Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Keen Home Long Beach

Small home·Licensed for 6·Long Beach, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #198320199
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJune 13, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 5, 2025CDSS inspection record

Keen Home Long Beach is a small care home in Long Beach — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Keen Home Long Beach

Is Keen Home Long Beach licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Keen Home Long Beach licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Keen Home Long Beach been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Keen Home Long Beach still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Keen Home Long Beach cost?

$4,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size in Long Beach that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,525 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Keen Home Long Beach take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Keen Home Long Beach LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UCI Health-Los Alamitos is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Keen Home Long Beach keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Keen Home Long Beach license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “KEEN HOME LONG BEACH”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198320199. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Keen Home Long Beach LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 5, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,000a month

Likely $4,000–$4,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$4,600
$4,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,100
$6,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

18 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,500–$9,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 18 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6441 E Bixby Hill Rd, Long Beach, CA 90815Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 5, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
December 5, 2025
Occupied · June 13, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 18, 2024 to June 13, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025110202444120221102021220

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/05/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Villegas conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Administrator Latoya Johnson as the purpose of the visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve (6) bedridden residents ages 60 and over, and has an approved hospice waiver for (6). Annual Fees are current. Liability insurance is active (Exp: 08/06/2026). This facility is located in a gated community and it consists of (6) resident bedrooms, (2) full bathrooms, (1) half bathroom, kitchen, living room/TV room, receiving room, dining area, a Pantry, shaded patio, and a garage. There are no bodies of water or firearms on the premises. Resident bedrooms were checked, mattresses and box springs were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space was observed. Bathroom toilets and water faucets worked properly, shower was free of mold/mildew, and there are sufficient toiletries accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available. The water temperature properly measured between 105-120 F.. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, and toxins were stored and not accessible to residents. The last facility fire drill was on 10/21/25. Operable smoke detectors/carbon monoxide in bedrooms and hallways were observed. (2) fire extinguishers are in the kitchen and hallway. First aid kits were observed throughout the facility, checked and fully stocked. LPA conducted a records review of 3 staff records, 4 resident records, and 4 medication administration records, no discrepancies observed. Medications were centrally stored and properly locked. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On October 16, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deborah Lee conducted an unannounced required annual visit using the CARE Inspection Tools. LPA met with Aurora Ortiz, Lead Staff and explained the purpose of this visit. Subsequently Administrator Ginny Dutile arrived and assisted with the visit. The facility is licensed to operate for (6) Bedridden elderly residents ages 60 and above and has an approved hospice waiver for (6); There are currently 6 residents in care--none of which are currently bedridden. Structure This facility consists of six (6) resident bedrooms, three (3) full bathrooms and 1/2, kitchen, living room/TV room, receiving room, dining area, shaded patio, and a garage which serves as an office/storage space. Operable smoke detectors/carbon monoxide throughout facility were observed. Two fire extinguishers last serviced on 02/05/2024 are in the kitchen and hallway. The last facility fire drill was on 08/22/2024 Physical Plant LPA and Ginny Dutile toured the facility inside and outside. LPA observed there were no bodies of water on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the resident's personal belongings was observed. LPA observed that facility had required postings: ombudsman poster, see something say something poster, clients rights, infectious disease postings, activities calendar and facility sketch. Page 1 of 3 Bedrooms LPA inspected all six (6) bedrooms. All bedrooms were observed to have the required furniture including beds, dressers, nightstands with lamps, chairs, and ample storage space for personal belongings. All bedrooms were observed to be clean, in good repair, and have ample lighting. Bathrooms LPA inspected the facility bathrooms. In the resident’s bathroom the toilet, faucets, and shower were fully operational. All safety handrails were securely fastened. LPA observed the showers to be clean and free of mold or mildew. The shower had a nonskid material in bottom and shower chair. LPA observed area where residents toiletries are kept. The water temperature measured 112-degrees Fahrenheit. The toilet and faucets are operational. Both bathrooms were observed to be clean, in good repair and within Title 22 regulations. Linens & Hygiene LPA observed all beds to have the required linens including mattress cover, fitted sheets, blanket, comforter, and pillow. LPA observed an ample supply of linens, towels, and blankets in the hall closets. Kitchen/Laundry Room LPA inspected the kitchen and observed all appliances to be in good working repair, including stove/oven, microwave, dishwasher, washer, dryer, refrigerator, and additional freezer. LPA observed an ample supply of cutleries, pots, pans, and bowls to be in good repair. LPA observed knives and additional sharps to be secured in locked cabinet in the kitchen and are inaccessible to residents. LPA observed a 3-day supply of perishable foods and a 7-day supply of nonperishable foods. Cleaning products and toxins were secured in closet that is inaccessible to clients. page 2 of 3 Common Rooms In the living room, LPA observed 2 recliners 2 chairs sofa mounted TV. In the dining room, LPA observed a six seated dinning table and large kitchen counter separating dinning area from kitchen. There is a "den" area with mounted TV and adequate seating: 4 recliners. Medications LPA observed all centrally stored medications in their original packaging and are secured in a locked closet that is inaccessible to Residents in care. Files LPA reviewed (6) resident files and found they contained all the necessary documentation. LPA reviewed four (4) staff files and found they contained the required documentation, certification, and training. Liability Insurance expires on 8/6/2025. Infection Control During the visit, LPA observed the facility’s infection control practices. LPA observed a sanitizing station at the facility entrance. PPE supplies are readily available to staff, and an additional 30-day supply of PPE was observed. Sufficient paper towels, cleaning, and disinfecting supplies were observed and stored in garage area. There were no deficiencies cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Ginny Dutile, Administrator. A copy of this report was given to Administrator. page 3 of 3 page 3 of 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2024
Jun 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper food service to resident in care Staff did not follow proper refund requirements Staff threatened to destroy resident's medication Staff overcharged resident/resident's representative

On 06/13/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was met by LaToya Johnson, Administrator (S2) and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 06/13/2024 LPA arrived to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. On 05/24/2024 LPA requested feeding schedule and information regarding special diet(s) for residents present during that period. On 04/09/2024 LPA interviewed 4 residents. On 03/18/2024 LPA requested training records for all staff who were present during resident one's (R1) stay and a copy of R1’s hospice care plan. LPA also interviewed two (2) staff. On 06/28/2023 LPA conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the above-mentioned facility. LPA was met by Aurora Ortiz, Team Lead (S3), and later by Adrien Herbas, Administrator (S1), and the purpose of the visit was explained. Report continues, see LIC9099C. Unsubstantiated LPA requested resident roster, staff roster, hospice care plans, physician reports, pre-placement appraisals, appraisals, identification and emergency contacts and other service documents which related to rental fees and back pay. A plant inspection was conducted and above-mentioned records were reviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation “Staff did not provide proper food service to resident in care”, It has been alleged that staff were uninformed regarding the feeding procedures for R1 during the weekend of 05/26/2023 through 05/29/2023. Record reviews revealed that on 05/27/2023 R1’s hospice team ordered “NPO” (Nothing By Mouth), which is shorthand for a period of time in which one may not eat or drink anything, aside from comfort medication. Interviews held on 06/28/2023 and 03/18/2024 revealed that four (4) out of 4 staff and three (3) out of four (4) residents have denied the allegation had taken place, while one (1) resident was unable to provide a verbal or visual response. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not follow proper refund requirements”, it has been alleged that staff did not provide any refund(s) for the dates as follows: 06/02/2023 through 06/05/2023. Record reviews revealed that the balance of $11,916.68 was paid to a family member of R1, posted on 06/12/2023. Record reviews also indicated that "unused rent moneys will be returned 15 days after room is vacated of all belongings, clothing and furnishings." and that R1's hospice items were removed from the facility on 06/04/2023. Interviews held on 06/28/2023, 03/18/2024 and 04/09/2024 revealed that 4 out of 4 staff and three (3) out of four (4) residents have denied the allegation had taken place, while one (1) resident was unable to provide a verbal or visual response. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. Report continues, see LIC9099C. Regarding the allegation “Staff threatened to destroy resident's medication”, it has been alleged that staff were uninformed regarding the delivery of comfort medications to R1, while R1 was under the above-mentioned facility’s care. Record reviews revealed that during a visit on 05/30/2023, by a skilled nurse (SN), visit notes were logged as follows: “SN reinforced teachings with caregiver, S3, on pain management including use of morphine and ativan as needed. Caregiver, S3, verbalized understanding and able to repeat back information.”. Interviews held on 06/28/2023, 03/18/2024 and 04/09/2024 revealed that 4 out of 4 staff and three (3) out of four (4) residents have denied the allegation had taken place, while one (1) resident was unable to provide a verbal or visual response. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation “Staff overcharged resident/resident's representative”, it has been alleged that staff had charged for fees related to an Emergency Department visit with R1 on 02/24/2023, when S1 had verified with the family member of R1 that monthly fees were to cover “transportation to all medical appointments.” and “Transportation and accompaniment are offered for all medical appointments. If you or another family member aren't present for an appointment, then our staff will take responsibility for communicating with the medical professionals and confirming new orders. You will receive a follow-up report after the appointment. If you or another family member are present, then our staff will wait for your resident while you're in the appointment together.” S2 later stated that “Family members and/or Legal representatives are responsible to transport and accompany their loved ones to all appointments or emergency medical visits. Otherwise, we must have an additional staff member manage the appointments/emergencies. Therefore, there is an additional charge. The charge is at our cost to afford the employee’s time/pay that we incur. There is no mark-up.” Record reviews revealed that the refund was provided to R1's family member on 04/01/2023, and was paid on 04/02/2023, in the balance of $357.50. Interviews held on 06/28/2023, 03/18/2024 and 04/09/2024 revealed that 4 out of 4 staff and three (3) out of four (4) residents have denied the allegation had taken place, while one (1) resident was unable to provide a verbal or visual response. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report continues, see LIC9099C Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. There have been no deficiencies cited today. An exit interview was held with LaToya Johnson, Administrator (S2), and a copy of this report has been provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024 · control 11-AS-20230627141017
Apr 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care.

On 04/09/2024 Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit at the above mentioned facility. LPA was met by Aurora Ortiz, Direct Care Staff Lead and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was later met by Adrien Herbas and LaT]oya Johnson, Administrators. The investigation consisted of the following: On 04/09/24 LPA interviewed 4 residents. On 03/18/24 LPA requested training records for all staff who were present during resident one's presence and resident one's hospice care plan. LPA also interviewed two (2) staff who were present at the facility. On 06/28/23 LPA conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the above mentioned facility. LPA was met by Aurora Ortiz, Team Lead, and later by Adrien Herbas, Administrator, who were both informed that this visit was conducted to investigate the above complaint allegation and LPA requested resident roster, staff roster, hospice care plans, physician reports, pre-placement appraisals, appraisals, identification and emergency contacts and other service documents which related to rental fees and back pay. A plant inspection was conducted and above mentioned records were reviewed. Report continues, see LIC9099C. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: "Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care.". It has been alleged that the above-mentioned facility could not store or administer proper comfort care medications. Interviews revealed that five (5) out of 5 staff and three (3) out of four (4) residents have denied the allegation, while one (1) resident was unable to provide a verbal or visual response. Record reviews revealed that staff Aurora Ortiz (S3) was properly instructed by a skilled nurse regarding the appropriate administration of comfort care medications for resident one (R1) on 03/01/23 and that there was a stop in morphine administration on 04/11/23. On 05/25/23 R1's registered nurse from Kaiser Hospice (RN), made a visit to R1, upon which S3 was informed by RN to follow order as received. According to Medication Admissions Record (MAR), S3 provided one (1) dose on 05/25/23, 1 dose on 05/27/23, and 4 doses on 05/28/23. On 05/29/23 RN provided a new order for the medication to be administered every six (6) hours, around the clock, and to continue previous order of 1 dose every hour as needed. MAR noted around the clock doses began on 05/29/23. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has/has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with LaToya Johnson, Administrator, and a copy of this report has been provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2024 · control 11-AS-20230627141017
Mar 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff tried to change resident's hospice care plan without proper authorization

On 04/09/2024 Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit at the above mentioned facility to deliver this amended document. LPA was met by Aurora Ortiz, Direct Care Staff Lead and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was later met by Adrien Herbas and Latoya Johnson, Administrators. The investigation consisted of the following: On 03/18/24 LPA requested training records for all staff who were present during resident one's presence and resident one's hospice care plan. LPA also interviewed two (2) staff who were present at the facility. On 06/28/23 LPA conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the above mentioned facility. LPA was met by Aurora Ortiz, Team Lead, and later by Adrien Herbas, Administrator, who were both informed that this visit was conducted to investigate the above complaint allegation and LPA requested resident roster, staff roster, hospice care plans, physician reports, pre-placement appraisals, appraisals, identification and emergency contacts and other service documents which related to rental fees and back pay. A plant inspection was conducted and above mentioned records were reviewed. Report continues, see LIC9099C. Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation "Staff tried to change resident's hospice care plan without proper authorization". It has been alleged that one hospice provider was requested not to return to the above-mentioned facility. Interviews revealed that two (2) out of 2 staff members have agreed that one worker was requested not to return to the facility. LPA's record reviews revealed that the facility does not contain a written hospice care plan for resident one. According to the terms and conditions of the hospice waiver, approved on 09/17/2021, section 6 is stated as follows: "Prior to the initiation of hospice services in the facility, the licensee will ensure a written hospice care plan is developed for each terminally ill resident or prospective resident, that specifies the care, services, and necessary medical intervention related to the terminal illness as necessary to supplement the care and supervision provided by the facility by that resident’s hospice agency, and agreed to by both the licensee and the resident or prospective resident or the resident’s or prospective resident’s Health Care Surrogate Decision Maker.". The facility was unable to provide a copy of any incident report(s), LIC624, of the incident; which has been mandated by the reporting requirements of the department, California Code of Regulations 87633(g). Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6) is being cited on the attached deficiency. Please see LIC9099D. An exit interview was held with Latoya Johnson, Administrator, and a copy of this report and appeal rights have been provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 11-AS-20230627141017

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87633(g) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2024

(g) In addition to...section 87211, Reporting Requirements, the licensee shall submit a report to the department when...hospice services are interrupted or discontinued for any reason other than the death of the resident, including refusal of hospice care or discharge from hospice. The licensee shall also report any deviation from the resident’s hospice care plan, or other incident, which threatens the health and safety of any resident. This has not been met as evidenced by: a requested change of a social worker, which had not been reported to the department.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024

Plan of correction: The administrator and LPA have agreed that any incident resulting in any deviation, or incident, of a resident's hospice care plan will be reported to the department of social services via fax number at 424.544.1016. Licensee will let LPA know about reception of this deficiency and will forward an update to their admission agreement which includes, but not limited to, section 6 of the hospice waiver approval letter, approved on 09/17/2021 via email to mario.leon@dss.ca.gov

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County