Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Seiko's Place

Small home·Licensed for 6·Concord, California

Licensed since 2006Licence #75601236
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJune 5, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 10, 2026CDSS inspection record

Seiko's Place is a small care home in Concord — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2006. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Seiko's Place

Is Seiko's Place licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Seiko's Place licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Seiko's Place been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Seiko's Place still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Seiko's Place cost?

$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 10 other homes of a similar licensed size in Concord that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 10 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Seiko's Place take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Seiko's Homes, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

John Muir Medical Center-Concord Campus is 3.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Seiko's Place keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Seiko's Place license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SEIKO'S PLACE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #75601236. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Seiko's Homes, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 10, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 1 resident
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,800–$5,750

From 17 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,800–$5,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,950
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,050
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

17 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,700.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 17 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4967 Hames Drive, Concord, CA 94521Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2006. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 29, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
13
Most recent visit
August 10, 2026
Occupied · June 5, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated June 5, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2006.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025341202411020231102022240

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/29/2026 at 11:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrew Christy arrived unannounced to conduct the 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Matt Ofahengaue, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility currently houses five (5) residents with a max capacity of six (6) residents. LPA toured facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, and backyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. No bodies of water were observed. A comfortable indoor temperature is maintained at 69.0 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 115.6 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 01/29/2026. At 12:30PM, LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and three (3) staff files, all found to be complete. The emergency disaster plan was last reviewed 07/29/2026. Quarterly emergency drills were last conducted 06/03/2026. A review of resident medications and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found no outstanding errors. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/03/24 at 12:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to conduct Required 1 Year Annual inspection. LPA met with Mateaki 'Mat' Ofenhengaue, House Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 6 Non-Ambulatory. LPA toured facility with caregiver including but not limited to bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, common area and backyard. The facility consists of 5 total bedrooms which all 5 bedrooms are occupied by the residents. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 70 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 114.7 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of 7 day supply of nonperishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 5/22/25. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 05/05/2025. LPA reviewed 4 resident and 2 staff files and all were complete. LPA also reviewed a sample of 4 resident’s medications. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 7/17/25: LIC 610D Emergency Disaster Plan Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left the residents unattended.

On this day, June 5, 2025, at 2:20 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Delmundo arrived unannounced to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Gladys Corpuz, staff. LPA called and spoke over the phone with House Manager (HM) Mateaki 'Mat' Ofenhengaue who stated he can not come to the facility and gave permission to Gladys Corpuz to sign and receive this report. During the course of investigation, LPA conducted interviews. LPA reviewed residents' files and obtained copies of the following residents' documents: LIC602A Physician's Reports; hospital After Visit Summary. LPA also obtained copies of LIC9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents, staff schedule and contact information. LPA interviewed the following: reporting party (RP) on 5/16/25; staff (HM) on 5/22/25; staff (S3) on 5/28/25. .....continued on 9099C (page 2) Substantiated Page 2 It was alleged that when resident’s (R1) family member went to the facility on 5/01/25, the staff was in the shower, and it was resident (R2) who opened the door. HM stated that R1's wife (FM1) was at the facility on 5/01/25 at around 6:30 pm, then left and came back. HM further stated that S3 was in the shower at the time when FM1 came back, and it was R2 who opened the door. S3 confirmed she was by herself and was taking shower and it was R2 who opened the door for FM1. Review of records showed R2 has major neuro cognitive disease and has wandering behavior. Based on interviews and records review, the preponderance standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on 809D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date along with the LIC9098 Proof of Correction form and any repeat violation within 12 month period may result in civil penalty Deficiency and plan and proof of correction were discussed with HM over the phone. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, LIC9098 Proof of Correction form and copy of this report provided. Page 2 Allegation: Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision of a resident (R1). It was reported that R1 had fallen out of bed and when FM1 came to the facility on 5/01/25, FM1 found R1 in poor condition and FM1 called 9-11. S1 and S3 stated they were not in the facility when FM1 called 9-11 and R1 was sent out. S1 stated R1 came back the following day. HM stated he talked to FM1 and asked why she wants to call 9-11 and FM1 said R1 does not look good. HM further stated the ambulance came, checked and took R1 vitals and didn't see anything but FM1 insisted to have R1 sent out. FM1 stated she does not have complaint about the care R1 is getting from the facility and that R1 did not fall out of bed. LPA interviewed and verified with RP who stated R1 was diagnosed with weakness and was discharged back to the facility the following. Review of hospital After Visit Summary dated 5/02/25 indicated the following: no admission diagnosis during encounter; no admission procedures for hospital encounters; no comments available. R1 was not able to provide information regarding the incident. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff mishandled a resident. It was alleged that when R1 asked staff to speak English, the staff lifted R1 up by R1’s shirt and put R1 back to bed and that R1 appeared upset. S1 stated that he was getting/preparing and giving R1 morning care when the incident happened. R1 was out balanced and about to fall and his immediate reflex was to catch R1, so he hold R1 onto his shirt to prevent him from falling. S1 denied handling any residents roughly. S1 and S3 also denied handling any residents roughly and stated not observing S1 handled the residents roughly. Three out of 5 residents stated all the staff are nice and never handled them roughly. Due to medical diagnosis, LPA was unable to obtain information from the other 2 residents on how they are handled and/or assisted by the staff. Therefore, the allegation in unsubstantiated. .....continued on 9099C (page 3) Page 3 A finding that a complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250514132244

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 6, 2025

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs……............... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: -Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section above when staff left the residents unattended which posed an immediate safety and/or personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator to in-service the staff and submit copy of training topic with attendees signatures by 6/06/25.

Jun 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

While at the facility for a complaint (Complaint Control # 15-AS-20250514132244), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Delmundo conducted a Proof of Correction visit for the deficiencies/citations issued by LPA on 5/22/25. LPA met with Gladys Corpuz, staff. LPA called and spoke over the phone with House Manager (HM) Mateaki 'Mat' Ofenhengaue, and informed the reason for visit. On 5/22/25, LPA conducted a case management visit and issued type B citations for the following deficiencies with proof of corrections (POCs) to be submitted by 6/05/25: 1. Deficiency section # 87211(a)(1)(D) 2. Deficiency section # 87458(a) LPA only received the POC (copy of LIC602A Physician's Report) for deficiency section # 87458(a) on 6/04/25. The POC for deficiency section # 87211(a)(1)(D) is not received. LPA discussed the above over the phone with HM and informed that POC for # 87211(a)(1)(D) shall be submitted by end of the day today. HM stated he will submit today. HM also stated he can not come to the facility and gave permission to Gladys Corpuz to sign and receive this report. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025
May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

While at the facility investigating a complaint (Control # 15-AS-20250514132244) and upon review of residents' records and interviews, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Delmundo observed the following: 1. Facility did not submit Unusual Incident Report for resident (R1) when R1 was sent out to the hospital on May 1, 2025. 2. The other resident's (R2) LIC602A Physician's Report on file was dated November 2021 and missing pages #'s 3 and 4. R2 was admitted to the facility on November 2021 and updated LIC602A was never obtained. The above were discussed with House Manager (HM) Mateaki 'Mat' Ofenhengaue. Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on 809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections by plan of correction due dates may result in civil penalties. Deficiencies and plan and proof of corrections were discussed with HM. HM has to leave and gave permission to Gladys Corpuz, staff, to sign and receive this report. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, LIC9098 Proof of Correction form and copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 5, 2025

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: -Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section above in not submitting an incident report wheh R1 was sent out which posed a personal rights risk to person in care,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator to do the followiing and submit POC by 6/05/25: 1. Complete and submit the incident report. 2. Read the Regulations and submit self-certification that report will be submitted timely.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 5, 2025

87458 Medical Assessment (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a licensed medical professional acting within the scope of their practice..... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: -Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section above in not obtaining a complete LIC602A nor having a current/updated LIC602Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator to schedule a medical assessment and submit copy of the LIC602A by 6/05/25.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/12/2024 at 1:50 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct Required 1 Year Annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver, Gladys Corpuz and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 6 Non-Ambulatory. LPA toured facility with caregiver including but not limited to bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, common area and backyard. The facility consists of 5 total bedrooms which all 5 bedrooms are occupied by the residents. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 77 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of 7 day supply of nonperishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 10/2023. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 05/01/2024. At 9:25 AM, LPA reviewed 4 of 4 residents records. All resident files were incomplete and missing required documents. At 11:18 AM, LPA reviewed a sample of 4 of 4 resident’s medications. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County