Dad's Place Loomis

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Thursday May 28, 2026 to conduct an unannounced post licensing inspection. LPA met with staff Nataliia and explained the purpose of the visit. Staff called Administrator Tyler on the phone who granted LPA permission to conduct the inspection with staff. During today's visit, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA did not review resident files as the resident files were reviewed during the pre licensing inspection. There have not been any new residents admitted since the previous inspection. LPA and staff toured the facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included resident rooms, bathroom, laundry room, kitchen and common area. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026

Allegation investigated: Staff are chemically restraining residents Staff administer medication without residents' knowledge or consent Staff are not properly preparing residents' medication Staff are not following food sanitation practices when preparing food for residents Staff leave residents unattended Staff do not inform residents' responsible parties of incidents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Thursday March 19, 2026, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Tyler Chester and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA observed the medication cabinet and reviewed medication lists. LPA toured the kitchen and inspected kitchen cabinets. LPA reviewed call logs and text messages between the Administrator and POA for all current residents. Allegation: staff are chemically restraining residents LPA interviewed staff who stated that all medications are given per doctors orders. No staff had any concerns about medications being given inappropriately or that residents were being administered too many medications. Unfounded Allegation: staff administering medication without resident’s knowledge or consent LPA learned that R1 has a crush order for one medication. LPA reviewed medications for R1. R1 has an order for Depakote Sprinkles which states: sprinkle contents of 1 capsule on food and eat 3 times a day. Additionally, R1 has a crush order for Trazadone which is mixed with chocolate syrup, applesauce, or pudding and given in a kitchen spoon. Allegation: Staff not properly preparing resident medication According to the complaint filed, staff were prepouring medication. LPA reviewed the mediation cabinet and did not find any evidence that medications were prepoured. There were no medication cups or medication pill organizers for staff to use in order to prepour medications. Additionally, no staff interviews acknowledged that medications were being prepoured. Allegation: Staff are not following food sanitation practices when preparing food for residents LPA toured the kitchen and inspected the kitchen cabinets. LPA did not find any evidence of the kitchen being unsanitary. All staff interviewed stated that the kitchen is kept clean at all times. Allegation: staff leave residents attended LPA observed 3 staff to be at the facility upon arrival for the complaint visit. LPA reviewed the facility’s LIC500 which showed staff at the facility at all times. Additionally, per staff interviews and the LIC500, there is awake staff for the overnight shift. No staff interviews acknowledged that residents were being left unattended. Allegation: Staff do not inform residents’ responsible parties of incidents LPA reviewed phone calls logs and text messages between POAs and the Administrator. Call logs and text messages showed constant communication between the facility and responsible parties. Staff interviews stated that there have not been any concerns from families about not being informed. Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260318113706

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday February 3, 2026 to conduct an announced prelicensing visit. This is a change of ownership with residents in care. The Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used during today's inspection. This facility has a fire clearance for 3 non-ambulatory and 3 bedridden residents. Facility has all required postings in the hallway. LPA and Administrator Tyler toured the facility together. The following areas were inspected for compliance: kitchen, resident rooms, bathroom, living room, and garage. Water temperature was within the required range. Facility has fire extinguishers with current inspection tags and a full first aid kit. Carbon monoxide detector was in the hallway. Medications are kept locked in the hallway cabinet. Cleaning chemicals are locked and inaccessible to residents. Facility has sufficient perishable and nonperishable food. Facility was clean and well organized. Component III was waived. The facility appears to be in substantial compliance and ready for licensure. The license will be granted upon completion of a final review and approval from the Licensing Program Manager and the Central Applications Bureau. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 3 COMP II Participants: Licensee/administrator Tyler Chester Interview Method: Telephone interview On 12/18/2025, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025