Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Pacifica Senior Living Merced
Large community·Licensed for 93·Merced, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,350
- Home sizeLicensed for 93Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit86 of 93 beds occupiedApril 29, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitApril 29, 2026CDSS inspection record
Pacifica Senior Living Merced is a large care community in Merced — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 93 residents since 2015. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Pacifica Senior Living Merced
Is Pacifica Senior Living Merced licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Pacifica Senior Living Merced licensed for?
93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Pacifica Senior Living Merced been cited?
5 Type A and 10 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 46 state visits over the same years.
Is Pacifica Senior Living Merced still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Pacifica Senior Living Merced cost?
$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 40 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Pacifica Senior Living Merced take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Northstar Senior Living Inc; Northstar Snr Lvg Mgt, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Northstar Senior Living Inc. — at least 6 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mercy Medical Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Pacifica Senior Living Merced keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Pacifica Senior Living Merced license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING MERCED”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #247206921. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Northstar Senior Living Inc; Northstar Snr Lvg Mgt, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 46 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 5 Type A and 10 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 46 state visits in that period.
- 21 complaints and 16 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is April 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 93 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
93 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN ON THE FIRST FLOOR ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 24. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,200a month to start
Likely $3,300–$5,350
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,200a month
Likely $3,300–$5,500
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,300–$5,350
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 40 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,500
- $4,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,600
- $6,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 40 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 40 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,650–$4,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Park MercedMerced · 0.8 mi · Large community$2,895Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunnyside Senior LivingTurlock · 23 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of TurlockTurlock · 25 mi · Large community$3,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Valley Spring Memory CareLos Banos · 26 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cedar Creek Senior LivingMadera · 33 mi · Large community$2,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmare Senior LivingOakdale · 36 mi · Large community$4,125Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Stratford at Beyer ParkModesto · 37 mi · Large community$3,008Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The GroveModesto · 39 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dale CommonsModesto · 40 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 3420 R St, Merced, CA 95348Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 38 documents for this home, and its records count 46 visits since 2015. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 29, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 46
- Most recent visit
- April 29, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 86 of 93 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 23 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 14, 2021 to April 29, 2026. 23 of the 23 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (8), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 23 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 23 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations5typical 0
- Type B citations10typical 1
- Substantiated allegations16typical 2
- Total complaints21typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2015.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 18 of 38 documents
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not able to implement a fire safety plan which poses a risk to residents in care Facility kitchen is not kept clean Staff did not provide good quality foods to residents in care
On 04/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted complaint investigation visit, introduced self and was allowed entry. LPA met with administrator Lisa Baricevic. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there is no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Allegations: Staff are not able to implement a fire safety plan which poses a risk to residents in care, Facility kitchen is not kept clean, and Staff did not provide good quality foods to residents in care. Regarding fire safety plan, based on records reviews, facility poses fire and disaster plan, train staff and conduct quarterly disaster drills with staff. Regarding unclean kitchen, based on observation and interviews, kitchen appeared clean and staff clean kitchen after each meal prep. Regarding quality meals, based on records review, records meets regulation expectations. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260311130945
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure a plan for residents to be transported downstairs
On 04/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted complaint investigation visit, introduced self and was allowed entry. LPA met with administrator Lisa Baricevic. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there is no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Allegation: Staff did not ensure a plan for residents to be transported downstairs. Based on interviews and records review, the facility prepared, and hold in place a disaster plan. Residents were notified via a in house note, contact personnel, and alternative way to transport residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-A Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260312083540
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 6, 2026
Maintenance and Operation. (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: Based on observation, second elevator, (west side of the building) is not operational for prolonged time frame which poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee will follow up and provide updated information regarding elevator repair following plan of correction. With updates, regarding repair to be provided to LPA via email by POC due date.
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 04/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lisa Baricevic. LPA conducted tour inside and out of facility with AD. Residents observed at the facility during meal times. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 76 degrees, clean, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 04/14/2026 Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in freezer, refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered by US Foods twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 40.0-degree F. and freezer was maintained at -9-degree F. Residents' rooms were toured and observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested and recorded at 106-degree F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bar and non-skid mat or non slippery surface covered floors in shower area. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart and monitored by QuickMar. Medications records reveals no concerns. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked for staff use only. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. Exit interview conducted, no deficiencies cited, report signed and provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide adequate food service to residents Staff does not ensure resident's bathroom is clean Staff did not allow a resident dignity in their relationships with others
On 04/09/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted complaint investigation visit, introduced self and was allowed entry. LPA met with administrator Lisa Baricevic. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there is no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Allegation: Staff does not provide adequate food service to residents. Based on records review and interviews facility provide a variety of food for each meal and in addition alternative menu is available upon request. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff does not ensure resident's bathroom is clean. Based on observation and interviews, resident room appear clean and in repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not allow a resident dignity in their relationships with others. Based on records reviews and interviews, facility conducting daily activities available to all residents to participate. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260330100507
Dec 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide activities for resident Staff did not seek medical attention for resident’s change in condition Staff did not notify authorized representative of resident's change in condition Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed
On 12/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with Wellness Director (WD). The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there is no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. LIC 9099D Allegation: Staff did not provide activities for resident. Based on interviews and records staff follow daily activities according to facility planner posted on the facility wall. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident’s change in condition. Based on records reviews, R1 was sent out on multiple occasions including May 8th, May 17th, May 19th, and May 30th due to aggression and medication adjustments. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not notify authorized representative of resident's change in condition. Based on records reviews, on May 19th family responsible party was notified of the incident via phone call, on May 21st, and May 30th family member either visited R1 or was notified by the facility of R1 behavior. In addition, responsible party signed updated changes of condition increased level of care from level one to level 2 on 5/21/25. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed. Based on records review and interviews, medication A and B were administered as prescribed. R1 medication records indicated on May 7th, 20th, 21st, 26th, and 27th, R1 either refused medications or R1 was out of the community with family, per records medications were dispensed as prescribed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250912133337
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 15, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements. (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary...... This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: Based on records review facility failed following Title 22 regulation regarding supervision resulting in one out of eighty four residents acquired facial injury and staff was not aware of the incident. This is poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility administrator or staff will provide a written statement describing on following regulation by POC due date to LPA by email.
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident falling on multiple occasions.
On 11/20/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with administrator. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident falling on multiple occasions. Based on records reviews resident fall recorded on multiple occasions with no re -appraisal follow up. The department conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA discussed with Administrator the significance of completing pre-appraisal and needs and services plan for residents in timely manner. Re-appraisal and new needs and services is to be completed upon resident’s change of condition. Deficiency will be cited according to Title 22 regulation on attached LIC9099-D Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report with appeal rights provided to administrator. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250821102719
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 24, 2025
87463 Reappraisals. (a) The pre-admission appraisal, as specified in Section 87457, Pre-Admission Appraisal, shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first.. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: The facility failed to record reappraisal after multiple fall of one out of 83 residents, which poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility administrator will update resident re assessment and will provide updated re assessment to Licensing office to LPA by email by POC due date. Licensee will communicate reassessment with resident responsible party.
Aug 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff providing care to residents Staff are inappropriately increasing resident's rent due for a change in level of care Staff are not responding to resident's call button in a timely manner Staff are accepting residents not in plan of operation
On 08/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban arrived unannounced to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to receptionist Tanya Linan and was allowed entry. Administrator Lisa Baricevic was notified and attended the licensing visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. The Department has investigated the allegation: Unqualified staff providing care to residents. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, personnel records meet the requirements necessary to provide services to residents in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated The Department has investigated the allegation: Staff are accepting residents not in plan of operation. Based on interviews conducted and review records, there are two different types of residents accepted by the facility: assisted living and memory care. The facility’s plan of operation addressed the care and restricted health care for the residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department has investigated the allegation: Staff are not responding to resident's call button in a timely manner. Based on records reviews and staff interviews, records revealed that residents (R1, R2 and R3) calls waiting due to not resetting the system after providing care to residents in timely manner. Per residents interviews no concerns regarding call response was stated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department has investigated the allegation Staff are inappropriately increasing resident's rent due for a change in level of care. Based on records reviews and interviews conducted, the facility charged resident (R1) in the amount of $950 instead of $900 per admission agreement contract. The resident was credited back the overcharge amount by the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. Report signed on-site. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250514162917
Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not ensure resident is accorded the ability to receive personal phone calls
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility to open this complaint. LPA met with facility Licensee Lisa Baricevic, and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation facility staff do not ensure resident is accorded the ability to receive personal phone calls. The facility does have a landline phone, and a cell phone that residents can use to contact family. Staff will assist the residents with use of the phone upon request. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250619100241
Apr 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow infection control requirements
On 04/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit on the above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of visit to Administrator Lisa Baricevic. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, reviewed records, and conducted interviews. The Department has investigated the allegation: staff do not follow infection control requirements. Based on interviews and records reviewed, it was found that the facility is following infection control requirements. LPA discovered that R1 is able to empty and drain their own ostomy bag. Additionally, R2 is receiving care from a hospice agency. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. Report signed on-site and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250411131032
Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 04/17/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban conducted unannounced visit regarding health and safety check on residents in care. During this visit LPA Gorban met with facility administrator Lisa Baricevic. The reason for this visit is to follow up on previous complaint investigation and residents interviews that staff do not respond to residents calls in timely manner. Based on residents interviews and records reviews residents calls were not answered for over 20 minutes and other for over an hour. Based on records review and interviews the deficiency will be issued on attached LIC809-D Based on residents file review, R1's physician report has not been updated since 2018. The deficiency will be issued on attached LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provide to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 27, 2025
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs.. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: Based on facility records review on multiple occasions facility did not respond to residents calls in timely manner resulting in at least 3 out of 75 residents wait time for assistance in January of 2025 varying from 30 minutes to over an hourthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility administrator will monitor call system performance and when system fail to operate, staff will be sent to check on residents health and safety every 15 minutes. Administrator will provide a written plan to LPA by email by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 27, 2025
87506 Resident Records. (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: Based on records reviews, one out of 75 residents have not had updated physician report since 2018. This is poses potential health and safety for clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility administrator will review and update resident physician report and provide a copy of updated report to licensing office or LPA by OC due date.
Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 04/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lisa Baricevic. LPA conducted tour inside and out of facility with AD. Residents observed at the facility during lunch time. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 76 degrees, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 05/06/2024 Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in freezer, refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered by US Foods twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 39.0-degree F. and freezer was maintained at -10-degree F. Residents' rooms were toured and observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested and recorded at 105-degree F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bar and non-skid mat in shower area. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart and monitored by QuickMar. Medications records were reviewed. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked for staff use only. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. Report continues on attached LIC809-C Residents’ files were reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Staff are fingerprinted clear and associated to the facility. Community Care Licensing (CCL) is always striving to have facility files that reflect the most accurate & up to date information for your facility. In an effort to maintain your facility file, please submit the most current & complete forms &/or information as identified below: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE): · LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility · LIC 309 Administrative Organization · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly Please submit the above forms/information to Fresno CCL by: 04/27/2025 As an operator of a Community Care Licensed facility it is your responsibility to be aware of and in compliance with all regulations, including Chaptered Legislation. Go to www.ccld.ca.gov to stay updated and informed. The observed deficiency was cited during case management visit. An exit interview was conducted with the AD. A copy of this report was given to the AD with appeal rights, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025
Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 03/20/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA introduced self and allowed entry in to the facility. LPA requested to speak and was accompanied during this visit by facility administrator LPA Gorban toured facility and observed residents having breakfast in the dining room and other residents resting in their rooms. Currently, facility has 20 residents receiving hospice services. During this visit LPA amended deficiency report provided on 3/12/25, requested administrator certificate and provided an updated facility hospice waiver. LPA requested facility files to be provide by 03/21/2025, 5 PM pacific time. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2025
Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide resident reappraisal upon change in condition
On 03/12/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban unannounced visited facility stated above to commence a complaint investigation, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility by Administrator (AD) Lisa . Allegation: Facility staff did not provide resident reappraisal upon change in condition. During this visit LPA toured the facility performing safety checks, also LPA interviewed Administrator, facility staff and resident. Based on interviews and observation R1 did not receive updated documents of re -appraisal due change the level of care, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided to Administrator for facility records. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250310162656
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(e) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2025
87507 Admission Agreements. (e) The licensee shall provide a copy of the signed and dated current admission agreement, and all subsequent signed and dated modifications, to the resident or the resident's representative... This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: facility staff failed to provide the resident with updated re-appraisal for resident knowledge and records. This is poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility administrator will provide education and traning to personnel and provide an official statement were facility will provide a responsible party with any updates made to residents' records to LPA by email following POC due date.
Nov 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure insect issue is being properly addressed for residents in care
On 11/26/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the finding for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA introduced herself, explained the reason for the visit, and met with Wellness Director- Tracy Gaddess. Administrator (AD) Emily Venegas was not available at the time. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff do not ensure insect issue is being properly addressed for residents in care. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pictures which were provided. LPA observed a cockroach infestation is resident's room. Based on LPA's observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report LIC9099, LIC9099D, and appeal rights were provided to Wellness Director- Tracy Gaddess. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240610092201
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 27, 2024
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation & interview, licensee did not comply with the regulations listed above. LPA observed in pictures there was an infestation of cockroaches in the residents room. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will have the rooms with insect issues serviced and verificaiton will be sent to LPA.
Oct 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit on 10/17/2024 at 10:40 AM. LPA met with facility Front Desk staff, LPA introduced self and presented badge. Front Desk staff obtained contact with Executive Director Emily Venegas. Stated the purpose of visit to Executive Director. LPA served Decision and Order excluding Staff 1 (S1) from being present inside the facility. LPA requested a current and updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) and Guardian account be updated to remove S1 from the facility staff roster. A notice of completion shall be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA informed Executive Director Emily Venegas that S1 is not allowed to be employed and/or on any facility premises. The Decision and Order of Exclusion From All Facilities came into effect as of 05/31/2024 upon receipt of the letter. A copy of the letter was given to facility Executive Director Emily Venegas during this visit. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were observed and cited. Exit interview held with Executive Director Emily Venegas, A Copy of report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2024
Apr 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 4/23/2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) D. Ayers arrived unannounced to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Emily Venegas and announced the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside. All passageways and exits were clear and free from obstruction. Fire extinguishers were recently serviced and facility had a sprinkler system. LPA reviewed facility emergency disaster plan and record of emergency drills. LPA toured the facility kitchen and observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foodstuffs. Kitchen and all common areas were clean, well-lit, and odor-free. Facility had adequate supply of emergency food and first aid supplies. LPA toured a sample of resident bedrooms and bathrooms. Bedrooms and bathrooms were clean and odor-free. Bedrooms had required minimum furnishings and were at a comfortable temperature. Bathrooms had secure grab bars and non-slip floors. LPA toured facility memory care unit and observed some residents participating in planned activities. LPA reviewed a sample of resident and staff files. Files contained required documentation and records. LPA requested the following files to be provided by 4/30/2024: LIC 500, LIC 308, LIC 9020a. At 10:15 am, LPA observed that a centrally stored medication was expired, but was still stored in the medication cart with the resident's other medications. During tour of the facility, it was observed that at least three storage bins in resident bathrooms and one in a common bathroom were not fitted with tight-fitting covers. See attached LIC 809D for two type-B deficiencies cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided to the administrator via email. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2024
Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Due to lack of staff, calls for assisance are not answered timely Due to staff neglect, resident missed medications Staff are not following residents care plan Due to neglect, resident has fallen multiple times Authorized representative has not received a copy of the care plan
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings a complaint on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Administrator Emily Venegas and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Due to lack of staff, calls for assistance are not answered timely. LPA Hurt reviewed records titled “Resident Event Report” documenting response times when Resident 1 pushed his pendant alarm. On 01/09/2024 the response time for staff to assist Resident 1 was 80 minutes, on 01/10/2024 the response time for staff to assist Resident 1 was 61 minutes, on 01/11/1024 the staff response time to assist Resident 1 was 55 minutes. Resident 1 stated when pushing his pendant alarm requesting staff assistance, he was having to wait at times more than hour before facility staff assisted. Based on LPAs interviews, and records reviewed which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED Continued.. Substantiated Continued.. Regarding the allegation Due to staff neglect, resident missed medications. LPA Hurt reviewed Centrally Stored Medication Logs, and Medication Administration Record for facility Resident 1. The Centrally Stored log lists several medications to be given daily to Resident 1. The MAR documents Resident 1 was not given most medications from 01/08/2024 to 01/18/2024. Based on records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED Regarding the allegation Staff are not following residents care plan. LPA Hurt reviewed facility records titled “Needs and Services Plan” for facility Resident 1. The Needs and Services Plan documents Resident 1 needs transfer assistance. Resident 1 was waiting over an hour after pushing his pendant for staff to assist with transfer. Based on records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED Regarding the allegation Due to neglect, resident has fallen multiple times. Resident 1 was not assisted timely by facility staff when attempting to transfer resulting in multiple falls. Facility staff did state they attempt to assist all residents when they call for assistance, but they are short staffed and residents are unfortunately having long wait times while they assist other residents. Based on interviews conducted, and records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED Regarding the allegation Authorized representative has not received a copy of the care plan. LPA Hurt reviewed records titled “Resident assessment” for facility Resident 1. This document was not signed by Resident 1 or their Responsible party. LPA Hurt interviewed Resident 1’s Responsible Party who stated they requested and were never provided a copy of the “Resident Assessment.” Based on LPA interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED Exit interview conducted with Administrator Emily Venegas, and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240116092943
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 21, 2024
87411 Personnel Requirements - General(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. The following requirement has ot been met as evidenced by: Resident 1's wait time for assistance when pushing his pendant was at times more than 60 minutes, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure sufficient staff is provided to care for facility residents, and provide proof to LPA by POC date of 03/21/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 21, 2024
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following:(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1 was not provided medications listed on medication list, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will train facility medication technicians on facility resident admission process and submit proof to LPA by POC date of 03/21/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2024
87464 Basic Services (d) A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal specified in Section 87457, Pre-admission Appraisal and providing the other basic services specified below, either directly or through outside resources. The following requirement has not been met evidenced by: Resident 1 was not correctly assisted with medications or transfers as listed on pre admission, which poses a potential, health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will conduct training with all facility staff on providing Basic Services for facility residents and provide proof to LPA by POC date of 04/03/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2024
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1 was not assisted by staff with transfers resulting in several falls, which poses a potential , health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will conduct staff training on assisting residents timely and submit proof to LPA by POC date of 04/03/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87457(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2024
87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal - General (a) Prior to admission, the prospective resident and his/her responsible person, if any, shall be interviewed by the licensee or the employee responsible for facility admissions(3) The prospective resident, or his/her responsible person, if any, shall be involved in the development of the appraisal. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1's Responsible Party was not provided and did not sign Resident Assesment or Needs and Services plan, which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Adminsitrator will provide training to facility staff on Admission process, and send proof to LPA Hurt by POC date of 04/03/2024.
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 12/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) D. Ayers arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Emily Venegas and announced the purpose of the inspection. LPA conducted a tour of the facility to ensure that there were no immediate health or safety concerns. LPA requested additional information regarding an incident which occurred 12/19/2023. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Merced County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Kazlin Infinite Care
Merced · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$3,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Golden Care
Merced · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Park Merced
Merced · Large community · 0.8 mi away
$2,895 a month to start · Listed by the home
St. Anthony's Senior Care
Merced · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
LLC Retirement Homes I
Merced · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
At Haven Home
Merced · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate