Small home · Licensed for 6 · Roseville
Brilliant Care Home
1105 Nob Hill Court, Roseville, CA 95661Licensed since 2023
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Brilliant Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,700–$5,550
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,500likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,700–$5,550
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,750
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,350–$8,950
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,800
12 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,250.
- Citrus Pines Senior LivingCitrus Heights · 0.6 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 0.9 mi · Small home$6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 1.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 1.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 1.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roseberry CareRoseville · 2.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 2.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sapphire Senior CareRoseville · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
1105 Nob Hill Court, Roseville, CA 95661Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - RosevilleHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #315002922 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Staff did not properly supervise residents who are a fall risk. Staff did not provide resident with activities.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator Karla Nesbitt during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation, “Questionable death”. The department interviewed relevant parties and staff, and reviewed hospital and facility documentation and obtained the death certificate. On 9/7/25 R1 had a fall at the facility and was admitted into the ER with a chief complaint of a fall and hip fracture. R1 and relevant parties were advised by hospital doctor about the risks of a surgery for R1. On 9/9/25 R1’s surgery took place and during the surgery R1 lost their pulse and deceased. R1’s death certificate states that the immediate cause of death was coronary artery disease, end stage renal disease, hypertension, myotonic dystrophy type 2, and aortic stenosis status post, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and hypothyroidism. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiated A review of medical records and death certificate indicates that the hip fracture was not the immediate cause of R1’s death. Furthermore, it is unclear if the hip fracture was due to staff neglect. The evidence does not support the allegation; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff did not properly supervise residents who are a fall risk.” The department interviewed relevant parties and staff, and reviewed hospital and facility documentation. On 9/7/25 R1 was admitted to the hospital with a chief complaint of a fall and hip fracture. Prior to this fall, R1 sustained approximately four falls while in care which resulted in injuries such as head injury, black eye, ear laceration, and an injury to their arm. Administrator and staff were interviewed in which they stated they were doing all they could to prevent R1’s falls. R1 had access to a call button, half bed rails, and a bed sensor to prevent falls. Staff were also checking on R1 every 30 minutes or less. Although R1 sustained several falls, there is not enough evidence to support that staff did not properly supervise resident; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff did not provide resident with activities”. LPA interviewed staff and residents and toured the facility. Relevant party stated facility staff had an activity calendar posted however they never engaged R1 in any activities. LPA interviewed 3 staff in which they stated R1 enjoyed a variety of activities from puzzles, playing cards, walking and gardening. Administrator stated that R1 had a garden bed that they would garden in frequently. Administrator stated that not many residents want to participate in group activities, so they engage the residents with more of 1-on-1 activities. LPA toured the facility and observed different activities available for resident use. LPA interviewed a resident in which they stated they are not interested in activities provided. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251009114942
Jan 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with Administrator, Karla Nesbitt, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured included but not limited to resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen sink at 114.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and was last serviced on 06/18/2025. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted in the entry of the facility. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files. Resident files contained all required documentation. LPA reviewed three (3) staff records. Staff have all required documentation and first aid training. No deficiencies are being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report will be emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2026
20251 state visit · 2 documents
Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide adequate supervision to resident resutling in resident sustaining severe injuries resulting in death.
On 01/29/25, Regional Manager Alycia Rayner, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Talwinder Bains and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings and met with Administrator, Karla Nesbitt. The department conducted records review ,facility observations, staff and residents interviews to investigate the complaint. **Report continued on LIC9099-C** Unsubstantiated **Report continued from 9099..... Allegation- Facility did not provide adequate supervision to resident resulting in resident sustaining severe injuries resulting in death. On August 28, 2024, at approximately 7:45 am, staff witnessed R1 in R2’s room standing over R2 while R2 was in bed. Interviews described witnessing R2 “covered in blood” and R1’s hands “covered in blood.” Staff quickly separated the two residents and 911 was called. R2 was taken to the hospital and diagnosed with significant facial trauma and swelling, tenderness and swelling to left eye, nasal bridge, and bilateral maxilla. Bleeding profusely from the left Nare and upper lip laceration approximately 0.5 cm. Medical records notated R2 passed away while at the hospital on September 3, 2024. The cause of death was listed as “Blunt Head Trauma.” Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, R1 had behaviors of wandering and going into other residents’ rooms during the day and night, however, interviews and documentation did not indicate R1 exhibited aggressive behaviors towards other residents. On August 28, 2024, it was reported that staff checked on R1 around 6:30 am. It was noted that R1 was awake but in their room. Staff then went on to finish their rounds, assisting other residents, and started cooking breakfast. Per facility policy and needs and service plans, both R1 and R2 were to be checked on every two hours by staff. Interviews reported that based on R1’s behaviors of wandering, staff were instructed to follow them and re-direct to the common areas. R1 at times showed aggression or agitation towards staff when they were showering or re-directing R1, but that aggression never resulted in physical violence. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the incident on August 28, 2024, wherein R2 was assaulted by R1 was an isolated incident. Although R2 sustained severe injuries while in care, neither R1 nor R2 required 1:1 care and supervision. Staff could not have predicted R1’s aggressive behavior would result on the assault of R2 therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240830164210
Jan 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Manager (LPM)- Laura Munoz, Regional Manager - Alycia Rayner ,Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) -Talwinder Bains arrived on 01/29/25 to conduct the annual inspection. CCL staff met with Administrator, Karla Nesbitt and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. Staff reviewed medications of four (4) residents comparing with physician orders . Staff reviewed four (4) residents files and two (2) staff files and found all required paperwork. Staff and Administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas and outside area. The food supply is within compliance, 2 days of perishable and 7 days worth of non-perishable food items. Grab bars were present at the toilet and in the shower. All exits were unobstructed. There is a side gate for emergency access. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA observed the area used for medication to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector at the care home are operational. Hot water temperature was observed to be 112 degrees F, which is within the regulation range of 105-120 degree. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 06/21/24 and was ready for emergency use. Citations were observed and issued as listed on LIC809-D per Title 22 ,CCR Regulations from this visit. LPA requested a copy of the LIC308, LIC 500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by 02/10/25. Civil penalties shall be assessed if facility does not comply with POC requirements which were issued today. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Staff did not dispense medication as prescribed and did not properly store resident's medications. Resident did not have access to call button. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.
On 08/01//24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Talwinder Bains arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings and met with staff, Daniel Smith who contacted Administrator, Karla Nesbitt. Administrator was not available to come and gave permission to staff, Daniel Smith to sign the report. The department conducted records review ,facility observations, staff and residents interviews to investigate the complaint. **Report continued on LIC9099-C** Unsubstantiated ***Report continued from 9099...... Allegation- Staff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time.-UNSUBSTANIATED The Department conducted facility’s observations, record review and interviewed three (3) residents and three (3) staff members to investigate the complaint allegation. During staff interviews it was learned that the facility has a 2-hour check rotation. 3 of 3 staff stated they were checking on R1 at hourly at which time they would check on resident, rotate resident and provided incontinence care when needed. Administrator stated R1 was checked on regularly. Based on gathered information, It was determined that staff were checking R1 at least every two hours, usually more often, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation- Staff did not dispense medication as prescribed and did not properly store resident's medications. -UNSUBSTANIATED The Department conducted facility’s observations, record review and interviewed three (3) residents and three (3) staff members to investigate the complaint allegation. Records were reviewed for resident’s medications for July 2024. Records reflected that facility was managing resident’s medications per their physician’s orders with proper record keeping per Department’s Regulations. 3 staff interviews conducted on 07/08/24 indicated that staff were giving resident’s medications per their physician’s orders and there were no problems to address. 3 residents interviews conducted on 07/24/24 reflected no medications mismanagement issues by facility staff. Based on this information, this allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. ***Report continued to 9099-C..... ***Report continued from 9099-C..... Allegation- Resident did not have access to call button. .-UNSUBSTANIATED The Department conducted facility’s observations, record review and interviewed three (3) residents and three (3) staff members to investigate the complaint allegation. 3 staff interviews conducted on 07/08/24 indicated that staff provide access to call buttons for all residents and assist them when called, however there were some residents who were not able to use call button due to their health issues, so staff check on them regularly to address their care needs. 3 residents interviews conducted on 07/24/24 reflected that they have access to their call button and staff assist them in timely way and there were no problems. During Department visits on 07/08/24 and 07/24/24, it was observed that residents have access to their call button, and they were using them as needed. Based on this information, this allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation- Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care. .-UNSUBSTANIATED The Department conducted facility’s observations, record review and interviewed three (3) residents and three (3) staff members to investigate the complaint allegation. 3 staff interviews conducted on 07/08/24 indicated that staff provide care and supervision to all residents per their needs and service plan and there were no problems. Administrator stated that they conduct training with their staff to go over any residents’ care issues concerns and address them in timely way. 3 residents interviews conducted on 07/24/24 reflected that their care needs were met at facility and staff assist them in timely way and there were no problems. During Department visits on 07/08/24 and 07/24/24, it was observed that staff were attentive to residents’ care needs and residents were observed to be in good care. Based on this information, this allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above all allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. The signature of the staff on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240703132523
Feb 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/09/2024 at 12:58 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with Administrator, Karla Nesbitt, and explained the purpose of the visit. At 1:10 PM, LPA and administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, residents' bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, garage and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of one (1) week and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxic and cleaning supplies locked and is inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen at 110 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was completed. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 05/10/2023. Fire drill was last conducted on 02/5/2024. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. At 1:30 PM, LPA reviewed a total of two (2) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals, identification sheets, releases, and resident's rights. Medications are centrally stored, locked, and appear to be given per doctor order. LPA compared medications to those being given for two (2) residents and found no discrepancies. Facility is correctly using the Medication Administration Records (MAR). LPA reviewed a total of two (2) staff record. Staff has training in medications, first aid and CPR, and other various areas of care provision. No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 2 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Feb 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On 02/03/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility to conduct a Pre-Licensing Inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Karla Nesbitt, and explained the purpose of the visit. The following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. LPA were screened by facility staff prior entering the facility. LPA observed six (6) residents and three (3) staff present at the facility. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) residents' bedrooms and six (6) bathrooms. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition, properly maintained, and the hot water temperature was observed at 111 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA observed at least a 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable food supply on hand. LPA observed sharps/ knives to be locked away and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed cleaning products and other toxins to be locked away. LPA observed the area used for medication to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed the perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris and there appeared to be no potential safety hazards. The care home has smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors that are operable. Licensing complaint poster are posted as required. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA observed PPE supplies and incontinence supplies are adequate. Component III presentation conducted with administrator. LPA observed that the facility is ready to be licensed. This report will be submitted to the Central Applications Bureau (CAB) and a final review of the application will be conducted. This facility is not yet licensed and is subject to final approval by CAB. Additional requirements may still be required. Exit Interview conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Sep 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 6 COMP II Participants: Nesbitt, Karla (Administrator and Corporate Board Member) Interview Method: Telephone interview On 9/9/22, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of the California Code Title 22 Regulations. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 5, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Brilliant Care Home Inc., licensed since 2023.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2023, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2023, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Brilliant Care Home
Is Brilliant Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Brilliant Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Brilliant Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Brilliant Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does Brilliant Care Home cost?
$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Brilliant Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Brilliant Care Home Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Brilliant Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Brilliant Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “BRILLIANT CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #315002922. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Brilliant Care Home Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Placer County