Jade and Jude Homes

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of supervision, resident eloped

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to address the above allegation and issue an updated report. LPA met with staff, Claudia Funez, and advised her of the complaint. The administrator, Emalyn Aguaiano, was advised over the telephone. Today's visit consisted of interviews with the administrator and staff. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection to insure the health and sagety of the residents in care. The ten day visit to this complaint was made by LPA Cava on June 16, 2026. The findings were Unsubstantiated at that time. Additional review of this investigation was conducted, and the following was revealed. Regarding allegation: Due to lack of supervision, resident eloped. It was alleged that on June 8, 2026, Resident 1 (R1) walked out of the facility because the door was not locked properly and the auditory alert did not go off. R1 was found by a cyclist, who called law enforcement, and was take to the emergency room. R1 was evaluated and discharged to family. There were some concerns because R1 has some cognitive issues. A file review was made prior to making this visit. An Incident Report (IR) was received by Substantiated Licensing on June 12, 2026. Review of this IR revealed that on June 9, 2026, at approximately 7:30am, staff noticed R1 was not in the facility. Staff searched for R1 immediately within parameters of the facility, but R1 could not be located. Law enforcement were called to report missing person, and R1's responsible person was notified. R1 was eventually located and was picked up at the hospital. There were no injuries noted. Although R1 was safely found at a nearby hospital, a review of R1's records indicate that R1 has a medical condition and diagnosis that does not allow for a person of this capacity to leave the facility unsupervised. R1 is identified to have disorientation, lack of hazard awareness, and unsafe wandering. Moreover, R1 is non-ambulatory and has some cognitive impairment. There was staff presence, but this may not have been sufficient to meet the needs in supervising R1. Therefore, based on this additional review, the allegation of Due to lack of supervision, R1 eloped is Substantiated. Citation issued on the 9099D. Appeal rights discussed and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260611134223

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2026

Personnel Requirements - General. Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was no met as evidenced by: On 06/09/26, R1 left the facility unsupervised. Review of R1's records reveal that R1 has a condition and diagnosis that does not allow for a person of this capacity to out unsupervised. This posses as an immediate health and safety risk to a resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026

Plan of correction: As POC, the licensee will hold trainig for the administrator and staff to address this section of the regulation. As proof training is held, a copy of the training log and attendance sheet is due to the licensing agency by 08/28/26.

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of supervision, resident eloped

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with staff, Elbert Perez, and advised him of the compleint. The administrator, Emalyn Anguinano, joined shortly after. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with administrator and one (1) staff, between 9:02 am to 9:30am and two (2) residents, between 9:30am to 10:00am. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection, between 10:00am to 10:30am and record review, between 10:30am to 11:00am. Regarding allegation: Due to lack of supervision, resident eloped, it was reported that on or around 06/08/26 Resident 1 (R1) walked out of the facility because the door was not lock properly and the auditory alert did not go off. R1 was found by a cyclist, who called law enforcement, and was take to the emergency room. R1 was evaluated and discharged to family. There were some concerns because R1 has some cognitive issues. Unsubstantiated Prior to this visit, LPA Cava ran a file review and observed an Incident Report (IR) pertaining to this allegation. The IR was received by Licensing on 06/12/26. Review of the IR reveal that on 06/09/26, at approximately 7:30am, staff noticed R1 was not in the facility. Staff searched for R1 immediately within parameters of the facility, but R1 could not be located. Law enforcement were called to report missing person, and R1's responsible person was notified. Interviews with the administrator and staff confirm that R1 made their way outside of the facility on their own, but deny the allegation of lack of supervision as there was staff presence (1 staff to 3 residents) when this incident had occurred. Once it was realized that R1 was not in the facility, staff launched a search for the resident, and notified law enforcement and R1's family within an hour. R1 was eventually located, and was recovered at the hospital. There were no injuries noted. R1's responsible person expressed no concerns. Interviews with two (2) residents deny the allegation of neglect, stating there is anywhere between one to two staff, including the administrator, on duty at all times. Both residents had no complaints or concerns regarding the care and supervision provided. R1 could not be interviewed as as R1 no longer resides at the facility. A review R1's records does not indicate any elopement or history of elopement. When both administrator and staff were asked if R1 had a history of eloping the facility since admission, both stated no. In addition to interviews and record review, a physical plant inspection was made. The facility is a one story building with four (4) bedrooms designated for resident use. There is a total of five (5) exits in the building. All exits were checked during this investigation to have a functional auditory alert. R1 stayed in Room #2, which has no direct exit. Although the resident did leave facility grounds on 06/09/26, based on the department’s observations, interviews and record review(s), it could not be proven that elopement was due to neglect. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260611134223

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 12.02.2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at facility at 9:22 AM to conduct a pre-licensing inspection with the licensee. Maya McCoy (licensee) was greeted upon entering the facility. An application to operate a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) was received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 11.24.2025. A fire clearance was approved on 09.18.2025 for one (1) bedridden, five (5) non-ambulatory residents for a total capacity of six (6). Bedroom #4 and bedroom #5 is approve for bedridden. At 9:30 AM, the smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector were tested, they are hard wired and inter-connected. The facility has one (1) new fire extinguishers that was purchased on 4.23.2025, located in the facility kitchen. A tour of the physical plant was initiated at approximately 10:00 AM and the following was observed: KITCHEN: The facility has a kitchen area that is equipped with a refrigerator, microwave oven, and sink. There were adequate supplies of perishable and nonperishable food and dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). LPA inspected the kitchen and observed gas stove and refrigerator to be clean and working. Knives and sharps are stored in a locked drawer. Cleaning agents are also stored under the sink with a locking mechanism. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents use and one (1) for staff. Bedroom #1 and room #4 are cleared to be private rooms. Bedrooms # 3 and bedroom #5 are shared. Bedroom #2 is for staff use. The applicant furnished the resident bedrooms with beds, night stand, dresser, bedding, and linen. The bedrooms have sufficient lighting and closet space. The linens were stored in the storage space in the cabinets at the hallway. Continue to LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: The facility has four and a half (4.5) bathrooms. Residents bathroom is located in the hallway beside bedroom #1. The bathroom were observed to have the proper fixtures, grab bars, and non-skid mats. Bathroom #1, hot water delivered in the bathrooms measured at 108.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #2 is located inside bedroom #1. Hot water delivered in the bathroom measured at 108.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #3 is located inside bedroom #4. Hot water delivered in the bathroom measured at 111.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #4 is located inside bedroom #5. Hot water delivered in the bathroom measured at 109.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #0.5 is located inside bedroom #2 for staff and is observed to be locked and inaccessible. COMMON AREAS: The common areas were appropriately furnished these included the living and dining room area. The living room was equipped with couch, tables and chairs. The LPA observed entertainment equipment and games for activities. The dining table is large enough to seat six (6) individuals. The facility has maintained a temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. There were no visible immediate hazards. Water and emergency kits are stored in a cabinet in the kitchen. LAUNDRY ROOM: The laundry room is located by the kitchen. The washer and dryer are observed to be brand new. All chemicals were stored and locked at the laundry area beside the kitchen. MEDICATIONS: The medications will be located in the kitchen. It has a locking mechanism. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: The facility has a staff workstation that is in bedroom #2. The first-aid kit is complete. Designated files will be stored in the cabinet by the office. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The passageways and entrance to the home was clear of obstruction. All entry and exit doors have a functional auditory alert when the doors open. There is sufficient outdoor space with seating and a shaded area with proper furniture for outdoor use. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Pursuant to Title 22, Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, the facility's physical environment appears to be compliant and ready for licensee. CAB will be advised, and a copy of this report provided. No health and safety hazard were noted during this visit. Licensee shall contact LPA once the first resident is admitted. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report was issued. In addition to the pre-licensing inspection, a Component III power point presentation was also held.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): N/A COMP II Participants: Administrator EMALYN ANGUIANO and Licensee MAYA MCCOY Interview Method: Telephone interview On 11/6/2025, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025