Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Ocean Breeze Care Home III

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Pedro, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #198320360
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,250 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 7, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 7, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderOcean Breeze Care Home, LLCSince 2023 · 3 licensed homes

Ocean Breeze Care Home III is a small care home in San Pedro — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Ocean Breeze Care Home III

Is Ocean Breeze Care Home III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Ocean Breeze Care Home III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Ocean Breeze Care Home III been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Ocean Breeze Care Home III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Ocean Breeze Care Home III cost?

$5,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,300–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Ocean Breeze Care Home III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ocean Breeze Care Home, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Ocean Breeze Care Home, LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center San Pedro is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Ocean Breeze Care Home III keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Ocean Breeze Care Home III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “OCEAN BREEZE CARE HOME III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198320360. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ocean Breeze Care Home, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FIRE CLEARANCE FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO(2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,250a month to start

Likely $4,300–$6,500

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,250a month

Likely $4,300–$6,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,250likely $4,300–$6,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,650
$5,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,700
$7,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,650.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1600 W 21St, San Pedro, CA 90732Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
8
Most recent visit
August 7, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 17, 2023 to August 7, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026221202511020241102023330

The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff restrain resident while in care. Facility did not follow reporting requirements.

On 08/07/2026, between 08:30 AM and 01:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Watson conducted an initial complaint visit to the facility listed above. LPA met with House Manager Jessica Hall and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Watson was granted entry into the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 01/30/2026, the department requested and obtained the following documentation: Register of Facility Residents, Staff Schedule, Medication Administration Record for R1, Staff Trainings, Physician’s Report for R1, Hospital Admission Record for R1, Residential Appraisal for R1, Hospice Care medication list, and Durable Medical Equipment document for R1. The department interviewed Staff #1–Staff #3 (S1–S3) and Residents #2–#6 (R2–R6). An attempt to interview Resident #1 (R1) was made; however, R1 was no longer living at the facility at the time of the complaint visit. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Staff restrain residents while in care. It is alleged that the facility restrains a resident in care without authorization from family or a physician. On 01/30/2026, the department interviewed Administrator Staff #1 (S1), Gregg MacEllven. During this interview, S1 was asked whether staff restrain residents while in care. S1 stated that staff do not restrain residents. S1 reported that R1 utilized a harness while seated in a wheelchair to help keep R1 upright due to paralysis on the right side of their body following a previous stroke. S1 also reported that the harness buckle was repaired while the resident was admitted to the hospital. The department requested but did not obtain documentation showing a doctor’s order or approval for R1 to use a manual restraint as a postural support while in care. The department interviewed Staff #1–#(S1–S3) and Residents #2–#6 (R2–R6). Out of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 staff and 5 out of 6 residents denied the above allegation.Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation, Staff restrain resident while in care, is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are cited on the attached LIC9099D. Deficiencies were issued and plans of correction were discussed. Note: Citations not cleared by the due date will result in a $100 fine assessed for each citation until cleared. Civil penalties will continue to accrue until Proof of Correction (POC) is cleared. Allegation: Facility did not follow reporting requirements. It is alleged that the facility failed to follow required reporting procedures for incidents involving residents. The department conducted an interview with Staff#1 (S1) and S1 was asked whether the facility follows the reporting requirements mandated by the California Department of Social Services. S1 stated that the facility does comply with reporting requirements. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C Regarding the fall incident on 01/19/2026, S1 reported that after noticing a lump on the resident, she immediately contacted the resident’s authorized representative and transported the resident to the hospital. S1 stated the authorized representative met her at the hospital approximately one hour later and assisted with verbal translation for the physician. S1 reported the resident was admitted to the hospital from 01/19/2026 to 01/23/2026. S1 also stated that the resident had experienced prior falls at home before being admitted to the facility and had previously been sent to Sea Crest Hospital due to those incidents. S1 reported discussing the incident with staff and reviewing supervision needs following the fall, noting that the resident “did not fall out of their wheelchair hard, but it was just a soft roll onto the carpet, resulting in no major injuries.” The department interviewed Staff #1–#3 (S1–S3) and Residents #2–#6 (R2–R6). The department requested but did not obtain records showing that an Unusual Incident Report was submitted to Licensing due to R1 experiencing a fall at the facility and being admitted to the hospital as a result. As stated in Title 22, whenever an incident at the facility involves a resident’s health and safety and presents a potential risk, a report is required within 7 days of the occurrence. The department interviewed Staff #1–#3 (S1–S3) and Residents #2–#6 (R2–R6). Out of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 staff and 5 out of 6 residents denied the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation, Facility did not follow reporting requirements, is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Deficiencies were issued and plans of correction were discussed. Note: Citations not cleared by the due date will result in a $100 fine assessed for each citation until cleared. Civil penalties will continue to accrue until Proof of Correction (POC) is cleared. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Gregg MacElven, and a copy of this report was provided. Allegation: Facility does not have enough staff. It is alleged that the facility has not employed enough staff to adequately monitor and care for residents, resulting in a resident experiencing a fall at the facility. On 01/30/2026, the department interviewed Administrator Greg MacEllven (S1). S1 was asked if the facility has enough staff, and S1 stated yes. Regarding the fall incident, S1 reported that the staff assigned to the resident was in the bathroom assisting another client with a bowel movement. S1 stated that staff heard the fall, responded immediately, assisted R1 back into their chair, assessed R1’s coherency, and notified the physical therapist, who then conducted an additional assessment. The department interviewed Staff #1–#3 (S1–S3) and Residents #2–#6 (R2–R6). Out of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 staff and 5 out of 6 residents denied the above allegation. The department obtained and reviewed the staff roster, which showed that the facility had enough trained staff available to adequately care for and monitor the residents in care. The department interviewed Staff #1–#3 (S1–S3) and Residents #2–#6 (R2–R6). Out of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 staff and 5 out of 6 residents denied the above allegation. Based on the information gathered, interviews conducted, and review of records, no evidence was found to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Jessica Hall, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260126152036

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 14, 2026

87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance and care for the resident in those activities of daily living which the resident is unable to do for himself/herself. Postural supports may be used under the following conditions. (3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record. The licensing agency shall be authorized to require other additional documentation if needed to verify the order. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, S1 acknowledged that a harness was placed on R1 since being admitted to the facility. The licensee did not have a physician’s order for Postural Supports. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee agreed to conduct an in service training for all staff on section cited and residents personal rights. The licensee shall submit to the department a copy of the sign in sheet, and training materials, by the POC due date via email to troy.watson@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 14, 2026

87211Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require…(1) A written report shall be submitted to…the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified…below…(B) Any serious injury as determined by the attending physician and occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee failed to submit a complete written report to (R1’s) responsible person (W1) regarding (R1’s) fall and hip fracture. This violation poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator agrees to: 1. Submit a complete written incident report containing all required elements for R1’s injury. 2. Conduct staff training on proper incident reporting procedures, including timelines and required documentation. 3. Provide a written statement to the Department confirming completion of corrective actions by the due date. Submit POC to: Troy.Watson@dss.ca.gov

Jul 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/02/26, the department conducted an unannounced annual required inspection visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. The department met with the Administrator, Gregg MacEllven, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The department was granted access to the facility. The facility is licensed to operate for (6) non-ambulatory elderly adults aged 60 and above. The facility is approved for one (2) hospice waiver. Currently, there are (2) hospice residents in care. The facility is a single-story home located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of the following: six (6) private rooms, one (1) staff room, two (2) bathrooms, a living area, a dining area, a kitchen, an office, a laundry area, and an outside patio area. All bedrooms were checked, mattresses and box springs were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space was observed. Bathroom toilets and water faucets worked properly, shower was free of mold/mildew, and there are sufficient toiletries accessible to residents. The water temperature properly measured between 105-120 F. A supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed, toxins and knifes were stored and inaccessible to residents, no weapons nor bodies of water on the premises, exits and walkways are free of debris/hazards. The department conducted a review of six (6) residents records, six (6) Resident Medication Administration Records (MAR) and three (3) staff records and observed them to be complete and in order. First aid kit observed along with manual, fire extinguishers were fully charged, carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were operational, and the last fire/emergency drill was completed on 03/03/26. Facility fees are current; liability insurance is active (Identity Insurance Services Policy #ISCAH00000319-00 exp. 02/24/27). No deficiencies were cited during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On August 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Administrator Gregg MacEllven. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to operate for (6) non-ambulatory elderly adults aged 60 and above. The facility is approved for one (2) hospice waiver. Currently, there are (2) hospice residents in care. The facility is a single-story home located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of the following: six (6) private rooms, one (1) staff room, two (2) bathrooms, a living area, a dining area, a kitchen, an office, a laundry area, and an outside patio area. LPA toured the physical plant. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage of the resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of the visit. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. A water temperature of 115.9 degrees F. A comfortable temperature of 75 degrees F. was maintained in the facility. LPA observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished during the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available and maintained adequately. The fire extinguishers were charged, and smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were operable. Evaluation Report Continues on LIC 809-C A review of Medication Records Administration (MAR) are maintained in order and accurate. The facility conducted Fire/Safety Drill on March 6, 2025. The facility has a working landline telephone. The staff have all the current CPR/First Aid Training on file. During the visit, LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed staff following screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Posters mandated for inspection control were posted. An audit of residents #1-#5 (R1-R5) service records and staff #1-#3 (S1-S3) personnel records revealed to be complete. The facility has current liability insurance effective policy #PC19145181-02 effective 12/12/24 – 12/12/25. The facility is current on CCL annual dues. The facility has a current administrator's certificate for Gregg MacEllven #7012185740 effective 06/09/24 through 06/08/26 No deficiencies cited during this inspection visit. An exit interview conducted with Gregg MacEllven and a copy of the report is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 6/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Gregg McEllven /Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (6) elderly adults ages 60 and above, of which (6) can be non-ambulatory. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for (2). Facility is a (7) bedroom, one (2) full bathroom, single story house with small front porch with small ramp, stairs on east side of facility, back covered porch with ramp, and attached 2 car garage. The facility is a orange stucco with wood structure and small backyard. Front yard landscape is in good condition. Rear patio is covered. and has table and chairs, washer/dryer area with wash basin. LPA Iniguez and the Administrator toured the physical plant. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. LPA inspected a total of (7) bedrooms and (2) bathrooms. The beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the residents’ personal belongings was observed. The bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were operational. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were in operable condition. The water temperature ranged from 112°F to 116°F, and the room temperature ranged from 76°F to 78°F. The evaluation Report continues on the next page, LIC 809-C, providing further details of the inspection findings. During the visit, LPA Iniguez observed that the facility was clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished. Storage areas for personal hygiene were in place. Cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharp objects were stored in a way that made them inaccessible to residents in care. The kitchen was inspected, and there was sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available, which was adequately maintained. All fire extinguishers were charged and operable. The last Fire/Disaster Drills were conducted on 3/25/24. A review of (3) residents' service files and (2) staff personnel files was maintained in order. LPA reviewed (3) Medication Administration Records (MARs) and found no discrepancies. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. All mandated inspection control posters were displayed throughout the facility. A copy of liability insurance was given to LPA. Facility Annual Fess current. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA did not observe deficiencies; therefore, no citations were issued at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Gregg McEllven/ Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Ocean Breeze Care Home, LLC, licensed since 2023, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County