Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Orangewood Guest Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Anaheim, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #306004826
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 20, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 16, 2026CDSS inspection record

Orangewood Guest Home is a small care home in Anaheim — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Orangewood Guest Home

Is Orangewood Guest Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Orangewood Guest Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Orangewood Guest Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Orangewood Guest Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Orangewood Guest Home cost?

$3,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,200–$4,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 18 other homes of a similar licensed size in Anaheim that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,100 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 18 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Orangewood Guest Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by M & M Guest Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Garden Grove Hospital and Medical Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Orangewood Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Orangewood Guest Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ORANGEWOOD GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306004826. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to M & M Guest Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
TWO (2) AMBULATORY AND FOUR (4) NON AMBULATORY ONLY

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,900a month to start

Likely $3,200–$4,800

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,900a month

Likely $3,200–$5,000

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,900likely $3,200–$4,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,200–$5,000
$3,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$8,200
$5,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1598 W. Orangewood Ave., Anaheim, CA 92802Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2017. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 16, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
January 16, 2026
Occupied · February 20, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 22, 2024 to February 20, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025220202433020231102022110

The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On today's date Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) William Vanegas made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting the required annual inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Care Giver (CG) Remedios Baculong after explaining the purpose for the visit. Administrator (AD) Mindy Fajardo was notified via telephone, and arrived shortly after to assist with the inspection. LPA observed that Administrator (AD) Mindy Fajardo has a valid Administrator certificate which expires May 22, 2027. LPA Vanegas began a tour of the facility and the facility consist of the following. It is a single story house with four bedrooms, one of which is a staff bedroom, two bathrooms one of which is a staff and guest bathroom, the other is for resident use only, a living room, a dining room, a kitchen, a laundry room, and an attached two car garage. LPA Vanegas observed one resident in care, lounging in the respective common areas, and in their room. LPA Vanegas observed the kitchen area to be clean and free of any mildew and debris. LPA Vanegas observed sharp utensils to be locked away and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA Vanegas observed the refrigerator, gas stove, microwave and dishwasher all to test operational. LPA Vanegas observed a two day supply of perishable food, and a seven day supply of non-perishable food. LPA observed the See Something, Say Something poster (PUB 475) mounted on a wall by the entryway of the facility. LPA inspected all five resident bedrooms, and they were observed to be free of any hazards. LPA observed the resident bedrooms had the required furnishings such as a bed, a chair, chest of drawers, and a reading lamp. All resident beds had clean linens in good repair; meaning no strains or tares. LPA observed additional linens are stored in a hallway closet. LPA inspected both bathrooms. Resident bathrooms are clean. Bathrooms are equipped with grab bars, slip resistant floor mats, and a shower chair. Faucets and toilets were operational. Hot water temperature measured between 108.5 and 111.5 degrees Fahrenheit. CONTINUED ON LIC809C LPA Vanegas observed the outside of the facility to be clean and free of any obstructions blocking the emergency exits. LPA Vanegas observed for the backyard of the facility to be large enough to participate in outdoor activities upon resident request. LPA Vanegas observed an outdoor shaded sitting area, and enough activities to participate in upon resident request. LPA Vanegas observed all smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to test operational. LPA Vanegas observed all fire extinguishers to be fully charged, and up to date. LPA Vanegas reviewed P&I with AD Mindy Fajardo all balances were up to date and documented accurately. LPA Vanegas reviewed five resident files, and five staff files. All files (Staff and Resident) had all required documents, staff training was up to date and documented. LPA Vanegas reviewed medications with AD Mindy, per LPA Vanegas review all medications are being administered per physicians orders, and are being documented accurately by facility staff. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with AD Mindy Fajardo and a copy of the report was provided to facility, additionally a copy of this report will be mailed to the facility as well.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at client Staff attempted to hit a client

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint received in our Regional Office on February 6, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA met with both Administrators, Melissa Carbajal and Mindy Fajardo. A report was filed with our office where a vendor witnessed a facility staff member, who yelled at the client and attempted to hit the client. On February 5, 2025, at 7:50am, the client was being picked up for Day Program when the incident occurred. Based on LPA interviews with the eyewitness and two of two staff present in facility at time of incident, Staff #1 (S1) had reached for the client’s backpack and the client grabbed S1’s hand. Client is non-verbal and indicated she wanted the backpack on her back. S1 raised her voice to the client to, “Let go” and client complied. According to the two of two staff members and eyewitness, the incident was brief. The staff member, S1, then placed the back pack on client’s shoulders and the client left for Day Program. (Continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Continued from LIC 9099) LPA interviewed four of four staff; including S1, the staff member directly involved, who all denied the allegations. LPA spoke with two clients, one involved in the incident, who is non-verbal, and the other, a verbal client. The verbal client stated the staff member does not yell at them and has never tried to hit residents. LPA engaged with the non-verbal client who smiled at LPA. LPA observed client to be oriented to time and place and used body language, such as hand gestures and nodding. Client understands questions asked by LPA and staff. When asked about staff member, S1, LPA observed the client to be relaxed, nodding head up and down and smiling. Documents obtained and reviewed include the Client’s: Identification and Emergency Information, Physician’s Report and Appraisal/ Needs and Services Plan. Additional documents obtained include the Register of Facility Clients and the facility sign-in/sign-out sheet; signed by the vendor on the day of the incident. Upon file review client is prone to have aggressive incidents per Individual Program Plan (IPP) dated February 24, 2024. LPA reviewed Staff #1’s file and there were no disciplinary actions on record. S1's staff training included Elder Abuse and mandated reporting from July 7, 2024. Two staff members were interviewed from the Day Program, who reported the allegations. The eyewitness stated the yelling, by S1, was not shouting, but a raised voice. The eyewitness stated S1 moved her hand from side-to-side, as if to swat the client’s hands. Eyewitness stated staff member raised her hand to client’s face and, again, moved her hand from side-to-side. No contact was made. Eyewitness stated S1 spoke to client, “Like a parent addressing a toddler” which witness felt was not professional. LPA spoke with the Regional Center of Orange County (RCOC) Quality Assurance Coordinator (QAC), who had also visited the facility on February 11, 2025. The RCOC QAC’s findings were inconclusive. A 9102-TV has been issued to request staff training on recognizing and mitigating client behaviors, as well as documenting behavioral incidents in client’s file. Although the above allegations may have happened there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegations that: staff yelled at client and that staff attempted to hit client is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Melissa Carbajal and Mindy Fajardo, Administrators, and a copy of this report and LIC 9102-TV was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250206160830
Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

On 01/08/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) William Vanegas made an unannounced visit to complete the annual visit that was started on 12/26/2024. Upon arrival LPA Vanegas was greeted and granted entry to the facility by Care Giver (CG) Ruben Carbajal. LPA Vanegas began to observe resident rooms and observed the following. All resident rooms are clean and sanitary, and have enough space to accommodate enough storage space and space to move freely throughout the rooms. LPA Vanegas observed all resident rooms to have the required furnishings such as a night stand, chest drawer, lamp, chairs, enough closet space to store personal belongings, and a bed with linens that are in good repair meaning no strains or tears. LPA Vanegas reviewed PNI with administrator Melissa Carbajal and everything added up to the correct balance that was documented. LPA Vanegas reviewed two staff files and five client files all staff files had the required documentation and required training. LPA Vanegas observed all client files to have the paperwork that is required and up to date documents were recorded. LPA Vanegas reviewed medications and per LPA Vanegas review medications are being centrally stored, locked and inaccessible to clients in care. Per LPA Vanegas review medications are being administered per physicians orders. LPA Vanegas interviewed one client and one staff member. LPA Vanegas observed first aid kit to have all required equipment such as bandages, adhesive tape, scissors, a thermometer, and tweezers. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are not being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/26/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) William Vanegas made and unannounced visit for the purposes of conducting an annual visit. Upon arrival LPA Vanegas was greeted and granted entrance by caregiver (CG) Ruben Carbajel. LPA Vanegas set up equipment and conducting a tour of the facility and observed the following. This is a one storied home that has four bedrooms, three of which are resident rooms and one staff room. This home has two bathrooms, one of which is a staff bathroom and another that is a resident bathroom. LPA observed kitchen area to be clean and free of debris. LPA observed a microwave, gas stove, and dish washer in kitchen all were tested and tested operational. LPA observed a washer and dryer to be operational. All toxins and detergents are locked away and out of resident reach. LPA Observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational. Fire Extinguishers were observed to be up to date and fully charged. LPA observed resident and staff bathrooms to be clean and free of mildew and debris. Water temperature tested from 114.6-116.8 Degrees F. Resident restrooms were observed to have grab bars and slip resistant matts. Water faucet and toilets were observed to be operational. LPA Vanegas observed the backyard of the facility to have a seated shading area with enough space to participate in outdoor activities. Emergency pathways were free of any obstructions, and side doors were observed to be unlocked. LPA Vanegas observed there to be a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-persihable food and a sufficient amount of emergency water on hand for residents. LPA Vanegas advised that due to time constraints LPA would need to return to complete the annual visit. No deficiency's were cited on today's date. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
Aug 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was hit by a facility staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to investigation a complaint received July 31, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit before entering the facility. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, witnesses, and document review. Regarding the allegation: Resident was hit by a facility staff. 5 of 8 individuals interviewed denied the complaint allegation above. During interview with multiple individuals, it was revealed Resident 1 (R1) has a history making false statements and having emotional outburst. Staff 1 (S1) explained R1 has outburst at the day program and has had outburst with the bus driver as well. S1 provided progress notes for R1 that document several of R1’s outburst. During an interview with Resident 2 (R2), the resident explained they get along with R1, and mentioned R1 yells and screams sometimes. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated During an interview with Witness 1 (W1) it was revealed R1's behaviors are well documented and W1 has had discussions with the facility as well as R1's day program regarding these behaviors. A review of R1’s Individualized Program Plan (IPP) dated January 11, 2024, list challenging behaviors for R1 including disruptive social behavior, self-injurious behavior, emotional outburst, and special conditions or behaviors that include assaultive behaviors that could have resulted in serious bodily injury or death. Based on the information gathered during the investigation through interviews, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240731162025
May 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident's food was protected against vermin.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to start the investigation for a complaint received May 17, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the complaint visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not ensure resident's food was protected against vermin. 3 of 5 individuals interviewed support the complaint allegation above. During an interview with Witness 2 (W2), the witness denied there’s a problem with vermin in the facility and said the facility is always clean. Witness 3 (W3) said the facility is sparkling clean and you can see your reflection on the floor. During the visit, LPA visually inspected the facility, made several observations, and closely examined the cleanliness of the physical plant. During the inspection LPA Haley observed Client 1’s (C1) lunch box, lunch bag(s), and observed how clients’ lunches are prepared and packed. During the inspection several photos were taken. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Based on the information gathered during the investigation through interviews and observations, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegations is deemed Unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240517084014
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dwayne Mason Jr. arrived at Orangewood Guest Home to conduct an unannounced Required 1 Year Inspection. LPA arrived at the facility at 8:30am, LPA was greeted and granted entry by Administrator (AD) Melissa Carbajal. The facility is a one-story home with three resident bedrooms, two bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining room, backyard, one staff bedroom, one office and an attached one car garage. There are two exit gates on either side of the house. There is one shaded seating area in the backyard. LPA did not observe any hazards or obstacles in back yard. All resident bedrooms had the required furnishings. LPA observed all resident beds had linens and blankets. LPA observed all windows were screened. All and any toxic chemicals, cleaning solutions, laundry toxins and disinfectants are inaccessible to clients and will be stored and locked in cabinets in the kitchen and laundry room. Medication and Files are stored in a locked cabinet in the dining room. First aid kit is locked in a hallway cabinet. LPA reviewed two out of four client files and medication. LPA reviewed three staff files. The clients were away at day program or appointments. The two fire extinguishers are fully charged as indicated by the arrow pointing in the green zone. LPA observed service tags to indicate the extinguisher was last serviced on 10/10/23. The facility has books, puzzles, exercise equipment and electronics for activity use. The facility also conducts group outings each weekend. All bathrooms have working plumbing and designated hand washing posters. Hot water measured at 108.5 degrees Fahrenheit in the hallway bathroom, 107 degrees Fahrenheit in the bathroom inside bedroom 3. A supply of extra linen and hygiene supplies was stored in the hallway cabinets and garage. Emergency Phone Numbers, Exit Plan & Menu are posted and available for review. There is a 2-day supply of perishable food and 7-day supply of non-perishable food on hand. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector tested operational. Stove with gas burners, oven, refrigerators, dish washer, microwave, washer and dryer are operational. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited as per Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 2 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Melissa Carbajal, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County