Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Lotus Homes Assisted Living I

Small home·Licensed for 6·Patterson, California

LicensedLicence #502701579
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit2 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 18, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 13, 2026CDSS inspection record

Lotus Homes Assisted Living I is a small care home in Patterson — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Lotus Homes Assisted Living I

Is Lotus Homes Assisted Living I licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Lotus Homes Assisted Living I licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Lotus Homes Assisted Living I been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is Lotus Homes Assisted Living I still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Lotus Homes Assisted Living I cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 21 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size across Stanislaus County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,900 to $4,950 a month, and the middle figure is $3,400 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Lotus Homes Assisted Living I take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Lotus Homes LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Lotus Homes Assisted Living I keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Lotus Homes Assisted Living I license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LOTUS HOMES ASSISTED LIVING I”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
  • License #502701579. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Lotus Homes LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
  • 5 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM 4 ONLY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,050

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 21 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 21 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 21 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1113 Van Gogh Lane, Patterson, CA 95363Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2025, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 30, 2026.

On file since
2025
State visits
5
Most recent visit
August 13, 2026
Occupied · February 18, 2026 visit
2 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated February 18, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025220

The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Unannounced Annual visit made out to this facility on 07/30/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility staff person, Giselle Haroornelas, who was briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that she go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator to inform her that CCL was present at this time. The facility designated Administrator, Olivia Perez, arrived later to this facility while this LPA was conducting this annual visit. Current census was 3 residents. It was learned that there were (2) residents under the care of hospice at this time. It was learned that this facility does have an approved hospice waiver to be able to accept and retain up to (6) hospice residents at any given time. It was learned that there weren't any residents deemed to have the diagnosis of dementia at this time. It was learned that this facility does have a dementia program on file at this time. It was learned that there weren't any residents receiving services through home health at this time. It was learned that there weren't any residents deemed to be bedridden at this time. This facility does have an approved bedridden fire clearance to be able to accept and retain up to (1) resident at this time. Tour of the facility was conducted. A tour of the living area, dining area, and all other areas intended for resident use was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Kitchen area was toured. Cabinets and drawers were reviewed at this time. Drawers storing knives and sharps were reviewed to make sure that they were locked and made inaccessible to the residents at all times. Cabinets storing detergent and all cleaning supplies were reviewed to make sure that they were locked and made inaccessible to the residents at all times. Facility restrooms were toured. Grab bars and non skid mats were observed to be present and in good working order at this time. Hot water temperatures were taken to make sure that the hot water being dispensed was within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees at all times. A review of the facility medications for the residents was conducted. It was learned that all of the resident medications were centrally stored. First aid kit, located in the facility medication closet located in the hallway, was reviewed. It was observed that it did contain all of the required components and was in compliance at this time. A review of the facility food supply was conducted. A tour of the facility pantry was conducted to make sure that there was a sufficient supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day non perishable food quantities on hand at all times. It was learned that there was an additional refrigerator being used in the garage area. Tour of the garage area was conducted. It was observed that this space was being used to store household items and personal items for the residents in care at this time. Laundry area was toured. It was observed that the door leading into the laundry area did have the ability to be locked at this time. This door was reviewed to make sure that it was locked to be able to store detergents and bleach so that they were inaccessible to the residents at all times. A tour of the facility resident bedrooms was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be present and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Linen closet, located in the facility hallway, was reviewed. Administrator certificate for Olivia Perez was observed to be present with certification #6071401740 set to expire on 07/10/2026. A tour of the facility exterior grounds was conducted. A review of the facility perimeter fence, side gate, and all other exits was conducted. A review of (3) facility resident files was conducted and noted on the following LIC 858. A review of (3) facility staff files was conducted and noted on the following LIC 859. The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal rights were printed and a copy was given to the facility designated Administrator at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2026
Jul 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Unannounced Post Licensing visit made out to this facility on 07/30/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility staff person, Giselle Haroornelas, who was briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that the facility staff person go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator, Olivia Perez, to inform her that CCL was present at this time. The facility designated Administrator, Olivia Perez, arrived later to this facility while this LPA was conducting this visit. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 3 residents, of which (1) resident was out of the facility at the hospital, at this time. It was learned that this facility is licensed to able to accept and retain up to (6) non ambulatory residents at any given time. Tour of the facility was conducted. This Post Licensing visit was conducted in conjunction with the Annual visit as well. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2026
Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that resident's incontinence needs are met Licensee confines resident to bed Licensee confines resident to wheelchair Licensee yelled at resident Licensee pushed resident Licensee does not distribute resident's medications as prescribed Licensee does not provide resident with adequate supervision, resulting in multiple falls Licensee does not maintain a centrally stored medication log for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Lund met with the Administrator Olivia Perez and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 2 Licensee does not ensure that resident's incontinence needs are met - LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, Reporting Party, Resident (R1), witness. LPA Lund reviewed LIC 602A dated 10/17/2025 for Resident (R1) which states that R1 has bladder and bowl impartment. LPA Lund also reviewed R1 facility notes when R1 has bowl movements from 11/1/2025 through 2/15/2026. LPA Lund interviewed Administrator Olivia Perez who stated that R1 is the only resident in care at the time of complaint being opened and either herself or staff would constantly check on R1 and change R1 when R1 uses the bathroom. LPA Lund interviewed R1 who stated that R1 get changed when R1 uses the bathroom. LPA Lund interviewed witness who stated that when she visits R1 everyday R1’s incontinence needs are being met. Unsubstantiated Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, R1, Reporting Party and witness on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee does not ensure that resident's incontinence needs are met, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee confines resident to bed- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, Reporting Party, Resident (R1), and witness. LPA Lund reviewed LIC 602A dated 10/17/2025 for R1 which states R1 is non- ambulatory. LPA Lund interviewed staff who stated that R1 does need guidance but can get up out of bed and wheelchair. LPA Lund interviewed R1 who stated that R1 can get up to R1 wheelchair or walk to a chair but can’t walk that far. LPA Lund interviewed witness who is there every day stated that staff help R1 out of bed but never confine to just the bed or wheelchair. R1 goes outside when it is nice or in the living room to watch TV. Based on reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, Reporting Party, R1 and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee confines resident to bed, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee confines resident to wheelchair- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, Reporting Party, Resident (R1) in care and witness. LPA Lund reviewed LIC 602A dated 10/17/2025 for (R1) which states R1 is non- ambulatory. LPA Lund interviewed staff who stated that R1 does need guidance but can get up out of bed and wheelchair. LPA Lund interviewed R1 who stated that R1 can get up to R1 wheelchair or walk to a chair but can’t walk that far. LPA Lund interviewed witness who is there every day stated that staff help R1 out of bed but in never confine to just the bed or wheelchair R1 goes outside when it is nice or in the living room to watch TV. Based on reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, R1 and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee confines resident to wheelchair, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee yelled at resident- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, R1 and witness. LPA Lund reviewed staff training, and all staff have been trained to know that they are mandated reporters and know how to report any abuse to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Staff stated they have taken the mandatory training and Dementia Care: Managing Challenging Behaviors. LPA Lund interviewed R1 who stated that staff are great and help with all needs. LPA Lund interviewed witness who stated staff help R1 with just about everything and never seen any staff yell or do anything to R1. Based on reviewed facility records interviewed staff, R1 and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee yelled at resident, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee pushed resident- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, Resident (R1), Reporting Party and witness. LPA Lund reviewed staff training, and all staff have been trained to know that they are mandated reporters and know how to report any abuse to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Staff stated they have taken the mandatory training to work at the facility and know how to report any issues to management or to CCL. LPA Lund interviewed R1 who stated that staff are great and help with all needs. LPA Lund interviewed witness who stated staff help R1 with just about everything and never seen any staff yell or do anything to R1. Based on reviewed facility records interviewed staff, R1, Reporting Party and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee pushed resident, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee does not distribute resident's medications as prescribed – Based on facility records and interviews with staff, Reporting Party and witness. LPA Lund reviewed facility Medication Administration Records (MARS) 10/1/2025 through 11/30/2025 were completed and in compliance. Bristol Hospice orders medications for R1. LPA Lund interviewed witness who stated that she sees staff giving medications and believes that R1 get medications that R1’s supposed to get. Based on facility records and interviews with staff, Reporting Party and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee does not distribute resident's medications as prescribed, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee does not provide resident with adequate supervision, resulting in multiple falls - Based on facility records, interviews with staff and Resident (R1) and witness. Staff records show that the facility always had one staff member for the one resident in care at all times. LPA Lund did receive a Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 10/12/2025 which states R1 was trying to get up and fall and had no injury. Administrator Olivia Perez stated that she notified hospice, POA and CCL of the fall. Staff do half hour checks on R1 to make sure R1 has not slipped out of bed. Based on facility records, interviews with staff and Resident (R1) and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if Licensee does not provide resident with adequate supervision, resulting in multiple falls, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee does not maintain a centrally stored medication log for resident - Based on LPA’s Lund observation of the centrally stored medications on 10/28/2026 and interviews with staff and witness. LPA observed the medications to stored in a hallway closed locked and secured. LPA Lund interviewed Administrator Olivia Perez who states that she stores all medications in the hallway closet locked. Witness stated that she see staff taking medications from hallway closet. Based on LPA’s Lund observation of the centrally stored medications on 10/28/2026 and interviews with staff and witness, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee does not maintain a centrally stored medication log for resident, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. As a result of this investigation, this Department finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Exit interview conducted and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251020154200
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Announced pre-licensing visit was made with Applicant Olivia Perez. LPA Jason Lund explained the reason for the visit. Census:0 The facility will be licensed to serve up to (6) clients at any given time. This applicant has a hospice wavier for one. The facility has five non- ambulatory and one bed ridden. Tour/Inspection of the facility was conducted. LPA toured/Inspected the dining area, living area, and all other areas intended for client use. LPA observed to be furnished and maintained in compliance at this time. The Facility had a Medication closet (locked) where medication will be stored. The first aid kit was observed in the Medication closet to be present and contained all required components at this time. A tour of the (4) resident bedrooms, was conducted. The facility will have two rooms with two residents per room and two private rooms. Furnishings intended for use by the residents were observed to meet the needs of the residents at this time. There are one linen closets, in the hallway, it was observed to contain a sufficient supply of towels and linens able to meet the needs of the clients at this time. A tour of the exterior grounds was conducted. A review of the facility perimeter fence, side gates, and walkways were observed to be maintained in compliance at this time. The facility has one fire extinguisher and a working telephone. Applicant Olivia Perez completed the Component 111 requirements. This facility has been found to be in compliance at this time. An exit interview, report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2025
May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 0 COMP II Participants: PEREZ, OLIVIA B - Licensee/Administrator Interview Method: Telephone interview On 05/06/2025, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County