Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Silvana Senior Care 6

Small home·Licensed for 6·Roseville, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #315002898
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 15, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 14, 2026CDSS inspection record

Silvana Senior Care 6 is a small care home in Roseville — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Silvana Senior Care 6

Is Silvana Senior Care 6 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Silvana Senior Care 6 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Silvana Senior Care 6 been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Silvana Senior Care 6 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Silvana Senior Care 6 cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $5,750 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Silvana Senior Care 6 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Silvana Senior Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Silvana Senior Care, Inc. — at least 5 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Roseville Medical Center is 4.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Silvana Senior Care 6 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Silvana Senior Care 6 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SILVANA SENIOR CARE 6”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #315002898. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Silvana Senior Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 4 HOSPICE RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA PLAN APPROVED. SUBMITTED.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,250

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,150–$6,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,150–$6,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,400
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,500
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$5,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7040 Ludlow Dr, Roseville, CA 95747Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 14, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
11
Most recent visit
April 14, 2026
Occupied · January 15, 2026 visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 15, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026561202511020242202022220

The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documents

20265 state visits · 6 documents
Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi, Kevin Mknelly, and Melissa Parks, and Licensing Program Manager Troy Ordonez and Laura Munoz met licensee Krisztina Ivascu in person for an office visit. This meeting was initiated by licensee to discuss the following topics: Night supervision. Staff supervision for dementia residents. Live in staff. Annual Fees. Refund for hospice residents. During today’s office meeting no deficiencies cited. Copy of report provided to licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
Apr 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a POC visit. LPA met with Administrator Lina Alexeeva during today's inspection. During today's visit LPA reviewed deficiencies cited on 01/15/26. LPA reviewed staff files and observed staff files to be complete. POC letter was provided. Copy of report given. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2026
Feb 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On Tuesday February 10, 2026, at 9:00 AM, an informal conference was conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams Meeting. Present in the meeting was Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Maribeth Senty, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks, LPA Bethany Mirlohi, and Licensee representative Krisztina Ivascu. License was informed that this Informal conference is a part of the Administrative Action process and that further noncompliance may result in an elevation to a formal noncompliance conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's legal division for possible revocation of license. The purpose of today’s meeting was to discuss solvency, plan of corrections, and facility administrators. Topic discussed: - Solvency - Past due annual fees - Plan of Corrections - Facility Administrators At this time, the Department agreed to monitor each facility. Additionally, the facility will provide the Department with the required documents and a schedule of each Administrator for each facility. Krisztina agreed to pay outstanding annual fees by 2/28/2026. The Department will submit a referral to the Technical Support Program. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. Informal meeting concluded and a copy of report will be emailed. Facility Representative Signature is expected to be signed and returned to LPA by close of business, 2/10/2026.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2026
Jan 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a POC visit. LPA spoke with Administrator Krisztina Ivanscu over the phone. On 1/15/26 LPA conducted a complaint investigation regarding, "Staff are not following refund conditions". Complaint was substantiated and POC date for deficiencies cited was for 1/19/26. Administrator was asked to send in receipts of refund to responsible party of resident. LPA did not receive the receipts from administrator, and only $4,000 of the $6,000 has been refunded to responsible party. Administrator to send LPA a receipt of the remaining $2,000 balance that is due to responsible party. Administrator agrees to send the remaining money by 1/23/26 into LPA. Civil Penalties have been assessed. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided. Appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following refund conditions

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to open complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator Krisztina Ivanscu during today's inspection. Relevant Party stated they paid the facility a $6,000 deposit prior to family member moving into the facility in February 2025. Family member passed away before they moved into the facility. Relevant party stated licensee did not refund the $6,000 deposit. LPA interviewed Administrator in which she stated she made a mistake and forgot to refund the deposit due to lack of contact information. Licensee stated she paid relevant party $4,000 on 1/12/26 and still owes $2,000. Licensee stated she will refund the remaining $2,000. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260113111411

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(g)(5)(E)(1)(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 19, 2026

87507 Admission agreement. (g) Admission agreements shall specify the following: (5) Refund conditions. (E) Preadmission fees shall be refunded according to the following conditions: 1. A 100 percent refund of a preadmission fee shall be provided to an applicant or the applicant’s representative if: a. The applicant decides not to enter the facility prior to the facility completing a preadmission appraisal as defined in Section 87457. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews the licensee did not provide family member a refund of pre-admission deposit which poses a potential health, safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator to send LPA a receipt that $6,000 refund was issued to resident responsible party. POC due by 1/19/26.

Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Krisztina Ivanscu during today's inspection. LPA toured facility with Administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 3 resident rooms, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Water temperature was measured. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 2 of 3 resident files and staff files. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. Deficiencies cited on 809-D. Appeal Rights provided. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 01/28/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Staff Rebecca Jackson during today's inspection.LPA spoke with Administrator, Krisztina Ivascu via telephone, who gave permission to have staff Rebecca Jackson assist LPA with visit. LPA toured facility with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured five (5) resident rooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Hot water was measured at 109 degrees at the kitchen sink. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens. Fire extinguisher was last inspected on 12/18/2024. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files and two (2) staff files. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Krisztina Ivascu. LPA arrived to discuss an incident report that was received. Resident was sent out to the emergency department due to a change of condition and pressure injuries. Resident is currently admitted to a SNF and is pending return to facility. During the file review LPA observed resident's LIC602 was completed in August 2023 and there was no doctor signature. Resident was admitted to the facility in August 2024. Due to file review, deficiencies have been cited on 809-D. Exit interview conducted and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 11, 2024

87458 Medical Assessment. (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year. The licensee shall be permitted to use the form LIC 602 (Rev. 9/89), Physician's Report, to obtain the medical assessment. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on record review the licensee did not obtain a signed, and current medical assessment prior to accepting resident which poses a potential health, safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to send into LPA a statement of understanding for regulation 87458. Statement to be sent into CCL on 10/11/24.

Jan 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Krisztina Ivascu during today's inspection. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 5 resident rooms, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Hot water was measured at 111 degrees. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 3 of 6 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA reviewed medications of two residents comparing with Centrally Stored Medication Record and physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Placer County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Placer County