Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Vmb Ultimate Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·National City, California

Licensed since 2004Licence #374601936
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 18, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 18, 2025CDSS inspection record

Vmb Ultimate Care is a small care home in National City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2004. Dementia care and hospice care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Vmb Ultimate Care

Is Vmb Ultimate Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Vmb Ultimate Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Vmb Ultimate Care been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Vmb Ultimate Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Vmb Ultimate Care cost?

$3,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 194 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 194 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Vmb Ultimate Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Bucatcat, Virgil P., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Paradise Valley Hospital is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Vmb Ultimate Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Vmb Ultimate Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “VMB ULTIMATE CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374601936. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Bucatcat, Virgil P., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 18, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. FACILITY APPROVED FOR ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT AND TWO (2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,500a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,500a month

Likely $3,500–$4,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,500this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Shared room insteadAsknot on file

    This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$4,100
$3,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,500–$7,600
$5,500

Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

15 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$5,800.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 344 E 27Th St, National City, CA 91950Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2004. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 18, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
September 18, 2025
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 20, 2023 to September 18, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2004.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025340202411020231112022220

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. During today's visit, LPA observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff did not meet resident care needs, specific to Resident 1 (R1) not being able to meet their financial needs. Review of R1’s medical assessment dated July 2025 revealed that R1 was diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder and was unable to manage their own cash resources but was able to communicate. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiated Interviews with outside sources revealed that there were concerns that R1 did not have a representative to assist R1 with managing R1’s financial and health care needs. Review of R1’s admission agreement dated June 2025 revealed that an individual was listed as R1’s responsible person, however, interviews revealed that the individual had not had contact with R1 for years and had no ability to assist with R1’s financial or health care needs. Interviews with staff and facility management provided conflicting information as they stated that the individual was R1’s responsible party and was responsible for handling R1’s finances. Facility management denied any issues with receiving payment from R1 or any concerns that R1, or any other residents, would be unable to pay for the facility’s basic services rate. Interviews with residents and outside sources did not reveal concerns regarding the care provided at the facility and did not disclose any difficulty with paying for the facility’s services. The Department was unable to interview R1 due to R1’s death in early August 2025. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250716114857
Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced case management visit to cite deficiencies. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. Review of the Department’s Active Administrator List dated 9/16/2025 revealed that Virgil P. Bucatcat, who is the currently listed Administrator for the facility, did not have an active or pending renewal for an Administrator Certificate, and their latest Administrator Certificate expired in 2013. Additionally, Staff 1, [House Manager was provided with an LIC811 Confidential Names List to identify individuals] who was acting as a facility manager did not have active or pending renewal for Administrator Certificate. Review of an Administrator Certificate for Staff 2 revealed that S2 had an active Administrator Certificate for residential care facilities for the elderly, however, interviews confirmed that facility management had not submitted a Change of Administrator request to the Department. Additionally, Staff 1 stated during multiple conversations that only Residents 1 and 2 were receiving hospice services and Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were not receiving hospice services. Staff 1 only provided LPA Borunda with hospice records for R1 and R2. However, interviews with outside sources and review of facility records revealed that Residents 1-7 were under the care of a hospice provider and were receiving hospice services. Residents 1-6 were all admitted to the facility at the same time, which placed the facility over their approved and pending hospice waiver requests. In 2013, the facility was originally approved to admit 2 hospice residents, however in 2022, the facility applied for a hospice waiver increase from 2 to 4 residents. Continued on LIC809-C page... Following a visit from the Department on 7/23/2025, S1 submitted a hospice waiver increase to 6 residents, which is still pending with the Department. Therefore the following deficiencies for lack of active Administrator, false claims, and over capacity for hospice residents are being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the LIC811, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2025

87207 No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S1 stated that only 2 of 6 residents were receiving hospice services, when it was actually 6 of 6 residents. This poses a potential person rights risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025

Plan of correction: House Manager will submit a written letter to the Department stating that S1 will be truthful when interacting with representatives from the Department and the LIC9098 Self Certification of Deficiencies Cleared to the Department by POC due date of 9/25/2025. LPA provided House Manager with LIC9098 Self Certification of Deficiencies Cleared.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87407(k)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2025

87407 (k) Whenever a certified administrator assumes… responsibility for administering a residential care facility for the elderly, he or she shall provide written notice, within thirty (30) days, to: (1) The local licensing office… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that a written notice of S2 acting at the facility’s administrator was not submitted to the Department. This poses a potential safety risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025

Plan of correction: House Manager will submit the LIC308, copy of S2's Administrator Certificate, and a written request to change the Administrator to S2 to the Department by POC due date of 9/25/2025. LPA provided House Manager with LIC308 and Change of Administrator Checklist.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87632(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 18, 2025

87632 (a) In order accept or retain terminally ill residents… the licensee shall have obtained a facility hospice care waiver from the Department… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility was caring for 6 hospice residents without requesting an hospice waiver for 6 residents. This posed a potential health risk to 6 of 6 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025

Plan of correction: House Manager submitted a hospice waiver request for 6 residents after 7/23/2025, which the Department has received and is currently reviewing. DEFICIENCY CLEARED

Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted a plan of correction (POC) visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. On 6/17/2025, the licensee was issued three deficiencies. Deficiency 87355(e)(2) had a POC due date of 6/18/2025 and deficiencies 87465(h)(2) and 87458(a) had POC due dates of 7/17/2025. On 6/18/2025, House Manager provided LPA with proof of correction for deficiency 87355(e). As of today’s date, 7/23/2025, the licensee has not submitted POC to the Department for deficiencies 87465(h)(2) and 87458(a). During today’s visit, LPA Borunda toured the facility, reviewed resident paperwork and staff training documents, and spoke with staff. House Manager stated that a new tenant was renting a room upstairs and provided LPA with background clearance and association paperwork, which LPA was able to confirm with the facility's Guardian Roster. Review of resident records revealed that each resident had a complete and signed medical assessment. House Manager stated staff will receive medication training on 7/25/2025 and provided LPA with training flyer. LPA observed a locked medication box in the refrigerator and observed that the medication cabinet was still unlocked. House Manager stated that they had already purchased the locks, which LPA verified, and their repair person was installing them tonight. LPA granted a POC extension for deficiency 87465(h)(2) until 7/28/2025 and informed House Manager to provide LPA with proof of lock installation and medication training as soon as completed. Therefore, the deficiencies 87355(e)(2) and 87458(a) are corrected. LPA provided House Manager with letters of Deficiency Cleared. LPA also provided LIC178 for POC extension. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, Letters of Deficiency Cleared, LIC178, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Ben Rosario. Manager Milagros Bucatcat arrived during the visit. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, reviewed facility records, observed residents in care, and spoke with staff. Review of resident records revealed that one resident did not have an initial medical assessment and multiple residents had medical assessments which were incomplete. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed multiple medications stored in the unsecured refrigerator in the kitchen as well as all resident medications stored in an unlocked cabinet in the facility kitchen. LPA spoke with Caregiver Rosario and Manager Bucatcat who stated that the kitchen is normally locked, however, LPA observed the facility kitchen door to remain open and unlocked for a majority of the visit. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed two individuals who Manager Bucatcat stated were not residents or staff. Manager Bucatcat stated that Tenant 1 (T1) was renting a room and Tenant 2 (T2) was their partner. LPA spoke with T1 and learned that T1 has been renting a room for 4.5 years and T2 has been at the facility approximately once a week for 4 months. LPA verified on Guardian that neither individual had active fingerprint clearance or association to the facility. [Manager was provided with an LIC811 Confidential Names List to identify residents, T1, and T2]. Continued on LIC809-C page... Due to time constraints, the annual inspection could not be completed and a return visit on a subsequent day is needed. LPA provided Manager Bucatcat with a copy of the facility's current Guardian roster, and written documentation regarding the facility's annual licensing fee balance and Administrator Certificate status of Licensee Virgil Bucacat. The following deficiencies were cited for incomplete medical assessments, unsecured medications, and non-cleared individuals and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. Additionally, a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 was assessed for T1 and T2 not being finger print cleared and noted on the attached LIC421BG form. An exit interview was conducted with Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the LIC811, the LIC421BG, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Manage Milagros Bucacat. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, of which all may be non-ambulatory. There was a total of four (4) client in care. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. Hot water temperature was in compliance. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were present. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher and first aid kit present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff/clients and reviewed multiple staff/client files. The files which LPA reviewed contained all required documents. No deficiencies were cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Manager to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County