Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Montoak Senior Living
Mid-size home·Licensed for 12·Lomita, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,000 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,950–$6,600
- Home sizeLicensed for 12Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit9 of 12 beds occupiedJune 20, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
- Last state visitJune 20, 2026CDSS inspection record
Montoak Senior Living is a mid-size care home in Lomita — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 12 residents since 2021.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Montoak Senior Living
Is Montoak Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Montoak Senior Living licensed for?
12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Montoak Senior Living been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Montoak Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Montoak Senior Living cost?
$5,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,950–$6,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Montoak Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Montoak Senior Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South Bay is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Montoak Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Montoak Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “MONTOAK SENIOR LIVING INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #198320119. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Montoak Senior Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 12 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER 12 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAVIER FOR 6.ROOMS 1 AND 2 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $3,950–$6,600
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,000a month
Likely $3,950–$6,750
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,950–$6,600
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,950–$6,750
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,650
- $7,000
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,100.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- St Anthony's Care Home IILomita · 0.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Global Elderly Care FacilityLomita · 0.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sweet Life Senior CareHarbor City · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Great Place Home CareHarbor City · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Michael's ManorHarbor City · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dhaniella's Care HomeHarbor City · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Place Home CareHarbor City · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Southwoods LivingHarbor City · 0.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakhorne ManorHarbor City · 1.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Green Meadows Board and Care 11Harbor City · 1.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ocean Breeze Care Home IILomita · 1.4 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sweet Care ManorTorrance · 1.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brightwater ManorTorrance · 1.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sweet Life CottageTorrance · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Americare Assisted Living of WalteriaTorrance · 1.5 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Luxury Assisted LivingTorrance · 1.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sterling Senior Community VTorrance · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Palos Verdes Care CottageRancho Palos Verdes · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden City Home CareTorrance · 1.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bright Sunlife Guest HomeTorrance · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Senior Manor Care IIITorrance · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Amazing Paradise Home CareCarson · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Paradise Elderly HomeCarson · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Avenida VillaRancho Palos Verdes · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1700 248Th Street, Lomita, CA 90717Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 20, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- June 20, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 9 of 12 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 21, 2023 to June 20, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints4typical 1
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents
Jun 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from developing multiple pressure injuries while in care.
On 06/20/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Regina Cloyd conducted a subsequent complaint investigation to deliver an updated complaint investigation report, which supersedes the report dated 03/26/2026. The purpose of this updated report is to provide additional information; however, the findings remain Unsubstantiated. The investigation consisted of the following: On 03/26/2026 the Department interviewed residents (R1-R4), Staff (S1-S4), and witness (W1), and obtained the following records: Physician report (dated 02/10/2024), Incident Report (dated 08/18/2025), Unison Health Services (dated 08/29/2025 to 11/08/2025), Incident Report (dated 09/06/2025), Oso Home Care (dated 09/06/2025), Needs and Service plan (dated 09/07/2025), First Unlimited Hospice Care (dated 09/16/2025) for R1. Continue to LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding Allegation: “Staff did not prevent residents from developing multiple pressure injuries while in care.” It is alleged that facility staff did not prevent R1 from developing pressure injuries. Record reviews indicate the following: Records indicate that R1 was being provided wound care by wound care providers. Based on the hospital’s clinical findings and documentation (dated 08/01/2023), the wound was determined to be related to cellulitis and not caused by pressure injury. On 08/18/2025 and 09/06/2025 the facilities incident report indicates R1 requires wound care and has been assigned home health care. Unison Health services (dated 08/29/2025 to 11/08/2025) indicate pressure injury ulcers to left heel and sacrum. Oso home Care (dated 09/06/2025 to 12/31/2025) indicates adult failure to thrive, sepsis. Resident R1 has several pressure ulcers, chronic on his heel, sacrum, buttocks. Oso Home Care (dated 09/06/2025) wound therapy 3 times a week diagnosis of adult failure to thrive, sepsis unspecified organism. San Gabriel Valley Medical Center (dated 09/06/2025) diagnosis sepsis, diabetic mellites, schizophrenia, old stroke, wound care, unstageable to left heel, and left lateral foot, dressing every 3 days or PRN if soiled/dislodged, heel protector applies to bilateral heels, old, healed stage 2 to sacrum. First Unlimited Hospice care (09/16/2025) indicates that R1 left leg wound was cleansed with solution. Interviews revealed the following: R1 could not be interviewed due to health issues. R2-R4 deny the allegation. Staff S1 indicates Staff state that S1 staff turn the residents over every 2 hours. S1 stated that the resident had pressure injury on R1 heal and that the staff kept moving the resident. S1 indicates that home health care comes every week and treats the heal wound. S1 indicates that the pressure injuries/wound are almost healed. S1 indicates that R1 do not like to be moved and scream loudly when staff moved R1. S1 indicates that due to dementia that R1 does not like to move. (S2-S4) interviews indicate that R1 had pressure injury to left leg prior to entering the facility. Witness (W1) indicates R1 was last seen by home health on 12/31/2025 and pressure injuries were caused by diabetic issues. R1 could not be interviewed due to health issues. R2-R4 deny the allegation. Based on interviews, observations, and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; "The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.” therefore, the allegation of “Staff did not prevent resident from developing multiple pressure injuries while in care” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator Najim Shaheen (S1).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2026 · control 11-AS-20250919094519
Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 01/16/2026 at 08:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit at the Montoak Senior Living Facility. LPA Calderon was allowed entry into the facility by Administrator Najma Shaheen. Facility is licensed to serve 12 non- ambulatory residents of which four (4) may be bedridden (room #1 and room #2 approved for bedridden) and approved for hospice waiver for six (6). None of the residents are diagnosed with dementia or receiving home health or hospice care services. Currently there are 11 residents in care. LPA Calderon explained to Administrator Najma Shaheen the purpose of the one-year Annual Inspection visit, and escorted LPA Calderon on a tour of the entire inside and outside facility grounds. As part of the inspection, LPA Calderon reviewed: Six (6) client service records, six (6) client medication records, four (4) staff records, and inspected the inside facility and outside grounds. The facilities’ last fire drill was conducted on 01/05/2026. The one-story residential home consists of eight (8) client bedrooms, four (4) client bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, staff room, office area, garage with washer and dryer/ storage area. No weapons are stored on the premises. Kitchen was inspected and observed to be clean and operational. A two-day supply perishable and seven-day supply of non-perishable foods are present in the facility. Emergency Water Storage is in the garage area. LPA Calderon observed that all facility rooms are clean and in good repair. A comfortable temperature was observed, and the facility has central air and heating. LPA Calderon observed the following during inspection of client’s rooms: mattresses are in good condition, adequate lighting present, plenty of dresser/closet space is present, and all bed linens present. All bedrooms contain furniture, lighting fixtures and personal storage space as required, all beds have the required amount of linen and mattress covers, LPA Calderon observed fully stocked closet with bedding, towels, and toiletries supplies. Bathroom fixtures are clean, in good repair, and working properly and contain the required nonskid mats and grab bars. LPA Calderon observed bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulation. Bathroom #1 hot water temperature properly measured at 108 degrees Fahrenheit, and bathroom #2 hot water temperature properly measured at 109 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #3 hot water temperature is properly measured at 108 degrees Fahrenheit, Bathroom # 4, hot water temperature is properly measured at 108 degrees Fahrenheit, Kitchen hot water temperature is properly measured at 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility one (1) Carbon Monoxide and twelve (12) Smoke Detectors, hard-wired and connected, were tested and working properly. The facility two (2) Fire Extinguishers were checked and found to be fully charged and accessible. All exit doors in the facility have alarm systems. All toxins and knives are locked/secured and inaccessible to clients. Medications are centrally stored and in a locked storage cabinet. Facility first aid kit is fully stocked with manual was checked and in order. A working landline phone was operational. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. All Exits/ Walkways around the home were free of debris and hazards. Outside patio accessible to clients. Six (6) client files were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA Calderon reviewed six (6) resident medications, and they were all found to be administered according to doctor's orders. Four (4) staff files were checked, and they have the required documents. LPA Calderon noted the Administrator Najma Shaheen Certification # 7013300740 expiration date of 04/12/2027 was valid at time of visit. The facility does NOT handle clients’ money/cash resources, and a NO Surety bond is needed. Commercial General Liability Policy #01002931911 policy period from 04/03/2025 to 04/03/2026 underwritten by Kinsale Insurance Company, coverage 1,000,000/3,000,000 is valid at time of inspection. All the required documents are posted in the facility in a clearly visible area. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA Calderon did not observe any deficiencies therefore no citations were issued at this time. Annual Licensing Fee is CURRENT. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Administrator Najma Shaheen.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026
Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/05/2024 at 11:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zina Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the above facility. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the one- year inspection. LPA met with Najma Shaheen, Administrator and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Facility is licensed to serve 12 non- ambulatory residents of which four (4) may be bedriddden (room #1 and room #2 approved for bedridden) and approved for hospice waiver for six (6). None of the residents are diagnosed with dementia or receiving home health or hospice care services. The facility does not handle any of the residents’ money. The facility fees are at a balance of $0. Liability Insurance is current with Kinsale Insurance Company (Policy #0100293191-0) effective 04/03/2024-04/03/2025 for $1,000,000 each occurrence /$3,000,000 policy aggregate limit. The last fire drill was conducted on 12/01/2024. The home is a single story home consisting of: (8) resident bedrooms, (4) full bathroom, a living room, a dining area, a kitchen with two refrigerators, an outside patio area, laundry room outside with an additional refrigerator. At 11:49 AM LPA toured the resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place, water temperature measured a 111.5 F, 107.9 F, and 113.4F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. A review of (10) residents service files, (9) staff personnel files and (12 Medication Administration Records (MAR) and did observe discrepancies at the time of visit. Report continues on LIC 809-C Kitchen was checked and observed to be within Title 22 regulations. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked. All cleaning solutions, hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors were working properly, and fire extinguisher was fully charged. Carbon monoxide detector was operational. First Aid kit was available. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8); LPA observed the following deficiencies: On 12/05/2024 at 11:49 am while LPA was conducting a tour of the physical plant, LPA reviewed and observed: padlock on exterior gate 10 out of 12 residents medication was not listed on the MAR, empty and or not check off by staff on consecutive days. LPA conducted a file review of the 6 out of 12 client files and did not observe an Needs and Services Plan within 30 days after admission date. An exit interview was conducted with Najma Shaheen, Administrator, and a copy of Report and Appeal Rights provided. Note: *Citations not cleared by the due date will be a $100 fine assessed for each citation until it is cleared. Civil penalties will continue to accrue until Proof of Corrections (POC) are cleared.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024
Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication Staff failed to meet resident's needs Resident was financially abused while in care Staff failed to provide adequate transportation for resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced complaint visit on Wednesday, February 14, 2024. Upon arrival at the facility. LPA Bunker called the facility via telephone and conducted a Risk Assessment. Based on the assessment, the facility is cleared of COVID-19 infection. LPA Bunker met with Licensee/Administrator Najma Shaheen. LPA Bunker explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the investigation. LPA Bunker interviewed staff 1-2 (S1-S2) and residents 2-6 (R2-R6). R1 is no longer residing at the facility. LPA Bunker asked questions relevant to the nature of the complaint. We observed and reviewed resident records, medications, MARs, and documents for accuracy. LPA Bunker requested copies of supporting documents. Administrator Najma Shaheen provided LPA Bunker with copies. See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Unsubstantiated Continued LIC9099-C page 2 Allegation #1: Staff mismanaged resident's medication. Upon investigation, both staff members (S1-S2) and residents (R2-R6) have reported comprehensive adherence to medication management protocols. It is asserted that all medications are dispensed strictly in accordance with physician orders. Furthermore, S1-S2 has confirmed that Resident 1 (R1) received her medication as prescribed. The facility ensures all medications are appropriately labeled, and securely stored in a locked cabinet within the office area, thus inaccessible to residents without proper authorization. Notably, there is no documentation from a physician suggesting R1 is authorized to self-manage her medication. Based on these observations, both staff and residents (S1-S2 and R2-R6) refute the allegation of medication mismanagement. Allegation #2: Staff failed to meet resident's needs. Regarding Allegation #2, which posits that staff failed to meet the resident's needs, a thorough investigation has been conducted. According to statements from staff members S1-S2 and residents R2-R6, it has been consistently reported that the resident's daily care needs are being met satisfactorily. These parties have confirmed that the staff is providing adequate care and supervision, highlighting the staff's competence and specialized training to fulfill the necessary services for residents. Furthermore, it was mentioned that staff members undergo ongoing training to maintain high standards of care. It has been noted by S1 that prior to the resident's admission to the facility, the individual was briefly in hospice care. The decision to discontinue hospice services was made by the hospice provider, indicating that the resident no longer required such care. It was also observed that the resident, who has access to a walker, is capable of ambulation without it and was not dependent on oxygen gas, despite being a heavy smoker. This detail is pertinent as, typically, hospice care provides oxygen support when necessary, which would be retracted once a resident exits hospice care. S1 has emphasized that the resident's needs and the services provided are clearly outlined in their admission agreement. The staff's adherence to Title 22 Regulations, along with facility policies and procedures, ensures that care standards are consistently met. See continued LIC9099-C page 3 Continued LIC9099-C page 3 Based on the evidence and statements provided, S1-S2 and R2-R6 have collectively refuted Allegation #2, asserting that the staff has not failed to meet the resident's needs. Allegation #3: Resident was financially abused while in care. In response to this, allegation interviews were conducted with both staff members (S1-S2) and residents 2-6 (R2-R6). The collective feedback from these interviews unanimously indicated residents are not financially abused while in care. S1-S2 and R2-R6 stated residents handle their owed debit cards and funds and staff do not handle resident's debit cards. S1-S2 stated staff did not make any online purchases from a resident's debit card. (R2-R6) expressed their satisfaction with living at the facility, highlighting the respect, dignity, and quality of care they receive. They also commended the facility for providing a secure, healthful, and comfortable living environment and they were happy. S1-S2 refuted the allegation, reinforcing the commitment to safety and well-being upheld at the facility. Allegation #4: Staff failed to provide adequate transportation for residents. In response to concerns about transportation, it has been clarified by S1-S2 and R2-R6 that the facility offers complimentary transportation services for residents requiring assistance. Access to transportation encompasses family support and arrangements made by the Licensee/Administrator to ensure residents' mobility needs are addressed. S1 has taken responsibility for escorting R1 to medical appointments, shopping, and other activities. This concerted effort by staff and the administration to provide comprehensive transportation solutions is affirmed by S1-S2 and R2-R6, thereby refuting the allegation of inadequate transportation provision. Investigation revealed the following: Interviews conducted with staff members S1-S2 and residents R2-R6 have consistently demonstrated that there is no mismanagement of residents' medication by the staff. It has been affirmed across the board that the daily needs of the residents are being adequately met by the staff. S1-S2 and R2-R6 stated that there have been no instances of financial abuse of any residents by the staff members or another resident. See continued LIC9099-C page 4 Continued LIC9099-C page 4 In terms of transportation, it was highlighted that the facility provides complimentary transportation services to residents in need. This ensures that all residents have access to necessary external appointments or engagements, irrespective of their personal transportation arrangements. Residents R2-R6 confirmed their access to this service, noting that family members and representatives also contribute to their transportation needs when required. During the comprehensive interviews with both staff members S1-S2 and residents R2-R6, all allegations regarding medication mismanagement, neglect of residents' daily needs, financial abuse, and inadequate transportation services have been categorically denied. Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099, and LIC9099-C, was provided to Licensee/Administrator Najma Shaheen. There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024 · control 11-AS-20230726080640
Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Annual/Random
On 1/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Najma Shasheen/Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (12) non-ambulatory residents ages 60 and above. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for (6) patients. (4) may be bedridden. Rooms #1 and #2 approved for bedridden. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of the following: (8) resident's rooms, (4) common bathrooms, a living area, a dining area, a kitchen, and an outside patio area. LPA Iniguez toured the physical plant with administrator. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. A total of (5) rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were operational. LPA inspected the carbon monoxide detectors combo were in operable conditions. The water temperature properly measured between (105°-120°F): Kitchen 111.7°F, Bathroom #1:108.7°F, Bathroom #2:109.4°F, and Bathroom #3:108.4°F Evaluation Report Continues LIC 809-C LPA Iniguez observed the facility to be clean sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. All fire extinguishers were charged and were operable. A review of (4) residents' service files, (4) staff personnel files and (4) Medication Administration Records (MAR) and did not observe any discrepancies at the time of visit. First AID kit was checked. Last fire disaster drill was on: 12/4/2023 LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. A copy of the liability insurance was provided to LPA during visit. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA did not observe deficiencies therefore no citations were issued at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Najma Shasheen /Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024
Jan 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incident to licensing. Staff inappropriately touched resident while in care.
On 1/12/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted a subsequent complaint visit at this facility to deliver the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with the Licensee/Administrator Najma Shaheen, who assisted with the visit. The purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 3/30/2022, LPA Don Senaja conducted a 10-day initial complaint visit. LPA interviewed Administrator, Staff and Residents. LPA obtained copies of Staff Roster (LIC 500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents (LIC 9020), Resident’s Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal & Needs Services Plan, Medication Administration Records (MAR) and a Copy of SRI dated on 2/8/2022. Report continued in LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation: Staff did not report incident to licensing. The details of the complaint alleged that facility staff did not report an incident to licensing. During records review, LPA Iniguez observed Special Incident Report (SRI) regarding (R#1) event dated on 2/8/2022. A copy if the SRI was provided to LPA Iniguez during this visit. During an Interview with Administrator (A#1), she stated that she did report to CCLD the incident through an SRI. Allegation: Staff inappropriately touched resident while in care. The details of the complaint alleged that facility staff inappropriately touched a resident while in care. During an Interview with Administrator (A#1), she stated that (R#1) told her that they were touched inappropriately by (S#1) approximately one month ago on 3/30/2022. (A#1) told (R#1) that they would be assisted by (S#2). In addition, (A#1) stated that it needed (2) staff to assist (R#1) with her ADLs, (R#1) was always assisted by (2) staff members, (R#1) was never alone with (1) staff. During an Interview with Staff (S#1-S#2), (2) out of (2) stated that they have never touched a resident inappropriately, and they have never touched a resident in their private areas. Also, (2) out of (2) stated that they had never seen another staff inappropriately handling the residents. Report continued in LIC 9099C During interviews with Residents (R#1-R#9), (6) out of (9) stated that no staff had ever inappropriately touched them. (2) out of (9) were sleeping during the time of the visit. During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s). Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Najma Shaheen /Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024 · control 11-AS-20220328160608
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Sunshine Home Care II
Lomita · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Divine Life Guest Home
Lomita · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$5,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
St Anthony's Care Home II
Lomita · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Montoak Two
Lomita · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Assisted livingMontoak One
Lomita · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Assisted livingSunshine Board and Care
Lomita · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate