Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Steeplechase Villa

Small home·Licensed for 6·Brentwood, California

Licensed since 2025Licence #79201482
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedMay 18, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 18, 2026CDSS inspection record

Steeplechase Villa is a small care home in Brentwood — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2025.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Steeplechase Villa

Is Steeplechase Villa licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Steeplechase Villa licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Steeplechase Villa been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Steeplechase Villa still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Steeplechase Villa cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,200–$6,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 19 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Steeplechase Villa take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Steeplechase Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Antioch is 3.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Steeplechase Villa keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Steeplechase Villa license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “STEEPLECHASE VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79201482. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Steeplechase Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #1 ONLY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,200–$6,300

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,200–$6,450

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,200–$6,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 19 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,200–$6,450
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,550
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 19 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 19 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,100–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1070 Steeple Blvd, Brentwood, CA 94513Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2025, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2025. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 18, 2026.

On file since
2025
State visits
7
Most recent visit
May 18, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 18, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2025.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261302025340

The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 3 documents
May 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents. Staff member worked while under the influence of marijuana, impairing their ability to provide adequate care.

On 05/18/2026 at 3:14PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Kimberly Whittle, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Facility did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents. Facility did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents Interview with S1 revealed the temperature is set at 72 degrees daily and staff have the ability to adjust the temperature if they need to. Interview with S1 also revealed the facility’s temperature is maintained through an application called Google Nest a system which allows Administrator to monitor and control the temperature remotely. Continues on LIC9099C.... Unsubstantiated Continues from LIC9099 Interview with W1 revealed the temperature at the facility is normally set to 51 degrees everyday causing the residents to complain of being cold. Interviews with R1, R2 and R3 revealed the temperature is okay at the facility. Interviews with R1 and R3 revealed they both get cold at times; staff will give them a throw blanket and then they’re okay. Record review revealed facility’s temperature was maintained between 72 degrees to 74 degrees throughout the Month of January 2026. Allegation: Staff member worked while under the influence of marijuana, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents in care Interviews with S1 revealed facility staff have not mentioned to S1 about staff member smelling like marijuana or any staff members being under any influence while providing care. Interview with S1 also revealed facility would take the proper steps to terminate anyone who is working under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Interview with W1 revealed that staff member came to work smelling like marijuana and could not perform work duties. Interview with W1 also revealed residents complained to W1 about staff member smelling like marijuana. Interview with S2 revealed facility has a zero policy regarding drugs and alcohol. Interview with S2 also revealed S2 hasn’t witnessed or heard of any staff members smelling like marijuana. Interviews with R1, R2 and R3 revealed residents have not witnessed any of the staff being under the influence of marijuana or the smelling like marijuana when providing care. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260123160633
May 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Not enough staff to care for residents. Lack of food and moldy food.

On 05/18/2026 at 2:17PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Kimberly Whittle, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Not enough staff to care for residents Interviews with S1, S2 and S3 revealed the facility’s staff schedules overlaps, resulting in two (2) staff members being at facility for a period of time on AM and PM shifts. Interviews with S1, S2 and S3 revealed the night staff prepare breakfast for the residents before end of their shift, allowing the staff on AM shift to start showering, toileting and getting residents dressed for the day. Interviews with R1, R2, and R3 revealed staff arrive within a couple of minutes after their call buttons have been activated. Record revealed, facility has staff sufficient in numbers. Continues on LIC9099C..... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 Allegation: Lack of food and moldy food. Interviews with S1 and S2 revealed staff cleans refrigerator bi-weekly and removes any food from refrigerator and countertops before food goes bad. Interview with S3 revealed staff provided a small portion of food to the residents in care. Interview with S3 also revealed, S3 witnessed a moldy piece of fruit on the countertop. Interview with R1, R2 and R3 also revealed facility provided a good amount of food and if residents want more food staff will provide residents with more food. LPA toured facility and observed facility to have 7- days of nonperishables and 2- days of perishable foods, fruits and food was in good quality. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260102151106
May 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/18/2026 at 10:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson arrived unannounced to conducted a 1-year inspection. LPA met with Caregiver Alexis Noblitt. Administrator, Kimberly Whittle, was present during the visit, LPA explained the purpose of visit. Administrator holds certificate # 7031907740 expires on 10/11/2027. Fire clearance was approved for six (6) non ambulatory residents. LPA toured facility with Administrator including but not limited to seven (7) bedrooms, one (1) occupied by staff, four (4) bathrooms, dining area, living room, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. LPA observed lighting in all rooms is adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hot water temperature in the shared residents’ bathroom was measured at 109.8 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed residents’ shared bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. LPA observed there is a minimum of 7-day supply of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable foods. LPA observed the facility has a comfortable room temperature and is maintained at 73 degrees F. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were observed in operating condition. The first-aid kit was observed and was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 09/04/2026. Emergency disaster plan was last posted on 05/01/2026. Last fire drill was conducted on 05/01/2026. Continue on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA reviewed all three (3) residents’ records, and three (3) staff records and they were complete. All staff are fingerprint clear, have FirstAid/CPR and are associated with the facility. LPA also reviewed a sample of medication during visit. The following forms are to be updated and submitted to CCL by 05/25/2026. LIC 500- Personnel Report LIC 308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan (9 pages) Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Kimberly Whittle.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

On 07/02/2025 at 1:35PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson conducted an unannounced post licensing inspection. LPA met with Caregiver, Jacqueline Samayoa. Jacqueline contacted the Administrator, Henry Paul Salazar, via telephone and advised the purpose of the visit. The administrator arrived at 2:14PM, LPA explained the purpose of visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, living room, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. The fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 04/15/2025. Medications were in a locked cabinet located in the kitchen. Comfortable room temperature is maintained at 76 degrees F. Hot water temperature in the shared residents’ bathroom was measured at 121.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were observed in operating condition. The first-aid kit was complete, and hygiene items for resident general use are sufficient. Extra linens and towels were observed. Last fire drill was conducted on 2/26/2019. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Continue on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA reviewed all four (4) residents’ records, and two (2) staff records and they were complete. All staff are fingerprint clear, have FirstAid/CPR and are associated with the facility. The following forms are to be updated and submitted to CCL by 07/09/2025: LIC 500- Personnel Report LIC 308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan (9 pages) Evidence of Liability Insurance LPA observed the following deficiencies: At 2:09PM, LPA observed during facility tour, facility does not have 7- days of nonperishables and 2- days of perishables At 3:22PM, LPA observed two (2) out four (4) personnel records were not at the facility during record review. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 11, 2025

(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable... This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in not having one week of nonperishables foods and two days of perishables foods, which poses a personal rights risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to purchase one week of nonperishables and two days of perishables foods and send CCLD an email with photo by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87412(f) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 3, 2025

(f) All personnel records shall be available to the licensing agency to inspect, audit, and copy upon demand during normal business hours...This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and record review the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having not having S1 and S4 personnel records available to the licensing agency, which poses a health and safety risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to have personnel records available for licensing agency to inspect during business hours and send CCLD a self-certifying email by the POC date.

May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 05/06/2025 at 2:15PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson conducted an announced pre-licensing inspection. This is a continuance from the previous visit conducted on 04/24/2025. LPA met with Paul Henry Salazar and Jan Jocson, Licensee/Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. On 04/29/2025 at 10:03 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson conducted a Pre-licensing Inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator, Paul Henry Salazar and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited seven (7) bedrooms, one (1) bedroom occupied by staff, four (4) bathrooms, one (1) occupied by staff, living room, dining area, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. LPA observed lighting in all rooms. LPA observed facility had some non-perishable food supply. Licensee will purchase additional food supplies once facility is licensed. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors was observed in operating condition. First aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was last purchased on 12/18/2024. Facility inspection matches the sketch that was provided. Continue on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA observed Licensee/Administrator made corrections from previous visit on 04/29/2025. LPA Conducted COMP III on 05/06/2025. The licensee/administrator was reminded of the statute that requires CCL to be notified within 5 business days of admitting their first resident. This notification may be done by phone, by mail, email, or by fax. No Issues were noted during inspection. LPA observed that facility is ready to be licensed. This report will be submitted to the Central Applications Unit (CAU) and a final review of the application will be conducted. This facility is not yet licensed and is subject to final approval by CAU. Additional requirements may still be required. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025
May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 05/06/2025 at 2:41PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), T. Syess-Gibson arrived to conduct an announced Case Management COMP III visit. LPA met with Paul Henry Salazar and Jan Jocson, Administrator/Licensee and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA presented Component III power point during visit and discussed the regulations embodied in the power point. LPA observed the participants gained knowledge about running and maintaining the facility in accordance with regulations. A license has not yet been granted to this facility. Licensure is subject to final review and approval by the Centralized Applications Unit. Licensee is not to accept consumers until notified by Community Care Licensing that the license has been approved. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025
Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 04/29/2025 at 10:03 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson conducted a Pre-licensing Inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator, Paul Henry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to resident's bedrooms, bathrooms, living room, dining area, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. LPA observed lighting in all rooms. LPA observed facility had some non-perishable food supply. Licensee will purchase additional food supplies once facility is licensed. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors was observed in operating condition. First aid kit was complete. The following will need to be completed before recommending licensure to Centralized Application Bureau (CAB): 1.)LPA observed facility does not have a professionally installed grab bars in all three (3) showers in residents’ shared restroom. Continue on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 2.) LPA observed facility does not have complete bedding for all six bedrooms, beds are missing mattress pads and blankets. 3.) LPA observed facility does not have an exit sign in the backyard identifying emergency exit. 4.) LPA observed facility does not have a dementia plan and observed the plan does not address behaviors such as ingestion of toxic chemicals and wandering behaviors. 5.) LPA observed facility does not have PUB 475 20x26 and Ombudsman poster. 6.)LPA observed facility does not have emergency disaster plan (9 pages) posted. Comp III will be conducted during follow-up visit. Licensee/Applicant will submit proof of corrections to CCLD on/before 05/06/2025. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County