Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

The Stratford at Beyer Park

Large community·Licensed for 107·Modesto, California

Licensed since 2003Licence #507002509
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,008 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 107Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit81 of 107 beds occupiedNovember 14, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitNovember 14, 2025CDSS inspection record

The Stratford at Beyer Park is a large care community in Modesto — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 107 residents since 2003. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about The Stratford at Beyer Park

Is The Stratford at Beyer Park licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is The Stratford at Beyer Park licensed for?

107 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has The Stratford at Beyer Park been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is The Stratford at Beyer Park still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does The Stratford at Beyer Park cost?

$3,008 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size across Stanislaus County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,900 to $4,125 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does The Stratford at Beyer Park take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Beyer Park Villas, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Modesto is 0.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can The Stratford at Beyer Park keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

The Stratford at Beyer Park license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “STRATFORD AT BEYER PARK, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #507002509. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 107 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Beyer Park Villas, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is November 14, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER ALL MY BE NONAMBULATORY. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. MAY SERVE RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME.

981 - RCFE / DELAYED

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Accepts residents needing a two-person transfer — reported yes

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Toileting assistance

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Low-sodium or cardiac diet available

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Accepts residents needing a two-person transfer

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Staff background checksEvery licensed home in California must do this.

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Training topics namedStaff trained in aging & mobility · Staff trained in ambulatory assistance · Staff trained in behavior management · Staff trained in client rights · Staff trained in diabetes care · Staff trained in disability care · and 11 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

    Staff trained in aging & mobility · Staff trained in ambulatory assistance · Staff trained in behavior management · Staff trained in client rights · Staff trained in diabetes care · Staff trained in disability care · Staff trained in disease/illness management and prevention · Staff trained in diversity/inclusion/sensitivity · Staff Trained in Ethics · Staff trained in eye/vision care · Staff trained in fitness & wellness · Staff trained in injury/trauma care · Staff trained in memory care · Staff trained in neurological disorders · Staff trained in personal care · Staff trained in safety · Trained staff on-site — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Secured building entry

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Emergency proceduresEvery licensed home in California must do this.

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • CPR / first aid certified staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Continuing education cadenceOngoing unspecified

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Safety and wellness checks

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Abuse recognition and reporting training

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Security system

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,008a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,008a month

Likely $3,008–$3,608

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,008this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,008–$3,608
$3,008
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,008–$7,100
$5,008

Costs & moving in

  • Payment methodsCheck

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Private pay

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Term of the admission agreementMonth to month

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • VA benefits

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

8 homes like this within 18 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$5,900.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3529 Forest Glenn Dr, Modesto, CA 95355Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2003. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 14, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
November 14, 2025
Occupied at that visit
81 of 107 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 16, 2025 to November 14, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints4typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2003.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253512024220202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 8 of 10 documents

20253 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow infections diseases plan properly Staff did not ensure residents room was cleaned/infected properly

On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 81. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not follow infection diseases plan properly. It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow infection disease plan properly. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interview and records review. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/04/2025, Resident 1 (R1) reported experiencing skin irritation over their entire body. During a follow-up appointment, the physician prescribed a topical cream to address the symptoms. Further information obtained from the physician indicated that the facility implemented its infection control policy. Unsubstantiated On 08/05/2025, the facility received further guidance from the doctor indicating that quarantine was recommended as a precautionary measure. In response, the facility activated its infection control procedures. Throughout the implementation of these measures, there was no indication that the physician advised against isolation; rather, it was recommended due to suspicion of an infectious skin condition. Additionally, the LPA’s review of facility records confirmed that the facility complied with the doctor’s orders and maintained appropriate communication with the physician regarding R1’s care. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff are not following doctors orders. Allegation: Facility staff are not allowing resident access to personal belongings It was alleged that facility staff are not allowing resident access to personal belongings. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/05/2025,a resident was placed on the facility's infection control protocol as a precautionary measure for a suspected contagious skin infection. In accordance with this protocol, the facility implemented specific treatment and containment procedures, including bagging and laundering the resident’s clothing, cleaning and disinfecting common areas, vacuuming the resident’s room, and isolating personal belongings for 14 days. However, it was also learned that the facility ensured that the resident had sufficient amount of clothing and belongings to ensure that they had clean clothes. An interview with 3 facility staff members was conducted. 3 out 3 deny that the resident did not have access to their belongings. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff were not allowing resident access to personal belongings. Allegation: Facility staff are not meeting residents grooming needs It was alleged that the facility staff are not meeting residents grooming needs. During the course of this investigation, the LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on the information obtained, it was determined that R1 was offered showers in accordance with the doctor’s orders and the facility’s infection control protocol. However, R1 frequently refused to participate. A review of facility records confirmed that R1 consistently declined showers, and the facility respected this decision, recognizing it as R1’s personal right. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff were not meeting the residents grooming needs. According to records reviewed, this policy was activated as a precautionary measure in response to a suspected contagious skin infection. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff did not follow infection diseases plan properly. Allegation: Staff did not ensure residents room was cleaned/infected properly. It was alleged that the facility did not ensure residents room was cleaned or infected properly. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and records review. Based on interviews conducted, a resident was placed on the facility's infection control protocol as a precautionary measure for a suspected contagious skin infection. In accordance with this protocol, the facility implemented specific treatment and containment procedures, including bagging and laundering the resident’s clothing, cleaning and disinfecting common areas, vacuuming the resident’s room, and isolating personal belongings for 14 days. LPA Pascua interviewed staff members, who denied failing to clean or disinfect. Staff stated that cleaning procedures were initiated immediately upon receiving information from the physician. Based on information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff did not ensure residents room was cleaned properly. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250805101829
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not following doctors orders Facility staff are not allowing resident access to personal belongings Facility staff are not meeting residents groomings needs Resident contracted communicable disease while in care

On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 81. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff are not following doctors orders. It was alleged that facility staff are not following doctors orders. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interview and review facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/04/2025, R1 visited the doctor’s office to address a medication concern, which resulted in a contagious diagnosis. Upon returning to the facility, no additional information regarding the diagnosis was initially communicated to staff. The facility subsequently sought clarification from the physician to ensure proper protocols were implemented and that all medical orders were followed. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Resident contracted communicable disease while in care It was alleged that the resident contracted a communicable disease while in care. During the course of this investigation, the LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was confirmed that no residents contracted a communicable disease while in care. Additional information indicated that the facility had received documentation from a recent doctor’s visit recommending that staff toilet the resident frequently and keep the resident’s incontinence brief off as much as possible to allow skin irritation to subside. However, on 10/15/2025, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was not complying with the recommendations provided by the physician, facility staff, and emergency personnel, and it was determined that R1 needed to be transported to the hospital. R1 initially refused transport, and a family member ultimately took the resident to the hospital. Approximately one week later, it was reported that R1 had received an updated physician’s report indicating an infection. There is no evidence or documentation indicating that the infection was contracted at the facility. Furthermore, no reports were submitted to the Local Public Health Office or to the Department regarding any communicable diseases that could pose a risk to the health and safety of other residents in care. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the resident contracted communicable disease while in care. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820093721
Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/25/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to conduct an annual visit. Current census was 86. 65 current resident in assisted living and 21 residents in Memory Care. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. This facility is licensed to served 60 elderly residents, of which, all my be non-ambulatory. This facility has a fire clearance for delayed egress and has a hospice waiver for 10. It was learned that this facility has LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. All of which were complete and up to date. The facility administrator has an active administrator certificate #7000291740 expires on 04/30/2027. All rooms designated as activity areas and common areas for resident use were toured. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be present and sufficient to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Office rooms and other areas intended for resident use were toured. Kitchen area was toured. Facility freezer and refrigerator units were toured. LPA reviewed the food storage supply to make sure that there was always a 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable food quantities on site at all times. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. It was observed in that the facility has cafe areas equipped with a microwave and addition refrigerator present to cool, heat, and warm up food of the residents if necessary. Storage area for chemicals and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. A tour of the facility resident bedrooms was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the resident restrooms was conducted. Grab bars and non skid mats were observed to be present and in good repair at this time. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured to make sure that they were within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees. Laundry area was toured. Laundry detergent, bleach, and all other cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. Additional incontinent supplies were also identified. Medication cabinet was reviewed. It was learned that narcotics and all other medications were housed in medication carts that were used to store and dispense medications to the residents at this time. This facility has an electronic Medication Administration Record system. A brief interview was conducted with facility staff responsible for handling, dispensing, and documentation of the medications at this time. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. A tour of the facility memory care unit was conducted. Exterior grounds of this facility was toured. Perimeter fence and gates were observed to be functional and in good repair at this time. Delayed egress and other safety measures were observed to be functional at this time. Fire extinguishers, located and placed throughout the facility, were observed to have been annually inspected on 3/5/2026 by the local fire extinguisher company noted as Silicon Valley Fire and in compliance at this time. All smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were present and working at this time. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL: -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610e As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were observed or cited during this annual visit. An exit interview was conducted and copy of the 809 and 809-C was provided to Facility Designated Administrator, Nicole Rodriguez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025
Aug 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items

On 08/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodgriuez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 82. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff mismanaged resident's medication It was alleged that staff mismanaged resident's medication. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Through staff interviews, it was determined that Resident 1 (R1) frequently experienced medical conditions that could impair their ability to understand the medications being administered. A review of the resident's records further confirmed that R1's diagnosis may contribute to confusion regarding their medications. Unsubstantiated Additionally, a review of the resident’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) was conducted. LPA Pascua did not find any discrepancies indicating that facility staff mismanaged the resident’s medication. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility mismanaged the resident's medication. Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items It was alleged that the staff did not safeguard resident's personal items. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was denied that the facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal items. Staff stated that a resident inventory list is provided to residents, documenting the items kept at the facility. In addition, if incontinent supplies are one of the items, these are not shared with any other residents. An interview with 5 residents were conducted. 5 out 5 residents deny that the facility does not safeguard the resident's personal items. Based on the information gathered, there is not a sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff did not safeguard resident's medication. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250711131606
Jun 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed.

On 06/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA was met by Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 80. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. It was alleged that staff failed to administer medication to a resident (R1) as prescribed. During the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted staff interviews and reviewed facility records. According to staff interviews, on January 26, 2025, R1 contacted the facility to report they would be late in returning for their scheduled medication. Upon R1’s return, facility staff declined to administer the medication, citing that more than one hour had passed since the scheduled time. Substantiated Based on the information gathered, staff did not administer the medication to the resident as prescribed. Based on observations, review of records and information gathered through interviews, the above allegations were SUBSTANTIATED meaning that there was a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred as alleged. The following deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulation. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report and appeals rights were provided to the facility at the end of this visit. Allegation: Staff is not following resident’s care plan. It was alleged that staff are not following resident’s care plan. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on staff interviews conducted it was denied that staff do not follow resident’s care plans. It was stated by 5 staff that they conduct staff meetings regarding updates with all residents. In addition, care plans are reviewed on an as needed basis. An interview with 5 residents was conducted, 5 out 5 residents deny that they are not receiving care and supervision. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that staff are not following resident’s care plan. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit. Based on the information gathered, staff did not administer the medication to the resident as prescribed. Based on observations, review of records and information gathered through interviews, the above allegations were SUBSTANTIATED meaning that there was a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred as alleged. The following deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulation. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report and appeals rights were provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250128085931

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 16, 2025

The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not ensure that R1 was provide medication as prescribed. It was learned that R1 was out of the facility and requested their medication at the time of return however was not provided the medication. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025

Plan of correction: The facility provide a statement of correction and acknowledgement to the LPA by the POC Date.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/25/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to conduct an annual visit. Current census was 86. 65 current resident in assisted living and 21 residents in Memory Care. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. This facility is licensed to served 60 elderly residents, of which, all my be non-ambulatory. This facility has a fire clearance for delayed egress and has a hospice waiver for 10. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. All of which were complete and up to date. The facility administrator has an active administrator certificate #7000291740 expires on 04/30/2025. All rooms designated as activity areas and common areas for resident use were toured. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be present and sufficient to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Office rooms and other areas intended for resident use were toured. Kitchen area was toured. Facility freezer and refrigerator units were toured. LPA reviewed the food storage supply to make sure that there was always a 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable food quantities on site at all times. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. It was observed in that the facility has cafe areas equipped with a microwave and addition refrigerator present to cool, heat, and warm up food of the residents if necessary. Storage area for chemicals and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. A tour of the facility resident bedrooms was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the resident restrooms was conducted. Grab bars and non skid mats were observed to be present and in good repair at this time. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured to make sure that they were within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees. Laundry area was toured. Laundry detergent, bleach, and all other cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. Additional incontinent supplies were also identified. Medication cabinet was reviewed. It was learned that narcotics and all other medications were housed in medication carts that were used to store and dispense medications to the residents at this time. This facility has an electronic Medication Administration Record system. A brief interview was conducted with facility staff responsible for handling, dispensing, and documentation of the medications at this time. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. A tour of the facility memory care unit was conducted. Exterior grounds of this facility was toured. Perimeter fence and gates were observed to be functional and in good repair at this time. Delayed egress and other safety measures were observed to be functional at this time. Fire extinguishers, located and placed throughout the facility, were observed to have been annually inspected on 12/11/2023 by the local fire extinguisher company noted as Assured and in compliance at this time. All smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were present and working at this time. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL: -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610e As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were observed or cited during this annual visit. An exit interview was conducted and copy of the 809 and 809-C was provided to Facility Designated Administrator, Nicole Rodriguez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024
May 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 05/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to follow up on an eviction notice that was to be served to a current resident due to non-payment. LPA reviewed the eviction notice to ensure that all components to the eviction were included based on Title 22 regulations. No deficiencies were observed or cited during the course of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/15/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to conduct an annual visit. LPA met with Business Office Director (BOD), Anna Jones and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA asked that BOD Jones call the Facility Designated Administrator, Nicole Rodriguez and inform her that CCL was present at this time. Shortly after, LPA met with FDA Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The current census to this facility was 83. 69 resident reside in assisted living and 14 residents in Memory Care. This facility is licensed to served 60 elderly residents,of which, all my be non-ambulatory. This facility has a fire clearance for delayed egress and has a hospice waiver for 10. A tour of the facility was conducted with BOD, Jones. All rooms designated as activity areas and common areas for resident use were toured. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be present and sufficient to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Office rooms and other areas intended for resident use were toured. Kitchen area was toured. Facility freezer and refrigerator units were toured. LPA reviewed the food storage supply to make sure that there was always a 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable food quantities on site at all times. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. It was observed in that the facility has cafe areas equipped with a microwave and addition refrigerator present to cool, heat, and warm up food of the residents if necessary. Storage area for chemicals and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. Additional incontinent supplies were also identified. A tour of the facility resident bedrooms was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the resident restrooms was conducted. Grab bars and non skid mats were observed to be present and in good repair at this time. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured to make sure that they were within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees. Laundry area was toured. Laundry detergent, bleach, and all other cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. Additional incontinent supplies were also identified. Medication cabinet was reviewed. It was learned that narcotics and all other medications were housed in medication carts that were used to store and dispense medications to the residents at this time. This facility has an electronic Medication Administration Record system. A brief interview was conducted with facility staff responsible for handling, dispensing, and documentation of the medications at this time. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. A tour of the facility memory care unit was conducted. Exterior grounds of this facility was toured. Perimeter fence and gates were observed to be functional and in good repair at this time. Delayed egress and other safety measures were observed to be functional at this time. Fire extinguishers, located and placed throughout the facility, were observed to have been annually inspected on 12/07/2022 by the local fire extinguisher company noted as Assured and in compliance at this time. All smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were present and working at this time. LPA Pascua reviewed 8 resident files and 5 staff files. 8 out 8 resident files were current and up to date. 5 out 5 staff files were current and up to date. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL: -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610 Technical assistance is being provided today for 87465(h)(5) As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were observed or cited during this annual visit. An exit interview was conducted and copy of the 809 and 809-C was provided to Facility Designated Administrator, Nicole Rodriguez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Common areasDining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · and 14 more

    Dining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Fitness room — reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

    Coffee shop · Conference room · Meeting room · Communal dining room · Computer room · Entertainment venue · TV lounge with cable/satellite · Communal kitchen · Recreational amenities · Shared common areas · Fitness and wellness facilities — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Room typesOne Bedroom · Studio · Unit with a living room · One Bedroom Apartment

    One Bedroom · Studio — reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

    Unit with a living room · One Bedroom Apartment — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Private space for family visits

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • AmenitiesConcierge · Move-in coordination · Convenient location · Bed Making Services · Groundskeeping Services · Maintenance & Repair Services · and 16 more

    Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

    Convenient location · Bed Making Services · Groundskeeping Services · Maintenance & Repair Services · Maintenance Staff On-Site · Pest Control Services · Trash Removal Services · Copying services · Fax services · Newspaper delivery · Beverages provided · Mailboxes · Restaurant on-site · Closet Space In Unit · Individual climate controls in unit · Premium Amenities In Unit · Premium Finishes In Unit · Telephone hookup in unit · Pet facilities · Library — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Snacks available

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Residents choose between options at each meal

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Residents have input into the menu

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Assistance with eating

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itHappy Hour

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activity types offeredMusic programs · Scheduled daily activities · Outdoor programs · Movie nights · Arts and crafts · Literary Activities/Programs · and 17 more

    Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Outdoor programs · Movie nights — reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

    Arts and crafts · Literary Activities/Programs · Educational Activities/Programs · Music activities · Tabletop & Other Games/Programs · Culinary Activities/Programs · Cultural activities/programs · Entertainment activities/programs · Organized activities/programs · Performing arts activities/programs · Recreational activities/programs · Seasonal, holiday, and themed events · Social Activities/Events · Sports & lawn games · Horticultural Activities · Brain fitness activities · Health & wellness activities/programs · Health & wellness education · Life enrichment activities/programs — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Exercise or fitness programBalance activities · Chair fitness · General fitness · Group exercise

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Intergenerational programs

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activities coordinator on staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish

    English — reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

    Spanish — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Staff help care for a resident's pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Smoking policyPermitted

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may bring a pet to visit

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visiting hoursFlexible Visitation Hours

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet types the home excludesLarge dogs

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet restrictions

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Support services for families

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

  • Staff accompany residents to appointments

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wheelchair-accessible vehicle

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated April 27, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County