Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sun and Sea Assisted Living

Mid-size home·Licensed for 32·Imperial Beach, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #374602472
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 32Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit29 of 32 beds occupiedApril 2, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 12, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sun and Sea Assisted Living is a mid-size care home in Imperial Beach — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 32 residents since 2007. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sun and Sea Assisted Living

Is Sun and Sea Assisted Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Sun and Sea Assisted Living licensed for?

32 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Sun and Sea Assisted Living been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Sun and Sea Assisted Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sun and Sea Assisted Living cost?

$4,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

Among 194 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 194 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Sun and Sea Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sun and Sea Assisted Living, LLC; Ssmib Opco, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Scripps Mercy Hospital Chula Vista is 4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sun and Sea Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Sun and Sea Assisted Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SUN AND SEA ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374602472. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 32 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sun and Sea Assisted Living, LLC; Ssmib Opco, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 32 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 32 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SEVEN (7). WAIVER APPROVED FOR NON-PHYSICIANS TO PRESCRIBE MEDICATIONS. NEW MGMT. CO, SSMIB OPCO, LLC EFFECTIVE 7/8/2026.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,000a month

Likely $4,000–$4,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$4,600
$4,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,100
$6,000

Costs & moving in

  • Payment methodsCheck

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

18 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,850.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 18 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 740 Seventh Street, Imperial Beach, CA 91932Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2007. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 12, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
14
Most recent visit
August 12, 2026
Occupied · April 2, 2026 visit
29 of 32 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 22, 2024 to April 2, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020251102024460202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 11 of 13 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a case management visit in response to a report submitted by facility dated 08/06/2026. LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit with Facility Director Jay Agustin. During the visit, LPA reviewed files and requested records related to the report. No deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Director Jay Agustin, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026
Apr 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced visit to amend an investigation report. LPA was greeted by and met with Executive Director (ED) Jay Agustin and to discuss the purpose of the visit. During today's visit LPA discussed the amendments with ED and the documents were signed and reviewed. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Jay Agustin who was provided with a copy of this report and Appeal Rights. Their signature confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2026
Apr 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above allegation. LPA was greeted by Executive Director Jay Agustin, to whom LPA identified as such and explained the purpose of the visit. The reporting party (RP) alleged that one resident (R1) was hit in the knee by facility staff. LPA contacted RP on March 27th, 2026. According to RP, staff member S1 reported the allegation after R1 left the facility for their day program and indicated that R1 was assessed on the same day, with no injuries or discoloration observed. RP stated that R1 did not repeat the allegation to RP. Additionally, an outside source familiar with R1 (OS1) believed that the injury was not caused by a staff member as R1 had provided conflicting accounts of the incident. [CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiated [CONTINUED FROM LIC9099] On the same date, LPA conducted an unannounced visit to the facility. R1’s records were reviewed which revealed a diagnosis of [INSERT dementia]. During the visit, LPA reviewed staff and resident files, incident reports, and interviewed staff involved. Per staff (S2 and the Executive Director), when R1 returned from the day program, R1 was physically assessed, and no injury, bruising, or bleeding was noted. When questioned about the allegation, R1 denied making any abuse allegations. On April 02, 2026, LPA interviewed R1’s day program staff member OS2, who initially received the allegation. OS2 corroborated the information provided by RP and reported that R1 had previously made statements such as “someone threw rocks at my head,” later correcting the statement to “it feels like somebody threw rocks at me.” On the same date, LPA conducted an additional unannounced visit to interview R1 and staff member S1, who reported the allegation. R1 was observed by LPA to be confused and disoriented, as they did not know the time, day, or year. R1 reported knee pain, however, they gave conflicting timelines and explanations, both inconsistent with abuse. S1 described the chain of events consistently with the statements provided by the Executive Director and S2 during the previous visit. Based on record reviews, LPA observations, and interviews conducted with RP, the alleged victim, facility staff, and day program staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations. Report and Appeal Rights were discussed with and provided to Executive Director Jay Agustin. Signature below confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260325110835
20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. LPA Lopez later arrived and joined the visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPAs identified themselves, were granted entry by Director Agustin. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Director Jay Agustin. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of 32 residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. The facility is approved for 7 hospice, 4 bedridden, and a waiver approved for non-physicians to prescribe medications. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 26 residents living at the facility. There were 25 residents present at the facility site during the inspection and one on day program. LPAs inspected the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 73 degrees(º) Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were also compliant: sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 105ºF; sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 105.3ºF; sink in restroom #3 delivered hot water at 105.1ºF. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present. Cooking, dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked cart, which LPA inspected. The facility maintained medication logs, which LPA reviewed. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per administrator Agustin, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and the facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguishers were present (03) and serviced within the last 12 months. The first aid kit was complete and readily accessible. LPAs interviewed 2 staff and 5 residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. LPAs interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPAs reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's annual inspection, but the facility received Technical Violation (TV) which may be found within this report. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator J Mhel Agustin, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20244 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was allowed entry by Shayla Martinez, Lead Caregiver. LPA met with Executive Director Jay Agustin and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 10/04/2024, the facility was issued deficiencies regarding the temperature of the hot water in various bathrooms, which did not comply with regulations, and resident files did not obtain updated copies of their Physician’s Report’s (LIC602s). During today’s visit, LPA measured the hot water temperature at taps and were all compliant: kitchen sink measured hot water at 108.5 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 108 degrees F; sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 110.7 degrees F; sink in restroom #3 delivered hot water at 107.2 degrees F; sink in restroom #4 delivered hot water at 111 degrees F; sink in restroom #5 delivered hot water at 110.8 degrees F; sink in restroom #6 delivered hot water at 110.3 degrees F; sink in restroom #7 delivered hot water at 109.9 degrees F; sink in restroom #8 delivered hot water at 113.9 degrees F; sink in restroom #9 delivered hot water at 113.7 degrees F; sink in restroom #10 delivered hot water at 113.4 degrees F; sink in restroom #11 delivered hot water at 114.1 degrees F; sink in restroom #12 delivered hot water at 115.3 degrees F; and sink in restroom #13 delivered hot water at 117 degrees F. The hot water temperatures were cleared throughout the facility. The LIC602s were all in the facility internal files and updated. As such, the deficiencies have been corrected and cleared during today’s visit. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Executive Director Jay Agustin at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024
Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Assistant Administrator Richard Tibi. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Assistant Administrator Tibi. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of 32 residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. The facility is approved seven (7) hospice residents, and four (4) bedridden residents. They also have a waiver for non-physicians to prescribe medications. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 24 residents living at the facility. There were 20 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Assistant Administrator Tibi, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 74 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were not all compliant: kitchen sink measured hot water at 115.2 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 116.4 degrees F; sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 116.4 degrees F; sink in restroom #3 delivered hot water at 116.2 degrees F; sink in restroom #4 delivered hot water at 116.4 degrees F; sink in restroom #5 delivered hot water at 115 degrees F; sink in restroom #6 delivered hot water at 113.9 degrees F; sink in restroom #7 delivered hot water at 126 degrees F; sink in restroom #8 delivered hot water at 127.8 degrees F; sink in restroom #9 delivered hot water at 125.8 degrees F; sink in restroom #10 delivered hot water at 124 degrees F; sink in restroom #11 delivered hot water at 123.4 degrees F; sink in restroom #12 delivered hot water at 125.8 degrees F; and sink in restroom #13 delivered hot water at 124.5 degrees F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking, dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored in a locked kitchen area. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked cart. LPA inspected the medication cart and confirmed medications were properly labeled and stored. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Assistant Administrator Tibi, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguishers were present (05) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. LPA reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 20 residents on the facility premise. LPA's inspection did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. Deficiencies observed and cited during today's annual inspection may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Administrator Richard Tibi to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Assistant Administrator Tibi to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, and Residential Infection Control Plan LIC 9282 (6/23), to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carmen Lopez, conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a required annual inspection and in conjunction initiate this case management visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Assistant Administrator Richard Tibi. LPA Lopez stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the visit with Assistant Administrator Tibi. This visit was in response to an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (IR) that was received at the San Diego Regional Office on Wednesday, September 18, 2024. The IR stated that there was an incident that transpired on Saturday, September 14, 2024, with resident #1 (R1) who was transported to the hospital due to becoming weak. The facility notified the resident’s primary care physician (PCP) and their power of attorney (POA). During today's visit LPA Lopez toured the facility, spoke with staff, and requested and obtained relevant documents pertinent to this incident. LPA Lopez verified R1 was still in the hospital and was to return to the facility within the next two weeks. Staff said that they contacted the POA to notify them of the residents condition and they agreed to contact emergency personnel to have the resident transported to the hospital due to changes in their condition. According to records R1 had gone to the hospital days prior due to refusing meals. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Administrator Tibi, and a copy of this report, LIC811 and Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024
Aug 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carmen Lopez, conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a case management visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Sharon Hays, Activities Coordinator. LPA Lopez stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the visit with Executive Director Jay Agustin. This visit was in response an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UIR) that was received at the San Diego Regional Office on Thursday, August 1, 2024. Per the UIR the incident transpired on Tuesday, July 30, 2024, with resident #1 (R1) who eloped from the facility. During today's visit LPA Lopez spoke with staff and resident, and requested and obtained relevant documents pertinent to this incident. According to staff, the resident was last seen on the facility premise at around 11:40 AM prior to their mealtime which was between 12:00 PM and 12:15 PM. According to Executive Director, he last observed resident to be at the facility at around 11:40 AM prior to his departure. About 30 minutes later, he was contacted by the family who made him aware that the resident had eloped and was with law enforcement. Resident was returned to the facility the same day with no injuries. R1's Needs and Service Plan was discussed and updated with the family. Per the Executive Director, R1 recently moved-in on July 29, 2024. The Executive Director mentioned that staff conduct visual resident head counts during all mealtimes – three times and monitor during incontinence checks– at least about twice and/or on an as needed basis. Records confirmed that the resident’s move-in date was recent. The incontinence sheets, for 7/30/24, show R1 incontinence time was left blank along with four additional residents for the time frame in question, but per ED it was due to residents not needing incontinence assistance during that time frame. Residents Physician’s Report confirms that the resident is an elopement risk. In review of the residents file, the resident did not have an elopement plan in place. Per the residents Needs and Service Plan, the elopement risk was implemented into R1’s plan on 7/31/24. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) According to the Executive Director, as of 7/30/24, the facility implemented a meal check sheet for residents to be accounted for during their mealtimes and in-between times. The facility did conduct in-service training to all staff for elopement. A copy of the forms and training sheets were provided to LPA during the visit. Based in the information obtained during the visit, there is a deficiency being cited during today’s visit that may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Jay Agustin, and a copy of this report, LIC811 and Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058) were provided to Executive Director Agustin, at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.317 · Plan of correction due date: Aug 20, 2024

H&S 1569.317 Absentee notification plan for missing residents - Every residential care facility for the elderly, as defined in Section 1569.2, shall, for the purpose of addressing issues that arise when a resident is missing from the facility, develop and comply with an absentee notification plan as part of the written record of the care the resident will receive in the facility, as described in Section 1569.80. This requirement was not met as evidency by: Based on records review, the licensee did not provide an elopement plan to meet resident’s needs to R1, 1 of 23 residents in care, which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2024

Plan of correction: Executive Director will implement an elopement plan for R1, and have staff complete Relias training and submit a copy of R1s elopment plan and the staff certificates to LPA via email by POC due date, 8/20/24.

Jul 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff physically abused resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Sharon Hays, Activities Coordinator. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Jay Agustine. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, resident, and outside sources, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On April 18, 2024, it was alleged that the facility staff physically abused a resident. It was specifically alleged that the facility staff kicked resident on her back. Interview with resident #1 (R1) showed that they were confused as they first reported to LPA that it was hospital staff who pushed them. R1 later contradicted themselves and said that it was facility staff who had pushed them. R1 was unable to keep their conversation centralized to one topic during the interview. (Continuation on LIC9009-C) Unsubstantiated (Continuation of LIC9099) LPA attempted to redirect the conversation, but the resident was forgetful and would continuously change the conversation. Staff interviews confirmed that resident would unconsciously make-up stories and would believe that they were true. Staff said they would have to intervene and inform resident that everything would be fine so the residents emotional state would stabilize. LPA attempted to speak with the LTCO but was unable. Interview with outside source said they had no concerns with the staff, or the care being provided by the facility to their loved one. A review of records revealed that resident does have a diagnosis of loss of intellectual functioning. Their primary diagnosis on their Physician’s Report (LIC602), per WebMD’s definition, describes it as damage or disease that affects the brain that leads to an altered mental state, leaving a person confused and not acting like oneself. Their LIC602 does confirm that resident is confused and at times may not be able to follow instructions. R1 does not have the capacity to provide themselves self-care. Per their mental cognition, the resident is non-ambulatory. The resident care notes shows that the resident is in need of ADL assistance with preparing items for them and standby assist. They also require reminders. A review of incident reports (IR) revealed that resident does have a history of falls. On 4/15/24, resident was found confused on the floor and staff initiated emergency response. Resident was taken to the hospital and treated. Residents responsible party (RP) and primary care physician (PCP) were notified. Another IR, dated 01/10/2024, revealed that R1 had fallen, and emergency response was initiated and R1 was taken to the hospital to be treated. This incident caused R1 to fracture their left wrist. R1’s PCP and RP were notified of the incident. According to hospital notes, R1 had old, healed fractures to the wrist and swelling to the right knee. Their mental cognition raced from topic to topic and very disjointed thinking. R1 does use a walker and hospital staff would need to follow them closely with a wheelchair. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff, resident and outside source interviews, records reviewed, and LPA observations, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Jay Agustine. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Executive Director Agustine at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240418105131
Jul 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for complaint investigation and in conjunction conduct this case management visit. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Sharon Hays, Activities Coordinator. LPA met with Executive Director Jay Agustine and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During the complaint investigation, control # 08-AS-20240418105131, the following was discovered: on 04/18/2024, the San Diego Regional Office (SDRO) received an incident report (IR) for resident #1 (R1). The IR reported that on 04/15/2024 R1 was found on the floor at 9:00 AM. According to the report staff immediately initiated 911 where paramedics transported R1 to the hospital. Upon further review of facility records, the charting notes state that R1 had fallen twice on 4/15/2024 and emergency response was initiated two (2) hours after the initial fall due to staff being unable to speak with R1. According to the IR, R1 was confused, pale and very weak. Based on the evidence obtained during the complaint investigation, deficiencies were observed and being cited during today’s case management and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted, a plan of correction was jointly developed with Executive Director Jay Agustine. A copy of this report, LIC811 and the Licensee Rights (01/2016) were provided to Executive Director Agustine at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below serves as confirmation of receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 5, 2024

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental: (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4). Based on records review the facility did not contact emergency personnel immediately after the initial fall and waited two hours to contact resident to be transported to the hospital which posed a potential health risk for 1 of 25 residents (R1) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024

Plan of correction: Executive Director will update the SIR and conduct staff in-service training on RELIAS for Reporting Incidents for documenting special incident reports properly and submit in-service training sheet and certificates for med techs and ED to LPA via email, by POC due date of 08/05/2024.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection to ensure substantial compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility by Med Tech, Chelsea Eutsey, after identifying themselves and stating the purpose of the inspection. This facility serves thirty two (32) residents 60 and above; all of whom may be non-ambulatory. Hospice care waiver approved for seven (7). Facility approved for four (4) bedridden residents. Waiver approved for non-physicians to prescribe medications.. LPA was accompanied by the Med Tech, Chelsea Eutsey during a tour of the facility. Later Executive Director, J. Mhel B. Agustin joined us. A tour of the facility was conducted which included a sample of resident units, the dining area, recreation rooms, and food storage areas. Signal systems are in place and operational. The last disaster drill was conducted in October 2023. PPE supplies are onsite. No bodies of water are on premises. Passageways were free from obstructions. According to Executive Director, Agustin, there are no weapons and/or ammunition stored on the premises. All doors were operational. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens. All extra linens, towels, and washcloths are stored in laundry room. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars however, there is 2 common shower rooms, and the individual bathtubs are not used for bathing. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were in working order. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Facility has a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food supply is replenished frequently by outside vendors. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. The food service area was observed to be neat and clean. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closed room. Centrally stored medications were properly stored and locked on medication cart. Medication logs and medications reviewed were current and medications appear to be administered according to the label instructions. Staff records review verified that all staff records are complete and compliant except for first aide and first aid/cpr certificates. All staff training were complaint. Resident records reviewed and confirmed compliant. Administrator’s certification is current. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. An exit interview was conducted, this report was discussed with Executive Director, Agustin. The report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/2106), and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt and a copy of the report was given to Executive Director, Agustin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Shared Bedrooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesPiano or Organ

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Ground-floor units

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Residents can cook in their own unit

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cultural cuisine regularly servedInternational

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredTrivia Games · Activities On-site · Holiday Parties · Live Musical Performances · Birthday Parties · Live Dance or Theater Performances · and 1 more

    Trivia Games · Activities On-site · Holiday Parties · Live Musical Performances · Birthday Parties · Live Dance or Theater Performances · BBQs or Picnics — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversFilipino · English · Spanish

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County