Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Pepper Tree Assisted Living II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Lomita, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #198320341
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 30, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMarch 4, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderPepper Tree Assisted Living Inc.Since 2023 · 2 licensed homes

Pepper Tree Assisted Living II is a small care home in Lomita — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Pepper Tree Assisted Living II

Is Pepper Tree Assisted Living II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Pepper Tree Assisted Living II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Pepper Tree Assisted Living II been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Pepper Tree Assisted Living II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Pepper Tree Assisted Living II cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Pepper Tree Assisted Living II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Pepper Tree Assisted Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Pepper Tree Assisted Living Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Torrance Memorial Medical Center is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Pepper Tree Assisted Living II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Pepper Tree Assisted Living II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PEPPER TREE ASSISTED LIVING II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198320341. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Pepper Tree Assisted Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,050

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,900.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 24606 Pennsylvania Avenue, Lomita, CA 90717Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 4, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
March 4, 2026
Occupied · July 30, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 6, 2025 to July 30, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202533220241102022220

The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/04/2026 at 01:00 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit at the Pepper Tree Assisted Living 2 Facility. LPA Calderon was allowed entry into the facility by Staff Ricarde Lapuz. Facility is to operate a Residential Care Facility for 6 Elderly residents 60 years or older. Currently, there are five (5) residents residing in the facility, 60 and older. LPA Calderon explained to Staff Ricarde Lapuz, the purpose of the one-year Annual Inspection visit, and escorted LPA Calderon on a tour of the entire inside and outside facility grounds. As part of the inspection, LPA Calderon reviewed: Five (5) client service records, five (5) client medication administration records (MAR), two (2) staff records, and inspected the inside facility and outside grounds. The facility’s last fire drill was conducted on 01/24/2026. The two-story residential home consists of five (5) client bedrooms, four (4) client bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, staff room, office area, attached garage with washer and dryer/ storage area, backyard with table and chairs. No weapons are stored on the premises. Kitchen was inspected and observed to be clean and operational. A two-day supply perishable and seven-day supply of non-perishable foods are present in the facility. Emergency Water Storage is in the garage and kitchen area. LPA Calderon observed that all facility rooms are clean and in good repair. A comfortable temperature was observed, and the facility has central air and heating. LPA Calderon observed the following during inspection of client’s rooms: mattresses are in good condition, adequate lighting present, plenty of dresser/closet space is present, and all bed linens present. All bedrooms contain furniture, lighting fixtures and personal storage space as required, all beds have the required amount of linen and mattress covers, LPA Calderon observed fully stocked closet with bedding, towels, and toiletries supplies. Bathroom fixtures are clean, in good repair, and working properly and contain the required nonskid mats and grab bars. LPA Calderon observed bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulation. Bathroom #1 hot water temperature properly measured at 110 degrees Fahrenheit, bathroom #2 hot water temperature properly measured at 114 degrees Fahrenheit, Bathroom #3 hot water temperature properly measured at 109 degrees Fahrenheit, and bathroom #4 hot water temperature properly measured at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen hot water temperature properly measured at 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility two (2) Carbon Monoxide and nine (9) Smoke Detectors, hard wired operated and connected were tested and working properly. Fire (3) Extinguishers were checked and found to be fully charged and accessible. All exit doors in the facility have alarm systems. The facility has a working landline telephone. All toxins and knives are locked/secured and inaccessible to clients. Medications are centrally stored and in a locked storage cabinet. Facility 2 first aid kit is fully stocked with manuals checked and in order. Outside grounds were toured and there is no water feature observed. All Exits/ Walkways around the home were free of debris and hazards. Outside patio accessible to clients. Five (5) client files were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA Calderon reviewed five (5) resident medications (MAR) and they were all found to be administered according to doctor's orders. Two (2) staff files were checked and have the required documents. LPA Calderon noted the Administrator Marhlyn Sapugay Certification # 7033660740 expiration date of 10/03/2026 was valid at time of inspection. Commercial General Liability Policy #PCI2983118801 policy period from 03/03/2026 to 03/03/2027 underwritten by Primary Care Insurance Company, coverage 1,000,000/3,000,000 is valid at time of inspection. All the required documents are posted in the facility in a clearly visible area. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA Calderon did observe deficiencies therefore citations were issued at this time. Annual Licensing Fee is CURRENT. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Staff Ricarde Lapuz.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed

*This report serves as an amendment to clarify findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created 6/6/25. On 6/6/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the address listed above. LPA Shirley arrived and spoke to the Administrator, Marhlyn Sapugay and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA was granted access to the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 6/6/25 LPA requested and reviewed copies of the following records: Residents file, Resident Roster, Staff roster, Identification and Emergency Contact Information, Physician’s Report, Medication Administration Record, (MAR), emailed communications, responsible party’s text message, Activities Calendar, Administrators Medication Certifications, and Special Incident Report dated 6/6/25. LPA Shirley interviewed Staff 1 – Staff 3 and Resident 1 – Resident 5, R6 was not available for interview. LPA Shirley spoke to a visitor, W1 that was at the facility at the time of investigation. Con'd on 9099-C Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley observed R1’s responsible party’s text dated, 5/13/25 sent to S1 regarding the reduction in medication indicated from R1’s doctor. During record review, LPA Felisa Shirley observed an email from R1’s doctor dated 5/13/25, regarding reducing divalproex to every other day for 2 weeks and to discontinue after. Per further review, LPA Shirley reviewed R1’s Medication Administration Record, (MAR), for May 2025 and the record shows that R1 received 500 mg of divalproex 2 times a day, daily from 5/1/25 through 5/31/25. During the course of the investigation, LPA Shirley received a copy of the Special Incident Report dated 6/6/25 stating that there was a medication error that occurred May 19 thru May 30, 2025. LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). LPA asked, does staff ensure that medications are dispensed as prescribed. Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 stated yes. LPA interviewed Resident 1 – Resident 5 (R-1 – R-5). LPA asked residents, does staff give you your medications as prescribed. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered, yes. Based on observations, information gathered and reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. Based on CCLD staff's observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6), is being cited, please see attached LIC-9099D. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and plans of corrections were developed, with Anna Leeza DeGuzman, Caregiver. A copy of this report and appeals rights were provided. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not ensure planned activities were conducted for residents in care On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley observed the activities calendar that was posted on the refrigerator. On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley observed, Dominos, the board game Scrabble and crossword puzzles. LPA observed 2 videos of residents doing chair yoga and exercises. On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley spoke with a visitor, W1 was visiting with a relative at the facility at the time of the investigation. W1 stated that she loved the facility because the staff had a genuine concern for the residents. W1 stated that staff helps the residents celebrate birthdays and different holidays. LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). LPA asked, does staff ensure that planned activities are conducted for residents in care. Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 stated yes. LPA interviewed Resident 1 – Resident 5 (R-1 – R-5). LPA asked residents, does staff offer activities for the residents in care to enjoy. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered, yes. Based on records review, interviews and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited for these allegations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Anna Leeza DeGuzman, Caregiver.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250602144808

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care. (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, records revealed that a medication error regarding R1 occurred, 5/19/25 thru 5/30/25 in which the wrong medication was discontinued. This action poses as an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit plan informing the department medication training has been performed with all staff. A written proof of correction must included along with date, time and participants names. Correction must be submitted by due date: 6/20/25 to LPA's email: felisa.shirley@dss.ca.gov or fax attn: to LPA Felisa Shirley to 424-544-1016. **Corrective action received 6/13/25

Jun 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed

On 6/6/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the address listed above. LPA Shirley arrived and spoke to the Administrator, Marhlyn Sapugay and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA was granted access to the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 6/6/25 LPA requested and reviewed copies of the following records: Residents file, Resident Roster, Staff roster, Activities Calendar, Administrators Medication Certifications, and Special Incident Report dated 6/6/25. LPA Shirley interviewed Staff 1 – Staff 3 and Resident 1 – Resident 5, R6 was not available for interview. LPA Shirley spoke to a visitor,W1 that was at the facility at the time of investigation. Con'd on 9099-C Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed On 6/6/25, LPA Felisa Shirley observed an email from R1’s doctor regarding administering medication changes forwarded to the facility’s Administrator instructing the caregivers to follow the directions of the doctor and to document and monitor for changes. LPA Shirley reviewed the email dated 5/31/25, from facility’s owner informing R1’s responsible party that R1 was may have been given the wrong medication. On 6/6/25, during the course of the investigation, LPA Shirley received a copy of the Special Incident Report dated 6/6/25 stating that there was a medication error that occurred May 19 thru 30, 2025. LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). LPA asked, does staff ensure that medications are dispensed as prescribed. Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 stated yes. LPA interviewed Resident 1 – Resident 5 (R-1 – R-5). LPA asked residents, does staff give you your medications as prescribed. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered, yes. Based on observations, information gathered and reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. Based on CCLD staff's observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6), is being cited, please see attached LIC-9099D. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and plans of corrections were developed with the Administrator, Marhlyn Sapugay . A copy of this report and appeals rights were provided. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not ensure planned activities were conducted for residents in care On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley observed the activities calendar that was posted on the refrigerator. On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley observed, Dominos, the board game Scrabble and crossword puzzles. LPA observed 2 videos of residents doing chair yoga and exercises. On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley spoke with a visitor, W1 was visiting with a relative at the facility at the time of the investigation. W1 stated that she loved the facility because the staff had a genuine concern for the residents. W1 stated that staff helps the residents celebrate birthdays and different holidays. LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). LPA asked, does staff ensure that planned activities are conducted for residents in care. Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 stated yes. LPA interviewed Resident 1 – Resident 5 (R-1 – R-5). LPA asked residents, does staff offer activities for the residents in care to enjoy. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered, yes. Based on records review, interviews and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited for this allegation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator,Marhlyn Sapugay .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250602144808

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care. (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, records revealed that a medication error regarding R1 occurred, 5/19/25 thru 5/30/25 in which the wrong medication was discontinued. This action poses as an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit plan informing the department medication training has been performed with all staff. A written proof of correction must included along with date, time and participants names. Correction must be submitted by due date: 6/20/25 to LPA's email: felisa.shirley@dss.ca.gov or fax attn: to LPA Felisa Shirley to 424-544-1016.

Jan 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sparkle Day conducted an unannounced visit to the above facility. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the one-year inspection. LPA met with Ricarte Lapuz, House Manager and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Facility is licensed to serve 6 non- ambulatory residents age 60 and over . The facility has an approved hospice waiver for 6 residents. None of the residents are diagnosed with dementia or receiving home health. One (1) resident is receiving hospice care services. The facility does not handle any of the residents’ money. This home is a single story home consisting of: (5) resident bedrooms, (3) Full bathroom, living room, kitchen, with dining area, laundry room (located in the attached garage) and an outdoor shaded patio area. LPA toured the Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place, water temperature measured between 115.1F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. Kitchen was checked and observed to be within Title 22 regulations. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked. All cleaning solutions, hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors were working properly and fire extinguisher was fully charged. Carbon monoxide detector was operational. First Aid kit was available. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. During todays visit LPA did not observe any deficiencies. Exit interview conducted with Ricarte Lapuz, House Manager and a copy of this report was provided..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 02/01/2024 at 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit at the Pepper Tree Assisted Living 2 Facility. LPA Calderon was allowed entry into the facility by Staff Mario Pangan. Staff Mario Pangan was asked questions regarding the full care tools control package (13) sections. Staff Mario Pangan took LPA Calderon temperature prior to entrance into the facility. Facility is licensed for (6) non-ambulatory residents. LPA Calderon explained to Staff Mario Pangan, the purpose of the one-year (1) Annual Inspection visit, and escorted LPA Calderon on a tour of the entire inside and outside facility grounds. As part of the inspection, LPA Calderon reviewed: six (6) resident service records, six (6) resident medication records, two (2) staff records. LPA Calderon interviewed six (6) residents and two (2) staff members for visit. LPA Calderon inspected the inside facility and outside grounds to include all common areas. The facilities’ last fire drill was conducted on 11/03/2023. The two-story residential home consists of five (5) resident bedrooms, three (3) resident bathrooms, living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, office area, attached garage with washer and dryer/ storage area, backyard with table and chairs. No weapons are stored in the premises. Kitchen was inspected and observed to be clean and operational. A two-day (2) supply perishable and seven-day (7) supply of non-perishable foods are present in the facility. Emergency Water seven-day (7) supply is found in the garage. LPA Calderon observed that all facility rooms are clean and in good repair. A comfortable temperature was observed, and the facility has central air and heating. LPA Calderon observed the following during inspection of resident’s rooms: mattresses are in good condition, adequate lighting present, plenty of dresser/closet space is present, and all bed linens present. All bedrooms contain furniture, lighting fixtures and personal storage space as required, all beds have the required amount of linen and mattress covers, LPA Calderon observed fully stocked closet with bedding, towels, and toiletries supplies. Bathroom fixtures are clean, in good repair, and working properly and contain the required nonskid mats and grab bars. LPA Calderon observed bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulation. Bathroom #1 hot water temperature properly measured at 109 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #2 hot water temperature properly measured at 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #3 hot water temperature properly measured at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen hot water temperature properly measured at 116 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility (2) carbon Monoxide and (10) Smoke Detectors hard wired and were tested and are working properly. The facility two (2) Fire Extinguishers were checked and found to be fully charged and accessible. All exit doors in the facility have alarm systems. All toxins and knifes are locked/secured and inaccessible to residents. Medications are centrally stored and in a locked storage cabinet. Facility first aid kit (1) is fully stocked with manual was checked and in order. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. All Exits/ Walkways around the home were free of debris and hazards. Outside patio accessible to residents. LPA Calderon noted the Administrator Marhlyn Sapugay Certification # 6018525740 expiration date of 10/03/2024 was valid at time of visit. The facility does NOT handle resident's money/cash resources and a NO Surety bond is needed. Commercial General Liability Policy #01002294880 policy period from 03/03/2023 to 03/03/2024 underwritten by Kinsale Insurance Company, coverage 1,000,000/3,000,000 is valid at time of inspection. LPA Calderon spoke to Administrator Marhlyn J Sapugay who will email full copy of insurance contact which shows all coverages to LPA Calderon no later than 02/28/2023. All the required documents are posted in the facility in a clearly visible area to all staff, clients, and guests. LPA Calderon reviewed LIC500 and noted all staff associated to facility per LIS. LPA Calderon reviewed the resident roster, LPA Calderon confirmed residents’ interview are on resident roster. During the visit, LPA Calderon observed the facility infection control practices. LPA Calderon observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, sanitizing stations (Located in common areas and restrooms). LPA Calderon observed staff and residents were NOT wearing face coverings. LPA Calderon observed the facility has a thirty-day (30) supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA Calderon advised the Staff Mario Pangan to continuously monitor the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website and Community Care Likening Provider Informational Notices (PIN) for any updates relating to COVID-19 guidance. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA Calderon did not observe any deficiencies therefore NO citations were issued at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Staff Mario Pangan.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Pepper Tree Assisted Living Inc., licensed since 2023, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County