Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Melrose Care Home II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Chula Vista, California

Licensed since 1999Licence #374600808
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Melrose Care Home II is a small care home in Chula Vista — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 1999. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Melrose Care Home II

Is Melrose Care Home II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Melrose Care Home II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Melrose Care Home II been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Melrose Care Home II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Melrose Care Home II cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Chula Vista that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Melrose Care Home II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Rena, Lilia P. &Federico D., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Melrose Care Home II keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Melrose Care Home II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MELROSE CARE HOME II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374600808. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Rena, Lilia P. &Federico D., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND OVER; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,300

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $3,500–$5,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$6,300.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Chula Vista Home CareChula Vista · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Liwag's Residential Care HomeSan Diego · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Amariah Home CareChula Vista · 1.8 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Faith VillaChula Vista · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Caring Heart ResidenceChula Vista · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Berland Home CareChula Vista · 2.4 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Royal Garden Guest HomeChula Vista · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Heart Home CareSan Diego · 3.8 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Warm Heart Senior LivingBonita · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sarasona Home CareBonita · 4.1 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ideal Home CareNational City · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sun and Sea Assisted LivingImperial Beach · 4.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

Where it is

  • 1627 Marl Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91911Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 1999. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 10, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
5
Most recent visit
August 3, 2026

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints0typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1999.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026120202511020241102022110

The last 36 months — 4 of 5 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jul 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted a case management visit in conjunction with an annual visit. LPA met with Lilia Rena, Administrator During the visit, LPA discussed with Administrator Rena the requirements to submit for a hospice waiver. Rena stated that she will submit the waiver request this year to have it ready when one of the residents is under service care. LPA provided the Title 22 regulation pertaining to hospice service. The administrator signature is confirmation of receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2026
Jul 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Lilia Rena. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity for six (6) residents, of whom all may be non-ambulatory, but none may be bedridden. During today’s inspection, there were a total of four (4) residents in care, of whom all were non-ambulatory, but none were bedridden. The facility’s license does not include endorsements for delayed-egress doors or secured perimeters, and none of these were present. LPA, accompanied by Rena, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected all common areas and resident bedrooms. LPA interviewed multiple residents and multiple staff. LPA reviewed care records for all residents and personnel records for all active staff. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were working. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was complaint at 74 F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Appliances to preserve perishable food were also compliant in temperature. There was at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No fireplaces or pools/bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detector, night lights, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. The facility’s fire extinguisher had been professionally inspected within the last twelve (12) months. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Fire/disaster drills were performed at required intervals. There were reserve supplies of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and staff were trained on PPE within the last twelve (12) months. Licensee presented proof of current business liability insurance good 11/2026. During facility tour, LPA observed, and manager interview confirmed: The facility’s manual fire alarm pull station and bell alarm had not been inspected/serviced within the last twelve (12) months. Two (2) of six (6) smoke detectors were working. These items were necessary to maintain ongoing compliance with the facility’s prior approved Fire Clearance. During records review, LPA observed no exceptions noted. Two (2) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the LIC809-D page). Plans of Correction were jointly developed with the Licensee. No deficiencies were issued during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Administrator Lilia Rena, to whom a copy of this report, the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee/Administrator Lilia Rena. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity for six (6) residents, of whom all may be ambulatory or non-ambulatory, but none may be bedridden. Per LPA observation, LIC602 Physician’s Reports, and staff interviews: During today’s inspection, there were a total of four (4) residents in care, of whom one (1) was ambulatory and three (3) were non-ambulatory, but none were bedridden. The facility’s license does not include endorsements for delayed-egress doors or secured perimeters, and none of these were present. LPA, accompanied by Licensee’s staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected all common areas and resident bedrooms. LPA interviewed multiple residents and multiple staff. LPA reviewed care records for all residents and personnel records for all active staff. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were working. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was complaint at 74 F. Where tested, hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant: Kitchen Sink was 113 F, Bathroom #1 Sink was 112.5 F, and Bathroom #2 Sink was 114.1 F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Appliances to preserve perishable food were also compliant in temperature. There was at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No fireplaces or pools/bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detector, night lights, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. The facility’s fire extinguisher had been professionally inspected within the last twelve (12) months. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Fire/disaster drills were performed at required intervals. There were reserve supplies of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and staff were trained on PPE within the last twelve (12) months. Licensee presented proof of current business liability insurance. During facility tour, LPA observed, and manager interview confirmed: The facility’s manual fire alarm pull station and bell alarm had not been inspected/serviced within the last twelve (12) months. Two (2) of six (6) smoke detectors were initally non-working. [During today's visit, Licensee inserted fresh batteries into both smoke detectors, correcting the problem.] These items were necessary to maintain ongoing compliance with the facility’s prior approved Fire Clearance. During records review, LPA observed, and manager interview confirmed: Licensee did not record the name, address, and telephone number of a primary dentist for 4 of 4 clients [Client #1 (C1) through Client #4 (C4)], as required. [See LIC811 Confidential Names List for a description of select person identifiers used in this report.] Two (2) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the LIC809-D page). Plans of Correction were jointly developed with the Licensee. LPA also issued one (1) Technical Violation (TV) regarding a videoconferencing device dedicated for resident use (refer to the LIC9102-TV page), and Technical Assistance (TA) regarding staff alert devices on exit doors and refresher training on Mandated Reporting requirements for staff (refer to the LIC9102-TA pages). An exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Administrator Lilia Rena, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D page, the LIC9102-TV page, the LIC9102-TA pages, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Lilia Rena. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity for six (6) residents, of whom all may be ambulatory or non-ambulatory, but none may be bedridden. Per LPA observation and review of each resident’s latest LIC602 Physician’s Report: During today’s visit, there were a total of three (3) clients in care, and none were bedridden. This facility’s license does not include endorsements for secured perimeter or delayed egress doors, and none of these were present during the visit. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed multiple staff and residents. LPA reviewed all staff and resident records/files. LPA, accompanied by Licensee’s staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in general good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens, hygiene supplies, and Personal Protective Equipment were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was complaint at 73 F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant: Kitchen Sink was 111.1 F, Bathroom #1 Sink was 111.6 F, and Bathroom #2 Sink was 112.1 F. Appliances to preserve perishable food were also compliant in temperature: Kitchen Refrigerator was 31 F and Kitchen Freezer was 0 F. Garage Refrigerator was 39 F and Garage Freezers were 0 F and 0 F, respectively. There was at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C, 1 of 2] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, active fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detector, smoke detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. The facility’s fire extinguisher was serviced within the last twelve (12) months. A complete first aid kit was present and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. During records review, LPA observed, and staff interviews confirmed: Resident #1 (R1) had an as-needed (PRN) medication made available to them by their doctor. [See LIC811 Confidential Names List for a description of resident identifiers used in this report.] Staff had given R1 this PRN medication often, prior to LPA’s 07-10-2024 visit. However, the staff assisting R1 did not record in writing the date, time, dosage, and the resident’s response to doses of this PRN which were given to them, as was required. For R1, Resident #2 (R2), and Resident #3 (R3), Licensee had not prepared a written record of care (i.e., a “care plan”) describing the services the resident will receive in the facility and the resident’s preferences, which was required to be done within two (2) weeks of admission to the facility. Because these care plans did not exist for R1, R2, and R3, those residents’ respective responsible persons (RPs) also did not have the opportunity to meet with Licensee to review them (which was required to be done at least annually). The latest LIC603 Resident Appraisals which Licensee had conducted on R1, R2, and R3 were all more than one year old. (Regulation required these residents’ condition to be reappraised upon any change in condition, but also at least annually.) For R3, Licensee did not have a record of body weight measurement for them. For R1, it had been over seventeen (17) months since Licensee last obtained a body weight measurement for them. For R3, it had been over sixteen (16) months since Licensee last obtained a body weight measurement for them. (Regulation required Licensee to “regularly observe” residents for changes in physical condition, to include “unusual weight gains or losses.”) [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C, 2 of 2] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809-C, 1 of 2] LPA also observed, and Licensee interview confirmed: Licensee did not perform emergency/disaster drills with the staff and/or residents. (Regulation required each shift to be drilled at least once per quarter). Licensee did have proof that 4 of 4 staff were trained on its written LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan and the staff’s individual roles/responsibilities under this plan. (Regulation required staff to be trained on the plan at time of hire and at least once per year thereafter). Licensee did not have proof that 4 of 4 staff received training on the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). (Regulation required staff to be trained on PPE annually.) Licensee also did not have proof that 4 of 4 staff received training on Resident’s Personal Rights described in law. (Regulation required staff to be trained on this topic initially and on an ongoing basis). Five (5) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and three (3) deficiencies were cited per California Health and Safety Code (refer to the attached LIC 809-D pages). Plans of Correction were jointly developed with the Licensee. LPA issued two (2) Technical Violations (TVs) regarding physician-authorized medication lists and night lights in bathrooms and hallways (refer to the attached LIC9102-TV pages). LPA also provided Technical Assistance (TA) regarding obtaining updated medical assessments for residents, and regarding staff auditory alert devices on exit doors (refer to the attached LIC 9102-TA page). An exit interview was conducted with Rena, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D pages, the LIC9102-TV pages, LIC9102-TA pages, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County