Casa Del Sol

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz made an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Vida Dacanay. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory elderly residents, ages 60 and above, one of whom might be bedridden only. Hospice waiver is approved for three residents. LPA arrived at 12:15 pm to the facility. At 12:30 pm, LPA requested residents and staff records. LPA and Licensee toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. LPA found a pair of scissors and a knife in an unlocked drawer. LPA and licensee reviewed the medications cabinet. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools, bodies of water or fire places exist on the premises. Per Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC809] Water temperatures were measured around the facility with the following readings in Fahrenheit degrees: kitchen sink 144, bathroom 1 143. LPA accompanied Licensee to verify that the water temperature was lowered with the water heather and until water measured at 105 degrees on both bath and kitchen sink. LPA interviewed a client, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA for residents were missing information. LPA assessed two bedridden residents at the facility. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Five deficiencies and two civil penalties were cited per California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 22, 2026

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure that hazard items are stored locked and inaccessible to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above allegation. LPA was greeted by Licensee Vida Dacanay, to whom he identified himself and explained the purpose of the visit. The complaint alleged sharp objects and alcoholic beverages being available to residents. LPA called the reporting party on February 13th, 2026, who reiterated the allegations and retold the observations during the visit. On the same day, LPA visited the facility to do a safety check and toured the facility. [CONTINUED ON 9099-C] Substantiated During the visit, LPA found the sharps drawer unlocked, and more sharps next to the kitchen sink. LPA also found alcoholic beverages on the kitchen cabinet, the refrigerator, and a camper in the backyard. Chemicals were found on the same camper as well as bathrooms and kitchen cabinets. During today’s visit, LPA found that two residents died on January 2026 while on hospice, however, only R3’s death was reported, while R2’s was not. Based on records reviewed, LPA observations, and interviews conducted with the client, and staff, the preponderance of evidence, standard has been meet for one allegation regarding sharps being available to the client to be substantiated. During the visit, LPA found that reporting requirements have not been met by the facility. Two deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, no civil penalty was assessed. Reports and Appeal Rights discussed with and provided to Licensee Vida Dacanay. Signature below confirms receipt. [CONTINUED FROM LIC9099-A] While touring the facility, LPA could not find food beyond the expiration date. While reviewing facility files, LPA found that one of the “adult guests” (AG1) mentioned in the complaint has criminal record clearance and is associated to the facility. Regarding the second person mentioned, (AG2) is AG1’s partner. Per interviews with the facility’s current and only resident (R1), AG2 does not visit the facility often, and in fact, R1 mentioned not knowing AG2. Based on records reviewed, LPA observations, records review, and interviews conducted with the resident (R1), reporting party (RP), and Licensee, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, and the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260204085426

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2026

87309(a) Except as specified in subsection (b), the licensee shall ensure that ... poisonous substances, knives... are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure sharps and poisonous substances are stored in a locked drawer/ cabinet, as well as access to a camper with poisonous substances located in the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee and staff should ensure that sharp objects and poisonous substances are locked, and access to the backyard camper is locked.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 20, 2026

87211(a)(1)(A) Each licensee... A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency ... Death of any resident from any cause regardless... Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not ensure to send the death report of a resident to CCDS, Licensing Division.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall personally send reports to the department. Send the death report of R2 by due date.

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity

On January 30, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings related to the allegation in this complaint. LPA was greeted by Caregiver Lily Dacanay, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation included a facility tour and interviews with staff and outside sources. On January 16, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff did not treat Resident 1 (R1) with dignity. Specifically, it was alleged that staff intentionally applied nail polish to R1’s fingernails, the surrounding skin, and R1’s lips. During interviews, staff reported that on or about March 6, 2025, R1 was sitting outside enjoying the sun when a staff member (S1) was observed polishing her own nails. R1 asked S1 to polish her nails as well and also requested lipstick. (continue at LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated (continue from LIC9099) S1 assisted R1 with applying lipstick and painting her nails. S1 stated that R1 may have touched her nails before the polish was completely dry, which may have resulted in polish on the surrounding skin. S1 denied intentionally applying nail polish to R1’s skin or lips and stated that lipstick was applied at R1’s request. Multiple interviews with staff and outside sources consistently indicated that they did not observe R1 with nail polish on her fingers or lips. During the visit, LPA did not observe nail polish on R1’s nails or lips. Additional interviews with outside sources did not produce corroborating evidence to support the allegation. Images of R1’s face and hands provided during interviews did not support the allegation. Based on the investigation, including interviews and a review of images, there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Lily Dacanay. A copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260116095531

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Vida Dacanay. Today’s visit was in response to an incident which licensee self reported via an LIC624 Incident Report on October 13, 2025. The report described Resident #1 (R1 – See LIC811 Confidential Names List for identification of R1), was Absent Without Leave on October 11, 2025 at approximately 10:00 am. LPA briefly toured the facility, performed a welfare check on residents in care, interviewed staff, and obtained copies of pertinent facility records. No immediate health or safety risks were observed and no deficiencies were cited during this visit. Additional case management will be provided for this incident, including subsequent visits and staff interviews, as needed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights LIC 9058 (03/22) were left with the Licensee Vida Dacanay, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year Visit. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by caregiver Alma Jaramillo, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. All staff present have current criminal record clearances. The facility administrator, Vida Dacanay, arrived during the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, age 60 and above, including non-ambulatory individuals. One resident may be bedridden in Room 1 or Room 4 only. The facility is also approved for three (3) hospice waivers. At the time of the visit, there were three (3) residents in care, two of whom are receiving hospice services. LPA, accompanied by caregiver Alma Jaramillo, conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. The facility was observed to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstructions and slip hazards. Residents’ bedrooms contained all required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens, hygiene supplies, and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) were available. The facility provided adequate space and equipment for dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility was stocked with at least two (2) days of perishable food and seven (7) days of non-perishable food, all safely stored. During the visit, caregiver Lily Dacanay returned from grocery shopping. Cooking and dining equipment and utensils were present and appropriately maintained. (Continue at LIC809C) (Continue from LIC809) No sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters were accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled and stored in locked areas. There were no bodies of water on the premises. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and the facility telephone were all functional. One (1) fire extinguisher was last serviced in February 2025, within the required timeframe. The first aid kit was complete. All required licensing postings were observed in clearly visible areas. The facility temperature was comfortable at 74°F. Current liability insurance is in place. All staff had valid CPR certifications, and the most recent emergency drill was conducted on March 22, 2025. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed a selection of staff and resident records. Residents appeared clean, well-groomed, and appropriately dressed, with no odors or signs of neglect observed. Interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documentation, and confidential records were stored in locked locations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Case Management visit in conjunction with the annual visit. LPA discussed the purpose of the case managment visit with Administrator Dacanay. During the visit, LPA discussed reporting requirements for incidents that occurred at the facility. During today's visit, it was disclosed that two (2) residents had medical emergencies that required 911 emergency personnel transport to the hospital. These incidents were not reported to CCL as required. In addition, it was disclosed that the Administrator went on vacation and did not inform CCL of her absence and who was responsible for overseeing the facility during her absence. LPA reviewed the residents records to ensure the care plans were updated for both residents' change of condition. During doday's visit, a deficiencies was cited per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations and is listed on LIC 9099-D. A plan of corrections was developed with Administrator, Dacanay. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2025

(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence …any incident which threatens the welfare, safety, or health of any resident… This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observations, interviews and records review, licensee did not report two (2) incidents that occurred at the facility for two (2) residents (R1 and R2), which posed a potential health risk to 2 of 3 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to submitt to CCL the LIC624 for the incidents that required reporting. In addition licensee agreed to conduct in service training on reporting requirments with staff. The training will be delivered by an independent contractor for all staff including licensee. Documentation of completion of training should be submitted to CCL by POC date of 8/21/2025.

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year Visit. LPA was greeted by, Caregiver, Maria Sunguad, to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. Administrator, Vida Dacanay arrived at the facility during the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents 60 and above of which may be non-ambulatory. One resident may be bedridden in Room 1 or 4 only. The facility is approved for three (3) hospice waivers. During today’s inspection, there were a total of four (4) residents in care. LPA, accompanied by Caregiver, Maria, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Residents’ bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required and stored in locked areas. (continue LIC809C) (Continue from LIC809) The facility had no pools of water on the premises. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. One (1) fire extinguisher was serviced within the last 12 months. The first aid kit was not complete; however, the licensee purchased a full first aid kit during the visit. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The room temperature in the facility was comfortable at 70 degrees. The facility had current liability insurance as required. All staff had current CPR certificates. The last emergency drill was conducted on March 22, 2024. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. Residents were observed to be clean, groomed, and properly dressed free from bad odors. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. During today’s visit, LPA observed via measurement with a thermometer device, that hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents complied with regulations. Water from the kitchen sink reached 108 F. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2024

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction Licensee did not notify POA of care meeting

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Administrator, Vida Dacanay to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, and records review. On June 26, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the licensee issued an unlawful eviction to R1. It was specifically alleged that on May 25th, 2023, R1 was mailed an eviction notice by the licensee effective June 25, 2023. CCL reviewed the eviction notice and determined that the eviction notice issued met Title 22 regulations and therefore was considered lawful. In addition, after further consideration of R1’s needs and collaborating with R1’s care team, the licensee rescinded the 30-day notice. (Continue at LIC9099C) Unfounded (Continue from LIC9099) R1 continued to live at the facility under the care and supervision of the outside agency with coordinated care provided by facility staff. Therefore, this allegation is unfounded as the 30-day notice was not put in effect. It was also alleged the licensee did not notify R1’s responsible party of a care conference that was held on April 24, 2023. Per a review of the care conference minutes it was disclosed that the outside medical agency responsible for R1’s medical care coordinated and set up the care conference. The licensee assumed the outside agency notified R1’s responsible party. The investigation did not disclose any evidence that the licensee purposely excluded R1’s responsible party from participating in the care conference. Based on the results of the investigation, which consisted of observations, interviews with staff, and outside sources, and a review of pertinent resident and facility records there was no evidence found to support the allegations listed in this report. The Department has found that the complaint allegations were unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened, and/or are without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report, Confidential Names List (LIC 811), and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. (Continue from LIC9099A) The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and based on interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230626110502

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide residents a clean room Staff did not meet the resident’s care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff, and outside sources. On November 30, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the licensee did not provide residents with a clean room. It was specifically alleged that a resident (R1) living at the facility diagnosed with dementia had fecal smearing (Scatolia) behavior and was throwing fecal matter inside the perimeter of their shared room. It was further alleged that staff did not thoroughly clean after R1’s alleged Scatolia behavior. During a visit conducted on December 5, 2023, the facility was observed to be clean, organized, and free from bad odors. (Continue at LIC9099) Unsubstantiated (Continue from LIC9099) The residents’ rooms and bathrooms were also observed to be orderly and equipped with all the furnishings and amenities as required by Title 22 regulations. During multiple interviews, staff, residents, and outside sources consistently indicated they had not witnessed R1’s alleged behavior. In addition, residents and outside sources did not voice any concerns regarding staff not cleaning the residents’ rooms. A review of R1’s medical records and service care plan did not disclose Scatolia as a problem behavior for R1. It was also alleged that staff did not meet a resident’s (R2) care needs. It was specifically alleged that R2 would call for assistance multiple times during the night shift and no staff would attend to their needs. During interviews, R2 stated they called law enforcement multiple times at nighttime to come to the facility to get the facility staff’s attention. When asked, R2 indicated they called staff for various non-emergency situations, such as repositioning pillows for comfort, medication, and room temperature changes. A review of R2’s medical records and service care plan did not indicate that R2 was diagnosed with a critical medical condition that required 24/7 care and supervision. In addition, a review of R2’s medication administration records indicated that facility staff administered medication as prescribed. On December 5, 2023, law enforcement confirmed they responded to R2’s calls seven different times during November 2023. On November 28, 2023, R2 was admitted to the hospital for psychiatric assessment. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and based on interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) was provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231130145404