Globus Senior Living Inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610446, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 7 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated December 30, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

15 homes in view

Globus Senior Living Inc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Granada Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610446, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
17339 Horace St · Granada Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(323) 491-0077
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 1 AMBULATORY & 5 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #1 CLEARED FOR AMBULATORY ONLY. BEDROOM #2, 3, 4 CLEARED FOR NON-AMBULATORY. BEDROOM #4 CLEARED FOR 1 BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 6.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 8 times and filed 7 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 30, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
December 2, 2025
Occupancy at the December 30, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 11, 2024 to December 30, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident in care.

This report is being amended to change the verbiage and structure of the narrative from the report issued on 12.30.2025. Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with the administrator, Donara Aghabalyan, and advised them about the visit. An entrance interview was conducted. To investigate the allegation, at 10:30 AM LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the clients in care on 12.30.2025, LPA interviewed four (4) residents, two (2) staff (including the Administrator) from 10:35 AM to 11:15 AM. At 11:00 AM, LPA reviewed and received copies of documents about the investigation: staff roster (LIC 500), resident roster (LIC 9020), R1 physician report, Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251226095217
Dec 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee admitted Resident with a prohibited health condition Resident developed multiple pressure injuries in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to this facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital on 11/15/2024 with a stage 4 wound. R1 had at least 5 pressure injuries, but the worst was the stage 4 wound that was not present when released from the hospital sometime in August 2024 to a skilled nursing facility. From the skilled nursing facility, R1 was admitted to this facility. The ten day visit was made by LPA Cava on 11/19/24, followed by another subsequent visit made by LPA Cava on 03/25/25. LPA Cava’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility administrator, staff and residents. LPA also obtained and reviewed facility and hospital records. Interviews with administrator reveal that R1 was admitted to the facility with a wound greater than a stage 2 on 08/31/24. Home Health services was ordered, but had yet to be initiated when R1 was admittethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241118163523
Mar 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was adequately dressed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with staff, Yegsik Tonikyan, and advised her of the visit. The adminstrator, Donara Aghabalyan was called and joined shortly after. It was reported that on or around 05/12/24, Resident 1 (R1) was observed by a visitor/guest with only a t-shirt, adult diaper and socks on. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, facility owner, three (3) of three residents and resident family. Record review was also made. According to the administrator, R1 was only at the facility for 24 hours. R1 was discharged (d/c) from the hospital on or around 05/12/24. When d/c to this facility, R1 did not have any clothing or personal belongings with them. Family was aware of the d/c from the hospital, and that R1 had no belongings and clothing with them. Family was preparing to bring over some clothing for R1 the next day, but R1 had a behavioral issuethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240604135203
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file8typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202544120241102023220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (323) 491-0077

Is Globus Senior Living Inc licensed?

Yes — Globus Senior Living Inc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610446, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 7 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated December 30, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Globus Senior Living Inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Globus Senior Living Inc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 1 AMBULATORY & 5 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #1 CLEARED FOR AMBULATORY ONLY. BEDROOM #2, 3, 4 CLEARED FOR NON-AMBULATORY. BEDROOM #4 CLEARED FOR 1 BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 6.

How much does Globus Senior Living Inc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Globus Senior Living Inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Globus Senior Living Inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Globus Senior Living Inc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 30, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Globus Senior Living Inc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 8 state visits and 7 dated documents since 2023 for Globus Senior Living Inc; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 30, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff abandoned resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This report is being amended to change the verbiage and structure of the narrative from the report issued on 12.30.2025. Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with the administrator, Donara Aghabalyan, and advised them about the visit. An entrance interview was conducted. To investigate the allegation, at 10:30 AM LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the clients in care on 12.30.2025, LPA interviewed four (4) residents, two (2) staff (including the Administrator) from 10:35 AM to 11:15 AM. At 11:00 AM, LPA reviewed and received copies of documents about the investigation: staff roster (LIC 500), resident roster (LIC 9020), R1 physician report, Continue to LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251226095217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee admitted Resident with a prohibited health condition Resident developed multiple pressure injuries in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to this facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital on 11/15/2024 with a stage 4 wound. R1 had at least 5 pressure injuries, but the worst was the stage 4 wound that was not present when released from the hospital sometime in August 2024 to a skilled nursing facility. From the skilled nursing facility, R1 was admitted to this facility. The ten day visit was made by LPA Cava on 11/19/24, followed by another subsequent visit made by LPA Cava on 03/25/25. LPA Cava’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility administrator, staff and residents. LPA also obtained and reviewed facility and hospital records. Interviews with administrator reveal that R1 was admitted to the facility with a wound greater than a stage 2 on 08/31/24. Home Health services was ordered, but had yet to be initiated when R1 was admitteCDSS inspection report, April 25, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241118163523

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was adequately dressed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with staff, Yegsik Tonikyan, and advised her of the visit. The adminstrator, Donara Aghabalyan was called and joined shortly after. It was reported that on or around 05/12/24, Resident 1 (R1) was observed by a visitor/guest with only a t-shirt, adult diaper and socks on. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, facility owner, three (3) of three residents and resident family. Record review was also made. According to the administrator, R1 was only at the facility for 24 hours. R1 was discharged (d/c) from the hospital on or around 05/12/24. When d/c to this facility, R1 did not have any clothing or personal belongings with them. Family was aware of the d/c from the hospital, and that R1 had no belongings and clothing with them. Family was preparing to bring over some clothing for R1 the next day, but R1 had a behavioral issueCDSS inspection report, June 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240604135203

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 8 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
8
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(323) 491-0077
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Globus Senior Living Inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.