Small home · Licensed for 6 · Roseville
Garden Villa
1104 Nottingham Court, Roseville, CA 95661Licensed since 2010
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGES 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS IN RMS 1,2,3,4,5 OR6. RM 7 CLEARED FOR AMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Garden Villa: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,250a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,200
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,250likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,450–$5,200
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
- $4,250
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
- $6,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,800
12 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,950.
- Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 0.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Citrus Pines Senior LivingCitrus Heights · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 1.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 1.1 mi · Small home$6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 1.3 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 2.3 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roseberry CareRoseville · 2.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 2.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sapphire Senior CareRoseville · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
1104 Nottingham Court, Roseville, CA 95661Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - RosevilleHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #315002339 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Sep 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 09/17/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a Required 1- year annual inspection. LPA was unable to open the CARE tool during this visit. LPA met with the Administrator, Preety Kaur, and explained the purpose of today's visit. The facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, hospice waiver of two (2). LPA was informed there are two (2) residents receiving hospice services. During today's inspection, LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to: residents bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, backyard and the common areas. LPA observed medication and sharps to be locked and secured. LPA observed cleaning solutions and disinfectants unlocked and accessible to residents in care. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be last serviced on 02/10/2026. Water temperature was measured in the kitchen sink at 117.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA reviewed six (6) residents files and three (3) staff files. Three (3) of six (6) resident records did not contain all required documentation. Staff files did not contain current and up-to-date CPR/First Aid training. Deficiencies are being cited during today's visit on LIC809-D Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report will be emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 18, 2026
87309 Storage Space (a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observation, facility did not ensure that cleaning products and disinfectants were inaccessible to residents in care, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure that all hazardous items are locked and inaccessible to the residents in care at all times. Administrator will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87309 and submit to LPA by POC due date of 09/18/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87623(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2026
87623(b)(2) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring that the bag and tubing are changed by an appropriately skilled professional should the resident require assistance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's review of records and statements by the Administrator, the Licensee failed to ensure catheter bag for R5 was changed by an appropriately skilled professional.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
Plan of correction: The Administrator shall develop policies and procedures for the care of residents with indwelling catheters which complies with the requirements of 87623. Administrator shall coordinate a skilled professional to train facility staff for this procedure. The policy shall be emailed to LPA by 10/17/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87629(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2026
87629 Injections. (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensees who admit or retain residents who require injections shall be responsible for the following: (1) Ensuring that injections are administered by an appropriately skilled professional should the resident require assistance. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above due to facility not having a diabetic management plan along with R3’s 602 stating they cannot perform their own injections or glucose monitoring which poses an potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator to send into LPA a copy of their plan for diabetic residents going forward. Administrator will coordinate a skilled professional to provide staff with training regarding injections and glucose monitoring. Plan to be emailed to LPA by 10/17/26.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.618(c)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2026
Administration/Management- Ensure that at least one staff member who has cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and first aid training is on duty and on the premises at all times. This paragraph shall not be construed to require staff to provide CPR. LPA did not observe any CPR cards in files for S1 during visit. Administrator acknowledged that one staff had a CPR card but it was not at the facility. It was stated working staff have CPR training, but could not provide confirmation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to immediately schedule staff to attend CPR training. Administrator also agrees to have one staff person on site at all times with a CPR card. Administrator will send to CCL a copy of staff CPR cards by 10/17/2026.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 9/9/25 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator, Preety Kaur, arrived to assist LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. 3 resident and 2 staff files were reviewed. Files are complete Dementia regs changes discussed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 9/24/24 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator, Preety Kaur, arrived to assist LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and licensee discussed leaving hallway fire door unobstructed as well as pending repair to roof on the rear of the house. 5 resident and 2 staff files were reviewed. Licensee to send missing documents to LPA. Additionally, licensee will send: Infection Control Plan, Emergency Plan, LIC 500, Resident roster, liability insurance and LIC 308s is applicable. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Aug 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to have visitors.
On 8/7/24, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Mknelly and Graham Gunby conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with designee caregiver. LPA soke with the Administrator by phone. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. On or about 4/14/24, R1 made a phone call to family. Reportedly R1 made statements to family that R1 was placed in the home against R1’s wishes and that R1 is being denied visits and phone access. R1 was interviewed by the Ombudsman and reportedly made similar statements that R1’s spouse was limiting access by R1 to R1’s sister and daughter. LPA interviewed R1, R1’s wife, R1’s sister and the Ombudsman during the course of the investigation. Report continued Unsubstantiated Records review for R1 found R1 to be diagnosed by R1’s primary physician as having Alzheimer's and bi-polar disorder. On 5/7/24, LPA interviewed R1. R1 stated that R1 is not being held against his will at the facility and that for the time being R1 does not wish to have calls or visits while R1 is focused on getting better. R1 stated to LPA that he does not know why R1 made those previous statements. On 5/7/24, LPA interviewed the Administrator. Administrator stated that R1 knew that R1 could make phone calls from the facility phone. After R1 took the phone of another resident to call R1’s family on 4/14/24, Administrator asked R1 why R1 did not ask for the facility phone. R1 reportedly stated that R1 did not know why R1 did that. Between 5/7/24 and the conclusion of this investigation, attempts by family to call or write to R1 were told to R1 and mail was delivered to R1 and R1 chose to not respond to family contact. The investigation found that while R1 at times made conflicting statements regarding his wishes or the wishes of others, conclusive evidence was not presented that the facility restricted R1’s right to visits, calls or personal mail. R1 has since moved out of the facility. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with designee, Mario Lantao and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240425134600
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 9/18/2023 LPA Tryon arrived at the facility unannounced to do an annual visit. LPA was greeted by staff, who said that the administrator was on her way. Administrator arrived a short time later. LPA toured the facility with the administrator including common areas, kitchen, living room areas, bedrooms, bathrooms, hallways, laundry, outside areas. The house is in good condition, nicely furnished and clean. Bedrooms are spacious and nicely furnished, have appropriate furniture. Medications are centrally stored in a locked hall cabinet in original containers. Ongoing medication logs are maintained. Food supplies were reviewed and appear to be fresh, healthy, stored appropriate and of sufficient quantity to meet the requirement of 2 days perishable and 7 days non-perishable supplies. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors installed. Fire extinguishers present and charged, were checked/updated in January 2023. There is plenty of space inside and outside for various activities. LPA reviewed 2 staff files and 2 resident files. Documentation appears to be appropriate and up to date. LPA reviewed the CARE Tool with licensee. At this time, the facility appears to be in substantial compliance with the regulations. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2023
Feb 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that facility property is kept in good repair.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 02/08/2023 to open complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with staff, Kenny Singh, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. LPA observed shared fence with neighbor to be in disrepair. Fence located on side of property had all fallen over. Photographs taken for evidence. Due to this information CCL finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. – A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report left at the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230203144932
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2023
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, shared fence located on the side of the facility's property had fallen over which posed an immediate and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to repair fence. Administrator is to submit proof of repair date by POC due date, 02/13/2023.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jul 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 07/26/2022 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with staff, Mario Lascano, and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee is unable to meet LPA at the facility. Licensee stated staff will be at the facility to assist LPA. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, six (6) resident bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Licensee completed the infection control domain via telephone and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 26, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20212 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 27, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was physically abused while in care.
On 08/27/2021 at 4:00 AM , Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jacob Williams arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver a complaint finding Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 04/28/2021. LPA requested for Administrator, Preety Kaur to be present, but administrator was busy and could not arrive. LPA left a voice message with Administrator by phone and explained the purpose of the visit, findings, and appeal rights. LPA went over complaint findings with Caregiver. Caregiver to sign report. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation, the Department obtained documents such as resident’s (R1) Physician’s Report, medication list, medical documents, and SOC341. LPA also interviewed Residents 1-3, Staff 1-2, and Witnesses 1-2. ********** Continue on page LIC 9099-C ************** Unsubstantiated The event was witnessed by one individual in a room with many others present, and while majority of them did not deny that it happened, nobody else saw it happen. S1 did not deny touching R1s arm after R1 was combative and had hit S1, but denies doing it with any force. All interviews with staff and residents could not recall a time when S1 ever was forceful or acted out of line with any residents in all her time working at Garden Villa. Through interviews and document review, there is not enough evidence to Substantiate this complaint. Therefore, the Department finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Exit interview conducted. A copy this report was left at the facility. Appeal rights were given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210428110318
Aug 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 08/23/2021 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with staff, Kenny Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee is unable to meet LPA at the facility. Licensee stated staff will be at the facility to assist LPA. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with Kenny Singh to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, six (6) resident bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Licensee completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2021
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Aug 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 8/23/2021 at 11:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jacob Williams arrived at the facility via continue complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator's husband, Kenny Singh as the Administrator was busy and could not come to facility.. LPA interviewed three residents (R 1-3), three other residents were asleep so LPA did not interview them. LPA also interviewed two staff (S 1-2). LPA is still attempting to reach two other individuals via phone who were visiting and may have witnessed the incident. Due to insufficient information available at this time, the above allegations needs further investigation. LPA informed Administrator that the complaint will need further investigation and shall take approximately one week to complete the investigation. An exit interview was conducted with Kenny Singh, Administrator's husband, and a copy of this report will be provided to the facility via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2021
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 7, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Kaur, Kanwalpreet, licensed since 2010.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2010, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2010, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Garden Villa
Is Garden Villa licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Garden Villa licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Garden Villa been cited?
1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2010, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Garden Villa still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does Garden Villa cost?
$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Garden Villa take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Kaur, Kanwalpreet, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 1.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Garden Villa keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Garden Villa license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “GARDEN VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #315002339. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Kaur, Kanwalpreet, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2010, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2010, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2010, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2010, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Placer County