in resident (R1's) room on the same date. The LIC624 indicated that R1's family was notified as well as their primary care physician. Facility removed all of R1's clothing from their room and laundered at a high temperature. R1 was moved to a respite room until room is cleared of bed bugs. The ED provided LPA with email communications with R1's family and power of attorney indicating that they are aware of the situation. The facility provided LPA with the minutes from the resident counsel meeting, dated September 11, 2025, indicating that there was a discussion ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** Unfounded regarding pest concerns and the ongoing pest control services. The facility provided LPA a copy of a letter that was sent to all residents and families on September 11, 2025 indicating that the facility has an anticipated community inspection for pests on September 25, 2025 and September 26, 2025. ED provided LPA with several invoices and service requests indicating services conducted in the facility to ensure the pest issue is resolved. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250911141050
Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting residents needs

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Dina Jones, Life Enrichment Director to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfounded Staff are not meeting residents needs Interviews conducted with Executive Director and Resident Care Coordinator indicated that staff are meeting residents care needs. Staff are monitoring all residents to ensure safety and assist with activities of daily living (ADL) as needed. Interview conducted with Resident R1 indicated that they feel their care needs are being met and R1 has no concerns regarding their care needs or facility staff. Records reviewed indicated that staff are checking on each resident multiple times daily whether they are in their rooms or in common areas. Resident R1 is receiving hospice care and is checked on multiple times daily by care staff and med-techs at the facility (two medication passes and four check ins daily) along with hospice nurses who come two or three times weekly. Facility staff are assisting R1 based on their needs and services plan. Call button logs reviewed indicated that facility staff are answering calls for assistance in a timely manner. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report was given to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250630142224
Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are charging residents for services not rendered

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Dina Jones, Life Enrichment Director to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfounded Staff are charging residents for services not rendered Records reviewed indicated that residents and responsible party (RP) for residents are aware of the charges that will occur based on the admission agreement which is signed by each resident or RP prior to moving in to the facility. Within the admission agreement, the signer is made aware of meal tray services, how and when they are available and the prices based on when tray service is requested. Monthly statements reviewed for three residents who receive meal trays on a regular basis indicated that meals were rendered and paid. Interviews conducted indicated that facility staff have a log of who requests or receives meal trays each day and which residents attend meals in the dining hall. Some residents that reside in the facility have a daily “meal tray ticket” that indicates staff to bring their meal to their room as requested by that resident. The residents who have daily meal tray tickets are able to request that the meal not be brought to their room which staff will take the charge off the resident’s account. Interviews with residents receiving daily meal trays indicated that they are happy with receiving their meals in their rooms as requested and have had no concerns or issues with receiving meals, requesting meals or the charges to their accounts. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report was given to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250627092706
Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/27/2025 LPA Tryon visited the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Kimberly Delgado. The facility currently has 75 residents. LPA toured the facility including common areas, dining room, kitchen, food storage/ coolers, chemical storage, medication rooms, resident rooms/apartments, bathrooms, workout room, laundry, puzzle room,outside areas. The facility is large, clean and nicely furnished. The facility is beginning to renovate resident apartments as they are empty, and updating the kitchen. There are various areas available for activities. The dining room is large and spacious. LPA toured the kitchen and storage, Food supplies appear more than adequate to meet the requirement of 2 days perishable supplies and 7 days non-perishable. Food appeared to be stored appropriately, food appears to be varied and of good quality. The kitchen has special diets posted with photos of residents that match. LPA toured several resident apartments. Apartments vary from studios, to one bedrooms and several 2 bedroom units. Rooms are spacious and nicely decorated and clean. Bathrooms are clean with functional plumbing in good condition. The facility appears to have various activities for residents to participate in. LPA interviewed 1 residents and one staff. Resident interviewed seemed to be comfortable and enjoy living at the facility. LPA reviewed 7 resident files and 5 staff files. Files included required documents. LPA reviewed the CARE Tool with ED. At this time the facility appears to be in substantial compliance with the regulations. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

20241 state visit · 1 document

Mar 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/21/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator Kristy Ashley. The facility currently has 85 residents. LPA toured the facility including common areas, dining room, kitchen, food storage/ coolers, chemical storage, medication rooms, resident rooms/apartments, bathrooms, outside areas. The facility is large, clean and nicely furnished. There are various areas available for activities. The dining room is large and spacious. LPA toured the kitchen and storage, Food supplies appear more than adequate to meet the requirement of 2 days perishable supplies and 7 days non-perishable. Food appeared to be stored appropriately, food appears to be varied and of good quality. The facility is working with the resident counsel to come up with a menu that is enjoyed by the residents and healthy. LPA toured 6 resident rooms. Rooms are spacious and nicely decorated and clean. Bathrooms are clean with functional plumbing in good condition. The facility appears to have various activities for residents to participate in. LPA interviewed 3 residents and spoke with several others. Residents interviewed seemed to be comfortable and enjoy living at the facility. LPA interviewed 3 staff who appeared knowledgeable about the facility and procedures. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 4 staff files. Files included required documents. LPA reviewed the CARE Tool with Ms. Ashley. At this time the facility appears to be in substantial compliance with the regulations. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Aug 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff not supervised resulting in medication errors Staff refusing to give residents medication Resident hygiene needs not being met Staff not trained Fire doors propped open illegally Staff yelling at residents Injuries not addressed by staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on August 8, 2023, to complete and deliver findings for a complaint received on 7/31/2023. LPA met with Administrator Kim and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of investigation, LPA interviewed residents, caregivers and med techs. LPA reviewed narcotic logbooks for downstairs and upstairs residents. LPA reviewed training records for new med techs. Through record review, LPA learned that there have not been missed medications. Through review, management has observed staff omitting a signature, but the medications were given. Residents and staff interviewed stated that medications were given timely. Interviews revealed that at no time has the facility not had a med tech on site. All interviewed stated that hygiene needs were being met. If residents refused showers, staff would contact management to become involved. No residents or staff observed staff yelling at residents. Unfounded Staff interviewed stated that any bruising, cuts, etc. on residents were addressed by med techs. Those interviewed stated that some residents have home health treating their wounds. Staff interviewed stated that they have not observed any untreated injuries on residents. LPA reviewed trained records and noted that new staff were adequately trained per regulations with topics including medication management, Dementia, resident rights, activities, ADLs, etc. Records show the required training hours. Staff interviewed stated that new staff were properly trained. LPA learned that during the facility's interior refresh, one fire door in the back hallway was not working properly. Upon LPA's facility visit, LPA observed the fire door to be closed (one half of the door was working, one half of the door was closed). Residents were still able to utilize the hallway without opening the door. LPA was notified by the Administrator on 8/1/2023, that a loose wire was reattached, and the fire door was working properly. Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230731125447
Feb 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Parks and AGPA Walker-Flores arrived on Thursday February 2, 2023 to conduct the annual inspection. Both were screened in the lobby of the facility and were wearing the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 mask and KN95. During today's annual inspection, the full CARES tool was used. LPA Parks and AGPA Walker-Flores reviewed resident and staff files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. Administrator Kim, LPA Parks and AGPA Walker-Flores toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident apartments, kitchen, hallways, activity room, and courtyard. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2023

20224 state visits · 5 documents

Dec 12, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are locking resident doors

LPA Parks arrived on Monday December 12, 2022 to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. Prior to the visit, LPA completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 mask. LPA discussed the allegation with Administrator Kim. Additionally, LPA interviewed the following staff: med techs, caregivers, and receptionist. LPA observed a resident's door and its locking mechanism. LPA learned that staff will lock the resident's doors based on their preference. Even if a resident door is locked, residents are able to get out of their room by simply turning the door handle. All residents are given a door key upon move-in and replaced if lost. Additionally, resident's can choose to give their family members a copy of their door key. Unfounded Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2022 · control 25-AS-20221207094433
Oct 31, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not following food service guidelines. Licensee did not keep food storage areas clean. Facility staff do not practice proper hygiene when handling food.

On 10/31/22, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator Kim Delgado. Prior to visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** Unsubstantiated Facility staff are not following food service guidelines. Licensee did not keep food storage areas clean. Facility staff do not practice proper hygiene when handling food. LPA Muscan spoke with Administrator, which stated staff have Food Handling Training and that staff interact frequently with the Food Service Coordinator. The facility provided LPA Muscan with California Food Hander Training certificates for food service staff on 9/21/2022. Food Service Staff were interviewed stating they had the Food Handler Training and reported how they handle food in the kitchen. LPA toured the kitchen on 8/31/2022 and 9/21/2022. 5 kitchen staff members were interviewed. Food was being prepared during visit. Hand washing was observed before food items were touched. Gloves were worn by kitchen staff. Food storage areas were observed to be clean and in good repair. This agency has investigated the above listed allegation(s). Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred therefore, we have found the allegation(s) to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. The signature of Administrator on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220824171053
Oct 31, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not meet resident’s incontinence needs. Facility does not meet resident’s dietary needs. Staff do not assist resident with grooming.

On 10/31/22, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator, Kim Delgado. Prior to visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** Unsubstantiated Facility does not meet residents’ incontinence needs. Facility does not meet residents’ dietary needs. Staff do not assist resident with grooming. LPA Muscan interviewed 4 staff and 6 residents on 9/21/2022. LPA toured facility and viewed the meal and dining area at lunch time. LPA observed a special diet board in the kitchen area for residents with special dietary needs. LPA has reviewed facility records, including charting notes, menus, staff schedule, and resident records. Interviews indicated that resident’s ADL’s. Interviews indicated state the residents showering, incontinence, and dietary needs, and needs of others are met as required and documented accordingly. This agency has investigated the above listed allegation(s). Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred therefore, we have found the allegation(s) to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. The signature of Administrator on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220822130038
May 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff failed to assist resident in a timely manner Insufficient staffing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to continue investigation into complaint. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Delgado and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they used hand sanitizer shortly after entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by Receptionist. LPA investigated allegation, "Staff handled resident in a rough manner". LPA interviewed 6 care staff, in which all care staff stated they have not observed staff handling residents in a rough manner. LPA interviewed 3 residents in care, in which 2 of 3 stated staff have never been rough with them during care or any other time. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiated LPA interviewed 1 resident in which they stated there have been a few times that staff have been rough during care unintentionally. Resident stated some staff can have attitudes toward them when providing care. Resident was unable to remember staff names or details. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA investigated allegation, "Staff failed to assist resident in a timely manner". LPA interviewed residents and staff and reviewed facility documentation. Facility has a call light system, and when residents require help they push their pendant which alarms the caregiver pager and a computer in the medication room. LPA interviewed 6 care staff in which they stated residents do not wait more than 15 minutes once pressing the pendant. Care staff stated if the assigned caregiver is unavailable to respond then other caregivers or med techs will respond to the call light. The computer in the medication room continues to signal until a caregiver responds to the pendant push and clears the call. Interviews indicated that staff do not have residents waiting over 20 minutes when responding to a pendant pushes. LPA interviewed 3 residents in care, in which they stated most the time staff respond in a timely manner to their pendant push. On occasion residents may wait for longer periods of time. Relevant party indicated residents can wait up to 45-60 minutes for staff to respond. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA investigated allegation that facility has, "Insufficient staffing". LPA interviewed residents, staff, and reviewed facility documentation. LPA interviewed staff in which they stated AM shift has 4 caregivers and 2 med techs, PM shift has 2 to 3 caregivers and 2 med techs, and NOC shift has 2 caregivers and 1 med tech on the floor. Care staff indicated that due to covid related issues, at times it was hard finding and hiring staff. Facility used a caregiver agency to supplement care when they were shorthanded. Care staff indicated they are able to meet residents needs with the staffing that is available. LPA interviewed residents in care, in which they stated staffing levels have improved over the last several months. Residents indicated that facility provided a caregiver agency to supplement staffing levels. 1 resident indicated at times they are waiting long periods of time for staff to respond to pendant pushes. Relevant party indicated there is insufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. LPA observed fruits, vegetables, dairy products, meats, canned goods, and other pantry items. LPA reviewed menus, and observed 3 different specials available to residents everyday which include fresh fruits and vegetables. If residents do not like the specials of the day, facility has a "bistro" menu that provides other options. LPA interviewed staff in which they stated, portions are sufficient in size and residents can always order seconds if requested. Staff interviews indicated that residents are served fruits and vegetables daily. LPA interviewed residents in which they stated they have sufficient amount of food available to eat and are served fruits and vegetables. At times residents do not like the quality of food provided but they have the bistro menu to order from when they want options. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated allegation, "Facility hasn’t had a fire drill in 8 months". LPA reviewed facility documentation and interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed facility documentation and observed fire drills were conducted on 2/9/21, 4/28/21, 8/31/21, 11/17/21, and 3/29/22. LPA interviewed caregivers, in which they stated fire drills are conducted throughout the year and they receive training on emergency protocols. LPA interviewed residents in which they stated they hear when the facility is conducting fire drills and they get a notice stating drills will be taking place. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated allegation that facility has "untrained staff". LPA interviewed staff and reviewed facility documentation. Staff interviews indicate facility provides training throughout the year online and in-person. LPA interviewed 3 staff members that were hired within the last 3 months, and all staff indicated they were provided on-line training, in person training, and shadowed other staff prior to working on their own. LPA reviewed 5 caregiver files and training documents. LPA observed facility provided required amount of yearly training. Due to the information provided, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 3, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220103144150
Apr 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Mirlohi and L. Muscan, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an annual visit using the infection control tool visit. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Delgado and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they used hand sanitizer shortly after entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by Receptionist. LPA and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, kitchen, medication room, and common restrooms. Facility has a 2 day perishable and a 7 day non-perishable amount of food. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. Facility has 94 residents, 1 of which is a hospice residents. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2022

20211 state visit · 2 documents

Dec 17, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) L. Muscan and K. Hiratsuka arrived at the facility unannounced on 12/17/2021 to conduct an unannounced annual visit using the infection control tool visit. LPAs met with Facility Administrator Kim Delgado and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPAs completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Facility Representative and completed a facility risk assessment. LPAs ensured they applied hand sanitizer prior to entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPAs were screened by Receptionist. LPAs and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, and common restrooms.. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPAs and Administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. A couple of topics were discussed during today's visit. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2021
Dec 17, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Muscan and K. Hiratsuka arrived at the facility unannounced on 12/17/2021 to conduct a Case Management visit. LPAs met with Facility Administrator Kim Delgado and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPAs completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; and contacted Facility Representative and completed a facility risk assessment. LPAs ensured they applied hand sanitizer prior to entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPAs were screened by Receptionist. The reason for the visit today was due to an Incident report the facility submitted. The incident in question took place 12/14/2021. The resident in question had something stuck in their throat and sent to hospital. During today's visit facility provided documentation the resident required no assistance with their activities of daily living prior to the incident Facility is reassessing resident upon return from hospital. Due to information provided, no deficiencies were cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2021

78 of 118 beds were occupied at the May 29, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay; Eskaton Properties Inc., licensed since 2015.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
24
Total complaints
11
Substantiated allegations
1
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
1

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations11
Substantiated allegations12
Total complaints116

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay

Is Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay licensed for?

118 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 24 state visits over the same years.

Is Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay cost?

$3,190 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 15 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,436 to $5,299 a month, and the middle figure is $4,795 (n = 15 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay; Eskaton Properties Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Eskaton Properties Inc. — at least 5 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 3.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ESKATON LODGE GRANITE BAY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #317005628. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 118 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay; Eskaton Properties Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 24 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 24 state visits in that period.
  • 11 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Granite Bay · 0.1 mi

    Granite Bay Countryhouse

    Mid-size home · licensed for 49

    Starting rate

    $5,595 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Granite Bay · 0.5 mi

    Elim Glen

    Mid-size home · licensed for 20

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granite Bay · 0.5 mi

    Granite Bay Villas II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
  • Map

    Granite Bay · 0.3 mi

    Lakeside Senior Living of Granite Bay

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granite Bay · 0.5 mi

    Golden Years Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Granite Bay · 0.6 mi

    Granite Bay Villas I

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Placer County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
EL

Call Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay

Granite Bay · Licensed for 118

(916) 789-0326

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Eskaton Lodge Granite Bay

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages