Vividus Senior Living

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with ambulation Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed Staff do not assist resident with showering Staff did not ensure that resident was hydrated Administrator is not present at facility a sufficient amount of time to manage facility

On May 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by care giving staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Administrator Baabak Sharifan was notified via telephone and later arrived to assist with the inspection. During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed three residents and five staff. The Department also reviewed and obtained pertinent documents to the complaint such as resident records and staff records. Regarding the allegation, staff did not assist resident with ambulation, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff did not assist Resident #1 (R1) with ambulation. The Department reviewed the file for R1 including R1's Physician's Report dated April 30, 2024. Per R1's Physician Report, R1 was diagnosed with Dementia and required full assistance with her activities of daily living (ADL's). The Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251021161230

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Bobbi Sharifan and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was reported that after R1 passed away a refund was requested by the responsible party but no refund was issued. R1 passed away on March 7, 2026. R1's responsible party reported that they informed the Administrator and requested a refund. The Administrator reported that the responsible party did not remove R1's bed until April 2, 2026. R1's responsible party verified that R1's bed was not removed from the facility until April 2, 2026. Health and Safety Code 1569.652(c) states, "A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the individual, individuals, or entity contractuathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260505095702

Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Facility does not have adequate staffing to care and supervise residents.

LPA Ruth Martinez made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Baabak "Bobbi" Sharifan and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, Department staff inspected the facility, interviewed AD, witnesses, and staff, and obtained and reviewed the following records, staff roster, staff schedule, Resident 1’s (R1) emergency contact information, R1’s medication administration record (MAR) for April and May 2023, Death Certificate for R1 dated May 15, 2023, R1’s physician’s report dated March 16, 2023, R1’s care plan, R1’s resident appraisal dated September 13, 2021, R1’s admission agreement dated March 14, 2023 and R1’s hospice notes for May 2023. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2026 · control 22-AS-20230801131957

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not abide by the terms of the admission agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted, and granted entry by staff on duty (S1) Edgardo Sevilla, who notified facility administrator about the visit. It was alleged that licensee did not abide by the terms of the admission agreement. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 7 interviews. 5 out of the 5 interviews with residents did not corroborate with the allegation due to being unable to provide information regarding the allegation. 2 out of the 2 staff interviews conducted also did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that the facility does abide by the terms of the admission agreement, and disclosed that prior to admission, the facility administrator will go over the agreement with the residents responsible party, and that the responsible party will review and sign it. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230920142902