Mid-size home · Licensed for 48 · Chico
Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose
2750 Sierra Sunrise Terrace, Chico, CA 95928Licensed since 2006
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 48: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 48 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 8 residents
- Bedridden
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
48 NONAMBULATORY TO INCLUDE 8 BEDRIDDEN, 8 HOSPICE
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 8 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,950a month to start
Likely $3,100–$5,200
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,950likely a month
Starting monthly rate$3,950likely $3,100–$5,200
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 11 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,100–$5,350
- $3,950
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,800–$8,500
- $6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,390 to $5,558
8 homes like this within 11 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$5,500.
- Almond Blossom Assisted Living-BH 1Chico · 0.7 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on its own website · cost is a combination of rent and level of care. almond blossom starts at around · seen October 27, 2026
- Almond Blossom Assisted Living BH 2Chico · 0.7 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on its own website · cost is a combination of rent and level of care. almond blossom starts at around · seen October 27, 2026
- Roseleaf Senior CareChico · 0.9 mi · Mid-size home$3,390Listed on its own website · pricing starts as low as · seen October 27, 2026
- The Courtyard at Little Chico CreekChico · 1.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,558Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 5, 2026
- Townsend HouseChico · 4.5 mi · Mid-size home$3,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Almond Blossom Assisted Living-WestChico · 4.9 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on its own website · cost is a combination of rent and level of care. almond blossom starts at around · seen October 27, 2026
- Sunshine Assisted Living - The HouseParadise · 10 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunshine Assisted Living - The CottageParadise · 10 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 11 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2750 Sierra Sunrise Terrace, Chico, CA 95928Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Enloe HealthHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #45001756 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20263 state visits · 4 documents
May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On May 13, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison arrived at the facility to conduct a scheduled pre-licensing inspection for a change of corporate structure (CHOCS) with residents in care. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Cliff Keene, and Resident Services Director (RSD), Pomali Thitphaneth and explained the purpose of the visit. Comp 3 was waived due to the facility already being in operation. Administrators license is current and posted for public view. During the inspection, there were 27 residents and four (4) staff providing care. LPA observed residents participating in ana exercise class. LPA, RSD and ED toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, courtyard, kitchen, and storage areas. All areas observed were found to be clean and in good repair. All walkways were free of obstructions. LPA observed each bedroom to have the required furnishings and working lights. LPA observed the facility to be at a comfortable temperature. There were various activities available for client recreation. LPA observed a calendar of activities posted for residents to view, as well as printed copies for resident rooms. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food. All residents requiring a special diet are posted for kitchen staff to review. LPA observed all medications, sharps, and cleaning supplies to be locked away and inaccessible to clients in care. LPA observed a complete First Aid kit ready for use. LPA observed fire extinguishers, smoke detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors to be in working condition and last inspected by the local fire jurisdiction in February 2026. The facility is conducting emergency disaster drills monthly with the last drill being documented in April 2026. This facility has successfully completed the CHOCS Pre-licensing inspection. LPA will contact the Central Application Bureau and declare no objections to continuing with the licensing process. Exit Interview and copy of report was provided to Executive Director, Cliff Keene, via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not adequately staffed to meet the needs of the residents in care. Residents are not provided with adequate access to the facility's call system. Facility staff sleep while on shift.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the care home and met with Executive Director (ED), Cliff Keene, to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegations listed above. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, toured the premises, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Facility is not adequately staffed to meet the needs of the residents in care. Relevant party reported that the care home only has one (1) staff member during night shift to assist the residents if needed. ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Unsubstantiated LPA conducted interviews with residents R1, R2, R3, and R4. No interviews conducted with residents indicated any concerns regarding staffing. Interviews conducted with staff members (S3, S4, S5, S6, and S7) and witness (W1) did not indicate any concerns regarding staffing. LPA observed Raw Time Entry Report for staff schedule. LPA observed the facility to have approximately 13 staff members working in a day. LPA observed that staff were scheduled accordingly to ensure at least one (1) staff member was on shift and to account for breaks and shift changes. Allegation: Residents are not provided with adequate access to the facility's call system. Relevant party reported that residents, including R1, may not have access to their call buttons. Interviews conducted with R1, R2, R3, R4, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and W1 did not indicate any concerns regarding the care home's call system. LPA observed call buttons with residents during interviews. LPA tested R1's call button and observed staff respond to R1's call button within three (3) minutes. LPA observed call buttons located in the bathrooms of each resident's apartment. LPA observed call logs for resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8 and observed the longest response time was less than ten (10) minutes. Allegation: Facility staff sleep while on shift. Relevant party reported that staff member (S1) has been sleeping at the facility during their shift. Interviews conducted with R1, R2, R3, R4, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and W1 did not indicate any concerns regarding staff sleeping while on shift. LPA observed a Corrective Counseling Documentation indicating that, on December 16, 2025, S1 was observed to be sleeping while on duty. S1 denied sleeping during shift per document. Staff member (S2) denied observing S1 sleeping while on duty per document. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251229100531
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Executive Director (ED), Cliff Keene, to follow-up regarding information obtained during a separate inspection conducted on April 29, 2026. LPA received a Corrective Counseling Documentation dated December 29, 2025 stating that, "On [December 26, 2025], a team member reported observing [staff member S1] sleeping for a period of time while on duty." LPA could not confirm if S1 was sleeping while on duty. LPA received images of S1 sleeping in the common areas of the facility. Per Section 87307 Personal Accommodations and Services, care home shall provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for staff. Due to LPA's observations, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 809-D page. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 14, 2026
87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents, staff, and others who may reside in the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observations, facility did not ensure that staff were not sleeping in the common areas of the care home, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure that staff do not sleep in the common areas of the care home. Facility will create a policy regarding staff breaks to ensure that staff are not sleeping in the common areas of the care home. Facility will submit a copy of the policy to LPA by POC due date of May 14, 2026.
Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On April 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Pomali Thitphaneth, Resident Service Director (RSD) and Cliff Keene, Executive Director (ED), and explained the purpose of the visit. During the inspection, there were 26 residents and 5 (five) staff providing direct care. LPA observed residents watching movies, visiting with family members, and participating in craft projects. LPA, RSD and ED toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, five (5) resident bedrooms and bathrooms, courtyard, kitchen, and storage areas. All areas observed were found to be clean and in good repair. LPA observed each bedroom to have the required furnishings and working lights. LPA observed the facility to be at a comfortable temperature. There were various activities available for client recreation. LPA observed a calendar of activities posted for residents to view, as well as printed copies for resident rooms. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food. All residents requiring a special diet are posted for kitchen staff to review. LPA observed all medications, sharps, and cleaning supplies to be locked away and inaccessible to clients in care. LPA reviewed Medication Administration Records (MARs) and found them to be current and accurate. LPA observed a complete First Aid kit. LPA observed (3) three fire extinguishers which were last inspected in February 2026. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were observed and found to be in working condition. The facility is conducting emergency disaster drills monthly with the last drill being documented in March 2026. Continued on LIC 809-C In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA reviewed a total of five (5) resident files and five (5) staff files which contained all the required documentation. All staff are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. All staff training is documented and in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Administrator's certificate is current and posted for public view. LPA obtained a copy of the most recent LIC 500, current liability insurance, and the facility's emergency disaster plan. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this inspection and the facility is currently in compliance. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and was provided, via email, to Executive Director, Cliff Keene, via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On April 24, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Resident Service Director (RSD), Pomali Thitphaneth, and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator, Cliff Keene, arrived approximately 30 minutes later and joined the inspection LPA and RSD toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas for dinning and activities, four (4) resident bedrooms, four (4) resident restrooms, and the courtyard. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA observed each resident bedroom to have the required furnishings. LPA observed calendar for monthly activities at the facility, and a daily posting of activities to help engage the residents. LPA observed the activities director conducting activities with several residents in the courtyard. LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and well stocked with a variety of food for residents. LPA observed a clear list of residents with restricted diets. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food. LPA observed a locked closet which contained toxic chemical storage. The door to the laundry room is locked. LPA observed the medication to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed fire extinguishers which were last serviced in February 2025. The facility was in the middle of an active fire drill. LPA reviewed a total of six (5) residents' files and five (5) staff files which contained all of the required documentation. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fracture while in care due to lack of care/supervision. Staff mismanaged resident's medication. A resident's personal rights were violated when staff did not prevent resident on resident intimidation, harassment, and/or harm.
/25/2024, Licensing Program Analyst Jaynae Boyles made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with administrator. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. During the course of the investigation the administrator, and five staff were interviewed. LPA reviewed the following documents from the resident file: Physicians report (602), pre-appraisal, care assessment and needs and services plan for resident care. LPA reviewed incident reports, medical appointments, Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the physician orders while in placement at the facility. Based on interviews, observation and record review of R1’s file the allegations are Unsubstantiated. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging resident sustained a fracture while in care due to lack of care/supervision, staff mismanaged resident's medication, facility is unclean, a resident's personal rights were violated when staff did not prevent resident on resident intimidation, harassment, and/or harm. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiated Resident sustained a fracture while in care due to lack of care/supervision. Based on staff interview statements, R1’s facility assessment, physician’s report, and care plan, LPA determined the following information. R1 did have a fall that occurred on 11/24/2023, which resulted in a hip fracture. R1’s care plan, physician’s report, and resident assessment does not indicate that R1 is a fall risk. R1 is able to ambulate with minimal assistance per R1’s assessments and reports. R1 has not had any prior falls during R1’s residency at the facility. All staff statements obtained indicate that R1 had no issues ambulating. Staff statements indicate that there’s on average three to four staff working during the first and second shifts at the facility. Furthermore, the LPA reviewed the staff schedule during the time of the fall and there were three to four direct care support staff/med tech scheduled to work. Staff mismanaged resident's medication. On May 25, 2023, R1 was showing signs of disorientation and the resident was treated at the hospital for a UTI. The facility received the prescription and administered the medication as informed. On June 16, 2023, R1 was showing signs of disorientation and the facility informed the primary care physician and subsequently a urinalysis was ordered. On June 21, 2023 the results of the testing indicated that the test result was negative. On June 21, 2023 an order for antibiotics was placed by the primary care physician, the facility filled the prescription and administered the medication. A resident's personal rights were violated when staff did not prevent resident on resident intimidation, harassment, and/or harm. Based on staff interview statements, there has been no indication of R1 experiencing intimidation, harassment and/or harm from other residents in care. Based on review of the daily charting by staff there was no indication of R1 experiencing intimidation, harassment and/or harm from other residents in care. Based on a review of the incident reports, no such incidents have been reported to the Department regarding R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240205092652
Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/28/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaynae Boyles, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Cliff Keene, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Boyles and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas for dinning and activities, resident bedrooms, resident restrooms, and the courtyard. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA observed each bathroom to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair, paper towels, trash can with lids and 20-second hand-washing poster. LPA observed each resident bedroom to have the required furnishings, window screens and working lights. LPA observed calendar for monthly activities at the facility, and a daily posting of activities to help engage the residents. The facility has a plethora of supplies to conduct the planned activities. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food. LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and well stocked with a variety of food for residents. LPA observed clear postings for residents with restricted diets. LPA observed locked closets which contained toxic chemical storage. The door to the laundry room is locked. LPA observed the medication to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed several fire extinguishers, fire detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors throughout the facility which were last services in February 2024. LPA observed first aid kit to be complete and ready for emergency use. LPA reviewed a total of six (6) residents' files and six (6) staff files which contained all of the required documentation. Several topics were discussed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 9 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
May 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced case management- legal/non-compliance visit. LPA toured with Mel Rabauliman, Resident Service Coordinator. LPA finished the visit with Cliff Keene and Pomali Thitphaneth. LPA also reviewed staff training. A couple topics were discussed. No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2023
Feb 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
02/16/2023 11:00 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain, LPA met with Resident Services Director Pomali Thitphanethand and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 Mask, gloves. LPA Knight and Ms.Thitphanethand toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, hallways, two resident bedrooms, visitation room, one visitor bathroom, supply room.. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA Knight and Ms. Thitphanethand completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator Cliff Keene.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2023
20225 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Donna Gurriere, Licensing Program Analyst was in contact and met with Cliff Keene, Administrator. It was alleged that there was a Failure to meet personnel requirements and conduct inimical. LPA Gurriere completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID 19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. The administrator/staff person was contacted to complete a facility risk assessment. LPA Gurriere ensured that hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical mask. Additionally, LPA Gurriere was screened by a staff person upon entering the facility. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) , Donna Gurriere met with Administrator, Cliff Keene, of Compass Rose, for a Case Management visit to follow up on a substantiated allegation of failure to meet personnel requirements and conduct inimical. continued On November 5, 2020, the Department concluded a Case Management investigation which alleged that the facility did not meet personnel requirements resulting in conduct inimical by a supervisor (S1) who allowed a caregiver (S2) with COVID-19 symptoms to work at the facility for multiple days while not fit for duty. It was alleged that S1 was contacted by S2 via text on July 22, 2020 with a temperature of 102.4 and S1 responded to S2 that S1 was “too tired to come in” and for S2 to re-take S2’s temperature after 20-23 minutes to see if there was a change. The subsequent temperatures were 102.4 and 101.9. After these temperatures were reported to S1, S1 no longer replied to S2’s communication attempts, so S2 finished the shift. S1 was aware that S2 had COVID-19 symptoms and allowed S2 to complete their shifts because S1 did not want to have to come into the facility after-hours and did not want to have to fill vacant shifts due to an illness. This decision by S1 created an unnecessary virus exposure to residents and other staff. The allegations were substantiated, and the licensee was cited for violating California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, 87411(f) for Personnel Requirements, and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, HSC 1560.50(3) for Conduct Inimical. On July 20, 2020, the facility did not ensure all personnel, including the Licensee and Administrator, were in good health and physically and mentally capable of performing assigned tasks. The facility did not respond to concerns that a staff person may have a health condition that would create a hazard to self, other staff members, or residents. Following this event, the facility experienced a COVID-19 outbreak. On July 22, 2020, there were two additional residents that tested positive for COVID-19. Another resident was diagnosed positive on July 31, 2020, and the last resident was diagnosed positive on August 20, 2020 (five staff members tested positive throughout that time). continued According to the Mayo Clinic, COVID-19, is a severe acute respiratory syndrome. The severity of COVID-19 can vary; however, one may experience fever, cough, tiredness, loss of taste or smell, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, muscle aches, chills, sore throat, runny nose, headache, chest pain, pink eye, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and rash, amongst other symptoms. COVID-19 may cause worsened symptoms such as pneumonia and people who are older have a higher risk of serious illness from COVID-19. Additionally, people who have an existing medical condition may have a higher risk of serious illness when infected with COVID-19. During the investigation, staff interviews conducted on October 29, 2020, October 30, 2020, and November 5, 2020, revealed that S2 communicated their symptoms to several other staff in addition to S1. On July 22, 2020, S2 communicated symptoms via phone call and text message to S1; but was not sent home and completed their shift. On July 23, 2020, S2 reported a fever via telephone and S2 came in for their shift and was sent home by a staff member other than S1. On July 24, 2020, S2 came to work with a 102.4 fever and S1 required re-testing of S2’s temperature but did not relieve S2 of work duties. On July 25, 2020, S2 called in sick, again due to ongoing COVID-19 symptoms. On July 26, 2020, S2 came to work and was subsequently sent home sick. On July 27, 2020, S2 was tested for COVID-19 and on July 28, 2020, S2 received positive COVID-19 test results. Based on medical records, interviews, and facility record review; the facility did not ensure personnel requirements were met to prevent inimical conduct on July 20, 2020, by employing a person in a supervisory position that did not practice proper infection control measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19. All facility staff and residents were exposed to an unnecessary risk of COVID-19. At the time of the complaint visit, on 11/05/20, the licensee was informed that a civil penalty was still being determined and might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. Today, 11/29/22 the Department is issuing a Civil Penalty per Health and Safety code section 1569.49 in the amount of $10,000. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to Cliff Keene and originals were signed. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights provided. A copy of the report issued. Cliff Keene's signature on this report acknowledges receipt of these rights, found on page 2 of LIC 421D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2022
Jul 6, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility is overcharging resident Facility is financially abusing resident Facility failed to meet resident's needs
/06/2022 at about 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation visit regarding the above listed allegations. LPA met with administrator Cliff Keene and RSD Pomali Thitphaneth and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 This Department has conducted an investigation which included interviews, observations and review of documents, none of which supported the allegations. The investigation revealed that the facility has advocated for the resident and made the required notifications regarding possible financial abuse of a dependent adult. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Facility is overcharging resident, Facility is financially abusing resident, Facility failed to meet resident's needs). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220421095400
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
On 07/06/2022 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila arrived at the facility and met with Administrator Cliff Keene and Resident Services Director (RSD) Pomali Thitphaneth to conduct a case management visit. The purpose of today's visit was to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Waiver; and Order effective June 29th, 2020. LPA toured the facility with Administrator and RSD. LPA inspected the common areas, kitchen, dining room, memory care unit and courtyard. LPA observed that per the stipulation order and staff schedules. LPA obtained copies of the April, May and June staff schedules and observed that the facility is staffing the facility with the minimum requirements to meet the needs of the residents in care. LPA reviewed the training documents and observed that the facility has provided the required training. LPA reviewed logs documenting that clients are checked on every 15 minutes in the courtyards at the facility. The facility has also informed current and prospective residents that it is currently operating under a probationary license. The terms of the probation are posted in the facility. LPA requested facility conduct an audit of resident's LIC 602's (physicians reports) to see which residents that personal hygiene items would pose a risk to. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2022
Apr 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 4/13/2022 at about 9:45 AM Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jaclyn Avila and David Loperena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct and unannounced case management visit on to Unusual incident reports that came in. LPAs met with administrator Cliff Keene and RSD Pomoli Thitphaneth and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPAs completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95. Additionally, LPA Avila and Loperena was screened by care staff upon entrance to the facility. LPAs discussed two self-reported incident reports that were sent in to the Chico CCLD office as required by regulation. LPAs reviewed staff schedules, LIC 602s, and care plans for 2 residents. Both residents had taken falls that resulted in injuries. Both falls were isolated incidents and facility ensured residents medical needs were met. LPAs discussed implementing an ADL checkoff sheet for staff to establish time frames and accountability No citations were issued. Per Administrators request report will be e-mailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022
Mar 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility and met with Administrator Cliff Keene to conduct a case management visit. The purpose of today's visit was to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Waiver; and Order effective June 29th, 2020. LPA and LPM toured the facility. LPA inspected the common areas, kitchen, dining room, memory care unit and courtyard. LPA observed that per the stipulation order and staff schedules LPA obtained copies of the January, February, and March staff schedules and observed that the facility is staffing the facility with the minimum requirements to meet the needs of the residents in care. LPA reviewed the training documents and observed that the facility has provided the required training. LPA reviewed logs documenting that clients are checked on every 15 minutes in the courtyards at the facility. The facility has also informed current and prospective residents that it is currently operating under a probationary license. The terms of the probation are posted in the facility. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022
Mar 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/09/2022 at 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain, LPA and LPM met with administrator Cliff Keene and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 Mask. Additionally, LPA Avila and LPM Munoz was screened by care staff upon entrance to the facility. LPA Avila, LPM Munoz and Mr. Keene, toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, hallways, resident bedrooms, kitchen and the courtyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA Avila, LPM Munoz and the administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was given to administrator Cliff Keene.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022
Jan 5, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
01/05/2022 at about 2:50 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management, LPA met with administrator Cliff Keene and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the case management visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: PAPR. Additionally, LPA Avila was screened by care staff upon entrance to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to discuss a Holiday Party where staff appeared to be unmasked. Administrator explained the party took place at the independent living building, The Lodge, which does not require a license or CCL oversight. The holiday party was held at that building due to there not being any residents in care. LPA observed residents to be socially distanced and staff wearing masks during the site visit. No deficiencies cited during todays visit. Report will be provided via e-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022
26 of 48 beds were occupied at the April 29, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Terraces Operations LP, The; Westmont Living Inc., licensed since 2006.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2006, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 18
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2006, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose
Is Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose licensed for?
48 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.
Is Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose still open?
The state does not list this license as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
What does Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose cost?
$3,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,100–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 11 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Chico that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,750 to $5,400 a month, and the middle figure is $5,400 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Terraces Operations LP, The; Westmont Living Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Westmont Living Inc. — at least 9 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Enloe Health is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 8 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “WESTMONT OF CHICO-COMPASS ROSE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #45001756. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 48 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Terraces Operations LP, The; Westmont Living Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 18 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Butte County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,250 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,390 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,400 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,400 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$3,400 a month to start
Typical in Butte County · likely $2,250–$5,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Butte County