Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Sunnyside Senior Living
Large community·Licensed for 56·Turlock, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$2,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 56Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit47 of 56 beds occupiedJuly 29, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJuly 29, 2026CDSS inspection record
Sunnyside Senior Living is a large care community in Turlock — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 56 residents since 2023.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Sunnyside Senior Living
Is Sunnyside Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Sunnyside Senior Living licensed for?
56 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Sunnyside Senior Living been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Sunnyside Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Sunnyside Senior Living cost?
$2,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size across Stanislaus County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,900 to $4,125 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Sunnyside Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Sunnyside Senior Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Emanuel Medical Center is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Sunnyside Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 16 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Sunnyside Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SUNNYSIDE SENIOR LIVING INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #502701283. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 56 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Sunnyside Senior Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 56 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 16 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 16 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.56 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 16 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.FIRST FLOOR APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 16.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 16 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$2,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$2,500a month
Likely $2,500–$3,100
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Starting monthly rate$2,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,500–$3,100
- $2,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,500–$6,600
- $4,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
11 homes like this within 37 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$4,700.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Cogir of TurlockTurlock · 2.1 mi · Large community$3,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Stratford at Beyer ParkModesto · 15 mi · Large community$3,008Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The GroveModesto · 17 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dale CommonsModesto · 18 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmare Senior LivingOakdale · 18 mi · Large community$4,125Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- El Rio Memory Care CommunityModesto · 18 mi · Large community$7,200Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Park MercedMerced · 24 mi · Large community$2,895Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Manteca Assisted LivingManteca · 29 mi · Large community$3,700Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Valley Spring Memory CareLos Banos · 30 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Commons at Union RanchManteca · 31 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marbella TracyTracy · 37 mi · Large community$2,950Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 120 2Oth Century Blvd, Turlock, CA 95380Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 29, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 8
- Most recent visit
- July 29, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 47 of 56 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated July 29, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints0typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 9 documents
Jul 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow the resident’s physician instructions
On 07/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings for complaint for the above allegations. LPA met with assistant adminstrator Crystal Calderon and explained the purpose of today's visit. Based on interviews and LPA observation R1 was recieving the care instruced by the physician it was observed over multiple visits to the facility. Therefore the allegation above is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstaniated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, and therefore the aegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260720125352
Mar 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst, LPA, Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management related to a recent incident where a resident was able to consume another resident's medication. LPA met with administrative assistant Krystal calderon to explain the purpose of the visit. Met with staff relevant to the incident for an interview. At the time of the incident the facility did have a crush order on file for the med(dated 1/20/26), at the time of the incident the facility did not have a signed written consent form from responsible party about camofaluging the medication. Per the interview with the staff, the facility has other clients who are reciving crushed/camoflauched medication, LPA gave guidance that consents should be audited and updated as necessary. LPA was given a copy of the training that the facility gave as a part of thier own internal process for resolving the inccident. Per the care coordinator, one of the two medications has been switched to a liquid form. Citations were issued as apart of the visit. A Copy of the report was left the the administrator, LPA sent a copy of the best practices for Medication dispersal to the care coordinator. Exit interview was conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 25, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)(4) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not followed as evidenced by: record review/interview of a situation where under the implemented plan of the facility, R2 made use of unsupervised access to medication prescribed to R1, causing R1 to be short a dose of medication and R2 to take medication not prescribed to them. This poses an immediate risk to the health saftey and personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026
Plan of correction: No POC, the facility has retrained the staff on providing observation for the situation. new training matierals given to the lpa directly address the level supervision the staff should be providing the clients during med dispersal.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(5)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 25, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)(5) Facility staff, except those authorized by law, shall not administer injections, but staff designated by the licensee may assist persons with self-administration as needed. Assistance with self-administered medications shall be limited to the following: (D) Assistance with self-administration does not include forcing a resident to take medication, hiding or camouflaging medications in other substances without the resident's knowledge and consent, or otherwise infringing upon a resident's right to refuse to take a medication. This requirement was not followed as evidenced by: Record review/interview that a client was receiving medication camoflaugeed by coffee without the residents written knowledge and consent facility did not have a signed knowledge and consent for Camoflauging medications at the time of the incident. This presents an immediate risk to the health safety and personal rights to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026
Plan of correction: No POC, the facility has aquired consent from the relevant parties for this client, LPA gave guidance that an internal audit of all clients with crushed medication orders for a consent form should happen.
Oct 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 10/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell received an incident report regarding Resident 1's (R1's) back brace and a missing bolt. Per the report, a friend of the responsible party came and provided a temporary solution with a replacement bolt. LPA Campbell contacted the responsible party (P1) and interviewed staff at the facility on 10/23/2025. LPA Campbell contacted the responsible party (P1) on 10/23/2025 regarding the incident. Per P1, the facility had not initially made sure that R1 was using the back brace. When staff notified P1 that a bolt had gone missing, a family friend came to the facility and provided a temporary replacement bolt. The combination of the missing bolt and because staff not hot initially provided support for usage of the back brace, P1 concluded that facility staff were not taking responsibility for R1 using the back brace correctly and they were not keeping track of the brace to avoid losing parts. When staff was interviewed on 10/23/2025, S1 stated that the facility had not known that staff needed to support R1's use of the back brace because they had not received doctor's orders regarding the back brace. Instead, S1 stated that P1 had "just shown up with it." and given it to staff. S1 then requested that P1 obtain doctor's orders so that staff could be properly trained and informed on how to properly assist R1 in using the brace. Once received staff then assisted R1 in putting on the brace in the mornings and taking it off in the evening. S1 had notified P1 on 10/22/2025 that staff noticed the bolt was missing from R1's back brace when they were assisting R1 with putting the brace on that morning. To avoid further miscommunication, the facility has taken steps to educate staff and document any issues that may arise when assisting with the back brace. Training has been conducted with 19 staff on the parts of the back brace and how to take it on and off (10/01, 10/18, 10/25) In the future, staff will scan for any missing parts or other issues when assisting R1 into or out of the back brace and document any changes in R1's notes. P1 will also be notified of additional resources in regards to regulations for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) to familiarize themselves with procedures and what the facilities can and cannot do. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, no deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was provided to Dawn Pero, Care Coordinator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 10/02/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbelll arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection with Stephenie Doub, Regional Manager. Krystal Calderon, Administrative Assistant assisted with the visit. LPA Campbell observed residents eating breakfast. The contact information for the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was displayed in the entrance for residents and visitors. There was also a See Something Say Something poster available to call in complaints. Throughout the day, LPA Campbell overheard residents using the signal system to call for a caregiver. Later during the visit, LPA Campbell observed two residents working on a puzzle together and a religious service was done in the common area with a priest and residents as parishioners. Upstairs, residents were observed eating lunch in the dining room. Staff were observed serving the meals and assisting where needed. The community is licensed to serve residents age 60 and over who are non-ambulatory of which 16 of them may be bedridden. Only the first floor is approved for bedridden residents and the community has a waiver granted for 16 hospice residents. A tour was conducted with Dawn Pero, Care Coordinator in the Med room, resident rooms, kitchen and common areas. LPA Campbell conducted a medication audit using randomly selected residents and found that the residents medication matched their name, rx, number, name of medication and the dosage prescribed. The first aid kit was inspected and included tweezers, scissors, thermometer and first aid manual along with bandages. LPA Campbell observed three resident rooms and found that the appropriate furnishings were present. However one room (#101) did not have a lamp available for residents outside of the overhead lights. LPA Campbell reminded the Care Coordinator that each resident is to have a lamp on the night stand for their personal use. Lamps were found in the other two rooms that were inspected. The water temperature in the three residents rooms inspected were all found to be over 120 degrees Fahrenheit. However all bathrooms were found to have signage warning of hot water and all residents were able to discern if the water was too hot. The thermostat was set at 75 degrees F During a tour of the community kitchen, LPA Campbell observed stoves with a fire supression system that was last inspected on 06/19/2025. There was a class K fire extinguisher for cooking oil and fat fires and a Class A fire extinguisher. Both fire extinguishers were last inspected on 12/18/2024 and were fully charged. When LPA Campbell observed the freezer and refrigerator, the temperature displayed was within regulations. The refrigerator was 35 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the freezer was -5 degrees Fahrenheit. There were enough perishable foods to last the community 2 days and enough non-perishable items in the pantry to last 7 days. A temperature log was observed to be kept on the front of freezer and refrigerator. No insects, spiders or spider webs were observed in the community. LPA Campbell also observed the emergency food supply stored in an outside shed. LPA Campbell reviewed the fire drill log for the community. Staff conducted quarterly drills once per quarter and recorded the date, time, number of residents and staff who participated and the scenario practiced. The administrator reviewed and signed off on each drill. After a review of the emergency and disaster plan, RM Stephen Doub consulted with staff regarding feasability. The community will update and expand the Emergency and Disaster Plan and provide the new plan to LPA Campbell by 10/10/2025. LPA Campbell compared the staff roster to the online Guardian report. One staff was not found in the Guardian but was added during the visit. LPA Campbell conducted 10 file reviews for residents and 5 file reviews for staff. All files were found to be complete. The following documents will be email to LPA Campbell (Renee.Campbell@dss.ca.gov) by 10/09/2025 by 5:00 PM by end of day: (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) LIC 500 Personnel Report (4) LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Updated Insurance Certificate Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. A copy of this report was provided to the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection on 11/26/2024. LPA met with Melissa Brichka, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Dawn Pero and Krystal Calderon assisted with today’s visit and were found to be associated to the facility. LPA Campbell inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, client bedrooms, client bathrooms, laundry room and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. This facility is a two story building licensed to service the elderly and those with dementia, age 60 and over or 56 non-ambulatory residents of which 16 may be bedridden. The first floor is approved for bedridden and a waiver was granted for hospice care for 16. LPA Campbell observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA Campbell observed 56 beds and 28 rooms to be properly furnished with appropriate bedding and lighting. There are no bodies of water present. Fire extinguishers were last inspected on 01/02/2024. The temperature for the refrigerator was measured at 33 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer was measured at -6 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Campbell observed sufficient seven-day non-perishable and two-day perishable food supplies. RCFE hot water temperatures are to be 105 degree F (41 degree C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degree C). Hot water was measured at 130 degrees Fahrenheit in a resident's bathroom was found to be accompanied by a sign warning of hot water as required. Fire extinguishers, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in good repair as documented in fire drill logs. A fire drill log was reviewed by LPA Campbell. Per documentation, a monthly fire drill was conducted successfully and staff reviewed use of the fire extinguishers. Facility thermostat observed at 74 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Campbell requested client and staff files for review. LPA reviewed 4 resident files and 4 staff files. Resident files were observed to be complete. Toxins were made inaccessible to clients in care. Toxins were stored in the laundry room and locked storage closets. The laundry room is locked when staff must leave it unattended. The following documents will be emailed to LPA Campbell (Renee.Campbell@dss.ca.gov) by 12/05/2024 by 12:00 PM : (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) LIC 500 Personnel Report (3) Copy of Administrator Certificate (4) LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. A copy of this report was provided to the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 09/11/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility at approximately 9:30 am regarding an eviction request. LPA Campbell met with Administrative Assistant Krystal Calderon and Care Coordinator, Dawn Pero and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Campbell also spoke with Administrator Nicole Ell by phone. On 09/06/24, Administrator/Licensee Nicole Ell submitted a copy of an eviction notice that would be provided to a resident (R1). After review, it was found that the facility needed to increase documentation of their search for an alternative placement (what places have been visited? their cost? can R1 afford it?). The facility should also provide detailed documentation of their attempts to help R1 find a new living situation (the name of the facilities, dates of visits to new facilities, details of refusals by R1 to visit a new facility.) In an attempt to help R1 resolve his behavioral issues, the facility will need to document contacts with R1’s psychiatrist using R1’s Medical Release Confirmation form. The facility must also write a plan if R1 cannot find a place to his liking within the 30 day timeframe. LPA Campbell consulted with both staff and the Administrator and explained that the purpose of the eviction procedure was to make sure client needs are met by ensuring an appropriate facility is found. LPA Campbell spoke to Administrator Nicole Ell to clarify the Reporting Requirements and the importance of being familiar with Title 22 Regulations. Per Title 22, written reports or Unusual Incident Reports (UIR) are to be submitted to licensing within 7 days. On 09/06/24, the facility emailed faxes (for incidents that occurred on 08/22/24 and 08/23/24) that had not been faxed until more than 7 days after the incidents. No further attempts were made to send the reports to licensing. When appraisals were discussed with staff. S1 and S2 stated that S2 does an pre-admission appraisal, S1 creates a Care Plan and S2 does a re-appraisal as needed. Both staff stated they were not trained medical or behavioral specialist. Per S2, no medical personnel are involved in reappraisals or assessment for mental health issues when admitted to the facility. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency is being cited on the attached 809-D during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and copies of the report and appeal rights left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 20, 2024
87211 (a)Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency ... (1) A written report ... submitted to the licensing agency ...within seven days of the occurrence of any ... events. This requirement was not met based on: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not insure all incident reports were submitted to licensing within seven days which poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024
Plan of correction: The administrator will present a signed declaration of understanding for the Reporting Requirements regulation found in 87211(a) by POC date. The licensee will ensure that incident reports will be submitted within 7 business daysl
May 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 05/24/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility unannounced regarding closure of the facility under the former owner. LPA Campbell was met by Dawn Pero, Care Coordinator and Krystal Calderon, Administrative Assistant and explained the purpose of the visit. As LPA Campbell drove into the driveway of the facility, the new sign bearing the name Sunnyside Senior Living was observed. Upon entry, LPA observed clients eating breakfast and being assisted by staff. Residents were observed socializing and watching TV as well. During the visit, staff conducted a Bingo game for the residents. LPA Campbell confirmed that the current owner and facility Administrator for Sunnyside Senior Living was Nicole Ell as recorded in FAS. It was then found that the former facility owners (under the former name of St. Francis Assisted Care) had not completed their closure process. When asked, Dawn Pero stated she had the contact information for the former owners of St. Francis Assisted Care. LPA Campbell recorded the information and prepared a forfeiture letter to be mailed to the former owners via certified mail from the regional office. Form 9104 was also prepared so that closure could be processed. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2024
Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On 11/21/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to conduct a Pre-Licensing Visit. LPA met with applicant Nicole Ell, Administrator and Albert Ell, Vice President and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this Pre-Licensing Visit is due to a change of ownership. Current census is 39 residents at this time. The facility has a fire clearance for 40 non-ambulatory and 16 bedridden residents. LPA observed the secure file room where staff and resident files are kept locked in a file cabinet. A tour of the facility was conducted. It was observed that a new resident in a shared bedroom did not have a chest of drawers yet but her family would be bringing one for her. The facility stated that they will provide a bed, night stand, chair, lighting and drawers if the resident is not able to provide it for themselves. A tour of the kitchen was conducted. LPA observed a sufficient amount of 2 day perishable and 7 day non-perishable food supply to meet the residents needs. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents in care. The refrigerator had a temperature of 39 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer -4.6 degree Fahrenheit. A tour of the pantry was conducted where the facility holds extra non-perishable food supplies. The facility regularly rotates out emergency food supplies to maintain freshness. LPA observed a locked centralized stored medication cabinet located in the Med Tech office near the front of the building. The MAR's log book and the locked narcotics box was observed as well. A First Aid Kit was present and contained all of the required components. A fire extinguisher was located in the living room and was last serviced on 01/26/2023. Dining areas, living areas, and all other areas intended for resident use were toured. It was observed that furniture and furnishings were sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. An additional emergency food supply was observed in an outside shed. A tour of the laundry room was conducted, laundry detergent, bleach and all other cleaning supplies were made inaccessible to the residents . Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies cited during visit. During today's visit Component III was done with Nicole Ell. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator and a report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Lifespring Senior Campus, A Wellness Community
Turlock · Mid-size home · 0.3 mi away
$1,900 a month to start · Listed by the home
Trinity Valley Care
Turlock · Mid-size home · 0.5 mi away
$3,650 a month to start · Listed by the home
Covenant Living of Turlock
Turlock · Large community · 1.1 mi away
$3,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Turlock Residential
Turlock · Mid-size home · 1.4 mi away
$4,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
St. Thomas Retirement Center
Turlock · Mid-size home · 1.7 mi away
$3,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Cogir of Turlock
Turlock · Large community · 2.1 mi away
$3,900 a month to start · Listed by the home