Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Diego
Liwag's Residential Care Home
3993 Caseman Street, San Diego, CA 92154Licensed since 1988
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Liwag's Residential Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$2,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$2,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$2,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,000–$2,600
- $2,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,000–$6,150
- $4,500
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $6,500
8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,100.
- Chula Vista Home CareChula Vista · 2.3 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Heart Home CareSan Diego · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Amariah Home CareChula Vista · 3.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Faith VillaChula Vista · 3.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- A Caring Heart ResidenceChula Vista · 3.7 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Berland Home CareChula Vista · 3.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sun and Sea Assisted LivingImperial Beach · 4.1 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Royal Garden Guest HomeChula Vista · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
3993 Caseman Street, San Diego, CA 92154Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sharp Chula Vista Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #370804527 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 3 of 8 documents
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz made an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Facility Director Nora Liwag (FD). The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) elderly residents age 60 and above, all of whom might be non-ambulatory. LPA arrived at 8:15 am to the facility, and requested staff and resident's records.At 10:50 am, LPA, FD toured the facility, the interior and exterior, six rooms and three bathrooms. The residents rooms where clean and with personal items and memorabilia. Activities and puzzles were found on the living room and residents rooms. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards.The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Toxic chemicals, poisons and sharps were locked in a cabinet. LPA measured the water temperature in the clients bathrooms and the kitchen sink in Fahrenheit degrees: B1 115.3, B2 116, B3 119, kitchen 118. [CONTINUED ON LIC809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC809] Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No bodies of water nor fireplace on the premises. Per FD, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and a resident and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Director Nora Liwag, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year Visit. LPA was greeted by, Administrator, Nora Liwag, to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents 60 and above of which may be non-ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of three (3) residents in care. LPA, accompanied by Administrator, Nora Liwag, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Residents’ bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required and stored in locked areas. (Continue at LIC809C) (Continue from LIC809) The facility had no pools of water on the premises. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Two fire extinguishers were serviced in April 2025. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The room temperature in the facility was comfortable at 73 degrees. All staff have current CPR certificates and annual training was completed as required. Facility has current liability insurance as required. Last emergency drill was conducted May, 2025. Liability insurance was current, expiration date February 5, 2026. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. Residents were observed to be clean, groomed and properly dressed free from bad odors. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. During today’s visit, LPA observed via measurement with a thermometer device, that hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents complied with regulations. Water from the kitchen sink reached 115.0 F. During today's visit no violations were observed. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Nora Liwag, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
May 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year Visit. LPA was greeted by, Administrator, Nora Liwag, to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents 60 and above of which may be non-ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of four (4) residents in care. LPA, accompanied by Administrator, Nora Liwag, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Residents’ bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required and stored in locked areas. The facility had no pools of water on the premises. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. (continue at LIC809C) (continue from LIC809) Two fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The room temperature in the facility was comfortable at 70 degrees. All staff have current CPR certificates and annual training was completed as required. Facility has current liability insurance as required. Last emergency drill was conducted April 7, 2024. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. Residents were observed to be clean, groomed and properly dressed free from bad odors. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. During today’s visit, LPA observed via measurement with a thermometer device, that hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents complied with regulations. Water from the kitchen sink reached 113.2 F. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Nora Liwag, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 5 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno made a Case Management visit to follow-up on a resident's death. LPA was granted entry into the facility by Administrator, Nora Liwag, to whom she disclosed the purpose of the visit. A Incident Report was received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on August 15, 2023, informing that Resident #1 (R1) [staff was provided an LIC 811 that identifies the Resident] passed away at the facility on August 14, 2023. During today's visit, LPA conducted a health and safety check, no violations were noted during today's visit. LPA collected R1's records. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Liwag, to whom a copy of this report and the appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16), was provided at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2023
May 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not administered medication as ordered
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to open an investigation and deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was granted entry by Administrator, Nora Liwag to whom she discussed the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff. It was reported staff did not administer medication for one resident (R1) [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident], as prescribed. It was specifically alleged that staff crushed and disguised medication in R1’s food. Review of R1’s medication records indicated the medication was to be administered three (3) times per day. A detailed audit of the medication records for the period between February 2, 2023, to May 2, 2023, indicated the psychiatric medication in question was administered three (3) times per day. (continue LIC9099C) Substantiated (continue from LIC9099) However, during interviews the staff stated they crushed and mixed the medicine in R1’s food because the resident did not want to take it. Staff reported they tried to encourage R1 to take the medication but that R1 still did not want to take it. In addition, staff stated they had consulted with R1’s medical provider regarding R1 refusing to take medication, however, there was no physician’s order to crush medication. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and has found that there was sufficient evidence to show facility staff were not administering medication as prescribed. Therefore, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations and is listed on LIC 9099D. A plan of corrections was developed with Administrator, Liwag. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Liwag and a copy of this report, Confidential Name List (LIC 811), the LIC9099D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Nora Liwag, to whom a copy of this report, LIC9099D, and LIC811 Confidential list form and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230503121308
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(C)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2023
87465(C)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care. Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observations, interviews and records review, facility staff did not administer medications in accordance with physician’s orders for R1, which posed a potential health and personal rights risk to 1 of 4 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to conduct in service training on medication management. In addition, licensee will obtain a doctor’s order to crush medication or stop crushing medication if a physician’s order is not obtained. Documentation of physician’s order and of completion of training should be submitted to CCL by POC date of 5/31/2023.
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 14, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst, Amy Domingo, conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA met with Nora Liwag (Licensee) and we discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, both inside and outside and observed the residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance, evaluated, and observed the facility's implementation of their mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing surveillance, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. The Licensee was provided a copy of her appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16), and her signature on this form, acknowledges receipt of these rights. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Nora Liwag.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2022
May 25, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff locks resident's inside and outside the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegation. LPA was met and granted entry into the facility by Licensee Liwag to whom was explained the purposes for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff and outside source interviews, a facility tour, and a facility record review. It was alleged that the facility staff lock residents inside and/or outside the facility. An interview with an outside source (OS1) revealed a staff member (S1) was outside the facility on the front patio with a resident and could not gain access back into the facility because the door providing entrance into the facility was locked. OS1 revealed that the facility residents only had access to the living room due to a gate that blocked the residents from entering the facility kitchen, and the only access to enter and exit the facility is through the kitchen. Unsubstantiated Interviews with the Licensee revealed they were at the facility with the other residents in care when S1 was out on the patio supervising a resident, S1 did not have their keys so the Licensee allowed S1 and the resident back in. The Licensee also revealed the kitchen gate was installed temporarily. The Licensee revealed the gate was not locked, there was a latch to open and close it, and it was used to delay a resident from entering the kitchen because they touched all the food with their bare hands, and the gate had since been removed. A facility record review and facility tour revealed there were approximately 9 doors providing entrances and/or exits at the facility, and a facility tour corroborated there was no gate that blocked the kitchen. Interviews with outside sources revealed no issues with the facility entry and exit points nor had any complaints regarding the facility or staff. Based on interviews, a facility record review, and facility tour the above allegation was established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means although the allegation may have happened or could be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Liwag and a copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC 9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01-2016) was provided to Licensee Liwag and signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 25, 2022 · control 08-AS-20201014122643
May 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in client on client altercation.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegation. LPA was met and granted entry into the facility by Licensee Nora Liwag to whom was explained the purposes for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff and outside source interviews, and a facility and resident record review. It was alleged that the above mentioned incident occurred due to lack of supervision. An interview with an outside source and a record review revealed the incident was observed and addressed by facility staff. On June 30, 2020 facility staff observed R1 begin to yell at another resident (R2) and swiftly punched and kicked them one time. R1 then proceeded to their bedroom. Facility staff called R1’s Case Manager who instructed staff to call 911. The police arrived at the facility and placed R1 on a 72 hour hold. An interview with an outside source (OS1) revealed alternative placement is being pursued that can provide a higher level of care due to R1’s aggressive behavior. The facility is fully staffed and there have been no other incidents or substantiated complaints regarding lack of supervision. Unsubstantiated With no other corroborating evidence, the finding regarding the above allegation was established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means although the allegation may have happened or could be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Liwag and a copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC 9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01-2016) was provided to Licensee Liwag and signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the reports. Based on a facility record review the above allegation is determined to be unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint allegation. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Liwag and a copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC 9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01-2016) was provided to Licensee Liwag and signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the reportsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200706140423
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 10, 2023 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Liwag, Nora B. and Ernesto A., licensed since 1988.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1988, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 6
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1988, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Liwag's Residential Care Home
Is Liwag's Residential Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Liwag's Residential Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Liwag's Residential Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.
Is Liwag's Residential Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Liwag's Residential Care Home cost?
$2,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 50 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 50 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Liwag's Residential Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Liwag, Nora B. and Ernesto A., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center is 3.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Liwag's Residential Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Liwag's Residential Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LIWAG'S RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #370804527. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Liwag, Nora B. and Ernesto A., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 6 state inspection visits since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,850–$4,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County