Small home · Licensed for 6 · Anaheim
Polly's Place
2143 W. Fir Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801Licensed since 2022
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishThe home’s website · July 2, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR SIX (6).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
Certified nursing assistants on staff
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Licensed or certified staff
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Hiring checksThe operator makes a conscious effort to hire highly regarded Certified Nurse Assistants and Caregivers.
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Polly's Place: two-person transfers or a lift and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,650a month to start
Likely $3,800–$5,750
From 20 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,650likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,750
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,950
- $4,650
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$9,150
- $7,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes20 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $6,500
20 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$6,050.
- Harmony Grove Assisted LivingAnaheim · 0.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- La Palma HomecareAnaheim · 1.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Olive Branch Care HomeFullerton · 1.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Loving Care Facility for the ElderlyFullerton · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunshine Home CareFullerton · 1.6 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Allen's Palm Cove Residence CareAnaheim · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Arabella Care VillaAnaheim · 1.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Karol's KornerFullerton · 1.9 mi · Small home$6,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Crown Manor at Paseo GrandeFullerton · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Faithful Home of AnaheimAnaheim · 2.3 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Blessings Senior CareAnaheim · 2.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Amazing Grace & CareFullerton · 2.4 mi · Small home$6,450Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lola Senior Guest HomeStanton · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Ridge Manor HomeFullerton · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mirage Manor Home CareAnaheim · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Cottages at Artesia AnaheimAnaheim · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Family Choice Senior LivingAnaheim · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home$3,400Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
- Sunny VillaFullerton · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,295Listed on its own website · assisted living · seen October 5, 2026
- Holly Homecare ServicesAnaheim · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Arc Facility at RichmanFullerton · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Exercise or fitness program
Activity types offeredMassage · Outside activities
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programStretching · Strength training
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (2)Languages spoken by caregivers · English proficiency of care staff addressed
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
English proficiency of care staff addressed
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (1)URL of the photo gallery page
- Open on the website
URL of the photo gallery page
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
Brand or trade namePolly's Place
Reported on pollys-place.com · source dated July 2, 2026.
Where it is
2143 W. Fir Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #306006178 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Mar 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handles residents in a rough manner. Staff spoke in an inappropriate manner to resident.
On March 2, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Licensee Polly Valencia was notified via telephone and later arrived to assist with the inspection. During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed residents, interviewed staff, reviewed and collected pertinent documents to this complaint. Regarding the allegation, staff handles residents in a rough manner, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff handle Resident #8 (R8) in a rough manner. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R8 for this allegation, due to R8 passing away on July 7, 2024. The Department conducted seven resident interviews. Four out of the seven residents were unable to qualify for an interview. However, three out of the seven residents denied the allegation. The Department conducted seven staff interviews, including an interview with Licensee Polly Valencia. Seven out of the seven staff interviewed denied the allegation. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C Substantiated However, the Department was able to obtain a video recording of an incident involving R8 and Licensee Polly Valencia, which was captured in R8’s bedroom. In the video recording, R8 appears to be adjusting herself to lay down on her bed. Licensee Polly Valencia is then seen wrapping both of her arms around R8 and tossing her down on the bed in an aggressive manner. R8 is then heard groining, which suggests this action may have caused her discomfort. At this point, R8's back is on the bed, however, her legs are still hanging on the side of the bed. Licensee Polly Valencia is then seen grabbing R8's legs with both arms, and tossing them onto the bed in an aggressive manner. R8 is seen saying something to Licensee Polly Valencia after this action, however, it is unclear of what was said. Regarding the allegation, staff spoke in an inappropriate manner to resident, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff spoke in an inappropriate manner to R8. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R8 for this allegation, due to R8 passing away on July 7, 2024. The Department conducted seven resident interviews. Four out of the seven residents were unable to qualify for an interview. However, three out of the seven residents denied the allegation. The Department conducted seven staff interviews, including an interview with Licensee Polly Valencia. Seven out of the seven staff interviewed denied the allegation. However, the Department was able to obtain a video recording of an incident involving R8 and Licensee Polly Valencia, which was captured in R8’s bedroom. In the video recording, Licensee Polly Valencia is seen speaking to R8 in an inappropriate manner multiple times. Licensee Polly Valencia is heard telling R8, "I am disgusted with you". Licensee Polly Valencia is heard telling R8, "I am absolutely disgusted with you". Licensee Polly Valencia is also heard telling R8, "Shame on you". Licensee Polly Valencia is heard making a fourth statement to R8, however, the video recording ends before the full statement is captured. Based on the evidence gathered during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited on the attached LIC9099-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Polly Valencia. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided. The Department conducted seven staff interviews, including an interview with Licensee Polly Valencia. Seven out of the seven staff interviewed denied the allegation. The Department obtained a video recording from a camera that was placed in Resident #8 (R8) bedroom. The Department reviewed R8’s file. The Department observed that there was a consent form which authorized a camera to be placed in R8’s bedroom for safety reasons. The consent form was signed by R8’s Responsible Party and by Licensee Polly Valencia. However, the consent form was not signed by R8 and the Department was unable to conduct an interview with R8 for this allegation, due to R8 passing away on July 7, 2024. Regarding the allegation, staff forced resident to eat, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff forced R8 to eat. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R8 for this allegation, due to R8 passing away on July 7, 2024. The Department conducted seven resident interviews. Four out of the seven residents were unable to qualify for an interview. However, three out of the seven residents denied the allegation. The Department conducted seven staff interviews, including an interview with Licensee Polly Valencia. Seven out of the seven staff interviewed denied the allegation. Regarding the allegation, staff hit resident, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff hit R8. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R8 for this allegation, due to R8 passing away on July 7, 2024. The Department conducted seven resident interviews. Four out of the seven residents were unable to qualify for an interview. However, three out of the seven residents denied the allegation. The Department conducted seven staff interviews, including an interview with Licensee Polly Valencia. Seven out of the seven staff interviewed denied the allegation. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the three allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Polly Valencia and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240227123453
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 3, 2026
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not evidenced by: Based on evidence gathered, the Licensee did not ensure Resident #8 was treated with dignity. LPA observed a video recording in which the Licensee spoke to R8 in an inappropriate manner. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee stated that she will complete a statement and conduct an in service training with all staff regarding this regulation. The Licensee agreed to provide LPA the statement and proof of training via email or fax by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 3, 2026
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall ...:(3) ...be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse... This requirement was not evidenced by: Based on evidence gathered, the Licensee did not ensure Resident #8 was free from intimidation and abuse. LPA observed a video recording in which the Licensee handled R8 in a rough manner. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee stated that she will complete a statement and conduct an in service training with all staff regarding this regulation. The Licensee agreed to provide LPA the statement and proof of training via email or fax by POC date.
Mar 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On March 2, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Case Management inspection. Licensee Polly Valencia was notified via telephone and later arrived to assist with the inspection. This visit is being conducted in conjunction with complaint #22-AS-20240227123453. During the complaint investigation, Licensee Polly Valencia was interviewed on two separate occasions, regarding the complaint allegations of staff handles residents in a rough manner, and staff spoke in an inappropriate manner to resident. During both interviews, Licensee Polly Valencia denied the complaint allegations and stated that she has not handled a resident in a rough manner and has not spoken to a resident in an inappropriate manner. However, during the complaint investigation, the Department obtained a video recording, which contradicted Licensee Polly Valencia’s statements. In the video recording, Licensee Polly Valencia is observed to be handling a resident in a rough manner when transferring a resident into her bed. The resident is heard groining in the video recording, which suggests it may have caused them a level of discomfort. Licensee Polly Valencia is also heard speaking to the resident in an inappropriate manner. Licensee Polly Valencia is heard telling the resident, "I am disgusted with you", "I am absolutely disgusted with you", and "Shame on you". The video recording directly contradicts the statements that Licensee Polly Valencia made to the Department during two separate interviews. Additionally the actions on the video recording by Licensee Polly Valencia were in itself, inimical to the health and safety of the resident in care. Based on the information gathered, a deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Polly Valencia. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87408(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 9, 2026
87408 Denial or Revocation of a Certificate: (a) The Department may deny or revoke any administrator certificate ... (6) The certificate holder engaged in conduct which is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of ... an individual ... This requirement was not evidenced by: Based on evidence gathered, the Licensee engaged in conduct inimical to the health and safety of a resident in care. The Licensee also provide false statements on two occasions to the Department. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee stated that she will complete a statement of understanding regarding this regulation. The Licensee agreed to provide the statement to LPA via email or fax by POC date.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to ensure a resident's visitation rights Facility staff failed to report a fall incident to a resident's reporting party in a timely manner Facility staff failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition requiring an admission onto hospice care Facility staff did not provide a responsible party with a list of the prescribed medication for a resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Polly Valencia and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, facility failed to ensure resident's visitation rights, revealed the following. It was reported that on two occasions facility staff told Resident 1's (R1) family members not to visit because R1 was asleep or was overwhelmed. The Administrator reported they never told any possible visitor not to visit. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported they have never told anyone not to visit a resident. No specific details were provided as to who informed possible visitors they could not visit or the dates that it occurred. LPA attempted to contact R1's responsible party but never received a response so they were not interviewed. R1's whereabouts are unknown so they could not be interviewed. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. Unsubstantiated The investigation into the allegation, facility staff failed to report a fall incident to a resident's reporting party in a timely manner, revealed the following. It was reported that in September 2023, R1 suffered a fall and the responsible party was not notified in a timely manner. No specific date was provided for R1's fall. The Administrator reported that R1 did have a fall in September 2023 but could not remember the exact date. Staff 1 reported that R1 started to fall out of their wheelchair and Staff 1 broke their fall but R1 still bumped their head on the ground. At that time R1's hospice nurse was present and assessed R1. R1's hospice nurse assessed R1 and determined R1 did not need emergency services. First aid was applied and R1 was taken to her room. R1' hospice nurse verified this information. The Administrator reported they contacted R1's responsible party and reported the incident. LPA attempted to contact R1's responsible party but never received a response so they were not interviewed. R1's whereabouts are unknown so they could not be interviewed. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition requiring an admission onto hospice care, revealed the following. Resident 1 (R1) moved into the facility May 15, 2023 and moved out November 30, 2023. A review of records shows R1 was put on hospice on September 9, 2023. The Administrator reported that R1 appeared to be losing weight and wanted R1 to be evaluated by hospice. The Administrator reported that R1 agreed. The Administrator reported that they informed the responsible party and they agreed. R1 was assessed and hospice was approved. R1 was admitted to hospice for unspecified protein/calorie malnutrition. The Administrator reported that the responsible party was notified and kept informed of all of R1's changes. LPA attempted to contact R1's responsible party but never received a response so they were not interviewed. R1's whereabouts are unknown so they could not be interviewed. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff did not provide a responsible party with a list of the prescribed medication for a resident, revealed the following. It was reported that after R1 moved out the responsible party requested a list of medications for R1. It was reported that the facility was taking R1 to medical appointments without notifying the responsible party. The Administrator reported that R1's appointments were at the facility and the responsible party was notified about each appointment. therefore the allegation is substantiated. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided. The Administrator reported that any issues with medication should have been communicated with the physician because the facility only administers medications as prescribed and doesn't decide what medications are prescribed. The Administrator reported that the responsible party was provided with R1's medications and a list of their medications when R1 moved out. LPA attempted to contact R1's responsible party but never received a response so they were not interviewed. R1's whereabouts are unknown so they could not be interviewed. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240416125427
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 26, 2025
A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below...This requirement was not met as evidenced by The facility verified R1 suffered a fall in September 2023 but did not report it to the Department, this poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to sign a statement of understanding for CCR 87211 and to train staff on CCR 87211. Licensee to submit proof to LPA by the POC due date.
Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted an unannounced Required One-Year Inspection. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator Polly Valencia and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to operate as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) serving six (6) residents, ages 60 and above. At the time of the visit, six residents were present in care. The facility is a one-story residence consisting of six bedrooms, seven bathrooms, and a detached garage used for storage. LPA inspected all resident bedrooms, which were observed to be clean, well-furnished with a bed, chair, and linens in good condition. Adequate storage space was available, and no tripping hazards were observed. The kitchen was clean and well-maintained, with all major appliances functioning properly. Knives and sharps were stored securely and were inaccessible to residents in care.The exterior grounds were observed to be clean, safe, and well-maintained. Outdoor pathways were unobstructed, and a shaded seating area was available for residents’ use. The fire extinguisher was fully charged, with the gauge indicator in the green zone. Hot water temperature was measured at 108.6 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the regulatory range. Facility records indicated that the most recent emergency drill was conducted on October 1, 2025. {***CONTINUE***} The facility maintained an adequate food supply consisting of at least two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable items. A review of resident and staff records revealed no discrepancies; all documentation was complete and met Title 22 requirements. Based on observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies were cited in accordance with Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomReport on file
Type of visit: Annual/Random
This LIC809 is generated to update the LIC9099 D page for the previous annual done on 11/23/2024.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2024
Nov 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/23/2024 at 11:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit at the Polly’s Place Facility. LPA Calderon was allowed entry into the facility by Administrator Polly Valencia. Administrator Valencia asked infection control questions and took LPA Calderon temperature prior to entrance into the facility. Facility is to operate a Residential Care Facility for 6 Elderly residents 60 years or older. Currently, there are six (6) residents residing in the facility, 60 and older. LPA Calderon explained to Administrator Valencia, the purpose of the one-year Annual Inspection visit, and escorted LPA Calderon on a tour of the entire inside and outside facility grounds. As part of the inspection, LPA Calderon reviewed: Six (6) client service records, six (6) client medication records (MAR), three (3) staff records, and inspected the inside facility and outside grounds. The facilities’ last fire drill was conducted on 10/01/2024. The one-story residential home consists of six (6) client bedrooms, seven (7) client bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, staff room, office area, attached garage with washer and dryer/ storage area, backyard with table and chairs. No weapons are stored in the premises. Kitchen was inspected and observed to be clean and operational. A two-day supply perishable and seven-day supply of non-perishable foods are present in the facility. Emergency Water Storage is in the garage and kitchen area. LPA Calderon observed that all facility rooms are clean and in good repair. A comfortable temperature was observed, and the facility has central air and heating. LPA Calderon observed the following during inspection of client’s rooms: mattresses are in good condition, adequate lighting present, plenty of dresser/closet space is present, and all bed linens present. All bedrooms contain furniture, lighting fixtures and personal storage space as required, all beds have the required amount of linen and mattress covers, LPA Calderon observed fully stocked closet with bedding, towels, and toiletries supplies. Bathroom fixtures are clean, in good repair, and working properly and contain the required nonskid mats and grab bars. LPA Calderon observed bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulation. Bathroom #1 hot water temperature properly measured at 115 degrees Fahrenheit, bathroom #2 hot water temperature properly measured at 113 degrees Fahrenheit, and bathroom #3 hot water temperature properly measured at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen hot water temperature properly measured at 118 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility (14) Carbon Monoxide and (14) Smoke Detectors hard wired operated and connected were tested and are working properly. The facility one (1) Fire Extinguishers was checked and found to be fully charged and accessible. All exit doors in the facility have alarm systems. The facility has a working landline telephone. All toxins and knifes are locked/secured and inaccessible to clients. Medications are centrally stored and in a locked storage cabinet. Facility 2 first aid kit is fully stocked with manuals was checked and in order. Outside grounds were toured and there is a pool observed. All Exits/ Walkways around the home were free of debris and hazards. Outside patio accessible to clients. Six (6) client files were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA Calderon reviewed six (6) resident medications (MAR) and they were all found to be administered according to doctor's orders. Three (3) staff files were checked and have the required documents. LPA Calderon noted the Administrator Polly Valencia Certification # 6061671740 expiration date of 1/5/2024 was NOT valid at time of inspection. The facility does not handle client's money/cash resources and no surety bond is needed. Commercial General Liability Policy #CFP3411281 policy period from 02/01/2024 to 02/01/2025 underwritten by Seneca Insurance Company, coverage 1,000,000/3,000,000 is valid at time of inspection. Administrator Valencia to email LPA Calderon a full copy of the commercial insurance policy including all endorsements no later than 12/10/2024. All the required documents are posted in the facility in a clearly visible area. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and clients, sanitizing stations (Located in common areas and restrooms). LPA observed staff and clients were NOT wearing face coverings. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA Calderon advised the Administrator Valencia to continuously monitor the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website and Community Care Licensing Provider Informational Notices (PIN) for any updates relating to COVID-19 guidance. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA Calderon did observe deficiencies therefore citations were issued at this time. Annual Licensing Fee is CURRENT. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Administrator Polly Valencia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2024
Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit 22-AS-20240416125427. LPA met with Administrator Polly Valencia. LPA explained the reason for the visit. During the visit LPA observed the following. The smoke detectors in the kitchen and TV room next to the kitchen that both smoke detectors have been removed. LPA observed that the base plates are attached with the wires to connect the smoke detectors hanging freely from the ceiling/wall. LPA toured the facility. LPA observed the bathroom next to the living room does not have a screen in the window. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the LIC 809D, LIC 421IM and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2024
All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: LPA observed the smoke detectors in the kitchen and TV room have been removed. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to install smoke detectors in the kitchen and TV room next to the kitchen and to forward proof to LPA by POC due date.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility refused to return resident’s medications
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted, and granted entry by facility administrator (AD) Polly Valencia. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that facility refused to return resident's medications. LPA De Perio conducted 5 interviews that consisted of staff and residents. 4 out of the 4 resident interviews, and the 1 staff interview did not corroborate with the allegation. An interview was conducted with the resident's (R1) social worker, who stated that R1's responsible party requested for the facility to return R1's medication on December 15, 2023, and that R1's responsible party confirmed to the social worker via text message that the facility had returned R1's medication the following day on December 16, 2023. Unsubstantiated R1's social worker listed the medications that R1's responsible party had received from the facility, and per documentation review, 8 out of the 8 medications that R1 was prescribed, was given to the responsible party. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with AD Valencia. A copy of this report was provided and explained.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231218142300
Earlier years2022 · 3 documents
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad conducted this announced inspection for the purpose of conducting a pre-licensing inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Polly Valencia, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and toured the facility. Facility is to operate a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. Application was submitted to Community Care Licensing on 04/07/2022. This is an initial application with no residents in care. This is the second pre-licensing inspection. Please see LIC809 dated 10/12/2022. During the initial pre-licensing inspection, LPA and AD observed that the room designated as an office on the floor plan contained 2 beds. AD stated that there are no staff bedrooms, but that the office was intended to be used as a staff break room, the beds were there for break purposes, and no one would sleep in that room overnight. AD also stated that overnight supervision would be provided by wake overnight staff. After the initial pre-licensing inspection, AD explored the possibility of having the office fire cleared as a staff bedroom, but chose to move forward with the current floor plan and removed the beds from the office. During today’s inspection, LPA and AD inspected the facility and observed that the room designated as an office on the floor plan no longer contains any beds. The office now contains a desk and couch. AD confirmed that overnight supervision will be provided by wake overnight staff. During the inspection, LPA explained the process of this application and about the post licensing inspection once the facility is licensed. AD was informed today that the facility is ready for licensure and final approval will be processed by the CAB supervisor in Sacramento. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to AD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2022
Oct 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad conducted this announced inspection for the purpose of conducting a pre-licensing inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Polly Valencia, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and toured the facility. Facility is to operate a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. Application was submitted to Community Care Licensing on 04/07/2022. This is an initial application with no residents in care. During the inspection, LPA and AD observed the following: Structure. This is a one-story home. Facility is a 6-bedroom, 7-bathroom, 1 story house with detached garage that is being used for storage. There is a back yard with a patio cover for the residents. Facility telephone number is (714) 603-7520. Resident Bedrooms. The 6 resident bedrooms are spacious and will easily accommodate the residents’ furnishings. Lamps, chairs, linens, and storage for each resident bedroom inspected. Staff Bedrooms. There are no staff bedrooms, but there is a staff break room. AD stated that overnight supervision will be provided by wake overnight staff. AD stated that if this provision is not already included in the plan of operation, AD will submit an addendum to AD’s CAB analyst to add to the plan of operation. Bathrooms. Bathrooms were clean, faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature: tested between 110 to 114 F degrees. Linens & Hygiene Supplies. New linens and fully stocked linen closets were observed. Emergency Phone Numbers, Exit Plan & Menu: Reviewed. Food Service. 7 days nonperishable food supply reviewed and AD stated they will obtain 2 days perishable food prior to accepting residents. Carbon Monoxide, Smoke Detectors, Fire Extinguisher were observed and tested, including the wired smoke detectors/carbon monoxide detectors. Appliances. Stove burners, microwave, washer, and dryer inspected. Knives: observed locked in the kitchen cabinet. Toxins: observed locked in laundry room cabinet. Medication cabinet is locked. First-Aid Kit & Activity Supplies: observed and available. Resident & Staff Files. This is an initial inspection and LPA observed storage space for resident and staff files. Fire clearance was approved by Anaheim Fire Department Inspector Alicia Badosa on 09/07/2022. Backyard. Backyard exit gate is operational and unlocked. Backyard has shaded area for outdoor activities and sufficient seating for residents. Component III was completed with AD during today’s inspection. AD will obtain liability insurance once the application is approved. During the inspection, LPA explained the process of this application and about the post licensing inspection once the facility is licensed. AD was informed today that the facility is ready for licensure and final approval will be processed by the CAB supervisor in Sacramento. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to AD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2022
Sep 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: INITIAL Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 0 COVID Mitigation Plan discussed? YES Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants: Licensee/Administrator, Polly Valencia Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II via telephone call with the analyst at CAB. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Staff qualifications and responsibilities 3. Applicant and Administrator qualifications 4. Program policy: Abuse, admission agreement, medication management, reporting incidents to CCL, restricted & prohibited conditions 5. Grievances, Complaints, Community resources 6. Physical plant, food service 7. Application document review and technical assistance: Criminal record clearance, Health screening, Fire clearance, First Aid/CPR certificate, Administrator certificate, Financial verification, Pre-licensing inspection, Compliance history, Control of propertythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2022
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 2, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Polly's Place RCFE, LLC, licensed since 2022.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Polly's Place 2 RCFE · Anaheim
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2022, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2022, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Polly's Place
Is Polly's Place licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Polly's Place licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Polly's Place been cited?
2 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Polly's Place still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Polly's Place cost?
$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in Anaheim that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,025 to $5,800 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Polly's Place take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Polly's Place RCFE, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Polly's Place RCFE, LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical Center is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Polly's Place keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Polly's Place license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “POLLY'S PLACE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #306006178. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Polly's Place RCFE, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 2, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Orange County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Orange County