Valley Silvertown is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in West Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610466, licensed for 183 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Valley Silvertown

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 183 residents · West Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610466, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6833 Fallbrook Ave · West Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 883-4123
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 183 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 183 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 103-108, 129, 130, 189 OR 190. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25. NEW MGMT COMPANY VALLEY SILVERTOWN LLC EFFECTIVE 09/23/2025.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 9, 2026
Occupancy at the December 4, 2025 visit
114 of 183 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 15, 2024 to December 4, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee allowed a volunteer to perform staff duties

At 12:45 p.m. on 12/04/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 11/06/25 and toured the facility inside and out at 1:50 p.m., interviewed staff and residents between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 pm., and conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to staff records and a staff roster at 2:30 p.m. Another subsequent visit was conducted on 11/13/25 in which LPA interviewed staff, family, and residents between 1:00 p.m. and 5:10 p.m. and toured the facility inside and out at 1:30 p.m. Another subsequent visit was conducted on 11/19/25 in which LPA interviewed staff and residents between 11:15 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., toured the facility inside and out at 1:00 p.m., and conducted a record review of pertinent records at 2:15 p.m. Today, LPA interviewed staff and residents between 12:50 pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251103130636
Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient care and supervision provided to residents Facility is unsanitary

At approximately 9:30 a.m. on 10/02/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted a file review at 4:00 p.m. on 10/01/25, interviewed staff and residents between 9:40 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. today, conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to an admission agreement, medical assessment, care plan, and client roster at 10:00 a.m., and toured the facility inside and out at 10:15 a.m. Regarding the allegation "Insufficient care and supervision provided to residents" it was alleged a resident exposed themselves and urinated in a common area. File review revealed the facility submitted an incident report in which Resident #1 (R1) had urinated in the courtyard on 09/20/25. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) at 9:40 a.m. today confirmed the details of the report and noted only Staff #2 (S2) witnessed the evethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250926092430
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is advertising miselading statements on its brochure

At approximately 12:30 p.m. on 06/26/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA interviewed staff and (07) residents [which was at least 10% of the community] between 12:40 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. today, toured the facility inside and out at 1:00 p.m., and conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to staff and client rosters at 3:30 p.m. Regarding the allegation "Facility is advertising misleading statements on its brochure" it was alleged the facility produced a brochure which advertised services which were not offered. The Department also received photographs of the brochure showing the facility offered “24-hour nursing care”, skilled nursing care, and physical therapy services. Interview with the administrator at 12:40 p.m. today confirmed the brochure was available in the facility about one (01) mothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250624150337
May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unassociated staff providing care Staff sleeping while on duty

At 8:30 a.m. on 05/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with the Executive Director (ED) and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 05/08/24 and interviewed the ED at 8:40 a.m., conducted a record review at 8:50 a.m., toured the facility at 9:00 a.m., and interviewed Resident #1 (R1) at 9:10 a.m. Today, LPA interviewed the ED, five (05) staff members, and four (04) out of forty (40) residents, which was 10% of the population between 8:35 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., conducted a record review at 10:30 a.m., and toured the facility at 10:45 a.m. Regarding the allegation “Unassociated staff providing care” it was alleged S1 was working in the facility before obtaining a criminal background clearance. Interview with R1 revealed they saw S1 in the building in April 2024 and asked staff who S1 was. R1 was told that multiple staff were not aware of S1’s identhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240503095800
Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026550202599220242212023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 883-4123

Is Valley Silvertown licensed?

Yes — Valley Silvertown is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in West Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610466, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 183 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Valley Silvertown care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Valley Silvertown with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 183 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 103-108, 129, 130, 189 OR 190. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25. NEW MGMT COMPANY VALLEY SILVERTOWN LLC EFFECTIVE 09/23/2025.

How much does Valley Silvertown cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Valley Silvertown's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Valley Silvertown accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Valley Silvertown through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

114 of 183 beds occupied (62%) when the state visited on December 4, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Valley Silvertown?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2023 for Valley Silvertown; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 4, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee allowed a volunteer to perform staff duties
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 12:45 p.m. on 12/04/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 11/06/25 and toured the facility inside and out at 1:50 p.m., interviewed staff and residents between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 pm., and conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to staff records and a staff roster at 2:30 p.m. Another subsequent visit was conducted on 11/13/25 in which LPA interviewed staff, family, and residents between 1:00 p.m. and 5:10 p.m. and toured the facility inside and out at 1:30 p.m. Another subsequent visit was conducted on 11/19/25 in which LPA interviewed staff and residents between 11:15 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., toured the facility inside and out at 1:00 p.m., and conducted a record review of pertinent records at 2:15 p.m. Today, LPA interviewed staff and residents between 12:50 pCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251103130636
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient care and supervision provided to residents Facility is unsanitary
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:30 a.m. on 10/02/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted a file review at 4:00 p.m. on 10/01/25, interviewed staff and residents between 9:40 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. today, conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to an admission agreement, medical assessment, care plan, and client roster at 10:00 a.m., and toured the facility inside and out at 10:15 a.m. Regarding the allegation "Insufficient care and supervision provided to residents" it was alleged a resident exposed themselves and urinated in a common area. File review revealed the facility submitted an incident report in which Resident #1 (R1) had urinated in the courtyard on 09/20/25. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) at 9:40 a.m. today confirmed the details of the report and noted only Staff #2 (S2) witnessed the eveCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250926092430
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is advertising miselading statements on its brochure
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 12:30 p.m. on 06/26/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA interviewed staff and (07) residents [which was at least 10% of the community] between 12:40 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. today, toured the facility inside and out at 1:00 p.m., and conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to staff and client rosters at 3:30 p.m. Regarding the allegation "Facility is advertising misleading statements on its brochure" it was alleged the facility produced a brochure which advertised services which were not offered. The Department also received photographs of the brochure showing the facility offered “24-hour nursing care”, skilled nursing care, and physical therapy services. Interview with the administrator at 12:40 p.m. today confirmed the brochure was available in the facility about one (01) moCDSS inspection report, June 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250624150337

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnassociated staff providing care Staff sleeping while on duty
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 8:30 a.m. on 05/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with the Executive Director (ED) and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 05/08/24 and interviewed the ED at 8:40 a.m., conducted a record review at 8:50 a.m., toured the facility at 9:00 a.m., and interviewed Resident #1 (R1) at 9:10 a.m. Today, LPA interviewed the ED, five (05) staff members, and four (04) out of forty (40) residents, which was 10% of the population between 8:35 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., conducted a record review at 10:30 a.m., and toured the facility at 10:45 a.m. Regarding the allegation “Unassociated staff providing care” it was alleged S1 was working in the facility before obtaining a criminal background clearance. Interview with R1 revealed they saw S1 in the building in April 2024 and asked staff who S1 was. R1 was told that multiple staff were not aware of S1’s idenCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240503095800

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 883-4123
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Valley Silvertown? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.