Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Dolce Vita Home Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Roseville, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #315002855
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 25, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitNovember 20, 2025CDSS inspection record

Dolce Vita Home Care is a small care home in Roseville — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Dolce Vita Home Care

Is Dolce Vita Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Dolce Vita Home Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Dolce Vita Home Care been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Dolce Vita Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Dolce Vita Home Care cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $5,750 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Dolce Vita Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Natalya Corp., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Roseville Medical Center is 4.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Dolce Vita Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Dolce Vita Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “DOLCE VITA HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #315002855. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Natalya Corp., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is November 20, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORIES. LICENSED IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4) RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,250

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,150–$6,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,150–$6,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,400
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,500
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$5,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 141 Hinckley Ct, Roseville, CA 95747Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 20, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
November 20, 2025
Occupied · September 25, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 4, 2023 to September 25, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253302024110202322120221102021220

The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documents

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Natayla Andreyea during today's inspection. Currently there are 6 residents in care and 3 are receiving hospice care services. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 5 resident room, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Hot water temperature was measured at 114. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 3 of 6 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA reviewed medications of three residents comparing with Centrally Stored Medication Record and physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current first aid certificates and training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff imposed restrictions on resident’s visits. Staff did not allow resident to receive telephone calls. Staff served as resident’s agent under a power of attorney document.

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Natalya Andreyea to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfounded Staff imposed restrictions on resident’s visits. Interviews conducted with the administrator indicated that resident R1 was allowed to have visitors. R1 had visitors and was able to leave the facility with the visitors for outings. Interviews with R1 indicated that they had had visitors while living at the facility. Interviews with staff indicated that R1 did not have many visitors but those who came were able to see R1. Records reviewed indicated that the visitor log had been signed and indicated that R1 had visitors on occasion. Therefore, the allegation staff imposed restrictions on resident’s visits is unfounded. Staff did not allow resident to receive telephone calls. Interviews conducted with staff indicated that resident R1 was allowed to receive phone calls from guests. Interviews with administrator indicated that R1 was able to receive phone calls but explained that when calls were received late at night from guests, she would not wake up R1 for the phone calls and encouraged guests to call during visiting hours. Interviews with R1 indicated that they were able to make and receive phone calls. R1 did not feel that their calls were restricted in any way. Therefore, the allegation staff did not allow resident to receive telephone calls is unfounded. Staff served as resident’s agent under a power of attorney document. Records reviewed indicated that resident R1 had a power of attorney in place through an individual who had no relation to the current facility. Interview with administrator indicated that due to R1’s physical status, it was advised that R1 had a power of attorney in place for financial assistance. R1 had chosen their own power of attorney and administrator assisted in getting all the paperwork completed. Therefore, the allegation staff served as resident’s agent under a power of attorney document is unfounded. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. Copy of report was given to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250715102317
Jun 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Collateral

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a collateral visit. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Today's visit, LPA spoke with Administrator and R1 regarding a concern that is not related to the facility. In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiencies were observed at the time of the visit. Exit interview and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to complete the annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Natalya Andreyea during today's inspection. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 5 resident room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Hot water temperature was taken. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 2 of 5 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA reviewed medications of two residents comparing with Centrally Stored Medication Record and physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current first aid certificates and training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Natalya Andreyea during today's inspection. LPA toured facility with Administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 6 resident rooms, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 2 of 6 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA reviewed medications of two residents comparing with Centrally Stored Medication Record and physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current first aid certificates and training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2023

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Placer County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Placer County