Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Tomas Residential Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2005Licence #374602117
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,050–$4,600
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedJune 29, 2022 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Tomas Residential Care is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2005. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Tomas Residential Care

Is Tomas Residential Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Tomas Residential Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Tomas Residential Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Tomas Residential Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Tomas Residential Care cost?

$3,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,050–$4,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Tomas Residential Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Abraham D. Tomas, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Paradise Valley Hospital is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Tomas Residential Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Tomas Residential Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “TOMAS RESIDENTIAL CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374602117. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Abraham D. Tomas, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY MAY SERVE (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. DEMENTIA PLAN OF OPERATION ON FILE.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,700a month to start

Likely $3,050–$4,600

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,700a month

Likely $3,050–$4,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,700likely $3,050–$4,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,050–$4,800
$3,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,550–$8,000
$5,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,150–$4,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6344 Jouglard St, San Diego, CA 92114Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2005. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 29, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
April 29, 2026
Occupied · June 29, 2022 visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 8, 2021 to June 29, 2022. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints0typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2005.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025330202411020222312021111

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was allowed entry by Administrator Norma Tomas. LPA met with Administrator Tomas and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 03/16/26, the facility was issued four (4) deficiencies [Plan of Corrections (POC)] for not having an updated Administrator’s Certificate, medications not being in their original containers, a quarterly fire drill, and a medication list for residents with centrally stored medications. During today’s visit, LPA was provided with information regarding their Administrator’s Certificate, which was in progress. The facility had agreed they would contact the Technical Support Program (TSP) for assistance with recertification, which was completed. This POC is deemed cleared during this visit. The facility agreed to follow up with LPA once they have obtained their certificate. The facility was issued a citation for obtaining medications in pill boxes, and according to their POC, they decided to remove the pill boxes and maintain their medications in their original containers. During the visit with TSP, they assisted with ensuring that the facility was within the scope of Title 22 regulations, and they were advised only to pour daily medications. LPA observed that the facility was in compliance and observed that only the medications for that day were poured. Based on the Department's instructions and LPA's observations, the facility is within the scope of the regulations. This citation is deemed cleared during today’s visit. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) The facility was issued a citation for not conducting their quarterly fire drill. According to their POC, they were to conduct a fire drill. During today’s visit, LPA observed that the facility had completed their quarterly fire drill in March 2026. They are aware that their next fire drill will be conducted in June 2026. Based on LPA's review of the record, this citation is deemed cleared during today’s inspection. The facility was issued a citation for not having updated medication lists for resident #1 (R1 – see confidential names list), resident #2 (R2 – see confidential names list), and resident #3 (R3 – see confidential names list). An updated medication list was provided for R1, but the facility was unable to provide an updated medication list for R2 or R3. This POC is not deemed cleared during today’s visit, and a failure to correct will be issued. No additional deficiencies were observed, but a civil penalty (CP - LIC421FC) for failure to correct was issued during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, CP was issued, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), were provided to Administrator Norma Tomas at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Norma Tomas, who was present at the facility. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. It was noted that the facility did have a dementia plan on file. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is three (3) residents living at the facility. There were 3 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Administrator Tomas, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present and safely stored in the garage. The facility had sufficient space to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 73º degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant. At least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of non-perishable food were present in their second kitchen area. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present and safely stored. No toxic chemicals or poisons were inaccessible to residents. [Continuation on LIC809-C] Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet, which LPA inspected and observed that the medications were not in their original containers. There are no pools or bodies of water on the facility premises. Per Administrator Norma Tomas, there are no weapons or ammunition kept on the facility grounds. Fire extinguishers were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. The fireplace was not in use and was inaccessible to residents. LPA spoke with staff and briefly with residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. The facility did not maintain a current administrator certificate. LPA’s visit did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained required documents that will need to be updated by the end of the month. Confidential records were stored in a locked cabinet. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were deficiencies observed and cited during today's annual inspection, and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Norma Tomas, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received. LPA requested licensee Norma Tomas to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026

The state marks this report as 10 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance and to clear citations issued during their annual inspection. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by resident Mark Hobbs. LPA met with licensee Norma Tomas and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 10/06/2025, the facility was issued two citations during their required annual inspection. The first citation was for Reappraisals, §87463(h). The facility agreed to have updated medical assessments for their residents by 10/06/2025 and submit documentation to LPA by the due date. The second citation issued to the facility was for not having a certified administrator with qualifications, §87405 (a). The facility agreed to have the facility manager register for CEU classes, submit the class registration to LPA by 11/06/2025, and submit their certificate at a later date. During today’s visit, LPA reviewed the documentation for the CEUs and deemed the citation to be cleared. LPA reviewed and observed that one out of 3 residents had their physical exam completed, and the other 2 residents denied going to their PCP for their yearly Physician’s Report. Both residents had a note in their file noting their refusal. The POC’s were deemed cleared during today’s visit. Although the POCs are deemed cleared during today’s visit, the facility is being assessed Civil Penalties for failure to correct citations by the POC due date, 11/06/2025. No new deficiencies were observed or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, civil penalties (LIC421) for failure to correct, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Norma Tomas at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit as a continuation to complete the required Annual Inspection visit, which commenced on March 18, 2025. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by facility manager Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with facility manager Tomas and Licensee Norma Tomas who joined the visit. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked cabinet which LPA inspected. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. Fire extinguishers were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. LPA informed Licensee Tomas of the new Department updates effective January 1, 2025, for the senior care regulations. LPA provided licensee with the Department flyer and demonstrated how and where to find the regulation updates. LPA informed licensee Norma Tomas that the facility's Plan of Operations will need to be updated. LPA spoke with staff and briefly with residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. The facility did not maintain a current administrator certificate and updates to medical assessments for residents in care. LPA’s visit did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained additional required documents, but updates were needed. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. [Continuation on LIC809-C] [Continuation of LIC809] An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Norma Tomas, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received. LPA requested licensee Norma Tomas to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025

The state marks this report as 15 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Tomas and Administrator Norma Tomas who joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. It was noted that the facility did have a dementia plan on file. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is three (3) residents living at the facility. There were 3 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Tomas, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 68 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant: the kitchen sink measured hot water at 115.5 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 105.4 degrees F; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 117.7 degrees F. At least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of non-perishable food were present. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present and safely stored. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per the licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Due to time constraints, LPA will need to return and complete this facility’s annual inspection. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Norma Tomas to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025

The state marks this report as 17 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Licensee Abraham Tomas. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Tomas and Administrator Norma Tomas. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. The facility does have a dementia plan of operation on file. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 3 residents living at the facility. There were 2 residents present at the facility site during the inspection, but one left during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Licensee and Administrator, toured the interior and exterior parts of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant: kitchen sink measured hot water at 119 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 107.4 degrees F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet. LPA inspected the medication storage and found that medications were properly labeled and stored. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per administrator Norma Tomas, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. LPA interviewed residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 3 residents on the facility premise with one who left during the inspection. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies cited during today's annual inspection, but a Technical Advisory was provided. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Tomas to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Administrator Norma Tomas to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, and Residential Infection Control Plan LIC 9282 (6/23), to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County