Royal Palms is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chatsworth, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197607361, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 30, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 19, 2022 to January 5, 2024. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jun 30, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 3, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 3, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 3, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 15, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 17, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 5, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing night time supervision to the residents
This is an ammended report to the complaint investigation conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma pertaining to the above allegation. The findings were unsubstantiated but erroneously marked substantiated. Licensee, John Mallon, designated staff Astrid Bautista to sign and accept the report. LPA Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with caregiver, John Mallon, and explained the reason for the visit. --- Staff are not providing night time supervision to the residents. It was alleged that the facility does not have awake staff member 24/7. To investigate the allegation, on 12/14/2022 at around 3:15 PM, LPA Martinez interviewed two (02) staff and on 01/05/2024, LPA Duguma interviewed two (02) staff from 10:30 AM – 11:30 AM and three (03) out of six (06) residents from 3:30 PM – 4:30 PM. During interviews with staff, Staff #1 (S1) stated they are live-in staff, work one twelve (12) hthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024 · control 31-AS-20221205172017
Sep 29, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items
At 12:15pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver final report. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. LPA contacted the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator was unable to come and designated S1 to sign for today's report. During the initial visit conducted by LPA Panushkina on 08/30/23, interviews and record review were made. LPA requested resident and staff roster and copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Resident Appraisal and Staff training, etc., relevant to the investigation. In addition, between 10:00am – 12:00pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff members and five (5) out of six (6) residents. The Administrator was informed that additional visit will follow to render final findings. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230824085032
Aug 30, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide toileting assistance to residents in care Staff do not provide transportation assistance to residents in care
At 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegations. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) who granted access to the facility. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 9:20am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 9:30am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Resident Appraisal and Staff training, etc., relevant to the investigation. At approximately 9:40am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 10:00am – 12:00pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff members and five (5) out of six (6) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230824085032
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Royal Palms licensed?
Yes — Royal Palms is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chatsworth (Los Angeles County): California license #197607361, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Royal Palms care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Royal Palms with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE SIX NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. 24-HOUR AWAKE STAFFING. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR ONE RESIDENT. ALL ROOMS CLEARED FOR NONAMBULATORY ONLY PER 2008 CBC.
How much does Royal Palms cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Royal Palms's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Royal Palms accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Royal Palms is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on January 5, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Royal Palms?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Royal Palms; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 5, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2024
2023
2022
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Who runs Royal Palms?
From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.
Licensed to Jj Palms, Inc., who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(818) 772-7153Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Royal Palms? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.