Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach

Small home·Licensed for 6·Huntington Beach, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #306005884Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,250 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 26, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJune 12, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderWellspring Senior Home Care Inc.Since 2021 · 2 licensed homes

Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach is a small care home in Huntington Beach — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach

Is Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach cost?

$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 13 other homes of a similar licensed size in Huntington Beach that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,800 (n = 13 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Wellspring Senior Home Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Wellspring Senior Home Care Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Huntington Beach Hospital is 0.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Luxury Living Senior Care Huntington Beach license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LUXURY LIVING SENIOR CARE HUNTINGTON BEACH”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306005884. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Wellspring Senior Home Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,250a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,200

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,250a month

Likely $3,450–$5,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,450–$5,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
$4,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,550
$6,250
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$6,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7261 Sunbreeze Dr., Huntington Beach, CA 92647Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 12, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
June 12, 2026
Occupied · March 26, 2026 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 20, 2025 to June 12, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020252202022110

The last 36 months — 5 of 6 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator failed to keep the facility free of an insect infestation.

On June 12, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hiratsuka, contacted the facility via phone and email to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 10/04/2022. The time frame of the allegations is prior to the complaint received by the department Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation, the Department is unable to determine the validity of the allegations listed above. Therefore, the allegations above are unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2026 · control 22-AS-20221004165353
Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide written notification of rate increase to responsible party.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Garlli Tat made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings on the above allegation. LPA met with staff on duty and explained the purpose of the visit. Staff on duty contacted administrator regarding the visit. Administrator provided verbal consent that staff can sign the report on his behalf. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, obtained and reviewed resident records including the rate increase letter and admission agreement. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide written notification of rate increase to the party responsible, the investigation revealed the following: Administrator provided a written notice of rate change to Resident 1's (R1) responsible party on December 9, 2025 after receiving notification from Community Care Licensing of the SSI rate change. Administrator included the PIN-15-19-CCLD, explanation of increase, the rate of increase and the date it would be in effect via text message. Responsible party verified they viewed the text message on December 9, 2025. Continued on LIC9099-C. Unfounded The 90-day notice does not apply because R1 participates in the ALW program. The notification from Community Care Licensing regarding rate change was sent out on December 8, 2025, to all residential care providers. Page 5 of the Admission Agreement states, “if the facility rate changes to reflect a government fund increase, written notice from the licensee if required as soon as the facility is notified of the increase and the rate shall not take effect until the operative date of the government fund increase”. Administrator submitted a written notice a day after notification of the increase was received. Based on the information above, the Department concluded that the allegation is Unfounded. A finding that an allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260223132915
Feb 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea conducted an unannounced visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by caregiver staff and explained the reason for the visit. Licensee (LE) Ban Nguyen is currently out of the country, but LPA was able to communicate with him via text message. LE Nguyen would stand by for assistance if needed. The facility is licensed for six non-ambulatory residents with a hospice waiver for five. Currently there are six residents, of which none are on hospice during today's visit. LPA Tea reviewed six resident files and two staff files. There were discrepancies with resident files. Some resident files are missing forms and need updated physician’s reports. The facility is up to date with required quarterly emergency disaster drills, which were last conducted in February 11, 2026. The administrator certificate expires October 17, 2026. LPA Tea along with staff toured the facility. LPA toured the physical plant, checked the food service, and the first aid kit. The facility is a two-story home, the first floor consists of five resident bedrooms, two bathrooms, a living room, family den, dining area, kitchen and attached garage. The second floor is a private resident area; no care residents reside on the second floor. Private residents are background cleared. LPA observed smoke detectors/carbon monoxide in common areas and bedrooms are operational. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and showers were free of mold/mildew. The water temperature measured between 116.9 to 118.9 Fahrenheit degrees. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of (Annual continuation on LIC809-C) visit. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. First aid kit had all the required elements including bandages, tweezers, thermometer, and scissors. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at the time of visit. LPA observed sharps locked and inaccessible to residents in a kitchen drawer. LPA also observed toxin substances secured underneath the kitchen sink and in cabinets in the garage. There were toxins placed underneath the bathroom sinks that were locked, but LPA felt the locks in place were not stable and suggested staff transfer toxins to the cabinet in the garage. The fire extinguisher in the dining area is fully charged. Kitchen appliances are operational during today's visit. LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample seating underneath a shaded patio area in the backyard. There are two exit gates that are self-latching and operational on both sides of the house. LPA observed PPE supplies, emergency food and water stored in the garage. Facility provides activities based on resident personal choice and health condition. Residents like to play bingo and color. At the time of the visit, LPA observed residents lounging in the living room watching television and having lunch. LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked cabinets in the kitchen. Medications are being administered per physician order. LPA notice medication was incorrectly recorded for administration on the MAR record. LPA advised facility to be more diligent with MAR records and properly document dosages given. LPA interviewed residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. The following deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was reviewed with the facility and a copy of this report LIC809, 809-C, LIC858, LIC859, LIC809D and Appeal Rights were read and provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following the proper protocol for COVID-19. Resident on Hospice transported via non-medical transportation.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced subsequent visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Jayvee Angeles and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (Admin) Ban Nguyen was also advised of the visit by telephone at 8:45am today and gave verbal consent authorizing staff to sign said report. On October 7, 2022, the Department received the complaint, and the investigation was initiated by LPA Andrea Mendivil on October 13, 2022 with a subsequent visit conducted by LPA Jenifer Tirre on November 18, 2022. During the course of the investigation, a facility tour and two staff interviews were conducted, and copies of facility records were obtained: Resident Roster, Face Sheet, Phsyician's Reports, Preplacement Appraisal, Needs and Services Plan, Admission Agreement, text messages, and hospice records for Resident #1 (R1). The investigation is as follows: Regarding the allegation, facility is not following the proper protocol for COVID-19, it is alleged that the facility was not enforcing masks for the visitors. Unsubstantiated On today's date, LPA Cho observed masking and Coronavirus (COVID-19) signs posted on the front door with masks and hand sanitizers provided in the entry way. LPA Cho was greeted by staff wearing a mask. LPA reviewed the resident roster dated September 15, 2025, and the residents currently registered to the facility were not present at the time when the complaint was received. LPA interviewed two staff both denying the allegation indicating that COVID-19 protocol and visitation policy was strictly enforced including masking, and confirmed masks were worn properly by all visitors, staff, and residents. Regarding the allegation, resident on hospice transported via non-medical transportation, it is alleged that the transfer in the vehicle caused R1 to decline. R1 was admitted to the facility on August 1, 2021 per the face sheet. Hospice agreement confirms R1 was admitted to hospice on February 25, 2022 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Per the Department's COVID-19 records, the census was five on October 6, 2022. Four out of five residents and two out of two staff tested positive on September 30, 2022. Because R1's roommate and all the other residents tested positive with COVID-19, R1's representative had agreed to move R1 to an alternative location and responded with a "Thank you!!" which was communicated via text on September 30, 2022 at 3:30pm. Based on the review of the admission agreement signed by R1's representative, the option for facility to provide transportation was declined. According to the admission agreement, facility is responsible to "plan and arrange" transportation which is covered under Basic Services. For non-emergency transportation, Transportation Policy indicates that "if a resident requires unscheduled non-emergency medical transportation, the facility will arrange for a taxi or other transport service to transport the resident." In R1's situation, Admin had indicated that R1 was transported by the facility vehicle due to 911 emergency not providing non-emergency medical transport and R1's family not taking action to provide transport even though it was declined on the agreement. Admin stated that the facility vehicle (van) which had access to a ramp, transferred resident safely. Based on the review of hospice records, there was no evidence that the facility vehicle transfer was related to, or resulted in R1's decline. Therefore, based on observation, interviews, and record review, the allegations, facility is not following the proper protocol for COVID-19 and resident on hospice transported via non-medical transportation are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted by telephone with Ban Nguyen and Caregiver Jayvee Angeles, and a copy of this report was provided at exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20221007135859
Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nancy Guillen made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a required annual Inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by caregiver Agafe Lorzano after explaining the purpose of the visit. Administrator was notified via telephone, but was unable to attend. LPA observed the Administrator certificate expired November 28,2024; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. This is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed to six non-ambulatory residents with a hospice waiver for five. The facility is a two story home. The first floor is made up of five resident bedrooms, two bathrooms, and an attached garage. The second floor contains 3 rooms and a bathroom that are not for resident use. During the inspection, LPA and caregiver Agafe conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, garage and observed the following: LPA observed residents watching television and resting in their respective bedrooms. LPA observed six residents in care and three staff present. LPA observed the See Something Say Something Poster (PUB 475) mounted on the wall by the entrance. All resident bedrooms had the required furnishings, however toxins were observed in a residents room; a deficiency is being cited on today’s date. LPA observed all resident beds had linens and blankets with additional linens stored in the hallway closet. LPA observed bathrooms were clean and equipped with grab bars and non skid floor mats. LPA observed all windows were appropriately screened. Bathrooms were observed to be free of debris and mildew, faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature tested between 108.5 and 112 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA toured the outside of the facility and observed outdoor emergency exit was obstructed; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. LPA observed the backyard had a shaded sitting area with furniture for resident use. LIC809C LPA observed the facility had a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food as required by regulations. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors tested operational. Fire extinguisher was observed to fully charged and operational. Gas stove, microwave, washer, and dryer were all inspected and observed to be operable. Toxic chemicals, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants were observed to be locked in the garage and inaccessible to residents. While touring the garage LPA observed a section of the garage to be used as a bedroom; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Medication cabinet was observed to be locked and centrally stored in the kitchen area. LPA observed the First Aid Kit had all the required components. LPA began review of the records. LPA Guillen reviewed six resident records. All the required documentation were present and current in the residents’ files reviewed. LPA reviewed three employee records. All employee’s present have a criminal record clearance and were associated to the facility. LPA observed records reviewed have a current First Aid certificate, however no trainings were documented. Per staff interview, no yearly training have been conducted; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Wellspring Senior Home Care Inc., licensed since 2021, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extraReported no

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County