The Grove

Type of visit: Annual/Random

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a annual/required visit. LPA met with Administrator Mary Zuniga and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 40 LPA Lund and Administrator Mary Zuniga toured/inspected the facility. The facility is a single-story building with 43 resident bedrooms, common area, activity room, dining area and kitchen. The facility has delayed egress perimeter. Rooms inspected have the proper furnishings for residents in care. Smoke and carbon monoxide alert systems were hardwired and found operational. All fire extinguishers were charged (7/11/2024) and in compliance. The kitchen was observed to be clean and operational. Washer and dryer are located in the laundry room and were clean and noted to be operational. Toxins are locked and stored in the utility closet. Adequate supply of linens is stored in laundry room. Adequate supply of 7-day non-perishable and 2-day perishables are stored in the kitchen. LPA Lund reviewed 4 staff & 4 residents files and were in compliance. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2026

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a annual/required visit. LPA met with Administrator Mary Zuniga and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 34 LPA Lund and Administrator Mary Zuniga toured/inspected the facility. The facility is a single-story building with 43 resident bedrooms, a common area, activity room, dining area and kitchen. The facility has delayed egress perimeter. Rooms inspected have the proper furnishings for residents in care. Smoke and carbon monoxide alert systems were hardwired and found operational. All fire extinguishers were charged (6/11/2025) and in compliance. The kitchen was observed to be clean and operational. The laundry room and were clean and noted to be operational and secure. Toxins are locked and stored in the utility closet. Adequate supply of linens is stored in the laundry room. There was sufficient supply of 7-day non-perishable and 2-day perishables are stored in the kitchen. LPA Lund reviewed 3 staff & 4 residents files and were in compliance. LPA observed the centrally stored medications area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Nick Gaither and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 36 LPA Lund and spoke Administrator Nick Gaither regarding staff (S1) has not worked at the facilities since December 2023. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2025

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a annual/required visit. LPA met with Administrator Mary Zuniga and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 34 LPA Lund and Administrator Mary Zuniga toured/inspected the facility. The facility is a single-story building with 43 resident bedrooms, common area, activity room, dining area and kitchen. The facility has delayed egress perimeter. Rooms inspected have the proper furnishings for residents in care. Smoke and carbon monoxide alert systems were hardwired and found operational. All fire extinguishers were charged (7/11/2024) and in compliance. The kitchen was observed to be clean and operational. Washer and dryer are located in the laundry room and were clean and noted to be operational. Toxins are locked and stored in the utility closet. Adequate supply of linens is stored in laundry room. Adequate supply of 7-day non-perishable and 2-day perishables are stored in the kitchen. LPA Lund reviewed 3 staff & 4 residents files and were in compliance. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2024

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent an outbreak of scabies. Staff handles residents in a rough manner. Staff yells at residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Chris Gaither and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. During interviews, Gaither and five staff members (S1, S2, S3, S4, S6) said there was not an outbreak of scabies at the facility. One staff member (S5) said they were not sure if there was a scabies outbreak or not, but said a few residents did have a rash. Of six residents interviewed (R1-R6), R1 and R6 were unable to answer questions regarding scabies, R2 and R4 were not aware of any scabies, and R3 and R5 said R1 had scabies. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiated LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and observed multiple medical records dating from March 2023 through October 2023 diagnosing R1 with an unspecified, itchy rash. LPA Moleski reviewed medical records for two other residents (R7, R8). R7 was prescribed an antihistamine for itchy spots, and R8 was diagnosed with a dry skin rash. LPA Moleski did not observe any skin rashes on residents other than R1. During an interview, R1’s responsible party said R1 has not had scabies. LPA Moleski interviewed six staff members (S1-S6). Of these, all six staff members denied that staff are rough with residents and denied that staff yell at residents. S1 and S5 said staff sometimes do have to speak louder for residents who are hard of hearing. LPA Moleski interviewed six residents (R1-R6). R2 said one staff member was too rough with R2. LPA Moleski interviewed R2’s responsible party, who said that R2 exaggerated the incident described. R3 said staff sometimes yell at residents if residents are yelling at them. R4 said staff sometimes yell at residents to get their attention, but said staff do not yell in a mean way. R5 said one staff member yells at R5. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that staff did not prevent an outbreak of scabies, that staff handle residents in a rough manner, and that staff yell at residents: Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED, which means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Gaither. LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file. Facility staff were aware of this rash since at least March 2023, based on a dermatologist’s prescription for medication to treat this rash dated 3/27/23. Following this date, LPA Moleski observed three after-visit summaries from medical appointments regarding this rash and three further prescriptions made by dermatologists addressing the treatment of R1’s rash. LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s MARs and observed that R1 had been receiving the medications prescribed. During interviews, Gaither and two care staff members (S1-S2) said R1 had been treated for the rash, but said that doctors were unable to determine the cause of the rash and that medications had not been very effective. A third care staff member (S3) was aware of the rash but did not handle any facility medications, so could not say what treatments had been given to R1. During an interview, R1’s responsible party (RP) said that although medications have not been effective, R1 has received medical attention for the rash. R1’s RP did not have any concerns regarding the facility. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident: Based on interviews and record review, the above allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the complaint allegation is unfounded means the allegation is false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Gaither.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230703105055