Large community · Licensed for 125 · Roseville
Eskaton Village Roseville
1650 Eskaton Loop, Roseville, CA 95747Licensed since 2008
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishReported on Seniorly · August 24, 2026
- Licensed for 125: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 125 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 20 residents
- Bedriddenup to 10 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR 125 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR DELAYED EGRESS. DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY (20) RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Secured building entry
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Eskaton Village Roseville: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,693a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,693likely a month
Starting monthly rate$3,693this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,693–$4,293
- $3,693
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,693–$7,850
- $6,193
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes18 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $5,595
18 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,150–$5,300.
- The Ivy at Blue OaksRoseville · 0.8 mi · Large community$4,795Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Oakmont of WestparkRoseville · 2.5 mi · Large community$5,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park of RosevilleRoseville · 2.9 mi · Large community$5,595Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Ansel Park Senior Living CommunityRocklin · 2.9 mi · Large community$5,145Listed on its own website · assisted living starting price · seen October 5, 2026
- Avella of RosevilleRoseville · 3.4 mi · Large community$4,295Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria RocklinRocklin · 4.4 mi · Large community$3,350Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Oakmont of RosevilleRoseville · 5.4 mi · Large community$5,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Terraces of RosevilleRoseville · 5.6 mi · Large community$3,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Meadow Oaks of RosevilleRoseville · 5.8 mi · Large community$3,215Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Summerfield of RosevilleRoseville · 6.2 mi · Large community$5,300Listed on its own website · studio memory care apartments, starting at · seen October 5, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Vista Roseville Senior LivingRoseville · 6.2 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of RocklinRocklin · 7.2 mi · Large community$3,900Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 27, 2026
- Brookdale Sylvan RanchCitrus Heights · 8.3 mi · Large community$2,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of Stock RanchCitrus Heights · 8.4 mi · Large community$3,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Carlton Senior Living OrangevaleOrangevale · 8.7 mi · Large community$4,395Listed on its own website · apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Eskaton Lodge Granite BayGranite Bay · 8.8 mi · Large community$3,190Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Almond Grove Assisted LivingOrangevale · 9.8 mi · Large community$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Almond HeightsOrangevale · 9.8 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on its own website · assisted living starting price · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (14)Private bathroom · Outdoor space · Rooms come furnished
Private bathroom
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Common areasDining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · and 4 more
Dining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Swimming pool / jacuzzi · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Fitness room — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
AmenitiesConcierge · Move-in coordination · Swimming Pool
Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Swimming Pool — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (7)Dining style · Vegetarian or vegan options · All-day or flexible dining
Dining styleRestaurant style
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Food allergy management
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Family may eat with the resident
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (5)Activity types offered · Trips outside the home · Resident-run activities
Activity types offeredMusic programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Resident-run activities
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish
English — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Spanish — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (3)Support services for families · Transport for group outings · Transportation
Support services for families
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Transport for group outings
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Where it is
1650 Eskaton Loop, Roseville, CA 95747Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #315002052 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 18 of 24 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.
20266 state visits · 6 documents
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with David Dingcong during today's inspection. The department received an incident report from the facility concerning R1. R1 is a memory care resident and was found by the campus patrol near the homes on the property. All memory care rooms have a window and the window has a lock in which only allows window to be opened about 2 inches. R1 had broken the window lock and left the facility through the window. R1 had no injuries and was moved to a room where the window faces into the memory care outdoor area that is secured. Hospice and family were notified. It is determined facility is acting appropriately and staff are following up with the appropriate parties. At the time of this visit no deficiencies were given. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2026
Apr 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Stephen MacDonald during today's inspection. LPA received an incident report that on 4/9/26, it was discovered that a medication error occurred for R1 for several days. Staff gave R1 a double dose of Lovastatin for 5 doses and R1 missed their Levothyroxine for 5 doses. Physician and family were informed of medication error. Training for staff has been given. Deficiencies cited on 809-D. Appeal rights provided. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 24, 2026
87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self administered medications as needed. This requirements was not met by evidenced by: Medication was given incorrectly to resident in care. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator has completed training with staff regarding medication errors. Administrator agrees to send into LPA a copy of training given to staff and a statement of the actions that took place to resolve the errors that occurred. POC due by 4/20/26.
Feb 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect led to resident's injury Staff did not provide a safe environment for residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator Stephen MacDonald during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff neglect led to resident's injury”. LPA interviewed relevant parties, residents, and staff and reviewed resident documentation. Relevant party (RP) stated R1 was admitted into the facility and staff were aware that R1 was a smoker and R1 was told they could smoke in the gazebo near the front entrance. Few days into their stay at the facility, R1 was told they would need to move to the smoking area at the back of the building. There was a back exit near R1’s apartment, however RP stated the door was too heavy for R1 to use. In December 2025, R1 attempted to exit the building on their own and hurt their back. R1 was seen in the hospital and was diagnosed with a compression fracture of the spine. Relevant party stated that staff should not have provided a smoking area that was not safe for R1 to access. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiated LPA interviewed administrator in which they stated they did not inform R1 that they could smoke in the gazebo area as it is against state law to smoke that close to the building entrance. Administrator stated that they did provide an alternative area for resident to smoke safely at. Administrator stated residents were not receiving any care at the time of the incident. LPA reviewed resident’s documentation which shows resident has a history of osteoporosis and other health related diagnosis. LPA reviewed hospital documentation from the visit following the incident in which it states resident was diagnosed with a spinal fracture. Due to the information gathered, LPA is unable to determine if staff neglect led to residents injury. Allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff did not provide a safe environment for residents in care”. LPA interviewed relevant parties, residents, and staff and reviewed resident documentation. Relevant party stated R1 is a smoker and was told they would need to move to the smoking area at the back of the building. Relevant party stated in order to get to the smoking area from the back exit, R1 had to either step down from the curb onto the parking lot or use a ramp which had obstructions and tripping hazards. Relevant party showed LPA photos of a hose near the ramp and other boxes which could cause a tripping hazard. The smoking area was eventually moved to a different location in the front of the building that had coverage and more accessible for R1. LPA toured the facility and observed where the past smoking area was located and LPA did not see any obstruction or tripping hazards present. LPA reviewed R1’s documentation in which it states resident is non-ambulatory due to the use of a walker and has macular degeneration. Due to the information gathered, LPA was unable to determine if staff did not provide a safe environment for residents in care. Allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260116142539
Feb 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate quantity/quality of food to residents in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to open complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator Stephen MacDonald during today's investigation. During today's investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents and toured the facility and kitchen. LPA interviewed administrator in which he stated the facility has weekly menus for the specials for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. In addition, they have a menu that is consistently available for residents to choose from. LPA toured the kitchen which including the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage. LPA observed sufficient amount of food to meet the 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable amount of food. LPA interviewed 3 residents, of which 3 of 3 residents stated there is sufficient amount of food, and a variety of fresh foods are always available. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260205121821
Jan 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to complete the annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Stephen MacDonald during today's inspection. Currently there are 12 residents receiving hospice care. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 7 resident rooms, medication rooms, staff area, bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, outdoor spaces, and activity areas. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA toured the assisted living side of the facility and the memory care unit with a delayed egress. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 15 resident files and 14 staff files. LPA reviewed 4 resident medications comparing with current physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated training completed and CPR and first aid certificates present. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2026
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met Administrator Stephen MacDonald and David David Dingcong during today's inspection. LPA reviewed 15 resident files. LPA observed all required paperwork was present in resident files. At this time LPA will return on a later date to continue and complete annual inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026
20257 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Amandeep Gill during today's inspection. During today's inspection LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1's documentation and hospital discharge paperwork. It is determined facility is acting appropriately and staff are following up with the appropriate parties. At the time of this visit no deficiencies were given. Exit interview and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived announced at the facility to follow up regarding a death report for a non-hospice death. LPA reviewed documents pertinent to Resident R1. LPA spoke with Executive Director and Resident Care Director regarding report. Facility investigated and did not find any suspicious circumstances. At this time, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director. Copy of report given to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents' rooms are clean and sanitized. Resident's rooms are malodorous.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with David Dingcong to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unsubstantiated Staff do not ensure that residents' rooms are clean and sanitized. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson toured the facility during the investigation. LPA reviewed documents pertinent to the investigation which indicated that resident’s rooms are being cleaned and maintained by staff. LPA reviewed work orders placed at the facility for maintenance like carpet and floor cleanings which indicated staff and maintenance teams were cleaning on a regular basis to keep the facility and resident rooms clean and sanitized. The allegation that staff do not ensure that resident rooms are clean and sanitized is unsubstantiated. Resident's rooms are malodorous. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson toured facility during investigation. LPA observed no odors in common areas and hallways. LPA toured multiple residents and observed no odors. Interviews with residents indicated that staff regularly assist with cleaning and help keep each resident’s room clean and free of odors. The allegation resident’s rooms are malodorous is unsubstantiated. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Resident's toileting needs are not being met Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson toured the facility during the investigation. Interviews with Resident R1, R2, R3, and R4 indicated that they were satisfied with the care they were receiving at the facility. LPA toured four (4) resident rooms which indicated clean and sanitary environments for each resident in care. Records reviewed indicated that each resident was receiving the assistance that was listed in their needs and services plans. The allegation that resident’s toileting needs are not being met is unfounded. Resident's hygiene needs are not being met Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson toured the facility during the investigation. Interviews conducted with residents indicated that resident’s hygiene needs are being met and there are no complaints regarding hygiene care. Records reviewed indicated that residents are receiving assistance with hygiene needs according to their care plans. LPA toured four (4) resident rooms and observed resident rooms and bathrooms were clean with no odors. The allegation that resident’s hygiene needs are not being met is unfounded. Facility has mold Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson toured the facility during the investigation. LPA toured the kitchen area where mold was alleged. LPA observed kitchen to be clean and free of visible mold. Records reviewed indicated that staff clean multiple times daily and monitor kitchen area for any potential mold hazards. Interviews conducted indicated that kitchen staff monitor for any hazards and report to management. No mold has been observed currently by staff. The allegation that facility has mold is unfounded. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. Copy of report was given to facility. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250515095816
Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensed Program Analysts (LPAs) Cassandra Mikkelson and Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility and met with Business Services Manager Kay DeVault for a case management visit. LPAs followed up regarding a LIC624 sent to CCLD regarding resident R2's blood sugar levels. LPAs reviewed medication records, blood sugar logs and R2's physician's report. LPAs reviewed records which indicated facility followed proper protocols regarding incident. LPAs followed up regarding incident involving Resident #1 (R1) was being financially abused by the nail salon services for about a year. LPAs reviewed termination letter given to vendor dated February 11, 2025. LPAs also reviewed new policies and new consent form with Kay DeVault and Executive Director Alicia Rist, on the phone, that has been put into place. At this time, deficiencies are not being cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
Feb 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 02/04/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Business Office Manager Kay DeVault and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit is to gather additional information regarding an unusual incident/injury report that was sent to Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 01/27/2025. The report indicates that Resident #1 (R1) was being financially abused by the nail salon services for about a year. During LPA interview with the Business Office Manager it was revealed that the facility did file a police report. Interview further revealed that when it comes to the nail salon services the facility has an outside vendor that comes in about twice a week to provide services to residents. These services are only provided if the resident is signed up for them. At this time the facility has suspended those services with the vendor. Additionally, LPA gathered pertinent documents relevant to the incident. At this time, deficiencies are not being cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2025
Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 01/23/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced to conduct the annual inspection. LPA met with Interim Executive Director (IED) Alicia Rist and explained the purpose of the visit. Currently there are 90 residents of which 17 residents are receiving hospice care. LPA toured facility with IED to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured ten (10) resident rooms, medication room, bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, and activity areas. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA toured the assisted living side of the facility and the memory care unit with a delayed egress. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day nonperishable. LPA reviewed drill logs, which are current. LPA reviewed ten (10) resident files and ten (10) staff files. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated training completed. LPA reviewed four (4) resident medications comparing with current physician orders. LPA requested facility to send a copy of the current liability insurance. LPA completed the full care tool and no deficiencies was observed. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025
Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 1/17/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson and Licensed Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility to conduct a case management visit regarding two (2) LIC 624 reports sent to CCL. The facility sent the department an LIC 624 on 01/07/2025 which stated that R1 was sent to the hospital on 12/30/2024 for shortness of breath. Family contacted the facility on 01/06/2025 to report R1 passed away due to pneumonia. A review of R1's LIC602/physician's report indicated R1 had a diagnosis of COPD and respiratory failure. R1's needs and service plan and physician orders indicated R1 was on oxygen at bedtime. Staff indicated R1 would be seen walking around the facility with their oxygen regularly. Based on the documentation reviewed and interviews conducted, no further follow up is needed at this time. The facility sent the department an LIC 624 on 01/03/2025 which stated that resident R2 was given the wrong dose of Omeprazole. LPA and LPM spoke with Tricia Diaz, LVN RCC, she stated that R2 was originally taking medication two times daily but their physician changed the order to one time daily in October 2024. Per Ms. Diaz facility received order but did not update in their Medication Administration Records (MAR). Medication error was found while attempting to refill medication in December 2024. Facility staff confirmed that R2 was administered the wrong dosage of Omeprazole for approximately three (3) months. Deficiency is being cited on LIC809-D. Failure to correct plan of correction could result in assessed civil penalties. Exit Interview and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 31, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This regulation has not been met as evidenced by: Facility staff failed to ensure R2’s medication dosage was correctly documented resulting in R2 being administered the wrong dosage for 3 months which posses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility shall submit a plan that addresses charting and documenting medication changes timely. Staff shall be trained on the implemented plan. Plan of correction shall be submitted by 01/31/2025.
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Adam Hill during today's inspection. LPA arrived to discuss two separate incident reports received from the facility. LPA interviewed administrator concerning incident. Administrator will follow up on information with staff and follow up with LPA. At this time, no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024
May 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Adam Hill during today's inspection. LPA arrived to discuss two separate incident reports received from the facility. LPA interviewed administrator and staff concerning incident and obtained resident documents. It appears facility followed proper protocol and regulation on each incident that occurred. No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024
Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA arrived to the facility and met with Administrator Adam Hill and Tricia Diaz. Facility sent an incident report into CCL concerning an incident that occurred on 3/28/24. LPA interviewed administrator concerning incident and obtained resident documents. No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2024
Mar 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On March 6, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi and Talwinder Bains conducted a case management visit to follow up on a case management visit conducted at the facility on February 2, 2023. LPA Bethany Mirlohi and Talwinder Bains met with Tricia Diaz and explained the purpose of the visit. On February 2, 2023, the Department concluded an investigation from a self-reported incident that occurred where R1 sustained a fall at the facility on June 6, 2022, which resulted in R1s death at the hospital on the same day. R1’s death certificate indicates R1’s “Cause of Death” as Acute Subdural Hematoma with Shift, Mechanical Fall, Acute Respiratory Failure, and Acute Cardiac Arrest; and states R1 suffered an unwitnessed, ground level fall. The licensee was cited for California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, § 87464(f)(1) states in part, “Basic services shall at a minimum include:(1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code Section 1569.2(c). At the time of the Case Management visit on February 2, 2023, an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 was issued, and the license was informed that an additional civil penalty was still being determined and might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. Continuation on 809-C. The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that a civil penalty is warranted for a violation that the Department determines resulted in the death of a resident. This is evidenced as facility management’s failure to reappraise R1 after R1 suffered five unwitnessed falls in a two-month period, the final fall resulting in R1’s death. The facility should have implemented enhanced care and supervision to mitigate the resident's risk of falls. Today, March 6, 2024, the Department will be issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code §1569.49(d) in the amount of $15,000 for a violation that the Department determines resulted in the death of a resident. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on February 2, 2023, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $14,500. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to the facility representative. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal Rights provided. Tricia Diaz signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC 421D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024
Jan 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct the annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Adam Hill upon arrival. Currently there are 98 residents of which 14 residents are receiving hospice care. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 6 resident rooms, medication room, staff area, bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, outdoor spaces, and activity areas. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA toured the assisted living side of the facility and the memory care unit with a delayed egress. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 10 resident files and 10 staff files. LPA reviewed 4 resident medications comparing with current physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. LPA observed not all care staff had updated CPR and first aid certificates. Deficiencies are cited on 809-D. Exit interview conducted and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20234 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection. LPA met with Administrator Adam Hill and Tricia Diaz, Resident Care Coordinator. LPA received a report from the facility concerning an incident that occurred on 9/11/23. R1 was a memory care resident and was found outside of the facility on the facility patio by staff. Facility investigated the incident and found that a caregiver had let R1 out of the memory care unit due to a misunderstanding. R1 was immediately brought back to the memory care unit and responsible party was notified. Administrator stated training was provided to care staff the following day. Due to the information gathered, deficiencies are cited on 809-D. Appeal rights provided. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 3, 2023
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met based on records of the incident of R1 AWOL from the facility memory care unit on 09/11/23. This posed a potential risk to the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator provided training on 9/12/23 to care staff in the memory care unit. LPA was provided the training that was completed. POC cleared and letter of clearance provided.
Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner Staff do not provide proper food service to residents in care Staff are unable to meet resident care needs Facility doors pose a hazard to residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Adam Hill during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation “Staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner”. LPA interviewed residents and staff and conducted a file a review. LPA interviewed 7 residents, in which they all stated the staff are quick to respond to their care needs. Residents stated on occasion it may take longer then normal but all staff are responsive. LPA interviewed care staff in which all staff stated they work together as a team, so if the assigned caregiver cannot respond to resident’s care light quickly, a different care staff will help. Continuation on 9099-C. Unfounded Care staff stated at times it may take a bit longer to respond if all caregivers are providing care to different residents, but it is never for an extended amount of time. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated allegation “Staff do not provide proper food service to residents in care”. LPA interviewed residents and staff and conducted a file a review. LPA interviewed 7 residents, in which they stated at times they get food delivered to their rooms and they always receive their food. At times the food can be cold, but they are able to reheat the food. LPA interviewed care staff in which they stated the kitchen staff make the food and then inform them when the food is ready for delivery. Caregivers pick up the food and delivery it to the resident rooms. Care staff stated they are unaware of a time when residents did not get their food delivered and residents were without a meal. LPA interviewed the Food Service Director, in which they stated residents are never without a meal. Kitchen informs care staff when food is ready for delivery and then care staff delivery the food to resident rooms. Medication technicians then check the meal tickets and verify that all residents have had their meal. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff is unable to meet resident care needs”. LPA interviewed residents and staff and conducted a file a review. LPA interviewed 7 residents, in which they stated their care needs are met by the facility staff. Residents did not have an issue with receiving the proper care. LPA interviewed care staff in which they stated they are able to meet the needs of the residents. All care staff stated they are staffed correctly and there has been no issues with resident’s receiving the proper care. LPA interviewed care staff in which all staff stated they work together as a team, so if the assigned caregiver cannot respond to resident’s care light quickly, a different care staff will help. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation on 9099-C. LPA investigated allegation, “Facility doors pose a hazard to residents in care”. LPA interviewed staff and residents in care. LPA interviewed Director of Environmental Services in which he stated there have been complaints that the doors are heavy to open and that they don't like the self-latching doors. Director stated the fire department requires the self latching doors and that facility has been instructed they are not able to use door stoppers. LPA interviewed residents in care which all stated they have had no issues with the facility doors. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230606163003
Feb 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bains arrived at the facility unannounced on 02/02/2023 to conduct a case management visit at the facility. LPA met with facility Administrator Adam Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, the daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted facility and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured to apply hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn surgical mask. LPA was screened by facility staff upon entry. LPA Bains came to facility to conduct a case management visit due an incident that occurred at the facility for R1 for 06/06/2022. On 06/08/2022, the facility submitted an incident report to the Department indicating R1 sustained a fall incident at the facility on 06/06/2022 which resulted in R1s death at hospital on the same day. A review of additional incident reports submitted by the facility to the Department for R1 indicated R1 sustained falls on 05/0722, 05/26/22, 05/28/22 and 06/03/22. The Department investigated the incident and concluded that the fall R1 sustained on 06/06/2022 contributed to R1’s death. R1’s certificate of Death identifies “Cause of Death” as Acute Subdural Hematoma with Shift, Mechanical Fall, Acute Respiratory Failure, and Acute Cardiac Arrest; and states R1 suffered an unwitnessed, ground level fall. Medical reports indicated R1 underwent a Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan upon admittance to the hospital which showed R1 suffered a Holohemispheric Subdural Hemorrhage, a fatal injury, because of an unwitnessed fall that occurred at the facility on 6/6/2022. ** continued on LIC809C.......** *** Continued from LIC809........ Based on interviews with facility staff, staff were aware R1 was a fall risk as R1 fell twice (5/26/2022, 6/6/2022) in the hallway and three times (5/7/2022, 5/28/2022, 6/3/2022) During investigation, facility staff members (S1, S2, S3, S4) stated they were not instructed by management to provide any additional care to R1other than to “keep an eye on her” in case she was to fall. In addition, facility management staff stated that they did not issue special instructions to staff on additional care for R1 relating to her falling and that they did not believe R1 falling in the future could be avoided. Furthermore, management staff stated that their efforts were on R1s family obtaining Hospice Care for R1s to assist in R1s care. In addition to R1’s falls, care notes indicated the facility observed R1 with a decline in heath. R1s overall health was never re-evaluated by R1s physician; therefore, R1 never received an updated Needs and Services plan to prevent future falls. Although the facility notified R1’s physician and responsible party of R1’s decline and falls, the facility did not reassess R1 due a change in condition after facility observed R1’s decline and R1 sustaining multiple falls. The facility did not put a plan in place for R1 to mitigate the risk of falls. Based on investigation conducted, facility staff were aware R1 was a fall risk and did not put measures in place to provide adequate care and supervision to R1 resulted in R1 sustaining multiple falls that contributed to R1’s death. The citation issued today is under review and a future civil penalty may apply based on Health and Safety code §1569.49(e) H&S. In addition, civil penalties in the amount of $500.00 are assessed today for a resident sustaining a serious bodily injury while in care. Failure to correct the deficiencies may also result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights provided. A copy of the report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 3, 2023
87466-Observation of the Resident- licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs……. This requirement is not as evidence by…. Based on record review and interviews, it has been concluded that facility did not reassess R1 for unmet needs despite multiple falls incidents in May and June 2022 which poses immediate health and safety risks for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will make sure that Observation of for any resident per their health care needs/changes will be done in timely manner so residents care needs can be met per RCFE regulation 87466. Licensee shall submit letter of understanding of this regulation to CCL by POC date-02/03/23.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87463(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 3, 2023
87463-Reappraisals-(a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing ....(3) (3) Any illness, injury, trauma, or change in the health care needs of the resident ....This requirement is not as evidence by…... Based on record review and interviews, it has been concluded that facility did not document a reappraisal for R1 once it was identified R1 was declining and sustained multiple falls within a 2 months period (May and June 2022) which poses immediate health and safety risks for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will make sure that re-appraisal will obtain for any resident per their health care needs/changes in timely manner so residents care needs can be met per RCFE regulation 87466. Licensee shall submit letter of understanding of this regulation to CCL by POC date-02/03/23.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 3, 2023
87464-Basic Services-(f)Basic services shall at a minimum include:(1)Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not as evidence by…. Based on record review and interviews, it has been concluded that facility did not provide proper care and supervision for R1 which resulted R1s fall and death on 06/06/22 which poses immediate health and safety risks for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will make sure to provide care and supervision to residents so residents care needs can be met per RCFE regulation 87464. Licensee shall submit letter of understanding of this regulation to CCL by POC date-02/03/23.
Jan 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Adam Hill during today's inspection. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Masks. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 5 resident rooms in memory care and assisted living side, bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, outdoor space, and medication and staff rooms. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Administrator stated there has been 1 positive COVID case at the facility, but facility has sufficient amount of PPE. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA and Administrator, completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Aug 25, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Talwinder Bains arrived at the facility unannounced on 08/25/22 to conduct a case management inspection to follow up on a recent AWOL for R1 and few fall incidents for R2 and R3 at the facility. LPA met with facility Administrator Adam Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, the daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted facility and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured to apply hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn surgical mask. LPA was screened by facility staff upon entry. R1’s AWOL Incident- The facility submitted a completed Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC624) on/around 08/11/22 regarding resident (R1) leaving the facility unattended on 08/10/22, at approximately 7.00pm. Per incident report, R1 was last seen around 6.25pm close to exit door and found outside the facility unassisted by a homeowner who notified the campus patrol person. R1 was brought back to facility uninjured around 7pm with facility staff. LPA followed up with memory care coordinator after this incident and gathered information for R1 including LIC602, Admission Agreement and care notes. Facility notified R1s doctor and family on 08/10/22 regarding this AWOL incident. R1's physician's report from 05/14/22 indicates that resident has diagnosis of dementia and cannot leave the facility unassisted. This was first AWOL incident for R1 since her admission to the facility. Resident has not tried to leave facility again and has been communicating better with the staff if R1 needs something. **to be continued on 809-C** R2’s Fall Incidents- The department has received incidents reports (LIC624) for R2 for date 08/13/22 and for 08/21/22 regarding R2s fall incidents. R2s doctor and family been notified regarding these fall incidents. R2 did not sustain any remarkable injuries from these fall incidents. Facility care staff has increased monitoring for R2 after these fall incidents and will report for any health changes to R2s doctor, family and to department. R3’s Fall Incidents- The department has received incidents reports (LIC624) for R3 for date 08/09/22, 08/10/22, 08/13/22 and for 08/21/22 regarding R3s fall incidents. R3s doctor and family been notified regarding these fall incidents.Facility care staff has increased monitoring for R3 after these fall incidents and will report for any health changes to R3s doctor, family and to department. The facility has been continuously addressing the falls and implementing measures to prevent the falls/AWOL incidents from occurring in the future to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. LPA did facility tour during today's visit, interviewed memory care director and 2 facility staff regarding these incidents. Several topics have been discussed during today's visit. No citations were issued at this time and only Technical Advisory has been issued to the facility. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K.. Hiratsuka, arrived at the facility unannounced on 12/15/2021 to conduct an unannounced annual visit using the infection control tool visit. LPA met with Facility Administrator Adam Hill, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Facility Representative and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA applied hand sanitizer shortly before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by Receptionist. LPA and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, and common restrooms.. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Caregiver completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. Several topics were discussed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2021
81 of 125 beds were occupied at the February 19, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Eskaton Village-Roseville, licensed since 2008.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 26
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Eskaton Village Roseville
Is Eskaton Village Roseville licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Eskaton Village Roseville licensed for?
125 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Eskaton Village Roseville been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 26 state visits over the same years.
Is Eskaton Village Roseville still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Eskaton Village Roseville cost?
$3,693 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,211 to $5,296 a month, and the middle figure is $4,795 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Eskaton Village Roseville take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Eskaton Village-Roseville, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Can Eskaton Village Roseville keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Eskaton Village Roseville license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ESKATON VILLAGE ROSEVILLE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #315002052. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 125 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Eskaton Village-Roseville, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 26 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 26 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,795 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Placer County