Simple Touch Board And Care Inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Canoga Park, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610429, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated May 19, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Simple Touch Board And Care Inc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Canoga Park, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610429, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
22317 Mobile St · Canoga Park, Los Angeles County
Phone
(747) 444-8506
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORIES WHERE ONE (1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #5. WAIVER/ GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA AND BEDRIDDEN PLAN SUBMITTED.State service designations983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 19, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 29, 2026
Occupancy at the September 26, 2025 visit
2 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 5, 2024 to September 26, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents unattended in the facility for an extended period of time.

At 09:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Staff 1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. The Administrator arrived shortly after, and LPA explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were conducted. At 09:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 09:10am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician's Report, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 09:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. Between 09:20am – 11:00am, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, one (1) staff and attempted to interview two (2) out of two (2) residents. However, due to their metal condition/diagnoses, residents were not able to communicate and or answer questions. Continthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250921123305
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are unable to communicate with residents

At 9:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with the staff, Gegham Amirkhanyan, who granted access to the facility. The staff contacted the Administrator and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator was unable to come to the facility and designated the current staff to sign for the report. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 09:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 09:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 09:20am – 10:30pm, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, one (1) staff, and three (3) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241216084841
Dec 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not provide quality meals to resident(s)

At 9:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina and Regional Director, LTC Ombudsman Program, Ginger Perini, conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. The team met with staff, Chinara Atamkulova, who granted access to the facility. Administrator arrived shortly after, and the team explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 09:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 10:10am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Preplacement Appraisal Information, and Facility Menu, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 09:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 09:20am – 12:30pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, and three (3) residents. Continue on LIC9099-Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241205141612
Dec 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that staff are present at the facility while residents are in care. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided with food that is of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet their needs.

At 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 10:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 10:10am, LPA attempted to request copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 10:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 10:20am – 12:30pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff and (two) out of two (2) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240531162143
Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that staff follow food safety protocols. Staff do not ensure that resident's room is sanitary.

Licensing Program Manager(LPM) Nichelle Gillyard and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at 8:20 am and met with the Administrator Karine Sarkisyan. The Administrator was informed of the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. LPA/LPM conducted interviews with staff, attempted to interview resident in care and attempted to review records. LPA/LPM conducted a food inspection tour and a physical plant tour. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure that staff follow food safety protocols. Continue to LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240531162143
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file18typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202534120245732023220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (747) 444-8506

Is Simple Touch Board And Care Inc licensed?

Yes — Simple Touch Board And Care Inc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Canoga Park (Los Angeles County): California license #197610429, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 19, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Simple Touch Board And Care Inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Simple Touch Board And Care Inc with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORIES WHERE ONE (1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #5. WAIVER/ GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA AND BEDRIDDEN PLAN SUBMITTED.

How much does Simple Touch Board And Care Inc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Simple Touch Board And Care Inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Simple Touch Board And Care Inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Simple Touch Board And Care Inc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

2 of 6 beds occupied (33%) when the state visited on September 26, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Simple Touch Board And Care Inc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2023 for Simple Touch Board And Care Inc; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 26, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents unattended in the facility for an extended period of time.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 09:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Staff 1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. The Administrator arrived shortly after, and LPA explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were conducted. At 09:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 09:10am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician's Report, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 09:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. Between 09:20am – 11:00am, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, one (1) staff and attempted to interview two (2) out of two (2) residents. However, due to their metal condition/diagnoses, residents were not able to communicate and or answer questions. ContinCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250921123305

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are unable to communicate with residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 9:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with the staff, Gegham Amirkhanyan, who granted access to the facility. The staff contacted the Administrator and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator was unable to come to the facility and designated the current staff to sign for the report. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 09:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 09:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 09:20am – 10:30pm, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, one (1) staff, and three (3) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241216084841
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not provide quality meals to resident(s)
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 9:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina and Regional Director, LTC Ombudsman Program, Ginger Perini, conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. The team met with staff, Chinara Atamkulova, who granted access to the facility. Administrator arrived shortly after, and the team explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 09:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 10:10am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Preplacement Appraisal Information, and Facility Menu, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 09:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 09:20am – 12:30pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, and three (3) residents. Continue on LIC9099-CCDSS inspection report, December 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241205141612
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that staff are present at the facility while residents are in care. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided with food that is of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet their needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 10:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 10:10am, LPA attempted to request copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 10:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 10:20am – 12:30pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff and (two) out of two (2) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240531162143
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that staff follow food safety protocols. Staff do not ensure that resident's room is sanitary.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Manager(LPM) Nichelle Gillyard and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at 8:20 am and met with the Administrator Karine Sarkisyan. The Administrator was informed of the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. LPA/LPM conducted interviews with staff, attempted to interview resident in care and attempted to review records. LPA/LPM conducted a food inspection tour and a physical plant tour. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure that staff follow food safety protocols. Continue to LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240531162143

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(747) 444-8506
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Simple Touch Board And Care Inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.