Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Tomas Residential CareLicense #374602117 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareTomas Residential CareLicense #374602117 · 6344 Jouglard St, San Diego, CA · (619) 773-6091Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/San Diego County/San Diego/Tomas Residential Care
Map · 6344 Jouglard St

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$3,850/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,750 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (619) 773-6091

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

TR

Call Tomas Residential Care

San Diego · Licensed for 6

(619) 773-6091

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Diego

Tomas Residential Care

6344 Jouglard St, San Diego, CA 92114 · Licensed since 2005

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Tomas Residential Care

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$3,850 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,750 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · DementiaState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia

Not on file: hospice and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY MAY SERVE (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. DEMENTIA PLAN OF OPERATION ON FILE.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Tomas Residential Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and staying through hospice. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,850a month to start

Likely $3,150–$4,750

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,850likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,850likely $3,150–$4,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,150–$4,950
$3,850
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$8,200
$6,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,000

$3,000$7,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,200–$4,950.

  • Villa Victoria Care HomeSan Diego · 0.5 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Daleina's Home CareNational City · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Archangel's Residential CareSan Diego · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Morningside ManorSan Diego · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mayflower Home CareSan Diego · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Seniors Dignity Home and CareSan Diego · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ideal Home CareNational City · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sarasona Home CareBonita · 2.4 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ohana Care HomeSan Diego · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on its own website · monthly service fee · seen October 27, 2026
  • Warm Heart Senior LivingBonita · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • VMB Ultimate CareNational City · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

6344 Jouglard St, San Diego, CA 92114Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Paradise Valley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.3 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374602117 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was allowed entry by Administrator Norma Tomas. LPA met with Administrator Tomas and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 03/16/26, the facility was issued four (4) deficiencies [Plan of Corrections (POC)] for not having an updated Administrator’s Certificate, medications not being in their original containers, a quarterly fire drill, and a medication list for residents with centrally stored medications. During today’s visit, LPA was provided with information regarding their Administrator’s Certificate, which was in progress. The facility had agreed they would contact the Technical Support Program (TSP) for assistance with recertification, which was completed. This POC is deemed cleared during this visit. The facility agreed to follow up with LPA once they have obtained their certificate. The facility was issued a citation for obtaining medications in pill boxes, and according to their POC, they decided to remove the pill boxes and maintain their medications in their original containers. During the visit with TSP, they assisted with ensuring that the facility was within the scope of Title 22 regulations, and they were advised only to pour daily medications. LPA observed that the facility was in compliance and observed that only the medications for that day were poured. Based on the Department's instructions and LPA's observations, the facility is within the scope of the regulations. This citation is deemed cleared during today’s visit. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) The facility was issued a citation for not conducting their quarterly fire drill. According to their POC, they were to conduct a fire drill. During today’s visit, LPA observed that the facility had completed their quarterly fire drill in March 2026. They are aware that their next fire drill will be conducted in June 2026. Based on LPA's review of the record, this citation is deemed cleared during today’s inspection. The facility was issued a citation for not having updated medication lists for resident #1 (R1 – see confidential names list), resident #2 (R2 – see confidential names list), and resident #3 (R3 – see confidential names list). An updated medication list was provided for R1, but the facility was unable to provide an updated medication list for R2 or R3. This POC is not deemed cleared during today’s visit, and a failure to correct will be issued. No additional deficiencies were observed, but a civil penalty (CP - LIC421FC) for failure to correct was issued during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, CP was issued, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), were provided to Administrator Norma Tomas at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Norma Tomas, who was present at the facility. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. It was noted that the facility did have a dementia plan on file. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is three (3) residents living at the facility. There were 3 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Administrator Tomas, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present and safely stored in the garage. The facility had sufficient space to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 73º degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant. At least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of non-perishable food were present in their second kitchen area. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present and safely stored. No toxic chemicals or poisons were inaccessible to residents. [Continuation on LIC809-C] Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet, which LPA inspected and observed that the medications were not in their original containers. There are no pools or bodies of water on the facility premises. Per Administrator Norma Tomas, there are no weapons or ammunition kept on the facility grounds. Fire extinguishers were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. The fireplace was not in use and was inaccessible to residents. LPA spoke with staff and briefly with residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. The facility did not maintain a current administrator certificate. LPA’s visit did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained required documents that will need to be updated by the end of the month. Confidential records were stored in a locked cabinet. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were deficiencies observed and cited during today's annual inspection, and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Norma Tomas, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received. LPA requested licensee Norma Tomas to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026

The state marks this report as 10 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20253 state visits · 3 documents

Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance and to clear citations issued during their annual inspection. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by resident Mark Hobbs. LPA met with licensee Norma Tomas and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 10/06/2025, the facility was issued two citations during their required annual inspection. The first citation was for Reappraisals, §87463(h). The facility agreed to have updated medical assessments for their residents by 10/06/2025 and submit documentation to LPA by the due date. The second citation issued to the facility was for not having a certified administrator with qualifications, §87405 (a). The facility agreed to have the facility manager register for CEU classes, submit the class registration to LPA by 11/06/2025, and submit their certificate at a later date. During today’s visit, LPA reviewed the documentation for the CEUs and deemed the citation to be cleared. LPA reviewed and observed that one out of 3 residents had their physical exam completed, and the other 2 residents denied going to their PCP for their yearly Physician’s Report. Both residents had a note in their file noting their refusal. The POC’s were deemed cleared during today’s visit. Although the POCs are deemed cleared during today’s visit, the facility is being assessed Civil Penalties for failure to correct citations by the POC due date, 11/06/2025. No new deficiencies were observed or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, civil penalties (LIC421) for failure to correct, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Norma Tomas at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit as a continuation to complete the required Annual Inspection visit, which commenced on March 18, 2025. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by facility manager Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with facility manager Tomas and Licensee Norma Tomas who joined the visit. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked cabinet which LPA inspected. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. Fire extinguishers were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. LPA informed Licensee Tomas of the new Department updates effective January 1, 2025, for the senior care regulations. LPA provided licensee with the Department flyer and demonstrated how and where to find the regulation updates. LPA informed licensee Norma Tomas that the facility's Plan of Operations will need to be updated. LPA spoke with staff and briefly with residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. The facility did not maintain a current administrator certificate and updates to medical assessments for residents in care. LPA’s visit did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained additional required documents, but updates were needed. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. [Continuation on LIC809-C] [Continuation of LIC809] An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Norma Tomas, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received. LPA requested licensee Norma Tomas to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025

The state marks this report as 15 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Tomas and Administrator Norma Tomas who joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. It was noted that the facility did have a dementia plan on file. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is three (3) residents living at the facility. There were 3 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Tomas, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 68 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant: the kitchen sink measured hot water at 115.5 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 105.4 degrees F; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 117.7 degrees F. At least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of non-perishable food were present. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present and safely stored. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per the licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Due to time constraints, LPA will need to return and complete this facility’s annual inspection. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Norma Tomas to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025

The state marks this report as 17 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 1 document

Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Licensee Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Tomas and Administrator Norma Tomas. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. The facility does have a dementia plan of operation on file. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 3 residents living at the facility. There were 2 residents present at the facility site during the inspection, but one left during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Licensee and Administrator, toured the interior and exterior parts of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant: kitchen sink measured hot water at 119 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 107.4 degrees F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet. LPA inspected the medication storage and found that medications were properly labeled and stored. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per administrator Norma Tomas, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. LPA interviewed residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 3 residents on the facility premise with one who left during the inspection. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies cited during today's annual inspection, but a Technical Advisory was provided. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Tomas to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Administrator Norma Tomas to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, and Residential Infection Control Plan LIC 9282 (6/23), to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 4 documents

20222 state visits · 3 documents

Jun 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal Eviction

On 06/29/22 at about 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted a complaint follow up visit to conclude this investigation. LPA was met at the front door by Aministrator, Norma Tomas. After identifying himself and explaining the reason for the visit, LPA was permitted into the facility. LPA explained to Ms. Tomas the purpose of the visit was to deliver findings on the above-mentioned complaint. LPA was later joined by Licensee, Abraham Tomas. The Department's investigation consisted of interviews with staff, outside sources, and record reviews. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was illegally evicted from the facility. Licensee, Tomas was provided with Confidential Names Form in order to identify R1 (LIC811). Investigation revealed that on July 11, 2020, R1 eloped from the facility and was hospitalized on the same day. During the inpatient stay, hospital staff contacted the facility to discuss R1’s discharge plan. Interview with the Licensee revealed he refused to accept R1 back into care because of a fear of COVID-19 exposure, which prompted the facility’s eviction of R1. Interview with the Licensee also Substantiated confirmed the Licensee did not conduct a reappraisal of R1 nor did they provide R1 or their designated representative with a written 30-day notice of eviction. Facility records reviewed by the LPA revealed no eviction notice was ever issued as well. The Department has investigated the allegation of illegal eviction and has found that, based upon evidence gathered through interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. This deficiency is noted on the attached 9099-D and is cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Mr. Tomas. A copy of this report, LIC-9099, LIC-9099D, and Licensee Rights (9058 01/16) were left with the Licensee, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200727120748

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 8, 2022

87224(a)(4) EVICTION PROCEDURES If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified and a reappraisal has been conducted pursuant to Section 87463, and the licensee and the person who performs the reappraisal believe that the facility is not appropriate for the resident. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon record review and interviews, the licensee did not serve a lawful written 30-day eviction notice and did not conduct a reappraisal prior to issuing the notice in one of six residents in care. This posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to review Title 22 Eviction Procedures with all staff and provide CCLD with written evidence of completion by POC date.

Jun 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was met by Norma Tomas, Administrator and was granted entry into the facility. LPA met with Ms. Tomas and later with Licensee Abraham Tomas to discuss the purpose of the visit. This visit was initiated due to a reported incident involving Resident #1 (R1), which was received by CCL on July 27, 2020. Ms. Tomas was provided with (LIC811) Confidential Names Form in order to identify R1. On June 11, 2020, R1 eloped from the facility and was later transported to a medical center and admitted for care. Hospital personnel contacted the facility to discuss R1’s discharge and return to the facility. According to facility staff interviews, R1 was refused readmittance to the facility for being under the influence of methamphetamine. Staff interviews also revealed staff refused R1’s return from the hospital as the facility believed R1 required placement into a locked facility. Interviews and records reviewed revealed that the Licensee did not conduct a reappraisal of R1. During today's visit, LPA reviewed records and interviewed staff. A citation was issued. This deficiency is noted on the attached 809-D and is cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was discussed with Licensee Tomas. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights, was provided to the Licensee at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 8, 2022

87463(c) Reappraisals: The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the licensee did not conduct a reappraisal to document changes in R1’s condition prior to eviction, which posed an immediate health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022

Plan of correction: R1 did not return to the facility. Licensee will review Title 22 Regulations as they pertain to Reappraisals with all staff and provide written evidence of completion to CCL by POC due date.

Mar 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. LPA was greeted by Administrator, Norma Tomas, identified himself, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Abraham Tomas, arrived during the visit, and conducted a tour of the facility with the LPA. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control program, the LPA provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan (LIC 808). LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for all visitors; signs posted at facility entrance with the facility’s visitor policy, and signs throughout the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing; Face coverings worn by staff; hand sanitizer/hand washing stations readily available; a designated visitation area; and the emergency agencies’ contact information posted in a location visible to staff and residents. Based on observations, the facility is in compliance with and has implemented infection control practices as outlined in its LIC 808. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Abraham Tomas, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via electronic mail. An electronic mail read receipt confirms these documents were received by the Licensee, Abraham Tomas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Oct 8, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lizzette Tellez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA was met by Administrator, Norma Tomas, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Abraham Tomas arrived during the visit. Investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, record review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was unlawfully evicted from the facility. Mr. Tomas was provided with Confidential Names Form in order to identify R1. Facility record review and investigative interviews revealed that on March 11, 2020, R1 was served with a written 60-day eviction notice which noted the reasons for eviction as non-compliance with house rules, specifically that R1 is non-compliant with their medication regimen, and health and safety concerns, such as cooking during overnight hours. Interviews and record review revealed R1 is non-compliant with their medication regimen, and a reappraisal of R1’s needs was not conducted prior to the date of the eviction notice. Review of the house rules revealed non-compliance with medication regimens is not part of the facility's house rules. Substantiated Additionally, the eviction notice did not include the required statements and resources, and a written copy was not provided to the resident’s designated representative. The Department has investigated the allegation of illegal eviction and has found that, based upon record review and interviews, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. This deficiency is noted on the attached 9099-D and is cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Mr. Tomas and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided to the Administrator via email. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent by the Administrator upon receipt of the documents. This Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and has found that, based upon the evidence gathered during the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Mr. Tomas and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided to the Administrator via email. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent by the Administrator upon receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2021 · control 08-AS-20200505150949

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 22, 2021

EVICTION PROCEDURES If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified and a reappraisal has been conducted pursuant to Section 87463, and the licensee and the person who performs the reappraisal believe that the facility is not appropriate for the resident. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon record review and interviews, the licensee did not serve a lawful written 30-day eviction notice and did not conduct a reappraisal of the resident prior to issuing the notice. This posed a potential personal rights risk to one (R1) of six residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2021

Plan of correction: Updated reappraisal of R1 was completed. Licensee stated a corrected and lawful 30-day eviction notice will be provided to R1 and their designated representative, and a copy provided to CCL by POC date.

3 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 29, 2022 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Abraham D. Tomas, licensed since 2005.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2005, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
8
Total complaints
0
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2005, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints00

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Tomas Residential Care

Is Tomas Residential Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Tomas Residential Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Tomas Residential Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Tomas Residential Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Tomas Residential Care cost?

$3,850 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,150–$4,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Tomas Residential Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Abraham D. Tomas, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Paradise Valley Hospital is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Tomas Residential Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Tomas Residential Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “TOMAS RESIDENTIAL CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374602117. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Abraham D. Tomas, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    San Diego · 0.2 mi

    P & P Homes 2

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Diego · 0.2 mi

    Good Samaritan Board and Care Facility

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $2,800–$4,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
  • Map

    San Diego · 0.2 mi

    St. Joseph's Guest Home

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,050–$4,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Diego · 0.3 mi

    St. Anthony's Board and Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Diego · 0.3 mi

    Petal Guest Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Diego · 0.4 mi

    Tangem Guest Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,100–$4,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore San Diego County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
TR

Call Tomas Residential Care

San Diego · Licensed for 6

(619) 773-6091

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Tomas Residential Care

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages