Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Saint Michael's Extended Care

Mid-size home·Licensed for 44·San Rafael, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #216801999
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,950
  • Home sizeLicensed for 44Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit39 of 44 beds occupiedAugust 21, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 21, 2026CDSS inspection record

Saint Michael's Extended Care is a mid-size care home in San Rafael — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 44 residents since 2007. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Saint Michael's Extended Care

Is Saint Michael's Extended Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Saint Michael's Extended Care licensed for?

44 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Saint Michael's Extended Care been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Saint Michael's Extended Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Saint Michael's Extended Care cost?

$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,200–$6,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Rafael that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,500 to $9,000 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Saint Michael's Extended Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Saint Michael's Extended Care, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Marinhealth Medical Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Saint Michael's Extended Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Saint Michael's Extended Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SAINT MICHAEL'S EXTENDED CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #216801999. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 44 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Saint Michael's Extended Care, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 44 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
44 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAY EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3)

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Renal diet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Low-sodium or cardiac diet available

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,300a month to start

Likely $4,200–$6,950

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,300a month

Likely $4,200–$6,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,200–$6,950

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Help with daily careIncludedper the home

    The home lists its rent as all-inclusive on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026. Ask which care needs would change the monthly rate.

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,200–$6,950
$5,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,900
$7,300

Costs & moving in

  • How care costs are added to the rentAll inclusive

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,800–$10,200.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 416 4Th Street, San Rafael, CA 94901Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2007. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 21, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
14
Most recent visit
August 21, 2026
Occupied at that visit
39 of 44 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 16, 2022 to August 21, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints5typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025121202434020232202022330

The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of supervision, resident was pushed and harassed by another resident

At approximately 9:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation, and met with Staff Member, Nataly Solis. Administrator, Rufus Zingkhai, arrived during visit at approximately 9:15AM. During the course of the investigation, the Department reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated, "Due to lack of supervision, resident was pushed and harassed by another resident." Complaint alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was being pushed and harrassed by Resident 2 (R2). Per complaint, R2 throws R1's personal belongings onto the floor, yells and screams at them, opens the door when they are in the bathroom, and threatens them. Report also stated that another resident at the facility has heard R2 screaming at night. Additional information from the Complainant revealed that R1 and R2 were roommates, and that R1 had been becoming increasingly Continued on LIC9099 Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 paranoid and delusional as a result of refusing their medications. Complainant further stated that when they spoke to facility staff members, staff had stated that they had not been on-site when R1 was allegedly pushed by R2. Department was unable to obtain information on who the other resident was that heard R2 screaming at night. Review of R1's care plan dated 02/13/2026 and R2's care plan dated 05/16/2025, showed that both residents did not require one-on-one supervision. Interview conducted with Administrator revealed that C1's mental health team notified them of the situation between R1 and R2 on 04/07/2026. Per Administrator, they spoke with both R1 and R2 and both residents denied the allegations, stating that they have not pushed or touched each other inappropriately. Interview further revealed that per facility protocol, facility separated R1 and R2 for their safety and moved R1 to a room located on the facility's second floor on 04/08/2026. During visit conducted on 04/17/2026, R1 was observed to be residing on the second floor of the facility. Additional documentation in R1's file further showed that R1 had entered a new roommate agreement with Resident 3 (R3) on 04/08/2026. During visit conducted on 08/21/2026, the Department was informed that R1 had been discharged from the facility on 05/03/2026 by their mental health team. Based on record review, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260407102405
Apr 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 8:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a 1 Year Required Visit and met with Staff Member, Sheila Manansala. Administrator, Rufus Zingkhai, arrived during visit at approximately 9:05AM. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) and serves residents with Dementia and has a plan of operation for dementia care and programming on file. Facility is a two story building and has an approved fire clearance for 44 non-ambulatory residents and an approved hospice waiver for 3 individuals. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were currently 39 residents in care and 6 staff members on-site. LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. LPA conducted a walk-though of the facility with Administrator. LPA observed the following: The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. Facility has an Infection Control plan on file. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. There was an appropriate supply of cleaning products, linens, hygiene products and paper products available for Residents. Mattress pads were in place or available for Resident use. Toxins were observed to be stored inaccessible to Residents. Hot water temperatures for a sample size of 6 sinks were within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility had emergency evacuation chairs at their stairwells. Facility fire extinguishers were last inspected February 2026. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired and were last inspected by the Fire Department February 2026. Facility's last emergency/disaster drill was conducted April 2026. Facility's emergency disaster plan was last reviewed and updated on 02/06/2026. During walkthrough, LPA observed the following: 2 resident rooms did not have a night stand or chair as required, facility did not have tight fitting lids on resident garbage cans, and facility did not have an adequate supply of emergency water accessible in the event they needed to shelter in place for 72 hours. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA reviewed staff files, resident files and resident medication. All files were all found to be well organized and thorough. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. Resident files had updated assessments and appraisals. LPA discussed with Administrator on ensuring that resident appraisals address behavioral expressions if they have been identified in resident medical assessments. LPA observed that 1 of 5 residents was missing proof of a negative TB test. Medication was observed to be centrally stored and secure. Administrator's Certificate for Rufus Zingkhai (7033932740) was current with an expiration of 08/15/2027. LPA discussed the following with Administrator: Reporting Requirements PIN regarding 911 protocols PIN regarding dementia regulations Review of facility's medication management program by a consultant pharmacist or nurse LPA requested the following documents to update facility file: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Personnel Report (LIC 500) Liability Insurance Active and Current Administrator Certificate Documents to be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by due date of 05/17/2025. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC809D (Deficiency Page), LIC9102 (Technical Violations/Advisories), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20251 state visit · 2 documents
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not administering medication per physician's orders Personal Rights

At approximately 9:35AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this complaint investigation regarding the above allegations, and met with Administrator, Rufus Zingkhai. During the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegations were investigated, ”Staff is not administering medication per physician’s orders” and “personal rights.” Complainant alleged that Facility staff was not giving Resident 1 (R1) their Lorazepam medication correctly and that R1 may be overmedicated as a result. Complainant stated that R1’s Lorazepam was a PRN or “as needed” medication but that the facility was giving it to R1 every day. Continued on LIC9099 Substantiated Continued from LIC9099 Review of R1’s centrally stored log and Medication Authorization Record (MAR) stated the following: · Lorazepam 1MG Tablet; take 1 tablet by mouth once daily as needed 1 hour prior to attending medical appointments · Centrally Stored Log for R1 showed that Facility received a quantity of 12 tablets. · Review of R1’s MAR shows that R1 received a dose of Lorazepam from 03/11/25-03/20/25, and on 03/24/25 and 03/25/25 Interview conducted with Marin County Mental Health Supervisor stated that the facility was to monitor and observe R1 for withdrawal and increased anxiety. If observed, facility staff were to contact 911 and ensure R1 received medical attention. Review of facility incident reports showed that on 03/30/2025, R1 was sent to the ER due to increase in anxiety and shortness of breath. Interviews conducted with facility staff confirmed that R1 does not have medical appointments every day and revealed that facility staff did not contact R1’s doctor for clarification on the medication. Based on document review and interviews conducted, these allegations are Substantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250320124909

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed...(4)The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: based on interviews and record review, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above and did not ensure that Resident 1’s medication was administered per physician’s orders. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit self certification that training will be conducted for all staff that administer medications by POC due date of 05/15/2025. Training to include the following: Trainer, Date, Topics, Job Role, Staff Names and Signatures. Training to be submitted to CCL by POC due date of 05/27/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87648.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2025

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, residents...shall have... (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs...Based on interviews and record review, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Facility provided medication in excess of the amount prescribed by R1’s psychiatrist. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit self certification that training will be conducted for all staff by POC due date of 05/15/2025. Licensee to review personal rights. Training to include the following: Trainer, Date, Topics, Job Role, Staff Names and Signatures. Personal Rights Training to be submitted to CCL by POC due date of CCL by POC due date of 05/27/2025.

May 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:35AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a 1 Year Required Visit and met with Administrator, Rufus Zinghkai. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) and serves residents with Dementia and has a plan of operation for dementia care and programming on file. Facility is a two story building and has an approved fire clearance for 44 non-ambulatory residents and an approved hospice waiver for 3 individuals. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there are currently 37 residents in care and 7 staff members on-site. At approximately 9:45AM, LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. At approximately 9:50AM, LPA conducted a walk-though of the facility with Administrator. LPA observed the following: The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. Facility has an Infection Control plan on file. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. There was an appropriate supply of cleaning products, linens, hygiene products and paper products available for Residents. Mattress pads were in place or available for Resident use. Toxins were observed to be stored inaccessible to Residents. Hot water temperatures for a sample size of 6 sinks were within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility fire extinguishers last inspected February 2025. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired and were last inspected by Fire Department February 2025. Facility's last emergency/disaster drill was conducted May 2025. At approximately 11:00AM, LPA reviewed staff files, resident files and resident medication. All files were all found to be well organized, thorough and contained the required documentation. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. Medication was observed to be centrally stored and secure. Administrator's Certificate for Rufus Zingkhai (7033932749) was current with an expiration date of 08/15/2025. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA requested the following documents to update facility file: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Personnel Report (LIC 500) Lease Liability Insurance Active and Current Administrator Certificate Documents to be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by due date of 06/14/2025. No Deficiencies Cited during Visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not keep the facility free of pests

At approximately 10:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Staff Member, Sheila Managsala. Administrator, Rufus Zingkhai, was available by telephone. Licensee, Ria Garrison, arrived during visit at approximately 10:45AM. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of “Licensee did not keep the facility free of pests.” Complainant stated that residents were observed to have bed bugs and bed bug bites on them, and that bed bugs were seen crawling from facility furniture on 07/26/2024. Complainant also stated that on 09/04/2024, bed bugs or cockroaches were observed in a resident’s room and under facility furniture.Interviews conducted with involved parties stated that during a visit on 07/30/2024, bed bugs were not seen or observed. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 Interviews conducted with facility staff, Administrator, and Licensee, stated that they have not seen any bed bug activity. Review of facility progress notes dated 07/25/2024 to 08/06/2024 did not notate any concerns regarding bedbugs. Review of Pest Control Inspector visit dated 08/21/2024, stated that there was no bed bug activity at the facility. Interview conducted with Administrator acknowledged that the facility has an ongoing cockroach issue and that the facility has routine visits from Pest Control to monitor and inspect for pests such as bedbugs and cockroaches. Review of Pest Control Service Agreement corroborates monthly treatment and review of facility receipts indicated that Pest Control visited facility on 08/13/2024 for inspection and monitoring. LPA was informed that Pest Control is scheduled to come back for another visit on 09/23/2024. Based on document review, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240801154438
Apr 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address resident behavior resulting in a resident's injury Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner Staff did not accord resident dignity in their relationship with staff or other persons Staff did not follow resident's special accommodations

At approximately 9:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Staff Member, Sheila Manansala. Administrator, Rufus Zingkhai, arrived during visit at approximately 10:00AM. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegations were investigated, “Staff did not address resident behavior resulting in a resident's injury, Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner, Staff did not accord resident dignity in their relationship with staff or other persons, and Staff did not follow resident's special accommodations.” The Department reviewed facility records, facility logs, and conducted interviews with involved parties and facility staff. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 Reporting Party stated that there was a physical confrontation between Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) and facility did not address R2’s behaviors resulting in R1 having their hand injured. LPA conducted interviews with involved parties and received inconsistent statements. Some interviews conducted stated the confrontation happened while others denied it occurred. LPA conducted staff interviews. Per staff interviews, LPA was informed that R1 and R2 used to be roommates, but the facility separated R1 and R2 into different rooms because they would argue with each other. Since R1 and R2 were separated, staff have not observed the residents interacting much. Review of R2’s Physician Report dated 02/17/2022 stated they did not have a history of aggressive behavior. LPA did not find any documentation on how facility staff are to address resident behaviors. Reporting Party stated that facility staff speak to R1 in an annoyed way and do not clean R1’s room or take out their trash. Per staff interviews, staff have not observed or seen residents being spoken to in a rude or demeaning way. Staff interviews stated that R1 would refuse to have their room cleaned and preferred to leave their trash bags outside of their room for staff to pick up. Staff interviews also stated R1 has been observed to have verbal altercations with other residents but were unable to recall specific details. During visit conducted on 04/03/2024, LPA observed that R1’s room was clean, had the trash taken out, and did not have any strong odors. Reporting Party stated that facility staff did not seek medical attention for R1 in a timely manner. Facility documents dated 12/06/2023, showed that facility staff were informed by R1 that their hand was slammed by their bathroom door. Facility staff assessed R1’s hand and did not observe bruising or swelling. Review of R1’s file showed a signed agreement dated 04/28/2022 between R1 and the facility. The agreement stated that R1 did not authorize facility staff to communicate with their Primary Care Physician regarding any medical condition. Staff interviews conducted corroborated this agreement, and stated R1 would verbally tell staff when they had appointments scheduled. Facility staff interviews also stated that they provided transportation to and from these medical appointments but would sit in the waiting room. R1’s Physician Report dated 02/27/2023, showed that R1 can leave the facility unassisted and can communicate their needs. Review of R1’s Care Plan dated 02/28/2023, stated that R1 attends their medical appointments independently. Facility documents showed that R1 had a Primary Care Physician appointment scheduled for 12/15/2023 and 12/19/2023. Per staff interviews, facility staff took R1 to their appointment on 12/19/2023 and provided ice when R1 requested it, per doctor’s instructions. LPA conducted interviews with involved parties and was informed that R1 did not tell facility staff their hand hurt. Reporting Party stated that staff did not follow R1’s special accommodations. Review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 02/27/2023, stated that R1 had environmental allergies and chemical sensitivities. Review of R1’s file showed a signed agreement dated 08/26/2022 between R1 and the facility. Continued on LIC9099C Continued from LIC9099C The agreement stated the facility can use cleaning products such as diluted Clorox and Bon Ami to clean R1’s bedroom and bathroom, and that the facility cleaning cart would be placed five feet from R1’s room. Staff interviews conducted corroborated this agreement. During visit conducted on 04/03/2023, LPA observed that R1’s room was clean and did not have any strong smelling odors. Based on inconsistent statements and lack of corroborating evidence, LPA is unable to determine if violations occurred, therefore these allegations are Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231228160617
Apr 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

At approximately 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Required 1 Year visit and met with Administrator, Rufus Zingkhai, and Designated Representative Giov Alipio. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were 33 residents in care and 6 staff members on-site. At approximately 10:40AM, LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. LPA conducted a walk-through of facility and observed the following: There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. Facility's fire and sprinkler system was last inspected March 2024. LPA reviewed staff and resident files and resident medication. Resident files were all found to be well organized, thorough and contained the required documentation. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. During staff file review, LPA observed that two staff members did not have a health screening form in their file but did have proof of negative TB test (See technical violation, LIC9102, Regulation 87411(f)). Medication was observed to be centrally stored and secure. Administrator's Certificate for Rufus Zingkhai (6053315740) was current with an expiration date of 08/15/2025. Facility has an Infection Control plan on file. LPA requested the following documents to update facility file: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610D) Updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) Register of Clients/Residents (LIC 9020) Updated Liability Insurance Documents to be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by due date of 05/17/2024. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9102 (Technical Advisory/Violation) discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2024

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 3:00PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Felias and Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. LPAs were greeted by Francisco Preciado, Medical Technician. LPAs were informed that Giov Alipio, Medical Technician and Designated Representative would tour the facility with LPAs to complete the inspection. LPAs conducted a physical plant walk-through and inspection. LPAs observed the following: The facility was found to be clean with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. Facility is a two story building with a census of 34 residents with a capacity for 44 residents. LPAs observed required postings including the CCL Complaint Poster. Mattress pads were in place or available for client use. Hot water temperatures for 4 out of 5 sinks were found to be within Title 22 Regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed one sink without functioning hot water and tempeurature was unable to be tested (See Technical Advisory, LIC9102, Regulation 87303(e)(6)). Facility's fire extinguishers were last inspected March 7, 2024. LPAs unable to complete Annual Inspection. Annual Continuation Visit to be conducted at a later date. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9102 (Technical Advisory/Violation) discussed and provided to Designated Representative. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasComputer room

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Special diets supportedLow fat

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Marin County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Marin County