Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek

Mid-size home·Licensed for 49·Chico, California

Licensed since 1999Licence #45000700
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$4,500 a monthTypical in Butte County · likely $3,500–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 49Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit41 of 49 beds occupiedNovember 20, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 4, 2026CDSS inspection record

The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek is a mid-size care home in Chico — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 49 residents since 1999. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek

Is The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek licensed for?

49 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek been cited?

0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.

Is The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek cost?

$4,500 a month to start is typical in Butte County, likely $3,500–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Butte County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Courtyard at Little Chico Creek/Hignell & Hignell, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Enloe Health is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “COURTYARD AT LITTLE CHICO CREEK, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #45000700. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 49 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Courtyard at Little Chico Creek/Hignell & Hignell, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 16 state inspection visits since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 34 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 25 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
34 NON AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 25 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 7.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,500

Covelight’s researched range for Butte County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,500–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,500–$5,500

    Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Butte County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,700
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,850
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Butte County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 5 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 1770 Humboldt Road, Chico, CA 95928Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 16 visits since 1999. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 22, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
16
Most recent visit
September 4, 2026
Occupied · November 20, 2025 visit
41 of 49 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 19, 2022 to November 20, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 2
  • Total complaints4typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1999.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020254402024220202322020222312021110

The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 01/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisa Chiarelli, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Melissa Aceves and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Chiarelli and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, backyard, shed, and common restrooms. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free and each bathroom to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair, paper towels, and trash can with lids. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food and sharps to be locked. All chemicals are locked up. Hot water temperature was taken by facility maintenance they took water temperature in resident room and activity room, due to LPA thermometer not working, staff showed proof of water temperature at 111 F. LPA observed several fire extinguishers, fire detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors all in working order. LPA reviewed a total of five (5) residents' files and five (5) staff files. Reviewed medications for two (2) residents. All medication is locked up. Continued on LIC 809-C LPA requested following documents: Education requirements for 2 staff files from 2025 Other requested documents refer to LIC 9102 technical assistance notes. Several topics were discussed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure changes in residents health condition were observed and addressed

On November 20, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Melissa Aceves and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation process, interviews and a review of records were initiated. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff did not ensure changes in residents health condition were observed and addressed.” Based on interviews it was indicated that R1's change in condition was addressed immediately. LPA observed documentation that Administrator had been in communication with the Regional Center regarding R1’s condition. Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left at the facility. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250821160027

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2025

87224(a)(4) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice....the licensee and the person who performs the reappraisal believe that the facility is not appropriate for the resident. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documentation review, the notice served to R1 did not include a valid reason for eviction, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights violation to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will develop a procedure to address resident eviction procedures. POC will be emailed to LPA by 12/05/2025.

Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On September 3, 2025, at 2:00 PM, an office meeting was held via Microsoft Teams. In attendance were Licensing Program Manager Lauren Crocker, Licensing Program Analyst Kayla Adkison, Long-Term care ombudsmen Kay Hudleston, Far Northern Regional Center (FRNC) representatives Fabiola Gutierrez and Michelle Wetmore, Assistant Administrator Michelle Cartier, and Administrator Melissa Morales. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss potential care options for the future of a specific resident and how to ensure the resident's health and safety going forward. The resident was present for a portion of the meeting with assistance from FRNC representative Fabiola Gutierrez.. It was determined this meeting should be continued to a later date to include additional relevant parties. The meeting was rescheduled and adjourned. A copy of this report was provided via email to Administrator, Melissa Morales, via email for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025
Jan 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death.

On January 27, 2025 at approximately 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Farhaan Sarangi and Kayla Adkison arrived unannounced at Courtyard at Little Chico Inn, The for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPAs were greeted at the door by Assistant Administrator, Michelle Sans-Cartier, and was granted access into the facility. Department of Social Services-Community Care Licensing Division-Investigations Branch, Investigator Belman obtained and reviewed the Death Report from Butte County. LPA reviewed facility records. Resident could not be interviewed. LPAs toured the facility on January 27, 2025, and made observations. Complaint alleges Questionable Death. Based on a review of the Death Report conducted by Investigator Belman, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. The resident was identified as being on Hospice and was cared for by the facility and the respective Hospice Agency. A review of the Hospice Care Records indicate that the resident was receiving comfort care and received continuous checkup hospice care visits. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated Furthermore, Investigator Belman reviewed a Hospice Care Note dated for July 16, 2024 in which it states, “Great care all needs well met.” LPA could not corroborate the allegation. A finding that the complaint allegation of Questionable Death is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this was report was signed and given to the Assistant Administrator. Furthermore, LPA reviewed the Care Notes and learned that a staff member made a medication error which is documented on the Care Notes and signed by the Administrator on August 12, 2024 (See LIC 9099D). LPA educated the Assistant Administrator on the importance of ensuring that all residents are given proper dosages of medication as outlined in Title 22 Regulations and Physician Orders. Deficiencies cited from the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights were provided. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in Civil Penalties. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was signed and given to the Resident Services Director along with Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240813163350

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 3, 2025

87465(c)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration, provided all of the following requirements are met: (2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of an incident report dated for August 9, 2024, and Care Notes, the facility staff member did not administer the correct dosage of medication as outlined in the Physician Orders which presents a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall conduct staff training and provide proof of that training to Community Care Licensing. In addition, Licensee/Administrator shall fill out an LIC 9098-Self-Certification understanding of the regulation. Licensee/Administrator shall also provide a statement on how future compliance will be met. POC due date: February 3, 2025.

Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On January 14, 2025 at approximately 11:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs), Farhaan Sarangi and Kayla Adkinson arrived unannounced at Courtyard at Little Chico Creek, The for the purpose of conducting a Required 1 year inspection. LPAs met with Administrator, Melissa Aceves and was granted access into the facility. LPAs and Administrator toured the facility. LPAs observed the facility to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Fire Extinguisher was found to be last charged on February 2024 at the time of the inspection. All smoke and carbon detectors sound directly to the fire station. Water temperature in facility bathroom measured at 108 degrees, within acceptable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. LPAs observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable foods located in the kitchen. There are special provisions made for individuals with special dietary needs. Food menu was presently available for viewing during the inspection. Medications were centrally stored and locked. Cleaning products and other toxins are located in a locked room that was inaccessible to residents in care. There was a supply of linens, cleaners, hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All bathrooms designated for residents in the common areas at the facility were supplied with individual paper towels and hand soap. Bathrooms in resident’s rooms have a towel and soap. Bathrooms were equipped with necessary grab bars, and non-slip floors/mats were present. A tour of occupied bedrooms were conducted, and bedrooms inspected have lighting and appropriate furnishing. LPA advised facility to contact County Public Health and Community Care Licensing immediately if symptoms of COVID-19 or other infectious diseases are present in the facility. Infection Control Plan and Emergency Disaster Plan were reviewed and found to be appropriate. First Aid kit was inspected and found to be appropriate during the inspection. Emergency Disaster Drill was last conducted in December 2024. (Report continued on LIC 809C) During a review of staff files, LPA identified 1 out of 5 staff members not having the annual training as outlined in regulation (See LIC 9102-Technical Violation). LPA educated the Administrator on the importance of ensuring that training is conducted as outlined in Title 22 regulations. During a resident file review, LPA observed that 2 out of 5 residents did not have an updated LIC 602 (See LIC 9102-Technical Violation). LPA educated the Administrator on the importance of ensuring that the updated LIC 602 is retained in resident files. LPA requested the following documents to be sent: LIC 500- Personnel Report LIC 308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 309- Administrative Organization Most up-to-date Liability insurance Control of Property Register of residents No deficiencies were cited during today's Required 1 year inspection. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was signed and emailed to the Administrator due to printer issues.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following protocals to prevent the spread of illness

On September 30, 2024 at approximately 11:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Courtyard At Little Chico Creek, The for the purpose of conducting a subsequent complaint investigation inspection and delivering findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Melissa Aceves, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed the Infection Control Plan and the Staff Roster. In addition, LPA conducted staff interviews. Complaint alleges that Staff are not following protocals to prevent the spread of illness. Based on interviews that were conducted, LPA received inconsistent statements. LPA reviewed the Infection Control Plan and emails from the Local Public Health Authority and learned that the facility was following Local Public Health guidelines as it relates to staff who test positive for COVID-19. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated A finding that the complaint allegation of Staff are not following protocols to prevent the spread of illness are unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this was report was signed and given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240815134720
Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

LPA received a call that the administrator was under the influence and activity drinking will disbursing medications for the facility. LPA arrived at the facility to discuss the incident reported. LPA toured the medication room and viewed the video footage for the last two days. There was no video footage that the administrator consumed alcohol while working and disbursing medications. Administrator reported that she is having challenges with an employee, who may have made reported this incident. Furthermore, the administrator reported that she does not drink alcohol. There is no evidence to support that the incident reported occurred. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaynae Boyles, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Melissa Morales and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Boyles and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, backyard, and common restrooms. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free and each bathroom to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair. Hot water temperature was measured within the required range. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food. Facility offered a variety of menu options for the residents, and has a two part process to verify residents have attended meal time or received meal service in their room. LPA observed an activity calendar with a variety of activities available to the residents. LPA observed an activity room which had supplies for painting, puzzles and games. LPA observed several fire extinguishers, fire detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. First aid is complete and ready for use. Administrator was unable to provide documentation of quarterly emergency disaster drills. LPA reviewed a total of five (5) residents' files and five (5) staff files. One staff file missing a criminal clearance. One resident who is diagnosed with dementia is missing an updated medical assessment within the last 12 months. Several topics were discussed. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC809D. A civil penalty for $100 per day for a maximum of 5 days, totaling $500 for criminal record clearance violation is being assessed on the attached LIC 421BG. An exit interview was conducted, and Plans of Corrections were reviewed and developed with the Administrator. A copy of this report, LIC 809-D, LIC421BG, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Butte County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Butte County