Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Loving Hands Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Rodeo, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #79200827
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedApril 23, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitFebruary 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Loving Hands Care Home is a small care home in Rodeo — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Loving Hands Care Home

Is Loving Hands Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Loving Hands Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Loving Hands Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Loving Hands Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Loving Hands Care Home cost?

$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,250–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Loving Hands Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Loving Hands Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Loving Hands Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Loving Hands Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LOVING HANDS CARE HOME LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79200827. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Loving Hands Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,200a month to start

Likely $4,250–$6,400

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,200a month

Likely $4,250–$6,550

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,250–$6,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,250–$6,550
$5,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,950–$9,650
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 748 Vaqueros Ave, Rodeo, CA 94572Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 3, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
February 3, 2026
Occupied · April 23, 2025 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 27, 2021 to April 23, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025440202422020232202021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 2/03/2026 at 2:15pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler conducted an unannounced annual required inspection. LPA met with Caregiver, Elizabeth Napolitano, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, garage, and back yard. The facility consists of four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms. All indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water. A comfortable temperature for clients is maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the clients. Hot water temperature in the shared clients’ bathroom was measured at 95.4 degrees Fahrenheit. All toilets, hand washing, and bathing are safe, sanitary. Hand washing poster and soap observed at all hand washing stations. The supply of extra hygiene was available for residents. There is a minimum of 7-day non-perishables and 2-day perishables foods. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher were not tagged. Fire drill last conducted 01/08/2026. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Continued on LIC809C. Three (3) staff records were reviewed, all complete. All three (3) residents records were reviewed and all 3 were incomplete. Deficiencies observed by LPA during record review: At 2:58PM LPA observed water temperature was 95.4. At 3:00PM LPA observed 2 metal poles with wire sticking out of the ground located in the backyard. At 3:15PM LPA observed Resident files are not complete. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. The following forms to be updated and submitted to CCLD by 2/13/2026: LIC610D Emergency disaster plan (last page) LIC500 (Personnel Record) LIC308 (Designation of facility Responsibility) Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC-809 & 809C, LIC-809D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Apr 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that resident receives their mail while in care.

On 04/23/2025 at 09:23am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carol Fowler arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. LPA met with Edelyn Tupas Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Allegation: Staff are not ensuring that resident receives their mail while in care. Investigation Finding: unsubstantiated. During the investigation LPA interviewed staff, conservator and resident. LPA obtained and reviewed physician report, appraisal needs and service plan,letter of conservatorship, and email from conservator. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Continue from LIC 9099 During an interview with resident R1 it revealed that R1 stated R1 did not receive a birthday card from a church that mailed R1 a birthday card last year. R1 thinks that the staff is withholding R1s mail. R1 stated that the birthday card is the only mail that R1 is missing. R1 stated that R1 knows that the church mailed R1 a card because they did so last year. Interview with W2 revealed that in the (very rare) event that R1 receives mail at Loving Hands facility, the facility calls W2 and W2 will go there in person to inspect and likely pick up the mail, If the mail is personal (including notices from the court), W2 would give the mail directly to R1. Interview with S1 revealed that R1 has a conservator that handles all of R1s mail, if mail is received at the facility S1 will contact the conservator and the conservator will come to the facility and inspect the mail and provide R1 with the mail unless it’s a bill or something the conservator needs to take care of. Interview with S2 reveals that when mail is received at the facility it is given directly to the resident it is addressed to. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250409154540
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly feeding a resident Staff are interfering with a resident's visitations

On 04/15/2025 at 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carol Fowler arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. LPA met with Edelyn Tupas, Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation LPA interviewed staff, conservator and resident. LPA obtained and reviewed physician report, appraisal needs and service plan, facility menus, photos of meals and snacks, text messages requesting food items from R1 to S1, email from conservator and visitor policy. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Continue from LIC 9099 Allegation: Staff are not properly feeding a resident Investigation Finding: unsubstantiated. During interviews with resident R1 revealed R1 is not satisfied with the food the facility is serving, R1 stated that the facility is serving 1 slice of bread for lunch, sometimes Pilipino food and crackers, R1 stated the facility provided R1 with popcorn once and it tasted stale. R1 stated R1 has been eating trail mix, popcorn, licorice and chips, R1 stated the facility gave R1 hot peppers one time. R1 also stated that R1 is starving. Interview with S1 revealed that R1 has a conservator which will explain that R1 constantly complains about R1 care and food at the facility. S1 stated that the facility is serving American nutritious meals and S1 will go out and buy the food items and snacks requested by R1. S1 also stated that R1 likes to sleep until afternoon and wishes to have breakfast, lunch and dinner all at the same time. S1 stated R1 is eating all meals and snacks daily. S1 stated S1 takes photos of meals served and eaten by R1. Interview with W2 revealed that R1 has complained constantly about R1’s care at the facility and that R1 has called the public defender, APS, Legal Assistance for Seniors and multiple other agencies. W2 stated R1 claims are R1 is being starved, being poisoned and having funds and belongings stolen and various other abuses, W2 states that R1’s claims have never been substantiated. W2 also stated that caregivers have overlooked R1’s racial and fat-shaming slurs. W2 states R1’s actions are due to diagnosis. LPA was presented with photos of R1’s snacks, meals, texted food requests and facility menu. LPA did not observe any food being locked or inaccessible to residents. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED Continue on LIC 9099C(2) Continue from LIC 9099C Allegation: Staff are interfering with a resident's visitations Investigation Finding: unsubstantiated. During the investigation LPA interviewed staff, conservator and resident. Interview with S1 revealed that visiting hours at the facility is 10:00am to 3:00pm. S1 stated that R1 was a part of the homeless population for over 10 years and R1’s friends are from the homeless population they are welcomed to visit and follow the facility policies, but they bring R1 over the counter drugs. During COVID a friend would not follow COVID guidelines being vaccinated or tested and R1 is not vaccinated. R1 has only a few visitors and a few visitors have restraining orders and are turned away. Interview with W2 revealed that R1 has been homeless for decades and most of R1’s friends can’t make the trip to visit R1 in Rodeo. There are also some friends of R1’s that have restraining orders and are not allowed to visit the facility. W2 stated that R1 has two phones to reach out to friends. W2 stated that R1 has an attorney, and the attorney is well aware of R1’s history and background. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 15-AS-20241126100312
Mar 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Staff do not ensure that resident(s) are provided food that is of quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the resident(s). Staff are not providing documentation regarding resident to their Responsible Party as necessary.

On 3/6/2025 at 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced deliver finding for the complaint investigation in regard to the allegation above. LPA K. Nguyen was greeted by the door by Edelyn Tupasp, caretaker. LPA K. Nguyen spoke with Cecelia San Diego-Tomas, Administrator (ADM) over the phone, and explained the purpose of the visit. ADM was not available to come to the facility and gave permission to Edelyn to sign the report. Allegation: Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed- Unsubstantiated During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 3 staff and 5 residents. LPA observed 1 resident in the living room and 2 residents in their bedroom. LPA received and reviewed the following documents: communication logs between RP and S1, MAR for 5 residents, staff roster with contact numbers, physician's report, care plan, MAR, emergency information, facility progress notes for R1, R2, and R3. Report continue on LIC 9099c… Unsubstantiated RP stated that R1 was not given medication as prescribed. Based on interviews and information obtained from the MAR (medication administration record) shows that R1 received medications as prescribed, the MAR is signed by staff at the time medication is given. Allegation: Staff do not ensure that resident(s) are provided food that is of quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the resident(s) – Unsubstantiated During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 3 staff and 5 residents. LPA observed residents are having lunch. LPA interviewed 5 residents, 5 out of 5 stated that they have no complaints on the quality of their food. LPA reviewed 5 residents files and 5 out of 5 do not have any restricted diet on files. Allegation: Staff are not providing documentation regarding resident to their Responsible Party as necessary – Unsubstantiated During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 3 staff, 3 out of 3 stated RP have not request any documents from them. S1 stated “I communicate with RP almost daily and have not received any files requested from RP via text, mail, or verbal. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conduct and a copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025 · control 15-AS-20230807122525
Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 1/14/2025 at 12:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler conducted an unannounced annual required inspection. LPA met with Caregiver, Edelyn Tupas, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, garage, and back yard. The facility consists of four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms. All indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water. A comfortable temperature for clients is maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the clients. Hot water temperature in the shared clients’ bathroom was measured at 135 degrees Fahrenheit. All toilets, hand washing, and bathing are safe, sanitary. Hand washing poster and soap observed at all hand washing stations. The supply of extra hygiene was available for residents. There is a minimum of 7-day non-perishables and 2-day perishables foods. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher were not tagged. Fire drill last conducted 12/09/2024. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809. Three (3) staff records were reviewed, one was complete and two (2) were incomplete. All three (3) clients' records were reviewed and 1 was complete and 2 incomplete. Deficiencies observed by LPA during record review: At 1:04PM LPA observed shower faucet was leaking. At 1:09PM LPA observed the water temperature is 135 degrees F. At 1:29PM LPA observed screen door and screen on side yard window is tore. At 1:35PM LPA observed Administrator Certificate is expired. At 1:40PM LPA observed Fire Extinguisher has no tag or receipt taped to cylinder. At 1:55PM LPA observed Staff and Resident files are not complete. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. The following forms to be updated and submitted to CCLD by 1/30/2024: LIC610D Emergency disaster plan (last page) LIC500 (Personnel Record) LIC308 (Designation of facility Responsibility) Administrator current Certificate. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC-809 & 809C, LIC-809D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to staff..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 12/6/24 at 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler arrived unannounced to open a 10-day initial complaint on an unrelated matter and conducted a case management. LPA met with Ester Ramos, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. At 9:55AM, LPA observed S1 was working at the facility and not have done fingerprint clearance. LPA verified that S1 was not fingerprint cleared. LPA was informed that S1 has been working for 2 days. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Civil penalty of $200 is being assess. Exit interview conducted with Cecilia San Diego-Tomas. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2024

All individuals subject to a criminal record review.... shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) ...the Department. Criminal Record Clearance. Prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility, all individuals subject to ...transfer of a ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to ensure all staff had a criminal record clearance. LPA observed S1 did not have a criminal record clearance, which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator will submit evidence that S1 will not work until criminal record clearance is obtained, proof of criminal record clearance and agree to have all future employee obtain criminal record clearance prior to working at facility and submit to CCL by POC date. A civil penalty of $200 is being assessed today.

Jan 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 1/05/2024 at 9:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Princess Nido, Caregiver, and explained the purpose of the visit. Cecilia San Diego-Tomas, Administrator arrived at 10:45am. The Administrator currently holds a certificate (#6048434740) that expires on 06/28/2024. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for four (4) non-ambulatory and four (4) bedridden residents. LPA toured the facility with Caregiver Princess Nido including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, garage and backyard. The facility consists of four (4) total bedrooms, and three (3) bathrooms. No bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 74.8 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 105.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. New Fire extinguisher will be purchased on 01/06/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 1/15/2023. First aid kit was observed to be complete. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and three (3) staff files which were found to be incomplete. Administrator had electronic copies of documents and will update resident and staff files. Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809. LPA observed the following deficiencies: · At 10:21am, LPA observed 2 ladders, buckets, bedframes, concrete mix, paint, shovels, wood pallets, wood boards with nails, hoyer lyft, large umbrella frame located in the backyard. LPA requested the following documents to be submitted to CCLD by 1/12/2024. · Resident Roster · LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility · LIC 309 Administrative Organization · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (9 pages) · Liability Insurance The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report along with appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County